| Literature DB >> 35928495 |
Xinchen Ke1,2,3,4, Wenrui Lin1,2,3,4, Daishi Li1,2,3,4, Shuang Zhao1,2,3,4, Mingliang Chen1,2,3,4, Yi Xiao1,2,3,4, Xiang Chen1,2,3,4, Minxue Shen1,2,3,5, Juan Su1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the economic burden of Chinese patients with melanoma in Hunan province of China, and to investigate the factors for hospitalization spending and length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing melanoma surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese hospitalization spending; economic burden; length of stay; melanoma; surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928495 PMCID: PMC9343693 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Visualization of total costs for beneficiaries with different characteristics (age, payer, and subsite).
Figure 2Pyramid diagram to describe the distribution of costs by sex and age group. (A) Cost at population level; (B) Cost at individual level.
Baseline characteristics of Hunan melanoma inpatients from 2017–2019.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| All | 2,644 (100) | 1,540 (100) | 1,104 (100) | |
|
| 59.60 (14.94) | 60.39 (14.01) | 58.50 (16.09) | 0.001 |
|
| 0.002 | |||
| ≤ 45 | 417 (15.8) | 214 (13.9) | 203 (18.4) | |
| 46–65 | 1,228 (46.4) | 713 (46.3) | 515 (46.6) | |
| >65 | 999 (37.8) | 613 (39.8) | 386 (35.0) | |
|
| 0.308 | |||
| Male | 1,402 (53.0) | 830 (53.9) | 572 (51.8) | |
| Female | 1,242 (47.0) | 710 (46.1) | 532 (48.2) | |
|
| 0.429 | |||
| 2017 | 780 (29.5) | 440 (28.6) | 340 (30.8) | |
| 2018 | 896 (33.9) | 533 (34.6) | 363 (32.9) | |
| 2019 | 968 (36.6) | 567 (36.8) | 401 (36.3) | |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Non- | 2,515 (95.1) | 1,486 (96.5) | 1,029 (93.2) | |
|
| 129 (4.9) | 54 (3.5) | 75 (6.8) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Head and neck | 480 (18.1) | 254 (16.5) | 226 (20.5) | |
| limbs | 892 (33.7) | 413 (26.8) | 479 (43.4) | |
| Trunk | 216 (8.2) | 133 (8.6) | 83 (7.5) | |
| Unspecified | 1,056 (39.9) | 740 (48.1) | 316 (28.6) | |
Baseline characteristics of melanoma patients undergoing surgery in Hunan during 2017–2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2088.82 (901.13,3937.64) | 14.0 (8.0,22.0) | |||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| ≤ 45 | 203 (18.4) | 1,679.91 (580.40, 3,572.73) | 11.0 (5.0,19.0) | ||
| 46–65 | 515 (46.6) | 2,644.29 (1,063.10, 4,348.39) | 15.0 (9.0,24.0) | ||
| >65 | 386 (35.0) | 1,749.35 (913.11, 3,591.30) | 14.0 (9.0,22.0) | ||
|
| 0.002 | <0.001 | |||
| Male | 572 (51.8) | 2,306.47 (1,011.77, 4,274.26) | 15.0 (9.0,23.0) | ||
| Female | 532 (48.2) | 1,872.00 (828.11, 3,646.53) | 13.0 (8.0,21.0) | ||
|
| 0.163 | 0.003 | |||
| 2017 | 340 (30.8) | 2,006.31 (866.31, 4,236.89) | 15.0 (9.0,26.0) | ||
| 2018 | 363 (32.9) | 2,241.05 (1,049.16, 4,043.96) | 15.0 (9.0,22.0) | ||
| 2019 | 401 (36.3) | 2 007.03 (747.85, 3,669.53) | 12.0 (8.0,21.0) | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Non- | 1,029 (93.2) | 2,371.73 (1,019.13, 4,099.43) | 14.0 (9.0,23.0) | ||
|
| 75 (6.8) | 577.34 (351.15, 1,328.39) | 5.0 (4.0,10.0) | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Head and neck | 226 (20.5) | 1,330.58 (524.72, 2,895.09) | 10.0 (5.0,14.0) | ||
| limbs | 479 (43.4) | 3,089.82 (1,496.31, 4,730.67) | 17.0 (10.0,25.0) | ||
| Trunk | 83 (7.5) | 1,803.70 (902.74, 3,435.41) | 12.0 (7.0,20.5) | ||
| Unspecified | 316 (28.6) | 1,582.64 (630.81, 3,479.57) | 14.0 (8.0,23.0) |
Quantile regression versus linear regression for the hospitalization costs of patients with melanoma undergoing surgery in Hunan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 126.70 | 52.31 | 85.35 | 127.74 | 181.82 | 216.42 | |
|
| |||||||
| ≤ 45 | 98.43 (182.46) | −66.46 (64.05) | −35.44 (58.94) | −8.08 (89.60) | 77.92 (214.04) | −178.20 (233.25) | |
| 46–65 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
| >65 | −435.01 | −7.60 (24.21) | −218.47 | −255.58 | −370.34 | −574.89 | |
|
| |||||||
| Male | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
| Female | −81.30 (131.79) | −4.32 (26.51) | −2.06 (37.50) | −104.10 (71.24) | −52.48 (128.94) | −117.39 (191.76) | |
|
| |||||||
| Non- | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
|
| −784.28 | −17.49 (28.50) | −97.46 | −319.05 | −674.96 | −1,426.55 | |
|
| |||||||
| Head and neck | −245.58 (182.08) | −141.25 | −224.53 | −528.64 | −266.27 (207.29) | 44.17 (247.06) | |
| limbs | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
| Trunk | −209.16 (259.00) | −82.17 (60.50) | −117.25 (143.52) | −419.12 | −402.44 (414.20) | −78.67 (234.08) | |
| Unspecified | −374.06 | −246.84 | −365.23 | −714.45 | −594.90 | −35.59 (290.21) | |
Standard errors in parentheses.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
LOS: length of stay, OLS: ordinary least squares.
Figure 3Estimated parameters for hospitalization costs in patients with melanoma undergoing surgery by quantile regression versus linear regression. Black lines signify the point estimates by quantile regression at 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 0.9 quantiles (gray bands signify 95% confidence intervals); and red lines signify the point estimates by linear regression (red dash lines signify 95% confidence intervals).
Quantile regression versus linear regression for LOS of patients with melanoma undergoing surgery in Hunan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| ≤ 45 | −3.64 | −2.00 | −3.00 | −2.67 | −3.00 | −7.00 | |
| 46–65 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
| >65 | −0.59 (0.80) | 0.00 (0.63) | −1.00 | −0.67 (0.71) | −2.00 | −5.00 (3.37) | |
|
| |||||||
| Male | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
| Female | −2.47 | −1.00 | −2.00 | −1.67 | −3.00 | −5.00 | |
|
| |||||||
| Non- | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
|
| −6.46 | −2.00 | −4.00 | −5.67 | −8.00 | −8.00 | |
|
| |||||||
| Head and neck | −7.74 | −3.00 | −4.00 | −6.67 | −10.00 | −14.00 | |
| limbs | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |
| Trunk | −4.51 | −3.00 | −5.00 | −4.67 | −4.00 | −8.00 (7.29) | |
| Unspecified | −2.29 | −2.00 | −2.00 | −2.67 | −2.00 (1.62) | −2.00 (2.36) | |
Standard errors in parentheses.
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
LOS: length of stay, OLS: ordinary least squares.
Figure 4Estimated parameters for length of hospital stay in patients with melanoma undergoing surgery by quantile regression versus linear regression. Black lines signify the point estimates by quantile regression at 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 0.9 quantiles (gray bands signify 95% confidence intervals); and red lines signify the point estimates by linear regression (red dash lines signify 95% confidence intervals).