| Literature DB >> 35923775 |
Lizhou Xu1,2, Sami Ramadan1, Bruno Gil Rosa3, Yuanzhou Zhang1, Tianyi Yin1, Elias Torres4, Olena Shaforost1, Apostolos Panagiotopoulos1, Bing Li5,6,7, Gwilherm Kerherve1, Dong Kuk Kim1, Cecilia Mattevi1, Long R Jiao8, Peter K Petrov1, Norbert Klein1.
Abstract
Graphene field-effect transistor (GFET) biosensors exhibit high sensitivity due to a large surface-to-volume ratio and the high sensitivity of the Fermi level to the presence of charged biomolecules near the surface. For most reported GFET biosensors, bulky external reference electrodes are used which prevent their full-scale chip integration and contribute to higher costs per test. In this study, GFET arrays with on-chip integrated liquid electrodes were employed for COVID-19 detection and functionalized with either antibody or aptamer to selectively bind the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. In the case of the aptamer-functionalized GFET (aptasensor, Apt-GFET), the limit-of-detection (LOD) achieved was about 103 particles per mL for virus-like particles (VLPs) in clinical transport medium, outperforming the Ab-GFET biosensor counterpart. In addition, the aptasensor achieved a LOD of 160 aM for COVID-19 neutralizing antibodies in serum. The sensors were found to be highly selective, fast (sample-to-result within minutes), and stable (low device-to-device signal variation; relative standard deviations below 0.5%). A home-built portable readout electronic unit was employed for simultaneous real-time measurements of 12 GFETs per chip. Our successful demonstration of a portable GFET biosensing platform has high potential for infectious disease detection and other health-care applications. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35923775 PMCID: PMC9280445 DOI: 10.1039/d2sd00076h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sens Diagn ISSN: 2635-0998
Fig. 1Schematics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus detection using an on-chip integrated GFET aptasensor with portable electronics and the software presenting real-time detection results on a laptop. The zoomed-in area in the middle shows the schematics of the functionalization of the aptamer. The chip layout allows the different functionalization of two sections on a chip comprising 6 GFETs each.
Fig. 2Illustration of the graphene chip, GFET array, and PCB board-based portable electronics: (A) process steps of wafer scale GFET fabrication; (B) chip design of the on-chip GFET array with an on-chip integrated gate electrode, where on-chip GFET sensors are designed with 6 devices each on the left and right sides and the left-hand enlarged image shows the graphene deposited between source and drain electrodes with a scale bar of 20 μm; (C) image of the integrated on-chip sensor; (D) image of the PCB board with reader electronic components; (E) simplified electronic schematic highlighting the main functional blocks and components of the reader electronics on the PCB board (MCU – microcontroller, DAC – digital-to-analogue converter, ADC – analogue-to-digital converter, MUX – multiplexer, USB – universal serial bus, PGA – programmable gain amplifier, NI-A – non-inverting amplifier), with the mathematical formulae involved in the estimation of the drain–source current and resistance exhibited on the bottom left corner.
Fig. 3Characterization and quality assessment of the on-chip GFET sensing platform: (A) the design of on-chip integrated sensor array outperforms the conventional GFET single sensor which uses an external bulky gate electrode (e.g. Ag/AgCl) and has minimal detection throughput; (B–D) electrochemistry of the device in a three-electrode set-up with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode and carbon foil counter electrode in 0.001 M PBS solution of pH 7.4; (B) the cyclic voltammogram of the device contacted at the gold/aluminum oxide junction in a scan rate range of 1000–1000 mV s−1; (C) cyclic voltammogram of the device contacted on gold showing a stability test done at a 1000 mV s−1 over 200 cycles; (D) the chronoamperometry experiment contacted on gold showing the current measured in response to the open circuit potential and applied potential; (E) AFM images showing the successful functionalization/binding of the PBASE, the antibody, and the target protein, with scale bar: 1 μm; (F) the Raman spectroscopy before and after PBASE functionalization on graphene surface; (G) I–V curves showing changes in the Dirac point after each surface functionalization step, where electrical measurement (I–V curves) confirmed the successful functionalization/binding of each molecule on the graphene surface (330 fM of spike proteins); (H) monitoring of I–V curves over time on the same device (33 pM of spike proteins). Vsd = 20 mV, indicating good stability of the data produced by each device over time; (I) I–V curves indicating good data repeatability and the signal stability of multiple sensing devices (n = 4) at 330 pM of spike proteins in d1000 PBS.
Fig. 4Analytical performance assessment of the on-chip GFET sensing platform for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein detection: (A and B) sensitivity; (A) I–V curves showing the Dirac point shift with an increasing spike protein concentration from 3.3 fM to 330 pM compared to the PBS (blank) sample; (B) calibration curves of Dirac voltage change against the spike protein concentration in the d1000 PBS buffering condition (y = 0.0069 ln(x) + 0.0657; R2 = 0.8433), where the LOD can be as low as 3 fM (103 proteins per μL) which is equal to 10–102 viruses per μL; (C) the serum testing using the on-chip GFET sensor (the detection of various concentrations of antibody dilutions) (n = 5); (D) the specificity test of spike protein antibodies against other non-target proteins using GFET sensors, where the bar chart shows the comparison of the change in Dirac point between the samples tested at 165 pM. n = 4; (E) the real-time monitoring of the source–drain current (ISD) change over time (s) in response to a series of spike protein concentrations, where VSD = 20 mV, VG = 0.65 V and the response time of the GFET sensor can be as fast as 100–150 s; (F) the change in current vs. the spike protein concentration.
Fig. 5The SARS-CoV-2 detection in universal transport media (UTM) (mimic swab sample) using the on-chip integrated graphene biosensor (Apt-GFET, aptasensor): (A) the comparison schematic of the on-chip Apt-GFET biosensor (aptasensor) vs. the Ab-GFET one; (B) P 2p XPS spectra; and (C) N 1s XPS spectra confirm the functionalization/attachment of aptamers on the graphene surface; (D) results of both sensors for SARS-CoV-2 virus detection in UTM; (E) the scheme showing the Debye screen effect for the Apt-GFET and Ab-GFET, as well as a comparison of the sizes of the antibody and aptamer.