| Literature DB >> 35923693 |
Aman Sharma1, Subasty Prakash1, Debasis Chattopadhyay1.
Abstract
The development of high-yielding, bio-fortified, stress-tolerant crop cultivars is the need of the hour in the wake of increasing global food insecurity, abrupt climate change, and continuous shrinking of resources and landmass suitable for agriculture. The cytokinin group of phytohormones positively regulates seed yield by simultaneous regulation of source capacity (leaf senescence) and sink strength (grain number and size). Cytokinins also regulate root-shoot architecture by promoting shoot growth and inhibiting root growth. Cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase (CKX) are the only enzymes that catalyze the irreversible degradation of active cytokinins and thus negatively regulate the endogenous cytokinin levels. Genetic manipulation of CKX genes is the key to improve seed yield and root-shoot architecture through direct manipulation of endogenous cytokinin levels. Downregulation of CKX genes expressed in sink tissues such as inflorescence meristem and developing seeds, through reverse genetics approaches such as RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 resulted in increased yield marked by increased number and size of grains. On the other hand, root-specific expression of CKX genes resulted in decreased endogenous cytokinin levels in roots which in turn resulted in increased root growth indicated by increased root branching, root biomass, and root-shoot biomass ratio. Enhanced root growth provided enhanced tolerance to drought stress and improved micronutrient uptake efficiency. In this review, we have emphasized the role of CKX as a genetic factor determining yield, micronutrient uptake efficiency, and response to drought stress. We have summarised the efforts made to increase crop productivity and drought stress tolerance in different crop species through genetic manipulation of CKX family genes.Entities:
Keywords: bio-fortification; cytokinin homeostasis; cytokinin oxidases/dehydrogenase; root-shoot architecture; sink strength; source capacity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35923693 PMCID: PMC9340367 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.941595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Cytokinin homeostasis maintenance pathway involving in situ cytokinin biosynthesis (catalyzed by ATP-ADP IPTs and tRNA-IPTs), activation (catalyzed by specific phosphoribohydrolases encoded by LOG genes), irreversible inactivation (catalyzed by N-glucosyltransferases), reversible inactivation (catalyzed by O-glucosyltransferases), reactivation (catalyzed by β-glucosidases) and irreversible degradation (catalyzed by cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenases). Cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenases substrates are highlighted in red (Modified from Frébort et al., 2011b; Kieber and Schaller, 2014; Hluska et al., 2021b).
Features of CKX gene family members in selected plant species.
| S.No | Plant species | Number of | Range of ORF size/gene size (base pairs) | Range of encoded polypeptide length (number of amino acids) | Range of molecular weight of encoded polypeptides (KDa) | spatio-temporal expression pattern | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model plant | |||||||
| 1 |
| 7 | 1,506–1728 | 501–575 | — | Inflorescence meristem and floral meristem: |
|
| Cereal crops | |||||||
| 2 |
| 11 | 1,506–1863 | 501–620 | — |
|
|
| 3 |
| At least 11 | 699–1842 | 233–614 | — | 14 |
|
| 4 |
| 13 | 804–2066 | 267–568 | — |
|
|
| Millets | |||||||
| 5 |
| 11 | 720–1,620 | 239–539 | — | Expression of all the |
|
| Legume crops | |||||||
| 6 |
| 9 | 1,530–1,644 | 509–547 | 56.8–62.2 | Flowers; Medtr7g090920 and Medtr4g126150/MtCKX2. Leaves: Medtr4g044110. Roots and root nodules: Medtr4g126160 |
|
| Oilseed crops | |||||||
| 7 |
| 23 | 1,011–2,307 | 336–768 | 33–87 | Systematic/constitutive: |
|
| 8 |
| 17 | 1,329–1,659 | 442–552 | 49–62 | Reproductive organs: |
|
| Cash crops | |||||||
| 9 |
| 7 | 1,332–1,650 | 443–549 | — | Roots: |
|
| Fruits crops | |||||||
| 10 |
| 8 | 1,279–1961 | 424–632 | 47–70 | Inflorescence: VvCKX4 and VvCKX8 |
|
| 11 |
| 12 | 942–2,535 | 313–844 | 34–96 | Leaves: MdCKX4, MdCKX5 and, MdCKX8. Root: MdCKX1, MdCKX7, MdCKX9 and, MdCKX11/12 |
|
FIGURE 2Combined strategy for the development of high yielding, biofortified, drought-tolerant crop cultivars through alteration of endogenous cytokinin by genetic manipulation of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase family genes (Modified from (Jameson and Song, 2020b).
Genetic manipulation of CKX genes in different plant species for increasing seed yield output.
| S.No. | Name of | Source species | Target species | Type of genetic manipulation | Observed changes in yield-related parameters | Comments | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
| Natural genetic variation | Panicle branches ↑ |
| |
| grain number per panicle ↑ | |||||||
| Total grain number ↑ | |||||||
| RNAi mediated gene knockdown | Number of tillers ↑ | Delayed Leaf senescence (DLS) phenotype in transgenic lines |
| ||||
| Number of panicles ↑ | |||||||
| Grains per plant ↑ | |||||||
| TGW ↑ | |||||||
| Total grain yield per plant ↑ | |||||||
| Plant height ↑ | Reduced yield loss in transgenic lines under salinity stress compared to control lines |
| |||||
| Filled grains per panicle ↑ | |||||||
| Panicle number ↑ | |||||||
| Harvest index ↑ | |||||||
| TGW ↑ | |||||||
| Leaf senescence ↑ | |||||||
| CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene knockout | Plant height ↑ | Effect on seed yield output not reported |
| ||||
| Panicle length ↑ | |||||||
| Flower number per panicle↑ | |||||||
| EMS mutagenesis is followed by Map-based cloning | Panicle length ↑ |
| |||||
| Panicle branches ↑ | |||||||
| Filled grains per plant ↑ | |||||||
| Grain length ↑ | |||||||
| TGW ↑ | |||||||
| Seed setting rate ↑ | |||||||
| 2 |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene knockout | Tiller’s number ↑ |
|
|
| Grains per panicle ↑ | |||||||
| Grains per plant ↑ | |||||||
| Fertility rate ↓ | |||||||
| TGW ↓ | |||||||
| Leaf senescence ↓ | |||||||
| 3 |
|
|
| RNAi mediated gene knockdown | Number of spikes ↑ |
| |
| Grain yield ↑ | |||||||
| TGW ↓ | |||||||
| 4 |
|
|
| RNAi mediated gene knockdown | Spikes number ↑ |
| |
| Grains per plant ↑ | |||||||
| Overall grain yield ↑ | |||||||
| TGW ↓ | |||||||
| 5 |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene knockout | In one | Activation of strong cytokinin homeostatic response resulted in reduced expression of CK biosynthetic genes and increased CK inactivation through |
|
| Spikes number ↑ | |||||||
| In other mutant lines | |||||||
| Grain number ↓ | |||||||
| Grain weight ↓ | |||||||
| 6 |
|
|
|
| Flowers number per plant ↑ |
|
|
| Flower size ↑ | |||||||
| Gynoecium size ↑ | |||||||
| Inflorescence meristem size ↑ | |||||||
| Ovules per gynoecium ↑ | |||||||
| Siliques per plant ↑ | |||||||
| Seed number per silique ↑ | |||||||
| Overall seed yield ↑ | |||||||
|
|
|
| Inflorescence meristem size ↑ | The number of seeds per silique was equivalent to wild type because of high seed mortality |
| ||
| Floral primordia number ↑ | |||||||
| Flower number per plant ↑ | |||||||
| Gynoecium size ↑ | |||||||
| Ovules per gynoecium ↑ | |||||||
| Seed weight and number ↑ | |||||||
| TGW ↑ | |||||||
| 7 |
|
|
|
| Length of primary root ↑ | Single mutants of any other |
|
| Lateral roots number ↓ |
#’↑’ and ‘↓’ symbols respectively indicate increase and decrease in corresponding parameter.
Genetic manipulation of CKX genes for drought tolerance and enhanced micronutrient acquisition.
| S.No. | Name of | Source species | Target species | Type of genetic manipulation | Observed effects of genetic manipulation | Comments | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
| Constitutive overexpression under | Lateral and adventitious roots number ↑ | Dwarfed shoot phenotype and size of shoot apical meristem and number of flowers decreased |
|
| Length of primary root ↑ | |||||||
| Root biomass ↑ | |||||||
| 2 |
|
|
| Root specific expression under | Lateral and adventitious roots number ↑ | No obvious adverse effect on shoot attributes |
|
| Length of the primary root ↑ | |||||||
| Root biomass ↑ | |||||||
| Root: shoot biomass ratio↑ | |||||||
| Nutrient stress tolerance ↑ | |||||||
| Micronutrient content in leaves ↑ | |||||||
| Phytoremediation capacity ↑ | |||||||
| 3 |
|
|
| Constitutive overexpression under | Length of primary root ↑ | No obvious adverse effects on shoot attributes |
|
| Lateral root density ↑ | |||||||
| Adventitious roots number ↑ | |||||||
| Root biomass ↑ | |||||||
| Tolerance to nutrient limitation ↑ | |||||||
| Leaves micronutrient content ↑ | |||||||
| Phytoremediation capacity ↑ | |||||||
| 4 |
|
|
| Root specific expression utilizing | Root length ↑ | Shoot growth and development were not compromised in transgenic lines |
|
| Root surface area ↑ | |||||||
| Root biomass ↑ | |||||||
| Root-shoot biomass ratio ↑ | |||||||
| Micronutrient content in leaves and seeds ↑ | |||||||
| Tolerance to drought stress ↑ | |||||||
| 5 |
|
|
| Constitutive overexpression under | Root length ↑ |
| |
| Lateral roots number ↑ | |||||||
| Root fresh weight ↑ | |||||||
| Tolerance to salinity stress ↑ | |||||||
| 6 |
|
|
| Root specific expression under | Root length ↑ | Stem growth and development were not affected and root nodulation was not compromised in transgenic lines |
|
| Lateral roots numbers ↑ | |||||||
| Root biomass ↑ | |||||||
| Seed yield output ↑ | |||||||
| Mineral content in seeds ↑ | |||||||
| Tolerance to drought stress ↑ | |||||||
| 7 |
|
|
| Root specific expression under | Root growth ↑ | Shoot growth and development was not compromised in transgenic lines |
|
| Root-shoot biomass ratio ↑ | |||||||
| Zinc content in the root, shoot, and grain ↑ | |||||||
| Overall yield output ↑ |
# ‘↑’ and ‘↓’ symbols respectively indicate increase and decrease in the corresponding parameter