| Literature DB >> 35928304 |
Hehua Zhang1, Borui Xu1,2,3, Yi Ouyang1, Yunqi Wang1, Hong Zhu1, Gaoshan Huang1,3,4, Jizhai Cui1,3, Yongfeng Mei1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Practical implementation of minimally invasive biomedical applications has been a long-sought goal for microrobots. In this field, most previous studies only demonstrate microrobots with locomotion ability or performing a single task, unable to be functionalized effectively. Here, we propose a biocompatible shape memory alloy helical microrobot with regulative structure transformation, making it possible to adjust its motion behavior and mechanical properties precisely. Especially, towards vascular occlusion problem, these microrobots reveal a fundamental solution strategy in the mechanical capability using shape memory effect. Such shape-transformable microrobots can not only manipulate thrust and torque by structure to enhance the unclogging efficiency as a microdriller but also utilize the high work energy to apply the expandable helical tail as a self-propulsive stent. The strategy takes advantage of untethered manipulation to operate microsurgery without unnecessary damage. This study opens a route to functionalize microrobots via accurate tuning in structures, motions, and mechanical properties.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928304 PMCID: PMC9297727 DOI: 10.34133/2022/9842752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Research (Wash D C) ISSN: 2639-5274
Figure 1Concept of magnetic helical microrobot with transformable capability. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication strategy and transformable motion principles of helical microrobot. The detail of assembling process is described in materials and methods. The assembled microrobot consists of NdFeB particles/PDMS head and NiTi helical tail. The shape-memory helical microrobot is propelled by an external rotation magnetic field. Controllable body shape transformation based on shape memory effect triggered by heating leads to the transformation of helical microrobot locomotion. The top left inset depicts that pitch is altered by adjusting the position of the screws. The top right inset depicts the SEM image of a microrobot. Scale bar is 300 μm. (b) Image sequences showing the moving performance before and after the shape transformation. Scale bar is 500 μm. (c) Velocity of microrobot overtime in response to shape transformation.
Figure 2Characterization of the shape-memory helical body of microrobot. (a) SEM image and EDS result of annealed NiTi wire. Scale bar is 50 μm. (b) Weight ratio of Ni and Ti element. (c) DSC result of annealed NiTi wire. (d) Shape memory performance of NiTi helical body when recovered from compressed states. Scale bar is 500 μm. (e) Recovery strain and pitch as a function of different compressed pitches. (f) Shape memory performance of NiTi helical body when recovered from different stretched state. Scale bar is 500 μm. (g) Recovery strain and pitch as a function of different stretched pitches.
Figure 3Locomotion behavior of SMA helical microrobot. (a) Velocity with response to different rotation frequency. The inset shows that the experimental and theoretical results of angular velocity related to external field frequency both in synchronous and step-out region. (b) Dependence of step-out frequency and maximum velocity on the viscosity of liquid viscosity. (c) Schematic illustrating the wobbling locomotion of helical microrobot. β is the angle between the axis of wobbling gaits and the axis of propulsion locomotion. (d) Optical images showing three gaits of magnetic helical microrobot. T is a period of rotation. (e) Variation of wobbling angle and velocity as a function of frequency. The region in different colors refers to different gaits. The density of magnetic field is 10 mT. (f) Schematic presenting structure parameters of a shape-memory helical microrobot. (g) Effect of the helix angle on the velocity when driven by 6 Hz magnetic field with density of 6 mT.
Figure 4Enhanced mechanical unclogging effect of microdriller by shape transformation. (a) Schematic indicating that the force and torque generated by the rotation of microrobot. (b) Step-out frequency and corresponding maximum velocity with respect to helix angles under 5 mT magnetic field. The inset shows the velocity of microrobot with different helix angle where the frequency of magnetic field is 3 Hz. (c) Calculation result of the force as a function of helix angle. (d) Experimental results of the force with different helix angle of a scaled-up NiTi helix. The wire diameter is 0.3 mm, and the helix diameter is 5 mm. (e) Schematic shows the process of microdriller implement and operation. The microrobot is injected into artery and driven to lesions under rotation magnetic field. The microdriller optimizes the unclogging effect via altering its structure by local heating. (f) Image sequence indicating unclogging performance of helical microrobots in a plump shape, slim shape, and a microrobot transforming from slim to plump shape. The unclogging process is divided into four stages: (i) reaching the location and beginning to drill in, (ii) DRILLING into the clot with one body length depth, (iii) drilling through the clot, and (iv) repeating drilling for four times. Heating process for shape transformation is conducted at the beginning of stage ii. Scale bar is 500 μm. (g) Statistics of time cost in different stages of three unclogging microrobots.
Figure 5Thermal responsive self-propelling stent towards plaque problem. (a) Schematic showing the helix radius variation occurred during SMA tail deformation. (b) Schematic exhibiting the strategies of shape memory helical microrobot towards self-propelled stent. (c) Simulation model of helices with same wire diameter d and helix angle θ. (d–f) Impact of spring index and deformation ratio of diameter in the model of (c) on crossstrain, energy density, and elastic strain energy, respectively. (g) Simulation model of helices with same helical outer diameter and helix angle. (h–j) Impact of wire diameter and helical radius variation in the model of (g) on crossstrain, energy density, and elastic strain energy, respectively. (k) Image sequence of the realization of a self-propelling stent. The procedure includes predesign, propulsion, expansion, and removal of magnetic head stages. The bottom left panels are the simulation result of the predesign and expansion process. The color mapping in first two panels refers to the stress, and one in the last panel refers to radial displacement. Scale bar is 2 mm. (l) Photograph and statistics recording the diameter change of stent before and after expanding. Scale bar is 4 mm.