| Literature DB >> 35927759 |
David Zapico1, José Espinosa2, Miguel Fernández1, Miguel Criado1, Noive Arteche-Villasol1, Valentín Pérez1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infected animals show a variety of granulomatous lesions, from focal forms with well-demarcated granulomas restricted to the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), that are seen in the initial phases or latency stages, to a diffuse granulomatous enteritis, with abundant (multibacillary) or scant (paucibacillary) bacteria, seen in clinical stages. Factors that determine the response to the infection, responsible for the occurrence of the different types of lesion, are still not fully determined. It has been seen that regulatory T cells (Treg) play an important role in various diseases where they act on the limitation of the immunopathology associated with the immune response. In the case of paratuberculosis (PTB) the role of Treg lymphocytes in the immunity against Map is far away to be completely understood; therefore, several studies addressing this subject have appeared recently. The aim of this work was to assess, by immunohistochemical methods, the presence of Foxp3+ T lymphocytes in intestinal samples with different types of lesions seen in cows with PTB.Entities:
Keywords: Foxp3+; Mycobacterium avium subsp, paratuberculosis; cattle; intestinal tissue; regulatory T lymphocytes; type of lesion
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35927759 PMCID: PMC9351272 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03399-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.792
Fig. 1Photomicrographs of jejunal tissue samples showing immunolabelling for Foxp3+ T cells, from control (a-b) and infected animals (c-h) showing different types of lesions associated with Map infection. (a-b). Positively immunolabelled cells show a bright brown stain in their cytoplasm. Control (C) animals with low presence of Foxp3+ T cells both in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) (a) and intestinal mucosa (MUCOSA) (b). (c-d) Animals with focal (F) lesions with a pronounced increase of immunolabelled Foxp3+ T lymphocytes is observed in the GALT (c) and to a lesser extent in the lamina propria (d). (e-f) Diffuse paucibacillary (PB) lesions where Foxp3+ T lymphocytes are also seen among the lymphocytic infiltrate of the LP (f) and in higher numbers on the GALT (e). (g-h) Diffuse multibacillary (MB) lesions with reduced presence of Foxp3+ T cells either in the GALT (g) or among the granulomas of the lamina propria (h), in similar amounts that the control (C) group. No specific distribution patter of the Foxp3+ T cells were detected in relation with the granulomas in any intestinal areas analyzed. Scale bar = 200 μm. Harris´s haematoxylin counterstain. e: epithelium lining the intestinal mucosa; lp: lamina propria; g: intestinal glands.
Linear mixed model selection for the effects of: infection status (IS), intestinal area (IA) and type of lesion (TL) on the number of positively immunolabelled Foxp3+ T cells.
| Biological models | AICc | ∆AICc | AICcWi | R2 (adj) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IS+TL+IA+IA*TL | 1136.42 | 0.00 | 0.487 | 0.513 |
| IS+IA+TL | 1145.23 | 8.81 | 0.323 | 0.503 |
| IA*TL | 1172.21 | 35.79 | 0.126 | 0.355 |
| IA+TL | 1198.91 | 62.42 | 0.059 | 0.322 |
| Null model | 1213.43 | 77.01 | 0.004 | 0.012 |
Note: Models with substantial support are in bold.
* : interaction, + : additive effect, AICc: Akaike's information criterion corrected for small sample size, ΔAICc : difference of AICc between the model and the most parsimonious model; AICcWi : Akaike weight of the model, R(adj) = adjusted R of the fitted model.
Results of the post-hoc Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test for all pairwise comparisons in the model classified with ∆AICC < 2 for the number of positively immunolabelled Foxp3+ T cells.
| Linear Hypotheses | Estimate | SE | Z-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IS (H) — IS (I) = 0 | -0.201 | 0.024 | - 8.144 | |
| TL (C) — TL (F) = 0 | - 0.551 | 0.024 | - 22.132 | |
| TL (C) — TL (DP) = 0 | -0.192 | 0.026 | -3.45 | |
| TL (C) — TL (DM) = 0 | -0.081 | 0.016 | -0.342 | |
| TL (F) — TL (DP) = 0 | 0.532 | 0.012 | 20.401 | |
| TL (F) — TL (DM) = 0 | 0.561 | 0.035 | 22.92 | |
| TL (DP) — TL (DM) = 0 | 0.028 | 0.011 | 1.105 | |
| IA (LP) — IA (GALT) = 0 | -0.171 | 0.025 | -3.221 | |
| IA (LP) — IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.126 | 0.027 | -1.178 | |
| IA (GALT) — IA (MLN) = 0 | 0.114 | 0.016 | 4.142 | |
| TL (C)*IA (LP) — TL (C)* IA (GALT) = 0 | -0.076 | 0.042 | -0181 | |
| TL (C)*IA (LP) — TL (C)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.039 | 0.044 | -0.870 | |
| TL (C)*IA (GALT) — TL (C)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.047 | 0.024 | -1.107 | |
| TL (F)*IA (LP) — TL (F)* IA (GALT) = 0 | -0.321 | 0.038 | -7.881 | |
| TL (F)*IA (LP) — TL (F)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.162 | 0.021 | -1.265 | |
| TL (F)*IA (GALT) — TL (F)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.239 | 0.047 | -6.651 | |
| TL (DP)*IA (LP) — TL (DP)* IA (GALT) = 0 | -0.181 | 0.044 | -1.761 | |
| TL (DP)*IA (LP) — TL (DP)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.082 | 0.012 | -1.702 | |
| TL (DP)*IA (GALT) — TL (DP)* IA (MLN) = 0 | 0.035 | 0.045 | 0.742 | |
| TL (DM)*IA (LP) — TL (DM)* IA (GALT) = 0 | -0.024 | 0.040 | -0.621 | |
| TL (DM)*IA (LP) — TL (DM)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.019 | 0.043 | -0.602 | |
| TL (DM)*IA (GALT) — TL (DM)* IA (MLN) = 0 | -0.011 | 0.025 | -0.164 | |
Fig. 2Bar-plot that shows the total mean cell counts and standard error (log-transformed) of positively immunolabelled Foxp3+ T cells subset according to the type of lesion. Different superscript letters indicate statistical significance between the different type of lesion. *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05. Specific p-value resulting from each pairwise comparison between lesion category groups can be consulted in the Table 2.
Fig. 3Bar-plot that shows the mean cell counts and standard errors (log-transformed) of positively immunolabelled Foxp3+ T cell subset in the different intestinal areas analyzed according to the type of lesion. LP: Lamina propria; GALT: gut-associated lymphoid tissue; MLN: mesenteric lymph node. Different superscript letters indicate statistical significance between the different intestinal areas within each type of lesion. ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.Specific p-value resulting from each pairwise comparison between intestinal areas within each type of lesion can be consulted in the Table 2.