Literature DB >> 35923305

Cuproptosis-Related Gene - SLC31A1, FDX1 and ATP7B - Polymorphisms are Associated with Risk of Lung Cancer.

Yuhui Yun1, Yun Wang2, Ende Yang1, Xin Jing1.   

Abstract

Background: Cuproptosis is a novel copper-dependent cell death, and the copper level was increased in lung cancer patients. However, few studies evaluated the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cuproptosis-related genes and lung cancer risk.
Methods: Six SNPs of the SLC31A1, FDX1 and ATP7B genes were genotyped in a case-control cohort including 650 lung cancer cases and 650 controls using the MassARRAY platform.
Results: The minor alleles of SLC31A1-rs10981694 and FDX1-rs10488764 were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (rs10981694: OR=1.455, 95% CI: 1.201-1.763, p<0.001; rs10488764: OR=1.483, 95% CI: 1.244-1.768, p<0.001). In contrast, the minor alleles of rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were related to a decreased risk of the disease (rs9535826: OR=0.714, 95% CI: 0.608-0.838 p<0.001; rs9535828: OR=0.679, 95% CI: 0.579-0.796, p<0.001). The frequencies of rs10981694-TG/GG and rs10488764-GA/AA genotypes were significantly higher in lung cancer cases than that in controls, making them risk genotypes for the disease (p < 0.001); while the rs9535826-TG/GG and rs9535828-GA/AA genotypes were protective genotypes and associated with a reduced risk of the disease (p<0.001). Genetic model evaluation revealed that SLC31A1-rs10981694 and FDX1-rs10488764 were associated with a growing risk of lung cancer in dominant, recessive and log-additive models (p<0.001). Moreover, rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were related to a declining risk of the disease in three genetic models (p<0.001). In addition, stratification analysis showed that FDX1-rs10488764 was risk variant for lung cancer in both smokers and nonsmokers, and was associated with risk of each pathological type of lung cancer (p<0.008).
Conclusion: The results shed new light on the correlation between cuproptosis-related genes and risk of lung cancer.
© 2022 Yun et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP7B; ATPase copper transporting beta; FDX1; SLC31A1; SNPs; ferredoxin 1; lung cancer; single-nucleotide polymorphisms; solute carrier family 31 member 1

Year:  2022        PMID: 35923305      PMCID: PMC9342429          DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S372824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med        ISSN: 1178-7066


Introduction

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality in China.1,2 The early stage of lung cancer generally has no specific clinical manifestations. Almost 70% of the patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage and even with distant metastasis, and lost the best treatment chance.3 Therefore, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment is the key to reducing the mortality and improving prognosis of the disease. Sufficient research evidence has identified a number of risk factors for lung cancer, including smoking, second-hand smoke, occupational exposure to asbestos and silica, indoor and atmospheric air pollution, and so on.4,5 At the same time, with the wide application of molecular biology technology in recent years, the effect of individual gene susceptibility on the risk of lung cancer has also been verified.6,7 The genetic predisposition to lung cancer is mainly involved in the high-frequency low-penetrance mutation caused by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and low-frequency high-penetrance mutation caused by driver gene mutation.8 Therefore, in-depth development and exploration of SNPs is helpful to screen genetic high-risk group and provide them genetic counseling, and therefore contributing to the early detection and diagnosis of the lung cancer. Cuproptosis is a copper-dependent and mitochondrial respiration-related cell death, which is different from known death mechanisms such as apoptosis, pyroptosis and ferroptosis.9 The copper level was found to be increased in lung cancer patients, which could promote tumor angiogenesis, progression and metastasis.10,11 Therefore, investigation of cuproptosis-related genes in patients with lung cancer could be of great significance. A recent study has found that cuproptosis was realized by the combination of copper and lipoxylated components in the cycle of tricarboxylic acid, which led to the lipoxylated protein aggregation and subsequent iron–sulfur cluster protein loss, resulting in protein toxic stress and cell death.12 The ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) encodes a small iron–sulfur protein that transfers electrons from NADPH through ferredoxin reductase to mitochondrial cytochrome P450, which is an upstream regulator for lipoxylation and essential for copper ionophore–induced cell death.12 The solute carrier family 31 member 1 (SLC31A1) is a high-affinity copper transporter in the cell membrane, function as a homotrimer to affect the uptake of dietary copper.13 In addition, ATPase copper transporting beta (ATP7B) generally acts as a copper-transporting ATPase which exports copper out of the cells.14 Previous studies mainly focused on the role of these three genes in copper metabolism disorder (Wilson disease), and the platinum resistance in cancer patients treated with platinum drugs.15,16 However, little research evaluated the association between SNPs in the three genes and risk of lung cancer. Considering the essential role exerted by copper and cuproptosis in the onset and development of lung cancer, we selected six SNPs on SLC31A1, FDX1 and ATP7B based on the previous studies, and genotyped these polymorphisms in our case–control cohort, and assessed their association with risk of lung cancer. rs2233914 in SLC31A1 was related to better prognosis and longer survival time in lung cancer patients treated with platinum drugs.17 rs10981694 in SLC31A1 was correlated with cisplatin-related toxicity in lung cancer patients after cisplatin treatment.18 Moreover, FDX1-rs10488764-AA genotype was found to be associated with an elevated risk of IgA nephropathy.19 In addition, rs1061472, rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were investigated in the gastrointestinal toxicity of lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.20,21 None of these studies directly evaluated the associations between these SNPs and risk of lung cancer, especially in different pathological types. We hope our genotyping results could provide new clues for the role of cuproptosis-related genes in the pathogenesis of lung cancer.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A total of 650 lung cancer patients and 650 healthy controls were included in this study. All subjects were of Chinese Han ethnicity and were recruited at Tangdu Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with lung cancer by histopathological examination of biopsy specimens. The control group included randomly selected healthy individuals with no history of cancer. All participants provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tangdu Hospital and carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.

Genotyping

Six SNPs in the cuproptosis-related genes SLC31A1, FDX1 and ATP7B were chosen for genotyping based on previous association studies. The minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of these SNPs are >5% in East Asian populations according to the NCBI database. DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Primers were designed using Sequenom MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 software. SNP genotyping was performed on a Mass ARRAY iPLEX platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS package version 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The MAFs of each SNP were checked for divergence from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). HaploReg v4.1 () was used to predict the potential functions of the SNPs. Allele and genotype frequencies in the cases and controls were evaluated using Chi-square tests. The association between SNPs and lung cancer risk was evaluated using SNPstats () and expressed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with adjustments for sex, age and smoking status. All p values were Bonferroni corrected, and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.008 (0.05/6).

Results

The demographic characteristics of the participants are listed in Table 1, including sex, age, smoking status and pathological types. No significant differences were observed in the distributions of sex, age and smoking status between the case and control groups (p > 0.05). The pathological types of cases mainly included adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer, with a percentage of 46.2%, 31.2% and 18.8%, respectively. In addition, 3.8% of the patients were other types of lung cancer.
Table 1

The Demographic Characteristics of the Participants

CharacteristicsCase (n=650)Control (n=650)χ2/tp
Sex (%)0.0300.862
 Male418 (64.3)415 (63.8)
 Female232 (35.7)235 (36.2)
Age0.6880.337
 Mean ±SD56.91±10.1756.36±10.26
Smoking (%)0.0300.862
 Yes415 (63.8)412 (63.4)
 No235 (36.2)238 (36.6)
Pathological types
 Adenocarcinoma300 (46.2)
 Squamous cell carcinoma203 (31.2)
 Small cell lung cancer122 (18.8)
 Others25 (3.8)
The Demographic Characteristics of the Participants The basic information and predicted functions of candidate SNPs are described in Table 2. The predicted function according to the HaploReg database showed that rs2233914 and rs10981694 in SLC31A1, rs10488764 in FDX1, and rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were involved in promoter/enhancer histone marks, DNAse, motifs changed and eQTLhits, making it a potential function on the regulation of the gene expression. Moreover, rs1061472 in ATP7B was a missense variant, and led to Lys832Arg.
Table 2

Basic Information and Predicted Functions of Candidate SNPs

SNPGenePositionAlleleRegionPredicted Functions
rs2233914SLC31A1chr9:113221260G>A2kB Upstream VariantPromoter histone marks, DNAse, Motifs changed, eQTLhits
rs10981694SLC31A1chr9:113224129T>GIntron VariantDNAse, Motifs changed, Selected eQTLhits
rs10488764FDX1chr11:110460907G>AIntron VariantMotifs changed, eQTLhits
rs1061472ATP7Bchr13:51950352T>CMissense VariantLys832Arg
rs9535826ATP7Bchr13:51991990T>GIntron VariantEnhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, eQTLhits
rs9535828ATP7Bchr13:51999286G>AIntron VariantPromoter/Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Motifs changed, eQTLhits

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; eQTL, expression quantitative trait locus.

Basic Information and Predicted Functions of Candidate SNPs Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; eQTL, expression quantitative trait locus. The MAFs of candidate SNPs between cases and controls are presented in Table 3. All of the SNPs were consistent with HWE (p > 0.05). We compared the MAF of each SNP between the two groups and found that two SNPs were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, and other two SNPs were protective factors for the disease. The minor alleles of SLC31A1-rs10981694 and FDX1-rs10488764 were associated with a 1.455-fold and 1.483-fold increased risk of lung cancer, respectively (rs10981694: 95% CI: 1.201–1.763, p<0.001; rs10488764: 95% CI: 1.244–1.768, p<0.001). In contrast, the minor alleles of rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were related to a decreased risk of the disease (rs9535826: OR=0.714, 95% CI: 0.608–0.838 p<0.001; rs9535828: OR=0.679, 95% CI: 0.579–0.796, p<0.001).
Table 3

The MAF and HWE of Candidate SNPs Between Lung Cancer Cases and Healthy Controls

SNPGeneMAF-CaseMAF-ControlHWE pOR (95% CI)p
rs2233914SLC31A10.350.330.861.075(0.914–1.264)0.385
rs10981694SLC31A10.240.170.221.455(1.201–1.763)0.00012*
rs10488764FDX10.300.230.571.483(1.244–1.768)0.00001*
rs1061472ATP7B0.410.400.461.066(0.911–1.247)0.424
rs9535826ATP7B0.320.400.190.714(0.608–0.838)0.00004*
rs9535828ATP7B0.340.430.750.679(0.579–0.796)0.00001*

Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008.

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; MAF, minor allele frequency; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

The MAF and HWE of Candidate SNPs Between Lung Cancer Cases and Healthy Controls Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008. Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; MAF, minor allele frequency; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The genotype frequency distributions between cases and controls are shown in Table 4. The frequencies of rs10981694-TG/GG genotypes were significantly higher in lung cancer cases than that in controls, making them risk genotypes for the disease (p = 0.0005). Similarly, the rs10488764-GA/AA genotypes were also related to an elevated risk of lung cancer (p<0.0001). By contrast, the frequencies of rs9535826-TG/GG and rs9535828-GA/AA genotypes were lower in cases than in controls, which made them become protective genotypes and associated with a reduced risk of the disease (prs9535826 =0.0002, prs9535828 <0.0001).
Table 4

Genotype Frequency Distributions Between Lung Cancer Cases and Healthy Controls

ModelGenotypeControlCaseOR (95% CI)p
rs2233914GG290 (44.6%)269 (41.4%)10.47
GA287 (44.1%)308 (47.4%)1.15 (0.92–1.46)
AA73 (11.2%)73 (11.2%)1.08 (0.75–1.55)
rs10981694TT438 (67.4%)377 (58%)10.0005*
TG197 (30.3%)240 (36.9%)1.44 (1.12–1.84)
GG15 (2.3%)33 (5.1%)2.57 (1.37–4.82)
rs10488764GG392 (60.3%)318 (48.9%)1<0.0001*
GA222 (34.1%)271 (41.7%)1.52 (1.21–1.92)
AA36 (5.5%)61 (9.4%)2.15 (1.39–3.34)
rs1061472TT242 (37.2%)226 (34.8%)10.67
TC302 (46.5%)314 (48.3%)1.11 (0.87–1.42)
CC106 (16.3%)110 (16.9%)1.10 (0.80–1.53)
rs9535826TT224 (34.5%)291 (44.8%)10.0002*
TG329 (50.6%)296 (45.5%)0.69 (0.55–0.88)
GG97 (14.9%)63 (9.7%)0.50 (0.35–0.72)
rs9535828GG207 (31.9%)285 (43.9%)1<0.0001*
GA324 (49.9%)287 (44.1%)0.49 (0.37–0.64)
AA119 (18.3%)78 (12%)0.30 (0.20–0.45)

Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008.

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Genotype Frequency Distributions Between Lung Cancer Cases and Healthy Controls Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008. Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. The effect of SNPs on the risk of lung cancer was further evaluated using three genetic models (Table 5). The results were consistent with allelic and genotypic results. The SLC31A1-rs10981694 and FDX1-rs10488764 were associated with a growing risk of lung cancer in dominant, recessive and log-additive models (rs10981694: p dominant =0.0005, p recessive =0.0085, p log-additive =0.0001; rs10488764: p dominant <0.0001, p recessive =0.006, p log-additive <0.0001). In addition, rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were related to a declining risk of the disease in three genetic models (rs9535826: p dominant =0.0002, p recessive =0.0043, p log-additive <0.0001; rs9535828: p dominant <0.0001, p recessive =0.0002, p log-additive <0.0001).
Table 5

Association Between SNPs and Risk of Lung Cancer in Genetic Models

SNPModelGenotypeControlCaseOR (95% CI)p
rs2233914DominantGG290 (44.6%)269 (41.4%)10.250
GA-AA360 (55.4%)381 (58.6%)1.14 (0.91–1.42)
RecessiveGG-GA577 (88.8%)577 (88.8%)11.000
AA73 (11.2%)73 (11.2%)1.00 (0.71–1.41)
Log-additive1.08 (0.91–1.27)0.390
rs10981694DominantTT438 (67.4%)377 (58%)10.0005*
TG-GG212 (32.6%)273 (42%)1.52 (1.20–1.93)
RecessiveTT-TG635 (97.7%)617 (94.9%)10.0085*
GG15 (2.3%)33 (5.1%)2.24 (1.20–4.16)
Log-additive1.50 (1.22–1.84)0.0001*
rs10488764DominantGG392 (60.3%)318 (48.9%)1<0.0001*
GA-AA258 (39.7%)332 (51.1%)1.61 (1.29–2.01)
RecessiveGG-GA614 (94.5%)589 (90.6%)10.006*
AA36 (5.5%)61 (9.4%)1.81 (1.18–2.78)
Log-additive1.49 (1.25–1.78)<0.0001*
rs1061472DominantTT242 (37.2%)226 (34.8%)10.370
TC-CC408 (62.8%)424 (65.2%)1.11 (0.88–1.39)
RecessiveTT-TC544 (83.7%)540 (83.1%)10.790
CC106 (16.3%)110 (16.9%)1.04 (0.78–1.39)
Log-additive1.06 (0.91–1.24)0.450
rs9535826DominantTT224 (34.5%)291 (44.8%)10.0002*
TG-GG426 (65.5%)359 (55.2%)0.65 (0.52–0.81)
RecessiveTT-TG553 (85.1%)587 (90.3%)10.0043*
GG97 (14.9%)63 (9.7%)0.61 (0.44–0.86)
Log-additive0.70 (0.60–0.83)<0.0001*
rs9535828DominantGG207 (31.9%)285 (43.9%)1<0.0001*
GA-AA443 (68.2%)365 (56.1%)0.46 (0.35–0.60)
RecessiveGG-GA531 (81.7%)572 (88%)10.0002*
AA119 (18.3%)78 (12%)0.53 (0.38–0.74)
Log-additive0.54 (0.44–0.65)<0.0001*

Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008.

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Association Between SNPs and Risk of Lung Cancer in Genetic Models Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008. Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Considering that smoking could be a potential risk factor and the different pathogenesis in various pathological types of lung cancer, stratification analysis according to smoking status and different pathological types were further performed (Tables 6 and 7). The FDX1-rs10488764 remained risk variant for lung cancer in both smokers and nonsmokers, and was associated with risk of each pathological type of lung cancer (p<0.008). In addition, the rs9535828 in ATP7B was still a protective factor for the disease whether smoking or not (p<0.008). However, SLC31A1-rs10981694 was only associated with squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer (p<0.008), and rs9535826 was not a protective variant for the risk of squamous cell carcinoma, which may be due to the limited sample size or the different pathogenesis.
Table 6

Association Between rs10981694, rs10488764, rs9535826 and rs9535828 and Risk of Lung Cancer in Smokers and Nonsmokers

SNPModelGenotypeSmokersNonsmokers
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
rs10981694DominantTT10.05710.0016*
TG-GG1.45 (1.02–2.08)1.86 (1.26–2.73)
RecessiveTT-TG10.04010.048
GG1.99 (0.92–4.31)2.72 (0.95–7.77)
Log-additive1.42 (1.06–1.90)0.0181.79 (1.27–2.52)0.0006*
rs10488764DominantGG10.01010.0034*
GA-AA1.61 (1.21–2.14)1.75 (1.20–2.55)
RecessiveGG-GA10.24010.0039*
AA1.39 (0.80–2.41)2.68 (1.33–5.40)
Log-additive1.44 (1.14–1.81)0.002*1.66 (1.24–2.21)0.0005*
rs9535826DominantTT10.02810.0008*
TG-GG0.73 (0.55–0.97)0.52 (0.36–0.77)
RecessiveTT-TG10.06410.027
GG0.66 (0.43–1.03)0.55 (0.32–0.94)
Log-additive0.76 (0.62–0.94)0.0120.61 (0.47–0.81)0.0004*
rs9535828DominantGG1<0.0001*10.100
GA-AA0.27 (0.18–0.40)0.72 (0.49–1.06)
RecessiveGG-GA10.004*10.0087*
AA0.50 (0.32–0.81)0.53 (0.32–0.86)
Log-additive0.32 (0.24–0.45)<0.00010.72 (0.55–0.93)0.011

Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008.

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 7

Association Between rs10981694, rs10488764, rs9535826 and rs9535828 and Risk of Different Pathological Types of Lung Cancer

SNPModelGenotypeAdenocarcinomaSquamous Cell CarcinomaSmall Cell Lung Cancer
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
rs10981694DominantTT10.04810.0001*10.024
TG-GG1.35 (1.00–1.81)2.06 (1.44–2.96)1.67 (1.07–2.59)
RecessiveTT-TG10.02710.0710.015
GG2.31 (1.11–4.83)2.21 (0.96–5.09)3.26 (1.34–7.93)
Log-additive1.37 (1.07–1.77)0.0141.86 (1.38–2.53)0.0001*1.70 (1.18–2.46)0.005*
rs10488764DominantGG10.0021*10.009810.0006*
GA-AA1.55 (1.17–2.05)1.53 (1.11–2.12)2.00 (1.34–2.96)
RecessiveGG-GA10.2210.0006*10.058
AA1.42 (0.82–2.45)2.70 (1.56–4.68)1.97 (1.01–3.85)
Log-additive1.40 (1.12–1.75)0.003*1.56 (1.22–2.00)0.0005*1.72 (1.27–2.31)0.0005*
rs9535826DominantTT10.0013*10.1810.0048*
TG-GG0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.80 (0.57–1.11)0.56 (0.38–0.84)
RecessiveTT-TG10.006*10.2910.015
GG0.54 (0.34–0.85)0.77 (0.47–1.26)0.44 (0.22–0.91)
Log-additive0.67 (0.54–0.83)0.0002*0.83 (0.65–1.06)0.130.60 (0.44–0.82)0.0011*
rs9535828DominantGG1<0.0001*10.0022*1<0.0001*
GA-AA0.46 (0.33–0.64)0.52 (0.34–0.79)0.36 (0.22–0.59)
RecessiveGG-GA10.0041*10.0035*10.049
AA0.55 (0.36–0.84)0.48 (0.28–0.80)0.53 (0.27–1.03)
Log-additive0.55 (0.43–0.71)<0.0001*0.52 (0.38–0.72)<0.0001*0.46 (0.31–0.67)<0.0001*

Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008.

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Association Between rs10981694, rs10488764, rs9535826 and rs9535828 and Risk of Lung Cancer in Smokers and Nonsmokers Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008. Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Association Between rs10981694, rs10488764, rs9535826 and rs9535828 and Risk of Different Pathological Types of Lung Cancer Note: *Bonferroni multiple adjustment was applied, with p ≤ 0.008. Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

Copper and cuproptosis is closely related to the genesis, severity, and progression of cancer, making it a vulnerable point to target for cancer prevention and treatment.22 In this study, we focused on cuproptosis-related gene polymorphisms in lung cancer patients and healthy controls, and identified two risk variants (SLC31A1-rs10981694 and FDX1-rs10488764) and two protective mutations (rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B) for lung cancer. The results broadened our knowledge on the effects of cuproptosis-related gene polymorphisms on the risk of lung cancer and provided new clues for the screening of high-risk population and early detection and diagnosis of the disease. SLC31A1 encodes the copper transporter 1 (CTR1) that belongs to the copper transporter family, playing an essential role in regulating the copper homeostasis and affecting the cisplatin and carboplatin uptake in human cells.23,24 Barresi et al reported that the mRNA level of SLC31A1 was significantly increased in colorectal carcinoma samples, which was accompanied by a series of elevated expression of copper metabolism-related genes, such as ATP7A, SCO1 and COX11.25 Moreover, the high levels of SLC31A1 were successively found in prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer, which drew researchers’ attention on the role of SLC31A1 in cancer development.26–28 Yu et al found that inhibition of SLC31A1 and blockage of copper absorption caused an elevated mitochondrial ROS level and reduced ATP level in pancreatic cancer cells, and led to an increased autophagy to resist the cell death.28 In addition, Wu et al demonstrated that ZNF711 could recruit the JHDM2A to the promoter and SLC31A1 and activate its expression, resulting in an enhancement of cisplatin uptake in epithelial ovarian cancer.29 As for the polymorphisms in SLC31A1, Fujita et al identified that rs10981694 A>C was correlated with a poorer prognosis in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.16 Wang et al revealed that SLC31A1 rs2233914 has an interaction with ABCG2 rs1871744, which are associated with poor response in lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.30 In this study, we genotyped rs10981694 and rs2233914 polymorphisms in our case–control cohort, and found that SLC31A1-rs10981694 is an independent risk variant for each pathological type of lung cancer, suggesting its important role in the onset of the disease in addition to the cisplatin resistance. Considering the function of SLC31A1 in copper transport and cuproptosis, we supposed that rs10981694 may alter the normal function of SLC31A1 and the cuproptosis in patients with lung cancer. However, the detailed mechanisms need to be explored in the further studies. FDX1 and FDX2 are two homologous ferredoxins in the human mitochondria. Previous studies on the function of these two ferredoxins has been controversial. Sheftel et al reported that FDX1 and FDX2 had distinct roles: FDX1 only participated in the biosynthesis of steroid hormones, whereas FDX2 contributed to the production of heme A and Fe−S cluster formation.31 Subsequently, Shi et al found that knock-out of FDX1 decreased the enzyme activity of iron–sulfur cluster and affected iron homeostasis, and demonstrated that both FDX1 and FDX2 were closely involved in the formation of Fe−S cluster.32 Cai et al further proved the important function of FDX1 in the biosynthesis process of Fe−S cluster using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.33 More recently, Tsvetkov identified FDX1 could rescue the cell death induced by elesclomol using CRISPR-Cas9 screening, and further revealed that FDX1 specifically promoted the copper-dependent cell death.34 Specifically, FDX1 could target the six important components in lipoic acid pathway, including LIPT1, LIAS, DLD, DLAT, PDHA1 and PHDB; and it is also a key mediator of protein lipoylation, making it an important promoting factor for cuproptosis.12 However, little information is found about the correlation between FDX1 and lung cancer. Zhang et al reported that FDX1 was not directly related to cell growth or apoptosis, but it did promote the ATP production and take part in the metabolism of glucose, fatty acid and amino acid in lung adenocarcinoma.35 In the present study, we determined that FDX1-rs10488764 was a risk polymorphism for lung cancer in both smokers and nonsmokers, and three different pathological types subgroups, which shed new light on the role of FDX1 on the development of the disease. ATP7B is an essential copper-transporting protein that regulates copper transportation from cytosol to Golgi apparatus or lysosomes to maintain copper homeostasis.36 Generally, ATP7B transfers copper to the Golgi network, whereas the high copper level alters the localization of ATP7B to lysosomes, resulting in a release of copper by vesicle transport.37 Yang et al reported that the expression of ATP7B was significantly correlated with tumor cell differentiation in lung cancer.38 Moreover, Li et al demonstrated that ATP7B expression was closely linked to the overall survival and treatment response in lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.39 As for polymorphisms in ATP7B, most of studies focused on its association with chemotherapeutic drug response in patients with cancer. In the early stage, Fukushima-Uesaka et al detected a total of 61 genetic variations on ATP7B in Japanese cancer patients and provided reference allele frequencies for other similar studies on Asian populations.40 Subsequently, Schmid et al identified that loss of heterozygosity of the ATP7B exhibited a better response in patients with bladder cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy.41 In addition, Li et al genotyped ATP7B rs1061472 and rs9535826 polymorphisms on ATP7B in 427 lung cancer patients and reported that individuals with rs9535826-GG genotype exhibited a lower gastrointestinal toxicity after platinum-based chemotherapy.20 We genotyped rs1061472, rs9535826 and rs9535828 on ATP7B in our case–control cohort and found that rs9535826 and rs9535828 were independent protective factors the lung cancer. Considering the overload copper status in cancer, we supposed that rs9535826 and rs9535828 polymorphisms may be essential for maintain the normal function of ATP7B and copper homeostasis. Recently, the latest association studies on lung cancer have provided us some novel research directions. Ji et al have reported that rs1948915 in lncRNA CCAT1 was correlated with risk of lung adenocarcinoma.42 Liu et al have found that EGFL7/miR-126 polymorphism rs2297538 was associated with the risk of non-small cell lung cancer.43 In addition, Yu et al have identified a novel regQTL-SNP, rs3768617, may have effects on lung cancer risk by influencing the expression of miRNA-548b-3p and LAMC1.44 These studies remind us that we could also explore the association between SNPs in cuproptosis-related lncRNA, miRNA and lung cancer risk, and might identify some novel regQTL-SNP related to lung cancer risk in further studies. There are some intrinsic in our study. Firstly, the subjects were enrolled in a very long time period, we did not detect the copper level of the subjects from the very beginning; therefore, the interaction between polymorphisms in the three genes and the copper level could not be evaluated. Secondly, there are many other potential risk factors for lung cancer, such as alcohol consumption, occupational exposure and air pollution. We did not evaluate the interaction between these factors and candidate SNPs due to the limited information. Thirdly, the present association study could only provide clues for the association between polymorphisms in SLC31A1, FDX1 and ATP7B and risk of lung cancer, but not fully reveal the underlying mechanism. The detailed molecular mechanism needs to be confirmed in tissue samples, cell experiments and animal models. In conclusion, we found that SLC31A1-rs10981694 and FDX1-rs10488764 were associated with an elevated risk of lung cancer, while rs9535826 and rs9535828 in ATP7B were related to a declining risk of the disease. The results shed new light on the correlation between cuproptosis-related genes and risk of lung cancer, and provided novel reference information for the early detection and diagnosis of the disease.
  44 in total

1.  Genetic polymorphisms of copper- and platinum drug-efflux transporters ATP7A and ATP7B in Japanese cancer patients.

Authors:  Hiromi Fukushima-Uesaka; Yoshiro Saito; Keiko Maekawa; Kouichi Kurose; Emiko Sugiyama; Noriko Katori; Nahoko Kaniwa; Ryuichi Hasegawa; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Takako Eguchi-Nakajima; Ken Kato; Yasuhide Yamada; Yasuhiro Shimada; Teruhiko Yoshida; Noboru Yamamoto; Hiroshi Nokihara; Hideo Kunitoh; Yuichiro Ohe; Tomohide Tamura; Takashi Ura; Miyuki Saito; Kei Muro; Toshihiko Doi; Nozomu Fuse; Takayuki Yoshino; Atsushi Ohtsu; Nagahiro Saijo; Yasuhiro Matsumura; Haruhiro Okuda; Jun-ichi Sawada
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.614

2.  Genetic polymorphisms in TNFSF13 and FDX1 are associated with IgA nephropathy in the Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Dan Niu; Ya Gao; Liyi Xie; Jiping Sun; Wanhong Lu; Gang Jin; Yaning Hao; Yali Zhang; Aiping Yin; Yingzhou Geng; Wenjing Zhang; Cuiping Chen; Shengbin Li
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 3.  Risk factors of Lung Cancer in nonsmoker.

Authors:  Nahid Akhtar; Jeena Gupta Bansal
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath; Michele L Cote
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Both human ferredoxins 1 and 2 and ferredoxin reductase are important for iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis.

Authors:  Yanbo Shi; Manik Ghosh; Gennadiy Kovtunovych; Daniel R Crooks; Tracey A Rouault
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-11-10

Review 6.  Hepatic copper-transporting ATPase ATP7B: function and inactivation at the molecular and cellular level.

Authors:  Mee Y Bartee; Svetlana Lutsenko
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.949

7.  Prediction of copper transport protein 1 (CTR1) genotype on severe cisplatin induced toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Authors:  Xiaojing Xu; Huayi Ren; Boting Zhou; Yingchun Zhao; Ruixia Yuan; Rui Ma; Honghao Zhou; Zhaoqian Liu
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Wilson disease protein ATP7B utilizes lysosomal exocytosis to maintain copper homeostasis.

Authors:  Elena V Polishchuk; Mafalda Concilli; Simona Iacobacci; Giancarlo Chesi; Nunzia Pastore; Pasquale Piccolo; Simona Paladino; Daniela Baldantoni; Sven C D van IJzendoorn; Jefferson Chan; Christopher J Chang; Angela Amoresano; Francesca Pane; Piero Pucci; Antonietta Tarallo; Giancarlo Parenti; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Carmine Settembre; Andrea Ballabio; Roman S Polishchuk
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 9.  Copper metabolism as a unique vulnerability in cancer.

Authors:  Vinit C Shanbhag; Nikita Gudekar; Kimberly Jasmer; Christos Papageorgiou; Kamal Singh; Michael J Petris
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Epidemiology of lung cancer in China.

Authors:  Maomao Cao; Wanqing Chen
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterization of the functional effects of ferredoxin 1 as a cuproptosis biomarker in cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Zihan Dai; Jincheng Liu; Zhenqian Sun; Na Li; Guangjun Jiao; Hongxin Cao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis in immune response and prognosis of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Mingzhe Li; Qiang Song; Yunfeng Bai; Feng Hua; Tao Wu; Jun Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.