| Literature DB >> 35928258 |
Rupu He1, Ruyun Ma1, Zheng Jin1, Yanning Zhu1, Fude Yang2, Fangdi Hu1, Jianye Dai1,3.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. (Codonopsis Radix, CR) and reveal the mechanism of its effects on suppressing Gastric Precancerous Lesions.Entities:
Keywords: Codonopsis Radix; energy metabolism; gastric precancerous lesions; metabolomics; proteomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928258 PMCID: PMC9343858 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.933096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Isotope label grouping table.
| Group | CH2O | NaBH3CN |
|---|---|---|
| Health group-light | CH2O | NaBH3CN |
| Model group-middle | CD2O | NaBH3CN |
| CR-treated group-heavy | 13CD2O | NaBD3CN |
FIGURE 1The pharmacodynamic results of CR in the treatment of GPL rats. (A) Weight diversity curve of animal experiments. (B) HE stained pathological section of gastric tissue in different group. (C) The contents of LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase) and CK (Creatine Kinase) in serum of different group. The graphs show the mean ± SD of at five independent experiments (n = 5). ## p < 0.01 vs Control. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. Model.
FIGURE 2Quantitative proteomics analysis of CR. (A) Schematic diagram of quantitative proteomics experiments. (B) Venn diagram showing the number of intervened proteins in the model group and CR-treated group. (C,D) Analysis of KEGG pathway and biological function (model group vs. healthy group) based on quantitative proteomics. (E,F) Analysis of KEGG pathway and biological function (CR-treated group vs. model group) based on quantitative proteomics.
FIGURE 3Quantitative metabolomics analysis of CR. (A) Relative abundance of each metabolite class in 221 metabolites. (B) PLS-DA analysis in healthy group, model group and CR-treated group (n = 5). (C) Analysis of KEGG pathway (model group vs. healthy group) based on quantitative metabolomics. (D) Analysis of KEGG pathway (CR-treated group vs. model group) based on quantitative metabolomics. (E) CR intervention reverses the disturbed biomarkers of glycolysis and citrate cycle in GPL animal model. The graphs show the mean ± SD in three independent experiments (n = 5). # p < 0.05 vs Healthy group. ## p < 0.01 vs Healthy group. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs Model group.
FIGURE 4CRCS’s anti-inflammatory and anti-gastric-cancer effect on MNNG-induced GES-1 cells and AGS cells. (A) MTS assay of CRCS on MNNG-induced inflammatory GES-1 cells. (B) Western blots of inflammatory factors (NF-κB) and apoptosis factors (Caspase three and Caspase 12) in GES-1 cells (Control) and inflammatory GES-1 cells induced by MNNG (Model). (C) Western blotting analysis of NF-κB in inflammatory GES-1 cells treated with CRCS. (D) Western blotting analysis of Caspase three in inflammatory GES-1 cells treated with CRCS. (E) Western blotting analysis of Caspase nine in inflammatory GES-1 cells treated with CRCS. (F) MTS assay of CRCS’s effects on AGS and GES-1 cells. (G) ATP contents in AGS cells treated with CRCS or not. (H) ATP contents in GES-1 cells treated with CRCS or not. β-actin served as the internal control in all Western blots. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n = 3 per group.
FIGURE 5Schematic diagram of Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. ‘s mechanism for suppressing GPL via the energy-related pathway.