Literature DB >> 35921532

Potent Neutralizing Activity of Polyclonal Equine Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern.

Joanna Luczkowiak1, Pauline Radreau2, Ludovic Nguyen2, Nuria Labiod1, Fátima Lasala1, Francisco Veas3,4, Cécile Hélène Herbreteau2, Rafael Delgado1,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Several monoclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (mAbs) have received emergency authorization for COVID-19 treatment. However, most of these mAbs are not active against the highly mutated Omicron SARS-CoV-2 subvariants. We have tested a polyclonal approach of equine anti-SARS-CoV-2 F(ab')2 antibodies that achieved a high level of neutralizing potency against all SARS-CoV-2 VoCs tested including Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12 and BA.4/5. A repertoire of antibodies targeting conserved epitopes in different regions of the spike protein could plausibly account for this remarkable breadth of neutralization. These results warrant the clinical investigation of equine polyclonal F(ab')2 antibodies as a novel therapeutic strategy against COVID-19.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Neutralizing antibodies; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; Variants of Concern

Year:  2022        PMID: 35921532      PMCID: PMC9384681          DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   7.759


The rapid widespread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused 550 million confirmed cases and >6 million deaths by July 2022, along with significant socioeconomic disruptions. This active transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in the emergence of several variants of concern (VoC) that have apparently been selected by a higher transmissibility and have challenged the public health control strategies to contain the pandemic. The recent appearance of the Omicron VoC, which combines an augmented transmission capability along with evasion from neutralization by convalescent or vaccinee serum, is a further hurdle for pandemic control [1]. A number of potent monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have received emergency authorization from European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration for COVID-19 treatment in selected patients. However, most of these mAbs have been found to be inefficacious against the highly mutated Omicron variant. The emergence of Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12, BA.4 and BA.5, with different sensitivity to mAbs, has complicated the scenario of immune therapeutics [2]. Considering the experience on the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 into a diversity of variants, a polyclonal approach in which many potential epitopes within the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein are targeted could have great advantages in terms of breadth to neutralize current and potential future SARS-CoV-2 VoC. On the other hand, heterologous immunoglobulins have been used for more than a century in human therapy, especially for envenomation, rabies, and tetanus [3]. Specific polyclonal immunoglobulins are indeed a well-known and effective therapeutic alternative that can be used quickly to respond against major health risks such as pandemics, emerging diseases, and bioterrorism. FBR-002 is composed of purified polyclonal equine fragments F(ab’)2 recognizing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. FBR-002 represents a serious therapy candidate for treating patients hospitalized with COVID-19 because of (1) its polyclonality, which allows targeting of multiple epitopes of the spike protein, limiting the risk of viral escape if new strains emerge, and (2) its highly purifying process and lack of Fc portion, minimizing the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement, immunogenicity, and overall adverse effects pattern (eg, serum sickness syndrome) compared with whole immunoglobulins that may be used for passive immunotherapy. Therefore, F(ab’)2 polyclonal fragments show fewer safety concerns than other related products, such as plasma from recovered patients or polyclonal humanized anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies [3]. A retrospective analysis of Favirab, anti-rabies F(ab’)2 fragments produced with similar technology than FBR-002, covering an approximation of 650 000 to 1 million treated patients found a very low rate (0.18%) of immediate hypersensitivity and supports the general safety of the compound [4]. Many other supportive safety data are available on other equine F(ab’)2 products, suggesting a strong historic of clinical use and pharmacovigilance on such highly purified product [5, 6]. In this report, we describe the in vitro evaluation of FBR-002 against SARS-CoV-2 VoC, a clinical grade product of polyclonal F(ab’)2 immunoglobulin fragments from Fab’entech.

METHODS

Equine hyperimmune plasma: Three healthy French trotter horses were hyperimmunized with full SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Horses had no detectable antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 before immunization and were strictly controlled for several viruses. Blood samples were collected regularly after immunization and plasma were prepared and stored at –20°C. For preparation of F(ab’)2 fragments, pooled horse plasma was purified to obtain highly purified F(ab’)2 fragment, as described elsewhere [7, 8]. The main purification steps consist of (1) anion-exchange chromatography steps, which eliminate proteins including albumin; (2) hydrolysis of whole immunoglobulins into F(ab’)2 fragments in order to eliminate Fc fragments; and (3) pasteurization (heat treatment) at 60°C for 10 hours to ensure viral safety of the product. The final bulk product (FBR-002) is filtered at a level of 0.2 µm and then stored at +5°C ± 3°C until use. The FBR-002 batch used in this study was purified (>99.5%) under good manufacturing practice conditions and prepared at a final concentration of 44.81 g/L. Neutralization assays using the rVSV-luc pseudovirus system (PSV) were performed following a previously published protocol [9] against SARS-CoV-2 Wu-hu-1 S-D614G as a reference; VoC Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5; variants Mu, Kappa, Iota, and Epsilon; and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) CoV, SARS-CoV-1, and Ebola virus (EBOV) strain Makona GP. Neutralization potency was calibrated using the World Health Organization international standard 20/136 and the well-characterized mAb Sotrovimab [6]. Full details and sequence references are provided in the Supplementary Methods. For the microneutralization assay with authentic SARS, neutralization against the reference virus SARS-CoV-2 D614G and the VoC Delta, BA.1, and BA.4 was determined according to protocols described elsewhere [10] and in the Supplementary Methods.

RESULTS

Results of the neutralization assays with PSV and authentic SARS-CoV-2 against representative VoC and controls are shown in Figure 1 and 1 respectively. The 50% neutralization titers for the complete set of VoC and controls are summarized in Table 1. FBR-002 achieved a very high level of neutralizing potency against all SARS-CoV-2 VoC tested: in the PSV assay, the neutralization titer was 546 827 IU/mL for the reference spike sequence (614G) and in the range of 0.5–6 × 105 IU/mL for the other VoC. Specifically, neutralizing titers against the Omicron VoC BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5 were 10 7355, 12 7229, 87 193, and 65 082 IU/mL, respectively (Table 1). The microneutralization assay with authentic SARS-CoV-2 yielded quite similar levels of neutralization with selected VoC using FBR-002 (Figure 1, Table 1, and Supplementary Figure 1). Based on the immunoglobulin concentration of FBR-002 (4481 g/L) the neutralizing titer of 511 920 IU/mL obtained in the PSV assay against the reference SARS-CoV-2 S-D614G would mean a median inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 81.9 ng/mL, and subsequently the IC50 for BA.4/5 is 688.5 ng/mL.
Figure 1.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing activity curves for FBR-002. A, SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern pseudotyped rVSV-luc: reference D614G, Alpha, Beta, Delta, BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5. B, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern authentic clinical isolates: reference D614G, Delta, BA.1, and BA.4. Neutralizing activity curves were calculated from individual results obtained by 3–12 replicates, using a nonlinear regression model fit with settings for log inhibitor versus normalized response curves with GraphPad Prism software (version 8).

Table 1.

Neutralizing Levels for FBR-002 Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Authentic Clinical Isolates, SARS-CoV-2 Pseudotyped Particles, and Controls and Median Inhibitory Concentrations With Sotrovimab[a]

 Neutralizing Level or IC5095% CI
Neutralizing level, IU/mL
 D614G authentic511 920426 600–614 588
 D614G546 827477 365–626 330
 Alpha251 961214 938–295 359
 Beta303 479266 704–345 477
 Gamma390 331343 295–443 782
 Delta authentic322 278238 006–436 481
 Delta258 224205 199–324 977
 BA.1 authentic96 37873 679–126 031
 BA.1107 35591 610–125 802
 BA.2127 22968 927–234 795
 BA.2.12.187 19370 155–108 368
 BA.4 authentic61 03547 512–78 374
 BA.4/565 08254 567–77 589
 Mu252 592222 100–287 195
 Kappa263 227173 630–398 927
 Iota246 339195 544–310 276
 Epsilon204 250160 604–259 743
 SARS-CoV-111 8037563–18 418
 MERS-CoVND
 EBOV[b]ND
 VSV[b]ND
IC50 for Sotrovimab,[c] ng/mL
 D614G authentic582458–738
 D614G481362–641
 BA.1 authentic23491758–3139
 BA.117171213–2431
 BA.4 authentic29501365–6376
 BA.4/511168769–1419

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EBOV, Ebola virus; IC50, median inhibitory concentration; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; ND, not detected; SARS-CoV-1, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus.

Calibrated 50% neutralization titers were calculated according to the World Health Organization international standard 20/136, tested in parallel in each assay.

EBOV and VSV were used as controls.

As a control, Sotrovimab was tested in parallel against SARS-CoV-2 authentic virus D614G, BA.1, and BA.4 and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped RVSV-luc D614G, BA.1, and BA.4/5.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing activity curves for FBR-002. A, SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern pseudotyped rVSV-luc: reference D614G, Alpha, Beta, Delta, BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5. B, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern authentic clinical isolates: reference D614G, Delta, BA.1, and BA.4. Neutralizing activity curves were calculated from individual results obtained by 3–12 replicates, using a nonlinear regression model fit with settings for log inhibitor versus normalized response curves with GraphPad Prism software (version 8). Neutralizing Levels for FBR-002 Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Authentic Clinical Isolates, SARS-CoV-2 Pseudotyped Particles, and Controls and Median Inhibitory Concentrations With Sotrovimab[a] Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EBOV, Ebola virus; IC50, median inhibitory concentration; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; ND, not detected; SARS-CoV-1, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus. Calibrated 50% neutralization titers were calculated according to the World Health Organization international standard 20/136, tested in parallel in each assay. EBOV and VSV were used as controls. As a control, Sotrovimab was tested in parallel against SARS-CoV-2 authentic virus D614G, BA.1, and BA.4 and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped RVSV-luc D614G, BA.1, and BA.4/5. Although the activity was much lower, we observed FBR-002 neutralization against a SARS-CoV-1 PSV, with a titer of 13 232 IU/mL. No measurable neutralizing activity was detected against MERS, Ebola virus, or vesicular stomatitis virus.

DISCUSSION

The emergence of diversity along the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the emergence of different SARS-CoV-2 variants whose adaptation properties to human transmission have resulted in an increased capability for transmission and in immune evasion to the neutralizing antibody response elicited by infection and or vaccination that is challenging the control of the pandemic. Among the antiviral strategies displayed, a number of mAbs have been developed for therapeutic purposes. mAbs have been shown to be clinically effective for treating severe cases of emergent pathogens, such as Ebola virus, and have been actively sought after for COVID-19. Most of the cloned neutralizing antibodies recognize epitopes within the receptor-binding motif, the contact region of the receptor-binding domain with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. These antibodies, which recognize residues within the receptor-binding motif, are among the most common produced in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. However, the evolution of scape mutations in the circulating VoC have rendered some of them inefficacious [11]. This capability for immune evasion has been exhibited to a new limit by the recent emergence of the Omicron VoC, which is resistant to neutralization by most of the clinically available mAbs. Using a polyclonal approach with equine neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 polyclonal F(ab’)2 antibodies, we have achieved extraordinary neutralizing potency that is 2–3 orders of magnitude what is normally achieved in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination [12]. The neutralization coverage for the different variants is also remarkable, reaching >105 IU/mL for most VoC tested. As expected, Omicron showed the highest reduction in neutralization: 5.1-, 4.3-, 6.3-, and 8.4-fold for BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5, respectively, with the PSV assay, compared with the ancestral D614G sequence. Results were quite similar for Omicron BA.1 and BA.4 in the microneutralization assay with authentic SARS-Cov-2, with 5.3- and 8.4-fold reduction, respectively. This neutralizing titer against Omicron is in fact 2 orders of magnitude higher that those obtained after booster vaccination in either COVID-19–naive or COVID-19–convalescent individuals [13] and J. Luczkowiak and colleagues (personal communication). An extrapolation of neutralizing potency of FBR-002 based on its immunoglobulin content would translate to an IC50 of 819 ng/mL for the SARS-CoV-2 reference sequence in the PSV assay (87.5 ng/mL in the authentic virus assay) and 688 ng/mL for Omicron BA.4/5 (734.2 ng/mL for BA.4 in the authentic virus assay). This potency is significant, considering the limited availability of mAbs that are active against the Omicron subvariants. Potency and breadth are properties of high-titer polyclonal preparation that could be particularly helpful for targeting an evolving agent such as SARS-CoV-2; considering the current level of transmission, even in highly immunized regions, the emergence of new variants can be expected. The presence of high titers of a repertoire of antibodies targeting conserved epitopes in different regions of the spike protein, such as the receptor binding domain [14] and also the N-terminal domain [15], could plausibly account for this remarkable breadth of neutralization and a more resilient activity against VoC. In this sense the neutralizing potency of the preparation is also significant against the related SARS-CoV-1 responsible for the SARS epidemic in 2002–2003. These results warrant the clinical investigation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 equine polyclonal F(ab’)2 antibodies as a novel therapeutic strategy against COVID-19.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at The Journal of Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author. Click here for additional data file.
  14 in total

1.  [Production of highly purified therapeutic immunoglobulins (HPTI): analysis of a purification process].

Authors:  Ludovic Nguyen
Journal:  Biol Aujourdhui       Date:  2010-04-08

Review 2.  Two decades of pharmacovigilance and clinical experience with highly purified rabies immunoglobulin F(ab')2 fragments.

Authors:  Elisa Reveneau; Pascale Cottin; Anvar Rasuli
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.217

3.  Escape of SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 from neutralization by convalescent plasma.

Authors:  Sandile Cele; Inbal Gazy; Laurelle Jackson; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Houriiyah Tegally; Gila Lustig; Jennifer Giandhari; Sureshnee Pillay; Eduan Wilkinson; Yeshnee Naidoo; Farina Karim; Yashica Ganga; Khadija Khan; Mallory Bernstein; Alejandro B Balazs; Bernadett I Gosnell; Willem Hanekom; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Richard J Lessells; Tulio de Oliveira; Alex Sigal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Immunoreactivity of a new generation of horse F(ab')2 preparations against European viper venoms and the tetanus toxin.

Authors:  S Pépin-Covatta; C Lutsch; M Grandgeorge; J M Scherrmann
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Omicron infection enhances Delta antibody immunity in vaccinated persons.

Authors:  Khadija Khan; Farina Karim; Sandile Cele; Kajal Reedoy; James Emmanuel San; Gila Lustig; Houriiyah Tegally; Yuval Rosenberg; Mallory Bernstein; Zesuliwe Jule; Yashica Ganga; Nokuthula Ngcobo; Matilda Mazibuko; Ntombifuthi Mthabela; Zoey Mhlane; Nikiwe Mbatha; Yoliswa Miya; Jennifer Giandhari; Yajna Ramphal; Taryn Naidoo; Aida Sivro; Natasha Samsunder; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Daniel Amoako; Jinal N Bhiman; Nithendra Manickchund; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Nombulelo Magula; Salim S Abdool Karim; Glenda Gray; Willem Hanekom; Anne von Gottberg; Ron Milo; Bernadett I Gosnell; Richard J Lessells; Penny L Moore; Tulio de Oliveira; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Alex Sigal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 69.504

6.  Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody.

Authors:  Dora Pinto; Young-Jun Park; Martina Beltramello; Alexandra C Walls; M Alejandra Tortorici; Siro Bianchi; Stefano Jaconi; Katja Culap; Fabrizia Zatta; Anna De Marco; Alessia Peter; Barbara Guarino; Roberto Spreafico; Elisabetta Cameroni; James Brett Case; Rita E Chen; Colin Havenar-Daughton; Gyorgy Snell; Amalio Telenti; Herbert W Virgin; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Michael S Diamond; Katja Fink; David Veesler; Davide Corti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Neutralizing Response Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants 8 Months After BNT162b2 Vaccination in Naive and COVID-19-Convalescent Individuals.

Authors:  Joanna Luczkowiak; Nuria Labiod; Gonzalo Rivas; Marta Rolo; Fátima Lasala; Jaime Lora-Tamayo; Mikel Mancheno-Losa; David Rial-Crestelo; Alfredo Pérez-Rivilla; María Dolores Folgueira; Rafael Delgado
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 7.759

8.  Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization.

Authors:  Sandile Cele; Laurelle Jackson; David S Khoury; Khadija Khan; Thandeka Moyo-Gwete; Houriiyah Tegally; James Emmanuel San; Deborah Cromer; Cathrine Scheepers; Daniel G Amoako; Farina Karim; Mallory Bernstein; Gila Lustig; Derseree Archary; Muneerah Smith; Yashica Ganga; Zesuliwe Jule; Kajal Reedoy; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Jennifer Giandhari; Jonathan M Blackburn; Bernadett I Gosnell; Salim S Abdool Karim; Willem Hanekom; Anne von Gottberg; Jinal N Bhiman; Richard J Lessells; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Miles P Davenport; Tulio de Oliveira; Penny L Moore; Alex Sigal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Analysis of memory B cells identifies conserved neutralizing epitopes on the N-terminal domain of variant SARS-Cov-2 spike proteins.

Authors:  Zijun Wang; Frauke Muecksch; Alice Cho; Christian Gaebler; Hans-Heinrich Hoffmann; Victor Ramos; Shuai Zong; Melissa Cipolla; Briana Johnson; Fabian Schmidt; Justin DaSilva; Eva Bednarski; Tarek Ben Tanfous; Raphael Raspe; Kaihui Yao; Yu E Lee; Teresia Chen; Martina Turroja; Katrina G Milard; Juan Dizon; Anna Kaczynska; Anna Gazumyan; Thiago Y Oliveira; Charles M Rice; Marina Caskey; Paul D Bieniasz; Theodora Hatziioannou; Christopher O Barnes; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 43.474

Review 10.  Benefits of using heterologous polyclonal antibodies and potential applications to new and undertreated infectious pathogens.

Authors:  Rashmi Dixit; Jenny Herz; Richard Dalton; Robert Booy
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.