Literature DB >> 35927956

Pulling, failing, and adaptive mechanotransduction of macrophage filopodia.

Rebecca Michiels1, Nicole Gensch2, Birgit Erhard1, Alexander Rohrbach3.   

Abstract

Macrophages use filopodia to withdraw particles toward the cell body for phagocytosis. This can require substantial forces, which the cell generates after bio-mechanical stimuli are transmitted to the filopodium. Adaptation mechanisms to mechanical stimuli are essential for cells, but can a cell iteratively improve filopodia pulling? If so, the underlying mechanic adaptation principles organized on the protein level are unclear. Here, we tackle this problem using optically trapped 1 μm beads, which we tracked interferometrically at 1 MHz during connection to the tips of dorsal filopodia of macrophages. We observe repetitive failures while the filopodium tries to pull the bead out of the optical trap. Analyses of mean bead motions and position fluctuations on the nano-meter and microsecond scale indicate mechanical ruptures caused by a force-dependent actin-membrane connection. We found that beads are retracted three times slower under any load between 5 and 40 pN relative to the no-load transport, which has the same speed as the actin retrograde flow obtained from fluorescent speckle tracking. From this duty ratio of pulling velocities, we estimated a continuous on/off binding with τoff = 2⋅τon, with measured off times τoff = 0.1-0.5 s. Remarkably, we see a gradual increase of filopodia pulling forces from 10 to 30 pN over time and after failures, which points toward an unknown adaptation mechanism. Additionally, we see that the attachment strength and friction between the bead and filopodium tip increases under load and over time. All observations are typical for catch-bond proteins such as integrin-talin complexes. We present a mechanistic picture of adaptive mechanotransduction, which formed by the help of mathematical models for repetitive tip ruptures and reconnections. The analytic mathematical model and the stochastic computer simulations, both based on catch-bond lifetimes, confirmed our measurements. Such catch-bond characteristics could also be important for other immune cells taking up counteracting pathogens.
Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927956      PMCID: PMC9463700          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   3.699


  34 in total

1.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model.

Authors:  Ulrich S Schwarz; Thorsten Erdmann; Ilka B Bischofs
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Intracellular motility: myosin and tropomyosin in actin cable flow.

Authors:  David R Kovar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  How filopodia pull: what we know about the mechanics and dynamics of filopodia.

Authors:  Thomas Bornschlögl
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-09-03

4.  Integrin β1 Promotes the Interaction of Murine IgG3 with Effector Cells.

Authors:  Carolyn Saylor Hawk; Carolina Coelho; Diane Sthefany Lima de Oliveira; Verenice Paredes; Patrícia Albuquerque; Anamélia Lorenzetti Bocca; Ananésia Correa Dos Santos; Victoria Rusakova; Heather Holemon; Ildinete Silva-Pereira; Maria Sueli Soares Felipe; Hideo Yagita; André Moraes Nicola; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Filopodia and adhesion in cancer cell motility.

Authors:  Antti Arjonen; Riina Kaukonen; Johanna Ivaska
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration.

Authors:  Margaret L Gardel; Ian C Schneider; Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus; Clare M Waterman
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 7.  Mechanobiology - chemical origin of membrane mechanical resistance and force-dependent signaling.

Authors:  Amy E M Beedle; Aisling Williams; Josep Relat-Goberna; Sergi Garcia-Manyes
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology.

Authors:  Thomas Iskratsch; Haguy Wolfenson; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 113.915

9.  Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand.

Authors:  Fang Kong; Andrés J García; A Paul Mould; Martin J Humphries; Cheng Zhu
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Myosin-X and talin modulate integrin activity at filopodia tips.

Authors:  Mitro Miihkinen; Max L B Grönloh; Ana Popović; Helena Vihinen; Eija Jokitalo; Benjamin T Goult; Johanna Ivaska; Guillaume Jacquemet
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.