| Literature DB >> 35928245 |
Farhana Alam Ripa1, Md Jamal Hossain2, Mst Luthfun Nesa2, Miss Sharmin Zahan2, Saikat Mitra3, Mohammad A Rashid4, Arpita Roy5, Saad Alghamdi6, Mazen Almehmadi7, Osama Abdulaziz7.
Abstract
Medicinal plants have been crucial in treating various chronic ailments since ancient times. The objective of this study was to evaluate in vitro pharmacological properties of petroleum ether, chloroform, and ethyl acetate soluble fractions of ethanolic extract (leaf, bark, and root) of Heritiera fomes Buch. Ham., including the phytochemical screening of the plant. Thrombolytic and antiarthritic properties were assessed through the clot lysis and protein denaturation experimental method, correspondingly. Anthelmintic and insecticidal activities were studied against Pheretima posthuma and Tribolium castaneum, respectively. The phytochemical analysis exhibited numerous active phytochemicals in different solvent fractions. In thrombolytic investigation, among all crude extracts, ethanolic leaf extract showed the highest 33.12 ± 7.52% clot lysis as compared to standard streptokinase (67.77 ± 9.78%). In antiarthritic assay, all the tested samples exhibited noteworthy protein denaturation in dose-dependent manner (100-500 μg/mL), whereas the utmost percentage inhibition was noticed for chloroform extract of roots (63.28 ± 5.96% at 500 μg/mL). All crude extracts exhibited a significant anthelmintic activity in different concentrations (25-75 mg/mL) and revealed paralysis and death of earthworms in comparison with albendazole; ethanolic extract of the bark was found to be more potent at the highest dose. For the insecticidal test, ethanolic extract of the leaf showed the utmost mortality rate (73%). The outcomes of the investigation confirmed the potential thrombolytic, antiarthritic, anthelmintic, and insecticidal activities of the different extracts of H. fomes, and hence, advanced studies on the isolation and identification of active phytocompounds are highly needed for new drug development.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928245 PMCID: PMC9345727 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2594127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Screening of bioactive phytocompounds in different extracts of H. fomes.
| Phytocompounds | Leaf | Root | Bark | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LE | LEA | LC | LPE | RE | REA | RC | RPE | BE | BEA | BC | BPE | |
| Carbohydrate | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Glycoside | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tannin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Alkaloid | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Saponin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Resin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Flavonoid | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Steroid | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Fixed oil | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
+, present; −, negative.
In vitro clot lysis activity of different extracts of H. fomes.
| Sample | % of lysis |
|---|---|
| Water | 10.44 ± 1.72 |
| Streptokinase (standard) | 67.77 ± 9.7 |
| LE | 33.12 ± 7.52 |
| LPE | 25.63 ± 4.63 |
| LEA | 26.39 ± 4.95 |
| LC | 27.76 ± 5.38 |
| RE | 24.28 ± 4.59 |
| RPE | 24.26 ± 4.35 |
| REA | 26.92 ± 6.11 |
| RC | 25.13 ± 4.81 |
| BE | 23.78 ± 4.77 |
| BPE | 27.03 ± 5.99 |
| BEA | 20.97 ± 6.97 |
| BC | 26.49 ± 5.62 |
Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Student's t-test, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001.
In vitro antiarthritic activity of H. fomes extracts in different concentrations.
| Sample | % of inhibition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | |
| Diclofenac sodium | 61.63 ± 1.44 | 71.41 ± 1.49 | 78.13 ± 1.47 | 81.09 ± 3.08 | 87.45 ± 4.05 |
| LPE | 45.35 ± 2.9 | 46.82 ± 6.1 | 48.24 ± 5.82 | 49.69 ± 7.00 | 60.59 ± 6.66 |
| LEA | 42.82 ± 4.4 | 47.45 ± 4.5 | 49.99 ± 5.61 | 50.65 ± 7.76 | 59.53 ± 6.86 |
| LC | 36.73 ± 6.0 | 39.89 ± 6.4 | 45.98 ± 6.15 | 47.61 ± 5.06 | 48.93 ± 8.42 |
| LE | 41.19 ± 6.6 | 46.11 ± 5.0 | 48.15 ± 5.39 | 55.53 ± 6.02 | 62.08 ± 6.31 |
| RPE | 39.82 ± 5.5 | 43.97 ± 5.6 | 46.53 ± 5.53 | 54.04 ± 6.16 | 57.35 ± 8.73 |
| REA | 40.25 ± 5.1 | 43.97 ± 5.6 | 48.29 ± 7.61 | 52.34 ± 6.72 | 55.92 ± 8.31 |
| RC | 41.36 ± 4.6 | 50.53 ± 4.0 | 52.05 ± 6.58 | 53.75 ± 6.19 | 63.28 ± 5.96 |
| RE | 36.12 ± 5.7 | 38.06 ± 7.2 | 46.61 ± 6.51 | 49.02 ± 7.28 | 56.73 ± 7.75 |
| BPE | 38.85 ± 5.7 | 39.00 ± 7.3 | 41.84 ± 7.75 | 47.96 ± 6.94 | 55.33 ± 7.82 |
| BEA | 41.48 ± 5.3 | 45.69 ± 6.3 | 49.03 ± 6.31 | 56.21 ± 6.51 | 61.49 ± 6.73 |
| BC | 38.14 ± 6.0 | 42.87 ± 5.3 | 48.25 ± 6.73 | 50.84 ± 8.27 | 60.14 ± 7.54 |
| BE | 40.96 ± 5.18 | 44.11 ± 5.45 | 52.03 ± 6.5 | 53.78 ± 7.01 | 55.88 ± 7.72 |
Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett's t-test, p < 0.01.
Anthelmintic activity of H. fomes extracts in different concentrations.
| Treatment | Conc. used (mg/ml) | Time taken for paralysis (min) | Time taken for death (min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | |||
| Standard | 20 | 37.67 ± 1.53 | 45.33 ± 2.52 |
|
| |||
| BE | 25 | 50.67 ± 5.13 | 69.00 ± 7.55 |
| 50 | 44.00 ± 2.00 | 54.33 ± 2.52 | |
| 75 | 39.67 ± 2.52 | 49.67 ± 3.51 | |
|
| |||
| LE | 25 | 59.67 ± 8.08 | 67.00 ± 7.09 |
| 50 | 48.33 ± 6.66 | 57.33 ± 3.05 | |
| 75 | 46.00 ± 5.29 | 52.67 ± 4.61 | |
|
| |||
| RE | 25 | 52.33 ± 9.45 | 69.67 ± 8.02 |
| 50 | 44.00 ± 7.81 | 54.00 ± 7.81 | |
| 75 | 42.00 ± 2.64 | 52.33 ± 4.16 | |
|
| |||
| BEA | 25 | 50.33 ± 4.04 | 71.67 ± 8.50 |
| 50 | 45.00 ± 2.00 | 55.33 ± 2.51 | |
| 75 | 45.33 ± 4.72 | 49.67 ± 2.52 | |
|
| |||
| LEA | 25 | 60.67 ± 8.08 | 70.33 ± 8.38 |
| 50 | 49.00 ± 6.93 | 54.00 ± 5.57 | |
| 75 | 48.33 ± 7.02 | 47.33 ± 3.78 | |
|
| |||
| REA | 25 | 51.67 ± 9.61 | 70.00 ± 7.81 |
| 50 | 45.00 ± 7.81 | 53.33 ± 5.13 | |
| 75 | 50.00 ± 8.01 | 46.67 ± 4.16 | |
|
| |||
| BC | 25 | 51.00 ± 4.58 | 66.67 ± 7.50 |
| 50 | 47.00 ± 6.56 | 58.00 ± 8.18 | |
| 75 | 45.67 ± 5.13 | 53.33 ± 4.93 | |
|
| |||
| LC | 25 | 61.33 ± 7.64 | 68.67 ± 7.64 |
| 50 | 51.67 ± 5.69 | 61.00 ± 4.58 | |
| 75 | 48.33 ± 8.03 | 52.33 ± 4.04 | |
|
| |||
| RC | 25 | 51.67 ± 9.29 | 67.33 ± 6.81 |
| 50 | 46.00 ± 7.81 | 56.00 ± 7.81 | |
| 75 | 41.33 ± 3.21 | 51.00 ± 7.55 | |
|
| |||
| BPE | 25 | 53.00 ± 6.24 | 70.33 ± 8.50 |
| 50 | 47.67 ± 3.51 | 64.00 ± 7.21 | |
| 75 | 46.33 ± 5.51 | 51.00 ± 3.60 | |
|
| |||
| LPE | 25 | 61.00 ± 7.55 | 72.33 ± 6.51 |
| 50 | 53.67 ± 5.69 | 69.00 ± 7.55 | |
| 75 | 49.33 ± 8.18 | 54.33 ± 2.08 | |
|
| |||
| RPE | 25 | 56.67 ± 5.69 | 67.00 ± 6.56 |
| 50 | 46.67 ± 7.23 | 62.00 ± 5.29 | |
| 75 | 49.33 ± 7.37 | 56.67 ± 7.23 | |
Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett's t-test, p < 0.01.
Figure 1Insecticidal activity of chloroform (BC, LC, and RC) and ethanolic (BE, LE, and RE) extracts of bark, root, and leaf of H. fomes. The data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The p values were calculated from Student's t-test, where a, b, and c expressed p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 vs. control, respectively.
Figure 2Insecticidal activity of ethyl acetate (BEA, REA, and LEA) and petroleum ether (BPE, RPE, and LPE) extracts of bark, root, and leaf of H. fomes. The data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The p values were calculated from Student's t-test, where a, b, and c expressed p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 vs. control, respectively.