| Literature DB >> 35923258 |
Haoran Chen1,2, Yu-Cheng Liu1, Zhiming Zhang1, Moxin Li1, Lidong Du1, Pei-Chun Wu1, Wai-How Chong1, Fuzeng Ren2, Weiming Zheng3, Tzu-Ming Liu1,4.
Abstract
Remarkable advancement has been made in the application of nanoparticles (NPs) for cancer therapy. Although NPs have been favorably delivered into tumors by taking advantage of the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect, several physiological barriers present within tumors tend to restrict the diffusion of NPs. To overcome this, one of the strategies is to design NPs that can reach lower size limits to improve tumor penetration without being rapidly cleared out by the body. Several attempts have been made to achieve this, such as selecting appropriate nanocarriers and modifying surface properties. While many studies focus on the optimal design of NPs, the influence of mouse strains on the effectiveness of NPs remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether the vascular permeability of NPs near the lower size limit differs among mouse strains. We found that the vessel permeability of dextran NPs was size-dependent and dextran NPs with a size below 15 nm exhibited leakage from postcapillary venules in all strains. Most importantly, the leakage rate of 8-nm fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran was significantly higher in the BALB/c mouse strain than in other strains. This strain dependence was not observed in slightly positive TRITC-dextran with comparable sizes. Our results indicate that the influence on mouse strains needs to be taken into account for the evaluation of NPs near the lower size limit.Entities:
Keywords: charge-dependent; drug delivery; lower size limit; mouse strain–dependent; nanoparticles; two-photon microscopy; vascular permeability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35923258 PMCID: PMC9339680 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.944556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1Vessel visualization and vascular permeability quantification. (A) Representative images of two-photon fluorescence angiography of 40 kDa TRITC-dextran tail-vein injected in ICR mice. The image acquisition time points were at 8.6, 41.3, and 127.1 s post injection, which showed the overall dextran perfusion in the vessel (blue color) and in the tissue (yellow color). (B) Representative images of two-photon fluorescence angiography of 150 kDa FITC-dextran injected in ICR mice. The series of images were taken at 15.5 s before flush, right after flush in, and 53.6 s after flush in. Scale bars: 50 μm. (C,D) The change of fluorescence intensity in a pair of the vessel point and the nearby tissue point measured (C) in the leaky region of (A) and (D) in the non-leaky region of (B), respectively.
Molecular weight corresponding to diameter of nanoparticles.
| Molecular weight | 40 kDa (nm) | 70 kDa (nm) | 150 kDa (nm) | 2,000 kDa (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | 8.64 | 10.17 | 15.87 | 53.24 |
Statistical analysis of initial permeability rate of each BALB/c mouse injected with 40 kDa FITC-dextran.
| Mouse ID | Valid data number | Mean | Standard error of mean | Coefficient of variation | Lower 95% confidence interval of mean | Upper 95% confidence interval of mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 0.00464 | 0.00041 | 0.48352 | 0.00381 | 0.00548 |
| 2 | 28 | 0.00211 | 0.00028 | 0.70465 | 0.00153 | 0.00269 |
| 3 | 29 | 0.00352 | 0.00025 | 0.38281 | 0.00301 | 0.00403 |
| 4 | 30 | 0.00376 | 0.00031 | 0.44559 | 0.00313 | 0.00439 |
| 5 | 30 | 0.00323 | 0.00031 | 0.52544 | 0.00259 | 0.00386 |
FIGURE 2(A) Representative images of two-photon fluorescence angiography of 40 kDa FITC-dextran injected in three strains of mice, respectively. The series of images were taken at 15.4–20.7 s before injection (left column), right after dextran flush in (middle column) and at 57.2–86.6 s post injection (right column). Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) The initial permeability rate of FITC-dextran at 40, 70, and 150 kDa in three mouse strains of BALB/c, C2J, and ICR, respectively. The valid measurement data of each mouse within the same group were merged together to generate the box chart. The data are presented as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. ***p < 0.005.
FIGURE 3(A) Comparison of the initial permeability rates of 40 kDa FITC-dextran between BALB/c (B1-B5), C2J (C1-C5), and ICR (I1-I4) mouse models. Significant differences were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (B) Comparison of the initial permeability rates of 40 kDa TRITC-dextran between BALB/c and C2J mouse models. The valid measurement data of each mouse within the same group were merged together to generate the box chart. The data are presented as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.
Statistical analysis of difference in initial permeability rates between BALB/c and C2J mice post 40 kDa FITC-dextran injection by Mann–Whitney U test.
| Group | BALB/c vs. C2J |
|---|---|
| Number | 5 |
| Sum rank of BALB/c | 38 |
| Sum rank of C2J | 17 |
| U value | 2 |
| Critical value of U at | 4 |
| One- or two-tailed hypothesis | One-tailed |
|
| 0.0159 |
FIGURE 4(A) Comparison of the initial permeability rates between FITC-dextran and TRITC-dextran at 40, 70, and 150 kDa in the C2J mouse strain (B) Comparison of initial permeability rates between 40 kDa FITC-dextran and 40 kDa TRITC-dextran in the BALB/c mouse strain. The valid measurement data of each mouse within the same group were merged together to generate the box chart. The data are presented as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005.