Literature DB >> 35930093

Treatment Planning for Atrial Fibrillation Using Patient-Specific Models Showing the Importance of Fibrillatory-Areas.

Roya Kamali1,2,3,4, Karli Gillete5, Jess Tate6, Devaki Abhijit Abhyankar1, Derek J Dosdall1,2,3, Gernot Plank5, T Jared Bunch2, Rob S Macleod1,3, Ravi Ranjan7,8,9.   

Abstract

Computational models have made it possible to study the effect of fibrosis and scar on atrial fibrillation (AF) and plan future personalized treatments. Here, we study the effect of area available for fibrillatory waves to sustain AF. Then we use it to plan for AF ablation to improve procedural outcomes. CARPentry was used to create patient-specific models to determine the association between the size of residual contiguous areas available for AF wavefronts to propagate and sustain AF [fibrillatory area (FA)] after ablation with procedural outcomes. The FA was quantified in a novel manner accounting for gaps in ablation lines. We selected 30 persistent AF patients with known ablation outcomes. We divided the atrial surface into five areas based on ablation scar pattern and anatomical landmarks and calculated the FAs. We validated the models based on clinical outcomes and suggested future ablation lines that minimize the FAs and terminate rotor activities in simulations. We also simulated the effects of three common antiarrhythmic drugs. In the patient-specific models, the predicted arrhythmias matched the clinical outcomes in 25 of 30 patients (accuracy 83.33%). The average largest FA (FAmax) in the recurrence group was 8517 ± 1444 vs. 6772 ± 1531 mm2 in the no recurrence group (p < 0.004). The final FAs after adding the suggested ablation lines in the AF recurrence group reduced the average FAmax from 8517 ± 1444 to 6168 ± 1358 mm2 (p < 0.001) and stopped the sustained rotor activity. Simulations also correctly anticipated the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs in 5 out of 6 patients who used drug therapy post unsuccessful ablation (accuracy 83.33%). Sizes of FAs available for AF wavefronts to propagate are important determinants for ablation outcomes. FA size in combination with computational simulations can be used to direct ablation in persistent AF to minimize the critical mass required to sustain recurrent AF.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Atrial rotor activities; Computational atrial fibrillation model; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35930093     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-03029-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   4.219


  6 in total

1.  Stand-Alone Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Additional Substrate Modification as Index Ablation Procedures in Patients With Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Randomized Alster-Lost-AF Trial (Ablation at St. Georg Hospital for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation).

Authors:  Thomas Fink; Michael Schlüter; Christian-Hendrik Heeger; Christine Lemes; Tilman Maurer; Bruno Reissmann; Johannes Riedl; Laura Rottner; Francesco Santoro; Boris Schmidt; Peter Wohlmuth; Shibu Mathew; Christian Sohns; Feifan Ouyang; Andreas Metzner; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07

2.  The cox-maze procedure for lone atrial fibrillation: a single-center experience over 2 decades.

Authors:  Timo Weimar; Stefano Schena; Marci S Bailey; Hersh S Maniar; Richard B Schuessler; James L Cox; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-17

3.  Randomized evaluation of right atrial ablation after left atrial ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Eric Good; Thomas Crawford; Jean F Sarrazin; Michael Kuhne; Nagib Chalfoun; Darryl Wells; Warangkna Boonyapisit; Nitesh Gadeela; Sundar Sankaran; Ayman Kfahagi; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Pelosi; Frank Bogun; Fred Morady
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-04

4.  Effective Ablation Settings That Predict Chronic Scar After Left Atrial Ablation.

Authors:  Kennosuke Yamashita; Roya Kamali; Eugene Kwan; Rob S MacLeod; Derek J Dosdall; Ravi Ranjan
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-27

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation in Patients With Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Luigi Di Biase; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Chintan Trivedi; Kavisha Patel; Michael Parides; Isabella Alviz; Juan C Diaz; Veronica Natale; Javier Sanchez; Domenico G Della Rocca; Ruike Yang; Prasant Mohanty; Carola Gianni; Rodney Horton; David Burkhardt; Amin Al-Ahmad; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Andrea Natale
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-09-30

6.  Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint.

Authors:  Daniel Scherr; Paul Khairy; Shinsuke Miyazaki; Valerie Aurillac-Lavignolle; Patrizio Pascale; Stephen B Wilton; Khaled Ramoul; Yuki Komatsu; Laurent Roten; Amir Jadidi; Nick Linton; Michala Pedersen; Matthew Daly; Mark O'Neill; Sebastien Knecht; Rukshen Weerasooriya; Thomas Rostock; Martin Manninger; Hubert Cochet; Ashok J Shah; Sunthareth Yeim; Arnaud Denis; Nicolas Derval; Meleze Hocini; Frederic Sacher; Michel Haissaguerre; Pierre Jais
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.