| Literature DB >> 35923624 |
Jason Phowira1,2, Sherin Bakhashab3, Anuradha Doddaballapur2, Jolanta U Weaver1,2.
Abstract
Background: Subclinical thyrotoxicosis (SCT) is defined by low or undetectable thyroid-stimulating hormones and normal thyroid hormones. The treatment of SCT is uncertain despite being associated with increased cardiovascular risk (CVR) and mortality. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) and circulating angiogenic cells (CACs) have been found to be reduced in conditions with CVR. We aimed to evaluate whether endothelial function and cEPC and CAC counts were reduced in SCT and to study the in vitro effect of triiodothyronine (T3) on proangiogenic cell (PAC) function from young healthy controls.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; cardiovascular risk; circulating angiogenic cells; endothelial progenitor cells; proangiogenic cells; subclinical thyrotoxicosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35923624 PMCID: PMC9339628 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.894093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
cEPCs at the lymphocyte gate and CAC cell numbers after culture in SCT and controls.
| Cell population (%) | Controls | SCT |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CD34+ | 2.3 (0.6–2.7) | 1.1 (0.2–2.1) | <0.001 |
| CD133+ | 1.9 (0.2–4.7) | 0.9 (0.0–2.3) | 0.01 |
| CD34+/CD133+ | 1.2 (0.4–3.2) | 0.6 (0.1–1.5) | 0.17 |
| CD133+/VEGFR-2+ | 0.6 (0.0–4.6) | 0.4 (0.0–0.7) | 0.009 |
| CD34+/VEGFR-2+ | 0.7 (0.1–4.9) | 0.3 (0.0–1.0) | 0.002 |
| CD34+/CD144+ | 0.7 (0.3–4.8) | 0.4 (0.1–1.1) | 0.002 |
| CD144+/CD133+ | 0.6 (0.2–4.4) | 0.4 (0.1–0.8) | 0.005 |
| CACs after culture (cells/15HPF)a | 34 (8–54) | 46 (17–72) | 0.07 |
HPF, high-power field. aCAC culture was done in 14 controls and 15 SCT subjects.
Antibodies are used for the enumeration of cEPCs and progenitor cells.
| Antibody | Fluorochrome | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| CD14 | PE-Cy7 | 4 μl |
| CD34 | PerCP-Cy5.5 | 5 μl |
| CD133 | APC | 5 μl |
| VEGFR2 (KDR) | PE | 5 μl |
| CD144 | FITC | 10 μl |
Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
| Gene name and accession number | Primer sequence | Product size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Forward | AACAGTGTTGACATGAAGAGCC | 148 bp |
| NM_000442.4 | Reverse | TGTAAAACAGCACGTCATCCTT | ||
| 2 |
| Forward | GCGCTTTGCTTGCTGAGTTT | 183 bp |
| NM_001773.2 | Reverse | GCCATGTTGAGACACAGGGT | ||
| 3 |
| Forward | GATCAAGTCAAGCGTGAGTCG | 114 bp |
| NM_001795.3 | Reverse | AGCCTCTCAATGGCGAACAC | ||
| 4 |
| Forward | AGCCTTGTGAAACTGAAGCAT | 154 bp |
| NM_000552.3 | Reverse | GGCCATCCCAGTCCATCTG | ||
| 5 |
| Forward | TCCCGCAGCCCCTGAGAGAC | 174 bp |
| NM_006500.2 | Reverse | CAGCGATAGCCGCCTCCTGC | ||
| 6 |
| Forward | GCGGGCCAATGGAGGGGAAC | 165 bp |
| NM_002253.2 | Reverse | AAGGCACCACGGCCAAGAGG | ||
| 7 |
| Forward | CGGCGGTGTCAACCTAGAG | 142 bp |
| NM_001174105.1 | Reverse | GCCTACCAGTAGCTGAGCAG | ||
| 8 |
| Forward | TCCAAAACACGGGGACCTATC | 133bp |
| NM_005211.3 | Reverse | TCCTCGAACACGACCACCT | ||
| 9 |
| Forward | GCTGCAGGCTGTGCTGCTA | 179 bp |
| NM_199334.3 | Reverse | CGATCATGCGGAGGTCAGT | ||
| 10 |
| Forward | AGGCTTTTGATCCCCGGGTCC | 164 bp |
| NM_000603.4 | Reverse | GTTGTAGGGGCCGGACATCTCCA | ||
| 11 |
| Forward | GCCACGCCAGCTTCGGAGAG | 184 bp |
| NM_003194.4 | Reverse | TCAGTGCCGTGGTTCGTGGC | ||
Summary of differences in parameters in two groups.
| Characteristics | Controls | SCT |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 20 | 20 | NS |
| Age (years) | 62 (10.4) | 61 (12.7) | 0.87 |
| Females | 18 | 18 | NS |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 26.6 (6.8) | 27.7 (6.2) | 0.60 |
| TSH (mU/L) | 2.32 (1.00–4.00) | 0.1 (<0.01–0.36) | <0.001 |
| FT4 (pmol/L) | 15.5 (1.8) | 16.6 (3.0) | 0.32 |
| FT3 (pmol/L) | 5.4 (0.6) | 5.6 (0.9) | 0.30 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 131.8 (18.9) | 133.7 (14.1) | 0.73 |
| Diabetes | 3 | 3 | NS |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 80.1 (8.5) | 81.2 (10.4) | 0.74 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.2 (1.1) | 4.8 (0.9) | 0.36 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.0 (0.9) | 3.0 (0.9) | 0.58 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.6 (0.5) | 1.4 (0.3) | 0.14 |
| ADMA (µmol/L) | 0.8 (0.2) | 1.0 (0.4) | 0.08 |
| FMD (%) | 6.1 (2.1) | 2.7 (2.3) | 0.005 |
NS, Non-significant.
Figure 1Differential gene expression (analyzed by RT-qPCR) in macrophages (MФ), PACs, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), all isolated from the same donor (n = 3). Gene expression of macrophage-specific markers (A) CD14 and (B) CD115. (C) Gene expression profile of endothelial cell surface marker CD31. (D) Gene expression of the hematopoietic stem cell surface marker CD34 in PACs. (E) CD144 (VE-cadherin) is expressed in endothelial cells but not in macrophages. (F) CD146 (melanoma cell adhesion molecule) cell adhesion molecule used as a marker for mature endothelial cell lineage. (G) Gene expression of endothelial cell-specific marker vWF, upregulated in mature endothelial cells but not in PACs and macrophages. (H) KDR vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), which is highly expressed in endothelial cells HUVECs and PACs. HUVECs serve as a control cell type for comparison. All data were normalized to the reference gene TATA-box-binding protein (TBP). It appears that PACs are distinctively different from macrophages given their characteristic gene signature.
Figure 2RT-PCR for TRα1 in PAC and HUVEC samples. All samples are shown positive for TRα1 mRNA expression. RT−, without reverse transcriptase. The size of DNA fragments was determined by comparison with a 100-bp DNA ladder molecular weight marker.
Figure 3Graph showing apoptosis in proangiogenic cells (PACs) after staining with Annexin V and 7-AAD. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 versus normal (1× T3) and n = 11. +con, positive control, −con, negative control.
Figure 4Effect of triiodothyronine (T3) on the expression of eNOS in PACs. Gene expression was quantified by real-time PCR and normalized to TBP (reference gene TATA-box-binding protein). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 versus normal (1× T3). +con, positive control; −con, negative control.