| Literature DB >> 35923196 |
Kaustubh Bora1, Bhupen Barman2, Star Pala3, Ananya Das4, Goter Doke5, Amar Tripura6.
Abstract
Iron-folic acid (IFA) and calcium supplementation are nutritional interventions recommended prophylactically (against maternal anemia and preeclampsia, respectively) to all antenatal mothers in India under basic antenatal care (ANC) services. Using Health Management Information System data (reporting period: 2018-19 to 2020-21), we mapped the coverage of antenatal IFA and calcium distribution across the remote northeastern region of India relative to the number of pregnant women (PW) who registered for ANC, disaggregated by states and districts. Variations in coverage were also investigated by subgroups based on contextual attributes, viz., physiography (hilly/ plateau/ plain), socioeconomic development ("aspirational"/ "non-aspirational") and proportion of early ANC visits (low/ medium/ high). Full course of antenatal IFA and calcium supplements were received by 79.36 (95% CI: 79.31-79.40) and 61.26 (95% CI: 61.21-61.32) PW per 100 ANC registered women, respectively. There was widespread heterogeneity in outreach, with calcium coverage generally trailing behind IFA coverage. Among states, coverage of the two interventions (per 100 ANC registered women) was highest in Assam (97.06 and 78.11 PW, respectively) and lowest in Nagaland (24.87 and 16.77 PW, respectively). At the district-level, the two interventions failed to reach even 50 PW per 100 ANC registered women in 32 (out of 115) districts. The coverage tended to be inferior in districts that were hilly, "non-aspirational" and had low proportion of early ANC visits. The granular information provided by our findings will facilitate monitoring, root cause analyses, microplanning, informed resource allocation and tailoring of locally appropriate solutions to achieve targeted coverage improvements.Entities:
Keywords: anemia; calcium; folic acid; iron; micronutrient; preeclampsia; pregnancy; supplement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35923196 PMCID: PMC9339897 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.894245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Coverage of iron-folic acid tablet distribution among pregnant women in the states of northeast India.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| India (national level) | 84.78 (84.77–84.79) | 89.22 (89.21–89.23) | 90.47 (90.46–90.48) | 88.13 (88.12–88.13) |
| All northeastern states | 77.32 (77.26–77.40) | 79.70 (79.62–79.78) | 81.23 (81.15–81.30) | 79.36 (79.31–79.40) |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 44.87 (44.33–45.42) | 58.11 (57.55–58.66) | 54.33 (53.78–54.88) | 52.31 (51.99–52.63) |
| Assam | 97.57 (97.53–97.60) | 98.34 (98.31–98.37) | 95.20 (95.15–95.25) | 97.06 (97.04–97.09) |
| Manipur | 38.77 (38.37–39.17) | 49.30 (48.88–49.72) | 42.62 (42.17–43.08) | 43.56 (43.32–43.81) |
| Meghalaya | 33.50 (33.25–33.75) | 42.60 (42.34–42.86) | 58.55 (58.26–58.84) | 43.84 (43.68–43.99) |
| Mizoram | 39.42 (38.79–40.06) | 50.72 (50.08–51.36) | 74.30 (73.72–74.86) | 54.76 (54.39–55.13) |
| Nagaland | 15.57 (15.21–15.94) | 22.98 (22.57–23.40) | 37.68 (37.16–38.20) | 24.87 (24.62–25.13) |
| Sikkim | 69.68 (68.75–70.60) | 63.79 (62.81–64.76) | 81.45 (80.57–82.29) | 71.10 (70.55–71.64) |
| Tripura | 56.49 (56.13–56.86) | 46.75 (46.37–47.13) | 42.33 (41.95–42.71) | 48.83 (48.61–49.05) |
ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval.
Coverage of iron-folic acid tablet distribution among pregnant women in the states of northeast India.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| India (national level) | 57.28 (57.27–57.30) | 72.02 (72.06–72.09) | 80.63 (80.62–80.65) | 69.86 (69.85–69.87) |
| All northeastern states | 46.31 (46.22–46.41) | 71.29 (71.20–71.37) | 66.94 (66.84–67.03) | 61.26 (61.21–61.32) |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 29.21 (28.72–29.71) | 52.59 (52.02–53.15) | 29.51 (29.01–30.02) | 36.82 (36.51–37.13) |
| Assam | 60.38 (60.27–60.50) | 90.79 (90.72–90.86) | 83.79 (83.70–83.88) | 78.11 (78.06–78.17) |
| Manipur | 19.79 (19.47–20.12) | 21.62 (21.28–21.97) | 27.52 (27.11–27.93) | 22.66 (22.45–22.87) |
| Meghalaya | 22.32 (22.10–22.54) | 37.41 (37.16–37.67) | 31.39 (31.12–31.66) | 30.26 (30.12–30.40) |
| Mizoram | 20.05 (19.53–20.57) | 43.81 (43.17–44.44) | 48.78 (48.13–49.43) | 37.62 (37.26–37.99) |
| Nagaland | 6.44 (6.20–6.69) | 15.65 (15.29–16.01) | 29.82 (29.33–30.32) | 16.77 (16.55–16.99) |
| Sikkim | 61.93 (60.49–62.45) | 66.39 (65.43–67.34) | 81.50 (80.63–82.34) | 69.28 (68.73–69.83) |
| Tripura | 12.22 (11.98–12.46) | 34.69 (34.33–35.05) | 25.39 (25.06–25.73) | 23.78 (23.59–23.96) |
ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1Choropleth maps showing the distribution of antenatal micronutrient supplements across northeast India in 2020–21. (A) Iron-folic acid coverage by districts; (B) Calcium coverage by districts; (C) Iron-folic acid coverage by states; and (D) Calcium coverage by states.
Variations in antenatal iron-folic acid and calcium coverage distribution among districts belonging to different states of northeast India, 2020–21.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Arunachal Pradesh | 24 | 65.0 (16.6–99.8) | 64.6 (24.7) | 38.2% | 31.5 (8.3–99.8) | 40.9 (28.7) | 70.1% |
| Assam | 32 | 95.8 (84.7–99.9) | 94.7 (4.7) | 5.0% | 86.5 (30.2–97.0) | 81.5 (15.9) | 19.5% |
| Manipur | 14 | 43.8 (8.7–91.0) | 43.6 (18.0) | 41.3% | 21.3 (2.7–63.6) | 25.0 (17.3) | 68.9% |
| Meghalaya | 11 | 66.8 (44.2–86.5) | 64.8 (16.5) | 25.4% | 33.0 (12.9–58.2) | 35.2 (15.7) | 44.4% |
| Mizoram | 11 | 68.2 (54.8–95.6) | 70.9 (13.6) | 19.2% | 39.0 (27.7–71.3) | 44.6 (14.0) | 31.5% |
| Nagaland | 11 | 41.9 (20.7–68.4) | 44.0 (13.3) | 30.3% | 37.4 (17.6–66.1) | 37.4 (13.6) | 36.5% |
| Sikkim | 4 | 84.0 (77.9–86.2) | 83.0 (3.7) | 4.5% | 85.2 (77.1–85.4) | 83.2 (4.1) | 4.9% |
| Tripura | 8 | 38.8 (24.9–64.3) | 43.7 (15.3) | 35.0% | 25.1 (10.9–52.2) | 27.4 (15.6) | 57.0% |
ANC, antenatal care; SD, standard deviation; CV, co-efficient of variation.
Differential patterns in antenatal iron-folic acid coverage across districts of northeast India by contextual factors, 2020–21.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Hilly/mountainous | 52.04 (51.79–52.29) | −42.54% | 0.57 |
| Plateau | 65.45 (65.19–66.70) | −27.74% | 0.72 |
| Plain | 90.57 (90.50–90.64) | Reference | Reference |
|
| |||
| Aspirational districts | 90.98 (90.86–91.10) | Reference | Reference |
| Other districts | 78.16 (78.07–78.26) | −14.09% | 0.85 |
|
| |||
| Low (27.1 to 54.8%) | 81.51 (81.36–81.65) | Reference | Reference |
| Medium (54.9 to 65.8%) | 81.21 (81.07–81.34) | −0.40% | 1.00 |
| High (65.9 to 90.6%) | 81.35 (81.22–81.49) | −0.20% | 1.00 |
ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; CD, coverage difference; CR, coverage ratio.
While comparing the coverage across different sub-groups within a grouping, the sub-group with the highest coverage was treated as reference.
Differential patterns in antenatal calcium coverage across districts of northeast India by contextual factors, 2020–21.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Hilly/mountainous | 36.28 (36.04–36.52) | −53.72% | 0.46 |
| Plateau | 41.08 (40.81–41.34) | −47.60% | 0.52 |
| Plain | 78.40 (78.30–78.49) | Reference | Reference |
|
| |||
| Aspirational districts | 80.36 (80.19–80.53) | Reference | Reference |
| Other districts | 62.67 (62.56–62.78) | −22.01% | 0.78 |
|
| |||
| Low (27.1 to 54.8%) | 62.01 (61.83–62.19) | −13.19% | 0.87 |
| Medium (54.9 to 65.8%) | 66.80 (66.65–66.96) | −6.48% | 0.94 |
| High (65.9 to 90.6%) | 71.43 (71.28–71.59) | Reference | Reference |
ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; CD, coverage difference; CR, coverage ratio.
While comparing the coverage across different sub-groups within a grouping, the sub-group with the highest coverage was treated as reference.