| Literature DB >> 35927679 |
Mady Cissoko1,2,3, Issaka Sagara4,5, Jordi Landier5, Abdoulaye Guindo4,5, Vincent Sanogo6, Oumou Yacouba Coulibaly7, Pascal Dembélé6, Sokhna Dieng5, Cedric S Bationo, Issa Diarra4, Mahamadou H Magassa6, Ibrahima Berthé4, Abdoulaye Katilé4,5, Diahara Traoré6, Nadine Dessay8, Jean Gaudart4,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In malaria endemic countries, seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) interventions are performed during the high malaria transmission in accordance with epidemiological surveillance data. In this study we propose a predictive approach for tailoring the timing and number of cycles of SMC in all health districts of Mali based on sub-national epidemiological surveillance and rainfall data. Our primary objective was to select the best of two approaches for predicting the onset of the high transmission season at the operational scale. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the number of malaria cases, hospitalisations and deaths in children under 5 years of age that would be prevented annually and the additional cost that would be incurred using the best approach.Entities:
Keywords: High transmission season; Malaria; Rainfall; Sub-national; Tailoring
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35927679 PMCID: PMC9351140 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05379-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 4.047
Fig. 1a, b Maps showing the predicted onset of the high transmission season in 2019, with the colour scale representing the week (W) of onset: a predicted onset using the App-A predictive approach (based on median rainfall data and median lag data for the 2014–2018 period, b predicted onset using the App-B predictive approach (based on rainfall data for 2019 and median lag data for the 2014–2018 period). c, d Maps showing the prediction error in weeks, with the colour scale representing the error value (note: a difference between - 2 and + 2 weeks was considered acceptable): cprediction error using App-A, d prediction error using App-B
Classification of health districts according to observed and predicted months of onset of the high malaria transmission season in 2019
| Month of onset of the high transmission season | Number of health districts according to observed month of onset | Number of health districts according to predicted month of onset using App-Aa | Number of health districts according to predicted month of onset using App-Ba |
|---|---|---|---|
| May | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| June | 36 | 40 | 43 |
| July | 21 | 21 | 15 |
| August | 14 | 12 | 10 |
| September | 0 | 0 | 6 |
aApp-A and App-B are the predictive approaches used in the study. App-A predicted the onset of the high transmission season in 2019 using median rainfall data and median lag data for the 2014–2018 period. App-B predicted the onset of the high transmission season in 2019 using rainfall data for 2019 and median lag data for the 2014–2018 period
Fig. 2Density of standardised scores with confidence intervals. Standardised scores for App-A and App-B are shown in red and blue, respectively
Fig. 3 The Blue line on a silver background represents the smoothing curve and the confidence intervalsDuration and seasonality of malaria transmission in four representative health districts. a Bimodal seasonality, b usual seasonality (from July to December), c irregular seasonality, d low seasonal transmission
Fig. 4Number of cycles of seasonal chemoprevention needed in each health district based on the duration and seasonality of malaria transmission. Colour scale represents the required number of cycles. SMC, Seasonal malaria chemoprevention
Fig. 5Maps showing the additional cost that would be incurred and the number of cases that would be prevented annually using App-A. a Additional cost incurred per health district, with the colour scale representing the difference between the cost of using the current approach and the cost of using App-A. b Number of malaria cases prevented per health district, with the colour scale representing the estimated number of cases that would be prevented using App-A