| Literature DB >> 35928959 |
Abdallah M A Hassane1, Saleh M Hussien2, Mohamed E Abouelela3, Taher M Taha1,4, Mohamed F Awad1,5, Hassan Mohamed1,6, Mohammad M Hassan5,7, Mohammad H A Hassan8, Nageh F Abo-Dahab1, Abdel-Rehim A El-Shanawany1.
Abstract
Oxidative stress is involved in the pathophysiology of multiple health complications, and it has become a major focus in targeted research fields. As known, black seeds are rich sources of bio-active compounds and widely used to promote human health due to their excellent medicinal and pharmaceutical properties. The present study investigated the antioxidant potency of various black seeds from plants and their derived mycoendophytes, and determined the total phenolic and flavonoid contents in different extracts, followed by characterization of major constituents by HPLC analysis. Finally, in silico docking determined their binding affinities to target myeloperoxidase enzymes. Ten dominant mycoendophytes were isolated from different black seed plants. Three isolates were then selected based on high antiradical potency and further identified by ITS ribosomal gene sequencing. Those isolated were Aspergillus niger TU 62, Chaetomium madrasense AUMC14830, and Rhizopus oryzae AUMC14823. Nigella sativa seeds and their corresponding endophyte A. niger had the highest content of phenolics in their n-butanol extracts (28.50 and 24.43 mg/g), flavonoids (15.02 and 11.45 mg/g), and antioxidant activities (90.48 and 81.48%), respectively, followed by Dodonaea viscosa and Portulaca oleracea along with their mycoendophytic R. oryzae and C. madrasense. Significant positive correlations were found between total phenolics, flavonoids, and the antioxidant activities of different tested extracts. The n-butanol extracts of both black seeds and their derived mycoendophytes showed reasonable IC50 values (0.81-1.44 mg/ml) compared to the control with significant correlations among their phytochemical contents. Overall, seventeen standard phenolics and flavonoids were used, and the compounds were detected in different degrees of existence and concentration in the examined extracts through HPLC analysis. Moreover, the investigation of the molecular simulation results of detected compounds against the myeloperoxidase enzyme revealed that, as a targeted antioxidant, rutin possessed a high affinity (-15.3184 kcal/mol) as an inhibitor. Taken together, the black seeds and their derived mycoendophytes are promising bio-prospects for the broad industrial sector of antioxidants with several valuable potential pharmaceutical and nutritional applications.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC; antioxidant; black seed plants; flavonoids; molecular docking; mycoendophytes; phenolics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928959 PMCID: PMC9344008 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.930161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Endophytic fungi isolated from different black seed plants.
| AUMC | Endophytic fungi | Phylum; class; order | Host plant | Common name | Herbarium voucher no. | Plant family |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14827 |
| Ascomycota; Eurotiomycetes; Eurotiales |
| Basil | ABH308-6 | Lamiaceae |
| 14825 |
|
| Leek | ABH20-29 | Amaryllidaceae | |
| 14829 |
|
| Black seed | ABH490-14 | Ranunculaceae | |
| 14828 |
|
| Black Pepper | ABH449-574 | Piperaceae | |
| 14830 |
| Ascomycota; Sordariomycetes; Sordariales |
| Purslane | ABH470-36 | Portulacaceae |
| 14822 |
| Ascomycota; Eurotiomycetes; Eurotiales |
| Onion | ABH20-143 | Amaryllidaceae |
| 14831 |
|
| Sand lily | ABH20-10 | Amaryllidaceae | |
| 14826 |
|
| Opium poppy | ABH421-46 | Papaveraceae | |
| 14824 |
|
| Redroot pigweed | ABH19-76 | Amaranthaceae | |
| 14823 |
| Zygomycota; Zygomycetes; Mucorales |
| Hopbush | ABH518-66 | Sapindaceae |
AUMC, Assiut University Mycological Center.
FIGURE 1Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree showing the genetic diversity of fungal isolates based on ITS sequences of tested fungi aligned with closely-related strains accessed from GenBank: (A) A. niger TU62; (B) C. madrasense AUMC14830; (C) R. oryzae AUMC14823.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients of total phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activities by DPPH assay of n-butanol, acetone and methanol extracts from the investigated host, black seed plants, and their endophytic fungal isolates.
| Host plants and their fungal endophyte isolates | Extracts | Pearson’s correlation coefficients | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butanol | Acetone | Methanol | Total phenolics | Total flavonoids | Antioxidant activity % | |||||||
| Total phenolics (mg/gm) | Total flavonoids (mg/gm) | Antioxidant activity % | Total phenolics (mg/gm) | Total flavonoids (mg/gm) | Antioxidant activity % | Total phenolics (mg/gm) | Total flavonoids (mg/gm) | Antioxidant activity % | ||||
|
| 15.12 ± 0.04 | 6.74 ± 0.02 | 62.30 ± 0.07 | 11.63 ± 0.21 | 5.48 ± 0.01 | 63.21 ± 0.03 | 15.53 ± 0.09 | 4.01 ± 0.08 | 65.85 ± 0.05 | 0.977 | 1.00** | 0.903 |
| AUMC14827 | 10.54 ± 0.03 | 4.73 ± 0.05 | 58.28 ± 0.04 | 8.64 ± 0.41 | 4.48 ± 0.01 | 39.01 ± 0.02 | 11.41 ± 0.07 | 4.20 ± 0.03 | 63.21 ± 0.03 | |||
|
| 18.75 ± 0.00 | 5.74 ± 0.04 | 70.17 ± 0.12 | 13.83 ± 0.06 | 4.36 ± 0.01 | 58.63 ± 0.02 | 7.43 ± 0.08 | 4.11 ± 0.02 | 20.03 ± 0.23 | 0.937 | 0.847 | 0.936 |
| AUMC14825 | 18.04 ± 0.07 | 5.70 ± 0.03 | 65.80 ± 0.03 | 11.12 ± 0.04 | 4.45 ± 0. 13 | 35.63 ± 0.06 | 8.81 ± 0.06 | 4.96 ± 0.20 | 11.03 ± 0.15 | |||
|
| 28.50 ± 0.01 | 15.02 ± 0.14 | 90.48 ± 0.12 | 4.52 ± 0.06 | 3.47 ± 0.11 | 23.81 ± 0.02 | 7.27 ± 0.01 | 3.67 ± 0.21 | 32.95 ± 0.03 | 1.00 | 0.998* | 0.984 |
| AUMC14829 | 24.43 ± 0.10 | 11.45 ± 0.01 | 81.48 ± 0.04 | 2.23 ± 0.07 | 2.10 ± 0.04 | 21.70 ± 0.11 | 5.16 ± 0.13 | 2.85 ± 0.13 | 40.13 ± 0.08 | |||
|
| 19.34 ± 0.02 | 9.70 ± 0.05 | 78.32 ± 0.08 | 4.30 ± 0.07 | 2.55 ± 0.11 | 27.31 ± 0.03 | 3.17 ± 0.06 | 3.01 ± 0.22 | 16.25 ± 0.22 | 0.715 | 0.974 | 0.884 |
| AUMC14828 | 12.15 ± 0.11 | 8.03 ± 0.06 | 71.21 ± 0.03 | 9.96 ± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.03 | 53.44 ± 0.08 | 2.20 ± 0.18 | 1.90 ± 0.18 | 25.23 ± 0.09 | |||
|
| 12.04 ± 0.16 | 10.46 ± 0.05 | 81.42 ± 0.08 | 9.92 ± 0.02 | 8.36 ± 0.11 | 52.93 ± 0.03 | 10.60 ± 0.80 | 8.01 ± 0.18 | 54.96 ± 0.05 | 0.984 | 0.975 | 0.970 |
| AUMC14830 | 9.51 ± 0.10 | 9.23 ± 0.04 | 78.55 ± 0.01 | 8.92 ± 0.25 | 6.66 ± 0.01 | 46.83 ± 0.14 | 9.01 ± 0.23 | 6.92 ± 0.10 | 52.93 ± 0.03 | |||
|
| 18.10 ± 0.05 | 7.73 ± 0.01 | 62.12 ± 0.11 | 7.70 ± 0.13 | 3.23 ± 0.12 | 21.36 ± 0.02 | 8.41 ± 0.11 | 4.65 ± 0.18 | 31.48 ± 0.21 | 0.999* | 1.00** | 0.999* |
| AUMC14822 | 17.59 ± 0.03 | 5.99 ± 0.08 | 54.06 ± 0.03 | 6.71 ± 0.06 | 1.12 ± 0.23 | 16.60 ± 0.08 | 7.86 ± 0.21 | 2.54 ± 0.04 | 27.44 ± 0.12 | |||
|
| 8.31 ± 0.11 | 3.79 ± 0.04 | 21.03 ± 0.10 | 12.31 ± 0.07 | 3.53 ± 0.08 | 63.65 ± 0.02 | 7.28 ± 0.01 | 2.51 ± 0.02 | 68.34 ± 0.06 | 0.883 | 0.563 | 0.978 |
| AUMC14831 | 8.82 ± 0.12 | 1.18 ± 0.23 | 16.64 ± 0.12 | 10.10 ± 0.06 | 4.08 ± 0.11 | 42.60 ± 0.12 | 9.20 ± 0.02 | 3.61 ± 0.05 | 39.24 ± 0.15 | |||
|
| 17.90 ± 0.04 | 6.34 ± 0.13 | 81.40 ± 0.04 | 14.74 ± 0.03 | 4.94 ± 0.02 | 61.45 ± 0.02 | 10.56 ± 0.04 | 4.38 ± 0.09 | 63.48 ± 0.17 | 0.999* | 0.962 | 0.906 |
| AUMC14826 | 16.17 ± 0.07 | 5.08 ± 0.04 | 78.21 ± 0.02 | 13.20 ± 0.03 | 3.22 ± 0.03 | 41.42 ± 0.08 | 8.53 ± 0.02 | 3.21 ± 0.05 | 22.16 ± 0.06 | |||
|
| 7.24 ± 0.04 | 3.21 ± 0.02 | 22.12 ± 0.04 | 15.54 ± 0.01 | 2.22 ± 0.04 | 70.91 ± 0.01 | 8.45 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.09 | 30.99 ± 0.11 | 0.977 | 0.334 | 0.756 |
| AUMC 14824 | 5.85 ± 0.06 | 1.84 ± 0.03 | 19.30 ± 0.21 | 12.50 ± 0.05 | 5.31 ± 0.07 | 25.82 ± 0.15 | 7.34 ± 0.04 | 2.87 ± 0.05 | 12.34 ± 0.10 | |||
|
| 26.51 ± 0.02 | 8.14 ± 0.11 | 89.21 ± 0.04 | 13.56 ± 0.11 | 4.33 ± 0.02 | 40.34 ± 0.03 | 9.30 ± 0.13 | 3.28 ± 0.12 | 46.72 ± 0.04 | 0.983 | 0.974 | 0.961 |
| AUMC 14823 | 24.40 ± 0.12 | 6.26 ± 0.02 | 81.71 ± 0.04 | 8.14 ± 0.23 | 2.43 ± 0.34 | 32.23 ± 0.07 | 7.12 ± 0.08 | 2.52 ± 0.26 | 22.13 ± 0.15 | |||
The data were given as averages of three replicates (Mean ± SE).
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
FIGURE 2Pearson’s correlation coefficients of total phenolics, flavonoids, and the antioxidant activities of different extracts from black seed plants and their mycoendophytic isolates.
IC50 values (mg/ml) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients of three antioxidant activity assays of butanol extracts from three black seed plants and associated endophytic fungal strains.
| Extracts | IC50 values (mg/ml) | Pearson’s correlation coefficients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | H2O2 | Nitric oxide | DPPH | H2O2 | Nitric oxide | |
|
| 0.81 ± 0.07c | 1.03 ± 0.05c | 0.81 ± 0.02c | 1 | 0.963** | 0.945** |
| AUMC14829 | 1.16 ± 0.06b | 1.31 ± 0.08b | 1.33 ± 0.01b | |||
|
| 1.16 ± 0.09b | 1.44 ± 0.09a | 1.30 ± 0.03b | 0.963** | 1 | 0.913* |
| AUMC14830 | 1.31 ± 0.02a | 1.48 ± 0.04a | 1.36 ± 0.02b | |||
|
| 1.11 ± 0.09b | 1.31 ± 0.01b | 1.33 ± 0.10b | 0.945** | 0.913* | 1 |
| AUMC14823 | 1.28 ± 0.07a | 1.44 ± 0.06a | 1.44 ± 0.06a | |||
| BHT | 0.34 ± 0.05d | 0.41 ± 0.04d | 0.33 ± 0.07d | |||
The data were given as averages of three replicates (Mean ± SE). Values followed by the different letters are significantly different at p ˂ 0.05.
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
FIGURE 3Chemical structures of detected compounds in different extracts.
Retention time (R ), and area percentage of detected phenolic and flavonoid compounds derived from selected black seeds and their associated fungi.
| Peak | RT (min) | Standard compounds | Area % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 1.9 | Gallic acid | ND | 0.49 | ND | 5.97 | ND | 2.71 |
| 2 | 5.1 | Chlorogenic acid | ND | 0.32 | ND | 38.34 | ND | 3.37 |
| 3 | 7.0 | Catechin | ND | 0.25 | 8.38 | ND | ND | ND |
| 4 | 8.6 | Methyl gallate | ND | 0.26 | ND | 34.41 | 2.65 | 11.57 |
| 5 | 8.7 | Caffeic acid | ND | 0.88 | ND | 10.57 | ND | 33.22 |
| 6 | 9.9 | Syringic acid | ND | 0.09 | ND | ND | 21.43 | 13.93 |
| 7 | 10.5 | Pyrocatechol | 75.79 | 3.78 | ND | ND | 1.80 | 3.63 |
| 8 | 11.7 | Rutin | ND | 0.11 | 13.93 | 3.50 | 3.24 | ND |
| 9 | 14.1 | Ellagic acid | ND | 0.11 | 28.47 | ND | 1.97 | ND |
| 10 | 16.5 |
| ND | 0.58 | ND | ND | 3.13 | ND |
| 11 | 19.0 | Vanillin | ND | 0.17 | ND | ND | 1.65 | ND |
| 12 | 19.3 | Ferulic acid | 10.88 | ND | ND | ND | 2.40 | 3.08 |
| 13 | 21.8 | Naringenin | ND | ND | ND | ND | 2.71 | ND |
| 14 | 25.4 | Quercetin | 4.52 | 0.23 | 23.55 | 1.71 | 1.00 | ND |
| 15 | 26.5 | Cinnamic acid | ND | 9.15 | ND | 1.09 | 7.75 | ND |
| 16 | 28.9 | Kaempferol | 5.21 | 0.89 | 25.67 | 1.66 | 9.35 | ND |
| 17 | 29.2 | Hesperetin | 3.60 | 0.56 | ND | 2.74 | 27.69 | ND |
Not detected.
FIGURE 4HPLC chromatograms of phenolic components in n-butanol extracts from: (A) N. sativa seeds; (B) endophytic fungus A. niger; (C) P. oleracea seeds; (D) endophytic fungus C. madrasense; (E) D. viscosa seeds; (F) endophytic fungus R. oryzae.
Pose score results of detected compound interactions with myeloperoxidase antioxidant target proteins.
| No. | Name | Pose score (kcal/mol) | RMSD refine Å |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallic acid | −8.3189 | 1.12 |
| 2 | Chlorogenic acid | −12.1866 | 0.64 |
| 3 | Catechin | −10.0794 | 1.22 |
| 4 | Methyl gallate | −10.1663 | 1.18 |
| 5 | Caffeic acid | −8.6657 | 0.57 |
| 6 | Syringic acid | −9.6642 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Pyrocatechol | −9.9019 | 1.13 |
| 8 | Rutin | −15.3184 | 0.99 |
| 9 | Ellagic acid | −9.8865 | 0.85 |
| 10 | p-Coumaric acid | −7.0201 | 0.86 |
| 11 | Vanillin | −6.1162 | 0.65 |
| 12 | Ferulic acid | −7.8350 | 0.66 |
| 13 | Naringenin | −9.0508 | 1.92 |
| 14 | Quercetin | −10.6613 | 0.76 |
| 15 | Cinnamic acid | −8.9470 | 1.29 |
| 16 | Kaempferol | −10.6037 | 0.70 |
| 17 | Hesperetin | −9.0758 | 1.03 |
FIGURE 5Predicted binding pose interactions with the residues of myeloperoxidase antioxidant target proteins: (A) whole protein binding site; (B) 3D interaction model; (C) 2D interaction model.