| Literature DB >> 35927706 |
Mohamed H Abdelazim1, Ahmed H Abdelazim2, Waleed Moneir3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is recognized as a symptom of COVID-19. Reports revealed the nasal calcium increase has adverse effects on olfactory function. Tetra sodium pyrophosphate, a chelating agent, can bind calcium and help improve olfaction.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Calcium; Chelating agent; Olfactory disorder; Tetra sodium pyrophosphate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35927706 PMCID: PMC9354346 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-022-00711-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol ISSN: 1710-1484 Impact factor: 3.373
Fig. 1The flow chart of the described study
Patient’s characteristics
| Character | Sodium chloride | TSPP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size, n | 32 | 32 | – |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 37.98 ± 6.27 | 36.87 ± 5.25 | – |
| Days since symptoms to enrollment, mean ± SD | 96.54 ± 4.12 | 94.81 ± 3.89 | – |
| Gender | |||
| Male, n | 14 | 12 | 0.79 |
| Female, n | 18 | 20 | 0.79 |
| Smokers (current/never), n | 5/32 | 4/32 | 1.00 |
| Comorbidities, n | |||
| Asthma | 4 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Diabetes | 2 | 4 | 0.67 |
| Hypertension | 3 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Migraine | 4 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Hyperuricemia | 2 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Current medication | |||
| Anti-histamine | 4 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Metformin | 1 | 2 | 1.00 |
| Glimepiride | 1 | 2 | 1.00 |
| ACE inhibitor | 3 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Paracetamol | 4 | 5 | 1.00 |
Fig. 2The chemical reaction pathway of TSPP and calcium
Clinically recorded results with statistical assessment before and after treatment with topical sodium chloride and TSPP
| Sodium chloride | TSPP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population size clinical assessment results | ||||||
| Pre administration | Post administration | Pre administration | Post administration | |||
| Population size with anosmia, n | 32 | 32 | 1 | 32 | 6 | |
| Population size with hyposmia, n | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 26 | |
| Male population size with anosmia, n | 14 | 14 | 1 | 12 | 4 | |
| Male population size with hyposmia, n | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| Female population size with anosmia, n | 18 | 18 | 1 | 20 | 2 | |
| Female population size with hyposmia,(n,%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18 | |
The significant difference indicated by the bold values, values in the parenthesis are the theoretical t values