Literature DB >> 35929600

Effect of Age on the Patterns of Traumatic Femoral Fractures: Seven Years of Experience at a Regional Tertiary Hospital.

Hong Yuan1, Hailong Yu1, Yunpeng Zhu2, Liangbi Xiang1, Hongwei Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Femoral fractures are a common cause of mortality and functional loss, mainly among older people, and there are few studies about the age in relation to traumatic femoral fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age on the patterns of traumatic femoral fractures in patients presenting to our regional tertiary hospital.
METHODS: The records of 2020 patients who presented with traumatic femoral fractures between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' clinical and radiographic records were reviewed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for associated injuries and complications.
RESULTS: The patients were divided into a child group (CH group, n = 342) aged under 18 years, a young adult group (YA group, n = 484) aged 18-60 years, and an older people group (OP group, n = 1194) aged 60 years and over. There were significant differences among the three groups in several indexes, such as sex ratio (χ2  = 301.699, p < 0.001), osteoporosis (χ2  = 375.463, p < 0.001), injury time of day (χ2  = 114.913, p < 0.001), injury cause (χ2  = 748.187, p < 0.001), injury location (χ2  = 490.153, p < 0.001), fracture side (χ2  = 57.000, p < 0.001), fracture site (χ2  = 806.650, p < 0.001), associated injuries (χ2  = 322.921, p < 0.001), coma after injury (χ2  = 147.814, p < 0.001), non-surgery-related complications (χ2  = 7.895, p = 0.019), and surgery-related complications (χ2  = 82.186, p < 0.001). The YA group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with surgery-related complications than the OP group. The OP group had a higher frequency of non-surgery-related complications than the YA group and CH group. The most common non-surgery-related complications were pneumonia (7.1%) in the OP group and deep venous thrombosis (6.4%) in the YA group. Multivariable logistic regression showed that young adults, high-energy injury, outdoors, coma after injury, and fracture sites except for the proximal region were independent risk factors for associated injuries. Older age, male, and fracture site except for the proximal region were independent risk factors for complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic femoral fractures are mostly the result of low-energy trauma and predominantly affect the proximal site of the femur among older people. A higher rate of shaft fractures, fractures occurring outdoors, and associated injuries were observed among young adults and children than among older people.
© 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Femoral fracture; Older people; Trauma; Young adult

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35929600      PMCID: PMC9483057          DOI: 10.1111/os.13410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.279


Introduction

Femoral fractures are a common cause of mortality and functional loss, mainly among older people. , , , , , , , , , , , Aging, which includes age‐related biomechanical changes in bone strength, and falling from a standing height or a lower height are the most common mechanisms of fragility‐related fractures among older people, and the incidence of these fractures is increasing. , , , , The consequences of falls in elderly people often include fractures, immobility, and impairment and sometimes include death. In recent years, there have been many reports about traumatic femoral fractures. , , , , , , , , However, there are few studies about the age differences related to traumatic femoral fractures. , , , Determination of the influence of age on the incidence of femoral fractures is complex, because many age‐related factors, including gender, trauma mechanism, would also have impact on the occurrence of the femoral fracture. The factors influencing femoral fracture are interrelated and are not independent. Some researchers revealed that the older patients were, the higher the risk of developing proximal fractures, while they were at a lower risk of developing fractures in the shaft and distal femur. This incidence of fracture site can largely be explained by age‐related factors, including a decrease in bone strength and falling being the most common mechanism of trauma in older patients. Increasing age is associated with osteoporotic bone changes, which are believed to increase the rate of femoral fracture; falls occur more frequently in the elderly. , Fractures in elderly patients caused by fall accidents presented with a bodily injury pattern that differs from that of adult patients and have a higher severe injury score, worse outcome, and higher mortality than those of adult patients. Traffic‐related fractures caused by motorcycle or bicycle accidents occur more often in younger adults and the rate of its occurrence differs between genders. , It is very important to investigate the age difference in the general characteristics of traumatic femoral fracture to take preventive measures according to different age groups. At the same time, we discuss the age difference of associated injuries and complications, which is helpful for discussing the early, timely diagnosis and treatment of associated injuries and effective prevention and treatment of complications. Understanding the age differences in traumatic femoral fractures is important for the allocation of public resources, the development of preventative strategies, and efficient diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the age differences in the clinical characteristics of traumatic femoral fractures, with an emphasis on the differences among children under 18 years old, young adults aged 18–60 years, and older people aged 60 years and over. Two topics have been discussed in depth: (i) To investigate the age differences of general characteristics such as injury season, cause and location, fracture side and site, associated injuries, and complications of traumatic femoral fractures; (ii) To investigate the risk factors for associated injuries and complications in the patients presented with traumatic femoral fractures.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

We retrospectively identified 2125 patients presenting to our tertiary hospital with femoral fractures between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. One hundred and five patients were excluded, so 2020 patients were finally included in the study. The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (approval no. Y‐2021‐009). The inclusion criteria for patients in this study were as follows: (i) patients who presented with femoral fractures on X ray, CT, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and (ii) hospitalization for the treatment of femoral fractures between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients with pathologic fractures; (ii) repeated hospitalizations due to injuries at the same fracture site; and (iii) patients with incomplete data. According to juveniles (under 18 years old), young adults (aged 18–60 years), and seniors (aged 60 years and over), all patients were divided into three age groups.

General Characteristics

The patients’ clinical and radiographic records were reviewed, and the general patient characteristics; cause of injury, including a high‐height fall (height ≥ 2 m), a low‐height fall (height <2 m), and road traffic crashes (RTCs); injury season (spring, summer, autumn, winter); injury time of day (0.00–6:00, 6:00–12:00, 12:00–18:00, 18:00–24:00); injury location (indoors, outdoors); fracture side (left side, right side, both sides); fracture site (proximal, shaft, distal, multiple sites) were recorded.

Associated Injuries

Associated injuries (fractures involving the leg and foot, pelvic fractures, fractures of ribs and vertebrae, skull and facial fracture, upper limb fractures, craniocerebral injury, intrathoracic injuries, intraabdominal injuries), the presence of a chronic disease (heart/brain/lung, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis), and whether the patient was in a coma after injury was recorded.

Complications

Complications including surgery‐related complications (postoperative infections, nonunion, malunion, bone defects, internal fixation failure) and non‐surgery complications (deep venous thrombosis, pneumonia, pressure sores) were collected.

Statistical Analysis

The mean age was expressed as the mean ± SD. All data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 24.0, SPSS Inc., America). Differences in the mean value were analyzed using Student's t test. The chi‐square test was used for frequency data. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for associated injuries and complications.

Results

Age Differences of General Characteristics, Associated Injuries, and Complications

A total of 2020 patients were divided into a child group (CH group, n = 342) under 18 years old, a young adult group (YA group, n = 484) aged 18–60 years, and an older people group (OP group, n = 1194) aged 60 years and over. There were significant differences among the three groups in several indexes, such as sex ratio (χ 2 = 301.699, p < 0.001), osteoporosis (χ 2 = 375.463, p < 0.001), injury time of day (χ 2 = 114.913, p < 0.001), injury cause (χ 2 = 748.187, p < 0.001), injury location (χ 2 = 490.153, p < 0.001), fracture side (χ 2 = 57.000, p < 0.001), and fracture site (χ 2 = 806.650, p < 0.001). The OP group included a significantly higher percentage of females and patients with chronic disease than did the YA group and CH group. Forty‐seven patients (n = 47; 9.7%) in the YA group and a total of 734 patients (n = 734; 61.5%) in the OP group were diagnosed with osteoporosis. The OP group had the highest frequency of winter fractures (n = 317; 26.5%), the YA group had the highest frequency of autumn fractures (n = 130; 26.9%), and the CH group had the highest frequency of summer fractures (n = 91; 26.6%). The OP group had the highest frequency of fractures occurring 06:00 a.m. –12:00 p.m. (n = 513; 43.0%), caused by low‐height falls (n = 1080; 90.5%), occurring indoors (n = 657; 55.0%) and occurring at a proximal site (n = 1061; 88.9%); the YA group had the highest frequency of fractures occurring 12:00–6:00 p.m. (n = 194; 40.1%), caused by road traffic accidents (n = 199; 41.1%), occurring outdoors (n = 431; 89.0%) and occurring at a proximal site (n = 245; 50.6%); and the CH group had the highest frequency of fractures occurring in the summer (n = 91; 26.6%), occurring 12:00–6:00 p.m. (n = 170; 49.7%), caused by road traffic accidents (n = 160; 46.8%), occurring outdoors (n = 334; 99.7%), and occurring in the PM shaft (n = 259%; 75.7%) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

General characteristics of traumatic femoral fractures

DataYA groupOP groupCH group χ 2 p
Total4841194342
Male/female (sex ratio)355/129 (2.8)401/793 (0.5)247/95 (2.6)301.699<0.001
Chronic disease
Heart/brain/lung32 (6.6%)885 (74.1%)633.303<0.001
Diabetes mellitus9 (1.9%)264 (29.9%)103.681<0.001
Osteoporosis47 (9.7%)738 (61.8%)375.463<0.001
Injury season
Spring119 (24.6%)289 (24.2%)84 (24.6%)2.9840.811
Summer123 (25.4%)296 (24.8%)91 (26.6%)
Autumn130 (26.9%)292 (24.5%)84 (24.6%)
Winter112 (23.1%)317 (26.5%)83 (24.3%)
Injury time of day
0‐6:0028 (5.8%)94 (7.9%)9 (2.6%)114.913<0.001
6‐12:00170 (35.1%)513 (43.0%)62 (18.1%)
12‐18:00194 (40.1%)437 (36.6%)170 (49.7%)
18‐24:0092 (19.0%)150 (12.6%)101 (29.5%)
Injury cause
Road traffic crashes199 (41.1%)100 (8.4%)160 (46.8%)748.187<0.001
Low‐height fall193 (39.9%)1080 (90.5%)87 (25.4%)
High‐height fall58 (12.0%)8 (0.7%)64 (18.7%)
Other34 (7.0%)6 (0.5%)31 (9.1%)
Injury location
Indoors53 (11.0%)657 (55.0%)8 (2.3%)490.153<0.001
Outdoors431 (89.0%)537 (45.0%)334 (97.7%)
Fracture side
Left side249 (51.4%)596 (49.9%)162 (47.4%)57.000<0.001
Right side225 (46.5%)598 (50.1%)162 (47.4%)
Both sides10 (2.1%)018 (5.3%)
Fracture site
Proximal region245 (50.6%)1059 (88.7%)54 (15.8%)806.650<0.001
Shaft157 (32.4%)87 (7.3%)259 (75.7%)
Distal region67 (13.8%)45 (3.8%)26 (7.6%)
Multiple sites15 (3.1%)3 (0.3%)3 (0.9%)
General characteristics of traumatic femoral fractures There were significant differences among the three groups in several indexes, such as associated injuries (χ 2 = 322.921, p < 0.001) and coma after injury (χ 2= 147.814, p < 0.001). The YA group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with associated injuries, and coma after injury, than the OP group (p<0.001). The most common fracture‐associated injuries were fractures involving the leg and foot (n = 127; 26.2%), intrathoracic injuries (n = 92; 19.0%), and upper limb fractures (n = 88; 18.2%) in the YA group; upper limb fractures (n = 59; 4.9%), fractures of the ribs and vertebrae (n = 59; 4.9%), and fractures involving the leg and foot (n = 41; 3.4%) in the OP group; and fractures involving the leg and foot (n = 55; 16.1%), upper limb fractures (n = 32; 9.4%), and skull and facial fractures (n = 32; 9.4%) in the CH group (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Associated injuries and complications of traumatic femoral fractures

DataYA groupOP groupCH group χ 2 p
Total4841194342
Associated injuries272 (56.2%)169 (14.2%)135 (39.5%)322.921<0.001
Fractures involving the leg/foot127 (26.2%)41 (3.4%)55 (16.1%)
Pelvic fractures74 (15.3%)27 (2.3%)21 (6.1%)
Fractures of ribs and vertebrae62 (12.8%)59 (4.9%)16 (4.7%)
Skull and facial fracture57 (11.8%)6 (0.5%)32 (9.4%)
Upper limb fractures88 (18.2%)59 (4.9%)32 (9.4%)
Craniocerebral injury68 (14.0%)30 (2.5%)17 (5.0%)
Intra‐thoracic injuries92 (19.0%)32 (2.7%)17 (5.0%)
Intra‐abdominal injuries43 (8.9%)2 (0.2%)6 (1.8%)
Coma after injury73 (15.1%)9 (0.8%)40 (11.7%)147.814<0.001
Non‐surgery‐related complications58 (12.0%)185 (15.5%)35 (10.2%)7.8950.019
Deep venous thrombosis31 (6.4%)78 (6.5%)0
Pneumonia23 (4.8%)85 (7.1%)3 (0.9%)
Pressure sores1 (0.2%)8 (0.7%)3 (0.9%)
Urinary infection1 (0.2%)16 (1.3%)0
Dead01 (0.1%)1 (0.3%)1.8010.406
Surgery‐related complications54 (10.7%)15 (1.3%)20 (5.8%)82.186<0.001
Associated injuries and complications of traumatic femoral fractures There were significant differences among the three groups in several indexes, such as non‐surgery‐related complications (χ 2 = 7.895, p = 0.019) and surgery‐related complications (χ 2 = 82.186, p < 0.001). The OP group had a higher frequency of non‐surgery‐related complications than the YA group and CH group. The most common non‐surgery‐related complications were pneumonia (n = 85; 7.1%) in the OP group and deep venous thrombosis (n = 31; 6.4%) in the YA group (Table 2).

Risk Factors for Associated Injuries and Complications

In the univariate analysis, age, sex, injury cause, injury location, coma after injury, fracture side and site, presentation of heart/brain/lung disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis were associated with associated injuries. After univariate analysis, all statistically or clinically significant variables were entered into the multivariable model. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the independent predictors for associated injuries were young adults, high‐energy injury, outdoors, coma after injury, and fracture sites except for the proximal region (Table 3).
TABLE 3

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors for associated injuries

DataUnivariateMultivariate
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Age
OP groupRefRef
YA group7.782 (6.107‐9.915)<0.0011.712 (1.216‐2.410)0.002
CH group3.955 (3.016‐5.187)<0.0010.393 (0.253‐0.612)<0.001
Gender
FemaleRef
Male2.349 (1.924‐2.869)<0.001
Injury season
WinterRef
Spring0.875 (0.663‐1.154)0.344
Summer1.064 (0.813‐1.391)0.652
Autumn0.950 (0.724‐1.247)0.714
Injury time of day
18‐24:00Ref
0‐6:000.889 (0.581‐1.361)0.588
6‐12:001.250 (0.822‐1.899)0.297
12‐18:001.555 (0.992‐2.436)0.054
Injury cause
Low‐height fallRefRef
Road traffic crashes18.459 (14.192‐24.008)<0.00112.018 (8.467‐17.059)<0.001
High‐height fall21.267 (14.020‐32.261)<0.00116.956 (10.209‐28.163)<0.001
Drifting‐down injury16.313 (8.323‐31.976)<0.00113.095 (6.139‐27.935)<0.001
Others3.055 (1.341‐6.961)0.0082.257 (0.923‐5.519)0.074
Injury location
OutdoorsRefRef
Indoors0.136 (0.102‐0.181)<0.0010.599 (0.416‐0.861)0.006
Coma after injury
NoRefRef
Yes21.735 (12.535‐37.685)<0.0015.271 (2.828‐9.822)<0.001
Fracture side
Both sideRef
Right side0.155 (0.067‐0.356)<0.001
Left side0.155 (0.067‐0.356)<0.001
Fracture site
Proximal regionRefRef
Shaft4.609 (3.681‐5.771)<0.0011.456 (1.019‐2.081)0.039
Distal region7.550 (5.215‐10.929)<0.0013.328 (2.045‐5.414)<0.001
Multiple sites12.134 (4.659‐31.603)<0.0015.260 (1.594‐17.356)0.006
Heart/brain/lung
NoRef
Yes0.202 (0.161‐0.254)<0.001
Diabetes
NoRef
Yes0.305 (0.209‐0.445)<0.001
Osteoporosis
NoRef
Yes0.200 (0.156‐0.256)<0.001
Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors for associated injuries In the univariate analysis, age, sex, injury cause, fracture sites, and presentation of associated injuries were associated with complications. After univariate analysis, all statistically or clinically significant variables were entered into the multivariable model. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the independent predictors for complications were older age, male, and fracture site, except for the proximal region (Table 4).
TABLE 4

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors for complications

DataUnivariateMultivariate
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Age
OP groupRefRef
YA group1.394 (1.071–1.814)0.0140.790 (0.561–1.112)0.177
CH group0.567 (0.387–0.830)0.0030.245 (0.151–0.399)<0.001
Gender
FemaleRefRef
Male1.379 (1.091–1.743)0.0071.403 (1.082–1.819)0.011
Injury season
WinterRef
Spring0.986 (0.699–1.390)0.935
Summer1.320 (0.954–1.827)0.094
Autumn1.154 (0.828–1.609)0.398
Injury time of day
18‐24:00Ref
0‐6:001.067 (0.650–1.751)0.798
6‐12:000.995 (0.607–1.632)0.985
12‐18:000.905 (0.526–1.560)0.720
Injury cause
Low‐height fallRefRef
Road traffic crashes1.454 (1.113–1.898)0.0061.087 (0.737–1.605)0.674
High‐height fall0.806 (0.474–1.369)0.4240.681 (0.364–1.276)0.230
Drifting‐down injury1.339 (0.609–2.945)0.4680.967 (0.404–2.315)0.940
Others0.793 (0.275–2.290)0.6690.740 (0.243–2.249)0.595
Injury location
OutdoorsRef
Indoors0.966 (0.757–1.234)0.784
Coma after injury
NoRef
Yes1.508 (0.972–2.340)0.067
Fracture side
Both sideRef
Right side0.960 (0.360–2.559)0.934
Left side0.908 (0.340–2.422)0.847
Fracture site
Proximal regionRefRef
Shaft1.621 (1.248–2.105)<0.0012.556 (1.811–3.606)<0.001
Distal region1.647 (1.069–2.536)0.0241.771 (1.105–2.839)0.018
Multiple sites2.964 (1.182–7.437)0.0213.357 (1.273–8.848)0.014
Heart/brain/lung
NoRef
Yes1.047 (0.829–1.322)0.703
Diabetes
NoRef
Yes1.059 (0.757–1.481)0.739
Osteoporosis
NoRef
Yes0.893 (0.702–1.137)0.360
Associated injuries
NoRefRef
Yes1.527 (1.194–1.953)0.0011.232 (0.881–1.722)0.223
Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors for complications

Discussion

In the current study, we have shown that traumatic femoral fractures are mostly the result of low‐energy trauma and predominantly affect the proximal site of the femur among older people. A higher rate of shaft fractures, fractures occurring outdoors, and associated injuries was observed among young adults and children than among older people. This study demonstrates the age‐specific clinical characteristics of traumatic femoral fractures and reveals a significant relationship among different ages and associated injuries, complications. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have systematically assessed the differences in traumatic femoral fractures among young adults, children, and elderly people. , Age‐related bone loss occurs in both men and women, , , although women have more bone loss than men. In the present study, 47 patients (9.7%) in the YA group and a total of 734 patients (61.5%) in the OP group were diagnosed with osteoporosis. Older women are more likely to have a traumatic femoral fracture, mainly due to accidental falls from low heights (50.8%). The mechanism of hip fractures involves more factors other than the simple loss of bone mass with age. Equally important, and perhaps even more so with increasing age, is the tendency to fall and to fall in a different way. , Visual acuity, hypofunction of the nervous and motor systems, and a loss of coordination increase the occurrence of spinal fractures, , which are also important causes of femoral fractures in older people. The most common injury causes were road traffic crashes (41.4%) in the YA group, road traffic crashes (46.8%) in the CH group, and low‐height falls (90.5%) in the OP group. Our results also show a male predominance in the YA group and CH group, which is probably associated with a higher likelihood of being engaged in higher risk labor and RTCs. Children not only fall when climbing play equipment and furniture but also mostly fall because of slipping or physical activity. With increasing age, the most common injury mechanism shifted from falls to traffic accidents. Patients in the OP group were predominately female, which is probably associated with a higher likelihood of suffering from femoral fractures because of osteoporosis and low‐energy trauma. Therefore, it is necessary to help prevent older people from experiencing osteoporosis and falling and to prevent young adults and children from experiencing RTCs to reduce the increasing occurrence and burden of these age‐related fractures. In addition, there seem to be some seasonal variations in the occurrence of femoral fracture. Traumatic femoral fractures most frequently occurred in autumn for young adults and summer for children. The results are consistent with those of previous studies. , , Traumatic femoral fractures usually occur outdoors from 12–6 p.m. among young adults and children. Reasons for this variation are unclear and will require further study. We speculate that children are more likely to be playing outside during warm weather months, with an increased incidence during summer. Traffic accidents increased during the summer and autumn months. In a study of nonspecific traffic injuries in urban children, it was reported that the peak incidence of pedestrian and bicyclist injuries occurred during summer months, whereas motor vehicle occupant injuries showed little seasonal variation. Based on these results, there is a need for greater attention to motor vehicle safety in adolescents. We should increase the education of parents and children regarding falls, bicycle and pedestrian safety in children, and enforce drivers' licenses for adolescent drivers. , , Making behaviors, roads, and vehicles safer can significantly reduce RTC‐related traumatic femoral fractures among children and young adults. Traumatic femoral fractures most frequently occur in winter and occur indoors from 6 a.m.–12 p.m. for elderly adults. Reasons for this variation remain uncertain, and possible hypotheses have been shown as follows , , , , : winters are darker and colder, slipping on ice and snow, and fractures occur in indoor environments. , Hypothermia among older people with undernutrition could lead to impairment of judgments and coordination and then lead to injury. Hindrances of free movements and increased clumsiness of older people with many layers of clothes on leads to falls. Therefore, modifying the environment to decrease the chance of tripping or slipping and providing more education for older people on home safety as well as fall avoidance may reduce the incidence of femoral fractures among older people. , The OP group (88.9%) and YA group (50.6%) had the highest frequency of proximal fractures, while the CH group (75.7%) had the highest frequency of shaft fractures. There were significant differences among the three groups in the distribution of cases by fracture site. Similarly, in previous studies, femoral shaft fractures were found to be the most commonly diagnosed femoral fractures in a pediatric population, , , , approximately 90% of femur fractures occur in the proximal femur in adults, and older patients were found to be at a higher risk of developing proximal fractures. , , Potential factors that may explain the difference in femur fracture patterns in pediatric patients compared to adult femur fractures are osteoporosis and a different manner of falling, including an increased risk of falling due to medication or impaired balance. Therefore, we should pay much more attention to the medical research and development, diagnosis, and treatment of femoral shaft fractures among the pediatric population, proximal femur fractures among young adults, and proximal femur fractures among older people. The incidence of associated injuries in our cohort was within the range of 25.3–68.3% reported previously. , , The YA group (56.2%) had a significantly higher frequency of associated injuries than the OP group (14.2%). A total of 135 patients in the CH group (39.5%) presented with associated injuries. The YA group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with surgery‐related complications than the OP group. The OP group had a higher frequency of non‐surgery‐related complications than the YA group and CH group. The most common non‐surgery‐related complications were pneumonia (7.1%) and deep venous thrombosis (6.5%) in the OP group and deep venous thrombosis (6.4%) and pneumonia (4.8%) in the YA group. The most common subsequent comorbidities were pneumonia and new upper‐limb fractures in younger adults and pneumonia in the elderly. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the independent predictors for associated injuries were young adults, high‐energy injury, outdoors, coma after injury, and fracture sites except for the proximal region. The most common fracture‐associated injuries were fractures involving the leg and foot in the YA group; upper limb fractures, fractures of the ribs and vertebrae in the OP group; and fractures involving the leg and foot, upper limb fractures, and skull and facial fractures in the CH group. Patients with femoral fractures have a higher incidence of organ damage and an increased incidence of upper and lower limb fractures. , Thus, in children and young adults with femoral fractures resulting from a high‐energy trauma, it is strongly recommended to carefully check the head, leg, and foot and intrathoracic and craniocerebral injuries since the rapid detection and adequate treatment of severe injuries associated with these areas improves patient outcome and reduces mortality. In older people with femoral fractures, it is strongly recommended to carefully check the ribs and vertebrae to avoid misdiagnosis. It is helpful for us to provide early, timely diagnosis and treatment of associated injuries for patients with traumatic femoral fractures. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the independent predictors for complications were older age, male sex, and fracture sites except for the proximal region. Hip fractures are high‐energy blunt injuries, and most elderly patients sustaining hip fractures are at high risk for associated thrombosis, which strongly influences their outcome after fractures. Respiratory complications contributed greatly to mortality in elderly patients with femoral fracture after a fall from ground level. Thus, aggressive chest‐protective measures are encouraged to decrease the respiratory complications associated with femoral fracture in elderly patients.

Limitations

The study has some limitations that need to be acknowledged. First, the retrospective design of the study may have led to selection bias. Second, the lack of information about bone mineral density (BMD), serum calcium and vitamin D levels, body mass index (BMI), and the patients' medical history are important limitations of this study. Third, the patients came from a regional tertiary hospital, but the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command is one of the largest tertiary hospitals located in the center of Shenyang, the large number of outpatients and emergency patients were included in our study. Fourth, the patients had been divided into juveniles (under 18 years old), young adults (aged 18–60 years), and seniors (aged 60 years and over), the age span of young adults (aged 18–60 years) was large which may lead to undetailed research results, more detailed age groups will be defined in future studies. Despite these limitations, we believe that this valuable information about age differences of traumatic femoral fractures and risk factors for associated injuries and complications can be used as guidance for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of traumatic femoral fractures in children, young adults, and older people, and provide reference for future high‐level multicenter study.

Conclusions

In conclusion, in this study, traumatic femoral fractures were mostly the result of low‐energy trauma and predominantly affected the proximal region of the femur among older people. A higher rate of shaft fractures, fractures occurring outdoors, and associated injuries was observed among young adults and children than among older people. Multivariable logistic regression showed that young adults, high‐energy injury, outdoors, coma after injury, and fracture sites except for the proximal region were independent risk factors for associated injuries. Older age, male, and fracture site except for the proximal region were independent risk factors for complications. Understanding the age differences in traumatic femoral fractures is important for the allocation of public resources, the development of preventative strategies, and efficient diagnosis and treatment.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol and this manuscript were approved by the ethics committee and the institutional review board of our institution, and the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Author Contributions

Hong Yuan, Hailong Yu, Yunpeng Zhu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing—Original draft preparation. Liangbi Xiang: Formal analysis, Software, Validation, Writing—Original draft preparation. Hongwei Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing—Reviewing and Editing.
  42 in total

1.  Seasonal variation of hip fracture at three latitudes.

Authors:  S Douglas; A Bunyan; K H Chiu; B Twaddle; N Maffulli
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  A population-based study of crashes involving 16- and 17-year-old drivers: the potential benefit of graduated driver licensing restrictions.

Authors:  N Z Cvijanovich; L J Cook; N C Mann; J M Dean
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Ben Caesar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Epidemiology and mechanisms of femur fractures in children.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; Patrick W O'Donnell; Judy R Feinberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Childhood femur fractures, associated injuries, and sociodemographic risk factors: a population-based study.

Authors:  Arleta Rewers; Holly Hedegaard; Dennis Lezotte; Katy Meng; F Keith Battan; Kathryn Emery; Richard F Hamman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Towards a diagnostic and therapeutic consensus in male osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; G Bianchi; J P Bilezikian; J-M Kaufman; S Khosla; E Orwoll; E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Geriatric hospitalizations in fall-related injuries.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Tsan-Shiun Lin; Shao-Chun Wu; Johnson Chia-Shen Yang; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Tzu-Yu Cho; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Epidemic of fractures during a period of snow and ice: has anything changed 33 years on?

Authors:  Waheeb Al-Azzani; Danial Adam Maliq Mak; Paul Hodgson; Rhodri Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Differences between the sexes in motorcycle-related injuries and fatalities at a Taiwanese level I trauma center.

Authors:  Ching-Hua Hsieh; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Yi-Chun Chen
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.910

10.  Burden of fractures in France: incidence and severity by age, gender, and site in 2016.

Authors:  Benjamin Bouyer; Fanny Leroy; Jérémie Rudant; Alain Weill; Joël Coste
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.