Literature DB >> 35921363

Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania.

Charles Daud Ching'oma1, Dickson Ally Mkoka2, Joel Seme Ambikile2, Masunga Kidula Iseselo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral childhood disorder. Children with ADHD are difficult to handle due to the symptoms causing great impairments such as inattention, hyperactivity compared to other childhood mental disorders. Having a child with ADHD is a stressful situation as it impacts the whole family. However, little is known about the experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with ADHD in low and middle-income countries such as Tanzania. Thus, this study explored the experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with ADHD in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study involving 16 parents of children with ADHD at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). We used the purposive sampling technique to obtain the participants. In-depth interviews, using a semi-structured interview guide, were used to collect data. Audio-recorded data were transcribed, translated, and analysed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Parents experienced difficulties in handling the children whose level of functioning was impaired due to abnormal and disruptive behaviour such as not being able to follow parental instructions. Psychological problems were also experienced due to caring demands exacerbated by lack of support and stigma from the community. Moreover, there were disruptions in family functioning and social interactions among family members due to the children's behaviour. Lastly, too much time and family resources spent to fulfil the needs of these children culminated into disruption in economic activities that negatively affected everyday life.
CONCLUSION: Parents struggle to meet and cope with care demands posed by children with ADHD. The disruptive nature of ADHD symptoms presents a unique caring challenge different from those experienced with other childhood mental illnesses. To address these challenges, a collaborative approach among key stakeholders such as the government, health care professionals, and non-governmental organizations, is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35921363      PMCID: PMC9348639          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral childhood disorder associated with inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity which surface between 3 and 7 years (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). It is approximated that 2.0% to 16.0% of children are affected by ADHD globally [1, 2]. In the USA and Iran, the prevalence of ADHD ranges between 2–20%, while in Congo and Nigeria, it is 6% and 8% respectively [3]. Despite all the previous studies conducted on ADHD, the challenges from this disorder are still increasing [4]. Prevalence of ADHD varies worldwide due to demographic, cultural, socioeconomic, and the criteria used for diagnosis. The disorder occurs in all socioeconomic groups, especially in low income countries, where evidence is still scarce [5]. ADHD has deleterious effects among children, both at school and home settings. It results in restlessness, impulsive acts, and lack of focus, which may impair the child’s performance [6]. These symptoms are challenging to manage particularly by parents with limited skills and understanding of the child’s outcomes [7, 8]. In this context, parents are the first-line caregivers, who often experience a heavy burden of care associated with the disorder. Previous studies in Tanzania and Palestine reported that the burden of care significantly affects parents’ physical and mental health [9, 10]. Most parents caring for children with ADHD experience similar effects, though some variations may occur due to social-economic factors and geographical locations [10]. For instance, in France parents experienced intense emotions and physical exhaustion [11]. Similarly, in South Africa parents experienced difficulties such as negative emotions, economic problems, inadequate social support, stigma, and extra caregiving responsibilities [6]. The burden of care experienced is substantial, leading to strained family relationships and stigma, coupled with minimal support [12]. Additionally, parents experience disruption in family functioning such as spouse misunderstanding, unnecessary divorces, and financial constraints [13, 14]. Previous studies have highlighted the role of parenting skills training in improving family relationship [15]. Research has also demonstrated that parents who have continuous contact with mental health professionals are more likely to recover from the crisis and cope with challenges of caring for mentally ill children [9]. To date, Tanzania lacks established statistics on families affected by mental illnesses [14]. Thus, this study explored the experiences of parents of children with ADHD at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Materials and methods

Study design

We employed an explorative study design using the phenomenology qualitative approach. The choice of this design was dictated by the nature of our study as there was limited information on the challenges and experiences of parents caring for children with ADHD. Thus, we wanted to familiarize with the basic concerns and get a well-grounded picture of the caring situation for children with ADHD in the local context. The design is also used when the problem has not been clearly defined [16].

Study context

The study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. MNH provides the most advanced specialized health services, where patients with complicated health problems are referred to from all over the country. Mental health services are provided in two major forms, i.e. on inpatient and outpatient basis, with adult and child and adolescent services provided separately. The clinics are conducted three days per week; on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The clinics also receive new children with mental illnesses from all over the country. Serious patients who require long-term hospitalization are referred to Mirembe National Psychiatric Hospital in the Dodoma region. The child and adolescent clinic serves approximately 50–55 patients every week according to the 2020 clinic records. Psychiatrists, mental health nurses, and social workers are the forefront professionals providing care to mentally ill children.

Study participants

Participants recruited in this study were parents of children with ADHD. A parents in this study referred to a biological mother, father, or any other person with caregiving responsibility to the child. An inclusion criterion was a parent who had stayed with the child for more than six months and directly involved in the caring process. The six months period is considered an adequate time for having reasonable caregiving experience to the child with ADHD [17].

Selection of participants

We used purposive sampling technique to obtain study participants. This technique enabled us to get participants with adequate experience and information to answer our research questions. Potential participants were obtained from the files of children with ADHD at the psychiatric and mental health unit. Those who met the criteria were contacted physically and through phones and asked to participate in the study. Therefore, 25 eligible participants agreed to participate and provided their phone contacts for future communication and appointment to attend the interview. However, 8 did not show up for various reasons and 2 could not be reached through their mobile phones until the end of data collection.

Data collection methods and tools

In-depth interview was used as a data collection method. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect the information from participants. The interview guide was based on a recent literature review as well as the researchers’ clinical experience in caring for children with ADHD. The tool was pre-tested and after revision the final interview guide had 5 main questions as shown in the Table 1 below:
Table 1

Interview guide.

1. How do you handle the disruptive behaviours of your child?
2. Can you explain any social or emotional support you received from the society?
3. What are the social and family dysfunctions you experienced after your child diagnosed with ADHS?
4. Can you explain the relationship of the child with ADHD with other children without ADHD in the family?
5. How this child with ADHD has affected your relationship with your spouse?
The interview guide questions were followed by specific probes to get a deeper understanding of the participants’ experiences. The data was collected between 4th June and 10th July 2020. Appointments were made two days before the day of the interview by a research assistant who was a nurse with a background in qualitative studies. On the day of the interview, participants were met at the clinic at the agreed time. All interviews were conducted in Kiswahili, the common language spoken by participants. The interviews were carried out at the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric clinic in a room that was available and temporarily prepared and used for this purpose. The room provided privacy, was quiet, and had good light for proper observation of nonverbal cues. Before the interviews, participants were briefed about the aim of the study and their rights to participate, including the right to quit from the study. The interviews were recorded using a digital recorder and continued until information saturation was attained at 16. The mean duration of the interviews was 45 minutes.

Data analysis

We conducted manual analysis which commenced soon after the first interview. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Authors read the transcripts and compared them against the original text and against the audio records to ensure coherence in content. To maintain validity, we consulted the original transcripts regularly to ensure interpretations were grounded in the data. Kiswahili and English transcripts were kept together for easy crosschecking. The content analysis approach, a research tool used to determine the presence of certain words or concepts within texts or sets of texts, guided the data analysis process [18]. This is the widely used research technique to analyse qualitative data which involves 4 stages, i.e. decontextualisation (identifying meaning units and creating code list), recontextualisation (including “content” and excluding “dross”), categorisation (identifying homogeneous groups), and compilation (drawing realistic conclusions) [19]. Therefore, we first read and re-read the transcripts several times to gain a general impression of the contents and familiarize with the data. Then we identified parts of transcripts that corresponded to the study objectives as meaning units of the transcript. The identified meaning units were then condensed closely adhering to the text. Codes that carried interpretation of underlying meanings were extracted from each condensed meaning unit. Based on the similarities or differences, the extracted codes were grouped into sub-categories and categories reflecting the core meaning of the text (the manifest content of the text). We then reviewed, defined, and then discussed intensively for their relevance with research questions and discussed the analysis outcome and reached a consensus. We kept interviews as the point of reference when deeper understanding was required concerning the meaning units, codes, and sub-categories. We present findings verbatim with quotes from participants as shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Examples of formation of categories during the analysis.

Meaning Unit (MU)Condensed MUCodesSub-CategoriesCategories
"Information about this disorder and how to parent the child I had no experience. Maybe when we come to these clinics that we have started, is where we meet with a panel of doctors"Information about ADHD and parenting skills are scarce, only obtained when contacting doctorsLack of skills to parent the childOnly one source of information—clinicAdvice is only when visiting doctorsInsufficient information about ADHDInsufficient parenting skillsNeed for knowledge of ADHD and child handling skills.
“….I rush back to help my wife because there was no house girl to help to stay with the child!! They cannot tolerate that stubbornness. My wife lost her job, and she had to ask for resignation.."Parents have to give up some important economic tasks for the sake of their childrenMore time needed to take care of the sick childIntolerance of child behaviours by helpersGiving up some economic activitiesIncreased burden of care due to intolerable behavioursThe economic burden on the parentsDisruption of economic activities
“…Yah, I have to feel that way (pretending okay) even if I feel bad, but the child is already mine I cannot leave for somebody else. I have to accept it.Parents feel sorry and overwhelmed about their children with ADHDParents feel bad about themselvesLost hope of support from somebody else Emotionally overwhelmingPhysical exhaustion on caring for the childEmotional and physical exhaustion

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences with IRB No. MUHAS-REC-04-2020-26. Permission to conduct interviews was sought from the management of Muhimbili National Hospital. We explained the aim, procedure, and benefits of the study to the participants. Participants were informed of their right to participate or withdraw to ensure openness of the study and cooperation. Participants were ensured that all information would be treated with high confidentiality and remain within the intended aim of the study and that their names would not be used in any record. Written informed consent to participate and record the interview was obtained from each participant.

Findings

Sociodemographic characteristics

Table 3 shows sociodemographic characteristics of participants. Of the 16 participants, 9 were aged 40 years and above, 12 were biological mothers, 8 had primary education, 10 were married, 10 were self-employed, and 10 were coming from a rural area. Most of their children with ADHD were males (13) and aged 6 to 10 years.
Table 3

Social demographic characteristics.

CharacteristicTypeFrequency/Number
Age of parentsBetween 30 and 395
40 years and above9
Age of children with ADHD6 to 10 years12
11 to 15 years4
Sex of children with ADHDMales13
Females3
Type of parentsBiological fathers4
Biological mothers12
Level of EducationPrimary education,.8
Secondary education,5
College education3
Marital StatusSingle2
Married10
Divorced4
Employment StatusEmployed5
Self-employed10
Not employed1
ResidenceUrban6
Rural10

Themes

During analysis four main themes emerged from the data. These were difficulty in handling a child’s abnormal behaviour, psychological problems due to caring demands, disruption of family functioning and social stability, and disruption of economic activities within the family. Each theme had categories as shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Themes and categories.

ThemesCategories
Challenges in handling child’s abnormal behaviour1Child’s Safety concern
2Parental reaction to child’ disruptive behaviour
Psychological problems associated with caring demands1Lack of emotional support
2Social discrimination
Family and social dysfunctions1Disrupted family process
2Disrupted neighbourhood relationship
Disruption of economic activities within the family1Lack of household manpower
2Lack of financial support

Challenges in handling child’s abnormal behaviour

Child’s safety concern. Participants in this study reported having hard times caring for children with ADHD. They reported that children begun to display the abnormal behaviour at an early age, raising serious concerns in their daily roles and affecting their performance. They further expressed that, as children grew up, their abnormal behaviour resulted in more significant challenges at home, particularly on their safety. Being easily distracted, trouble with listening, constantly moving here and there, and being exposed to injuries created a big burden to the whole family as expressed by a female parent: “Doctor this child…I cannot go to public places or use Daladala (commuter bus) together with him; he grabs items from people and sometimes hits people who try to warn him with stones. He should remain locked inside a room for the whole day”. (Female, 45 years old,) Living with a child with ADHD was found to be very demanding, requiring some participants to modify accommodation to meet their child’s needs. Some of the participants reported using harsh physical punishment in trying to rectify their children’s disruptive behaviour without any success as stated by a male parent: “I always use sticks beating him but this child is not listening and does not seem to change. My wife is struggling and puts a lot of effort to change and make him like other children…She does a lot” (Male, 40 years old). Parental reaction to child’ disruptive behaviour. Participants reported that it was difficult for the children to follow daily routines, such as abiding by the daily rules. Behaviours like beating other children, fighting with a parent, and destroying property troubled parents who confessed to have insufficient skills to discipline their children. Some parents were puzzled and didn’t know what to do, others tried to channel the child’s energy by giving them activities to do, while still others took inappropriate disciplinary measures such as reprimanding and use of corporal punishment when children overtly misbehaved. Male parents tended to be more violent and aggressive towards the child and sometimes extended their anger towards the spouse as stated by a female participant: “…One day my husband was beating the child too terrible and I was shocked (…) when I tried to stop him, he turned on to me. Always beating the child but it does not help” (Female,49 years old).

Psychological problems associated with caring demands

Lack of emotional support. Some parents expressed feelings of being exhausted emotionally. They verbalized feelings of depression and sadness due to care demands. They reported that caring for children with ADHD was stressful, requiring continuous reassurance and emotional support from teachers and psychologists. Furthermore, participants reported that they had been interacting with other parents and hoped for acceptance and inclusion in the society. Some reported that their children also needed emotional support from grownups and friends, but they had no friends. Generally, participants demonstrated to be emotionally overwhelmed with caring demands which were said to be stressful and difficult to cope with. “…Yah, I have to feel that way (pretending to be okay) even if I feel bad, but the child is already mine I cannot leave (him to someone else. I have to accept the way it is and wait for God to help in the care…" (Female,42 years old). The disruptive behaviour exhibited by children both at school and home was reported to cause emotional difficulties to parents. They expressed that, they often turned to schoolteachers and health professionals for guidance. Self-blaming and being isolated by the community were major concerns experienced by the parents as stated below: “Sometimes I feel so alone and would like to chat with other parents about how they handle it all, it can all be so hard. I think that would also be helpful to hear […] from the other parents as well…”. (Female, 38 years old) Social discrimination. Participants expressed that they felt abandoned and experienced discrimination from the community for having children with abnormal behaviour and felt they could benefit from peer support and other social networks if they were connected with the world. It was noted that caring for children with ADHD brought a sense of unworthiness and social isolation which had a negative impact on their health and well-being. Despite having family support, they reported feelings of increased isolation, which contributed to distress as expressed by a female participant: “I don’t feel worth living, I am socially isolated and lack support from my relatives, friends, and health professionals. I think there is no use to tell others to get help or advice because they don’t understand me”. (Female,30 years old) Social discrimination occurred even in the political affairs as they reported to be discriminated against and isolated when contesting for leadership positions. Lack of understanding of ADHD in the society underpinned political problems participants experienced as stated below: “Last year there was an election to our savings and credit cooperative society, I decided to take part to be chosen as one of the committee member, but they did not accept my name as some of the members thought that I am also sick and my child has inherited ADHD from me…thus I am not fit to be a leader”. (Female,38years old)

Family and social dysfunctions

Disrupted of family process. Participants said that life in families with a child with ADHD was influenced by the child’s behaviour, parental role, family functioning, and support from the social network. They insisted that family functioning is crucial in managing life such as problem-solving and social networking roles. Female participants reported that fathers always blamed them for always favouring and being too fair to the children. This stressful situation created conflicts in families and led to unnecessary divorces as stated by a female participant: “I’m a single mother with two children… one is okay, but this one (sick child) only God knows…their father is enjoying life there… we divorced two years ago and he does not care or even visit us.” (Female,37years old) During a typical day, extra time was required by participants to make sure children got their needs. They reported to have lower self-confidence and less warmth and involvement with their children and used corporal punishment more than other forms of interventions, putting children at risk of abuse. “Disruptive behaviours of my child caused him to have academic underperformance, disciplinary issues at home and school. This affects all areas of family life such as relationships in the family and relatives”. (Female,30 years old) Disrupted neighbourhood relationship. Parents reported that their relationship with neighbours was not good as they were blamed for their children’s behaviour. Their children were often beaten when they entered neighbours’ houses and the family sometimes expelled from the house by the landlords. Parents were always worried about how the child would behave if they got visitors or went to public places and their social life was affected as narrated by a male participant: “…When we get visitors at home; they will not stay long …I remember one day I attended a party at my neighbour’s house, what he (the child) did was horrible …beating other children… taking off clothes, threatening to beat other children around…. I decided to leave immediately” (Male, 32 years old) Lack of tolerance among neighbours towards child’s behaviour was also reported by some parents. On many occasions, they had to pay for or buy the neighbours’ items to compensate for what the child had destroyed. The neighbours were not kind enough to forgive the child and maintain good terms with the child’s family, as expressed by a male participant: “Last year we had a case at the police station with one of the neighbours after a long term conflict with them, they demanded that we should lock our child inside after breaking their 40 inch flat-screen television. It’s too expensive for us to pay but they still insist that we should pay back their money or buy the flat-screen television.” (Male, 40 years old)

Disrupted family economic activities

Lack of household manpower. Almost all parents reported going through the economic crisis and voiced out for social-economic support. It was noted that the care demands of children with ADHD interfered with the family’s economic activities, leaving the family unstable economically. One parent revealed that his wife had to stop working to take care of the child after their house girl left due to the child’s disruptive behaviours: “…. I rush back to help my wife because there was no house girl to stay with the child. All house girls ran away despite promising to pay them a good amount of money!! They could not tolerate the child’s stubbornness. My wife was expelled from her job.” (Male,47 years old). In addition, parents reported having limited social network affiliations and interpersonal relationships at work place. It was very difficult to get employed because of their poor social network which deprived the family of meeting essential needs as a result of having a sick child. They also had no time to engage in other economic activities as they were busy supervising the child most of the time. Lack of financial support. Participants reported that their families were poor because they had no support even from any of their relatives. Their family resources were consumed by treatment costs which necessitated even selling a house or the land they had. They also sacrificed the needs of other children to meet the needs of the child with ADHD as expressed by a female participant: Our child (a healthy one) is being expelled from school after we failed to pay school fees, my husband is trying a lot but we have remained poor since then …what we get all goes to manage our (sick) child” (Female, 54 years old). Participants expressed the need for more support in areas such as education and health services. Schools for children with ADHD were expensive and parents could not afford sending them there, hence many children stayed at home. They also reported having difficulties accessing healthcare services for their children since it was costly as stated by a female participant: “It is very expensive … the medication prices are horrible …. My biggest worry is that he will be taking these medications for life with no health insurance” …. (Female, 38 years old). Some participants were blamed by doctors when they failed to get medications for their children. They reported unsupportive attitudes from mental health professionals when they expressed their experiences and challenges, including problems with affording transport fair to the hospital.

Discussion

This study aimed at exploring caregiving experiences of parents of children with ADHD at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es salaam, Tanzania. Most participants were females and the findings reveal that they experienced difficulties in handling children’s abnormal behaviour and emotional and physical exhaustion. Participants also reported disruption of the family process and social interaction. In addition, disruption of economic activities was another important reported finding in the current study. Most of the participants in this study were females. This was not caused by the purposive sampling technique we used but the clinic records showed that females were the main caretakers of the children. This is not a new finding since many previous studies within and outside Tanzania have shown that, unlike their male counterparts, female parents and guardians bear a greater burden of care, not only to children, but also to adults and the elderly with mental illness [9, 20, 21]. This may be explained by the influence of culture and ethnicity which are known to have a seminal influence on caregiving [22]. As reported in our study, difficulties in handling the child’s abnormal behaviour is a frustrating situation among many caregivers. The fact that children do not follow instructions when instructed, or never concentrate, may be described by the psychopathology of ADHD in children. ADHD symptoms affect the child’s behaviours resulting in significant challenges at home and schools [23]. Difficult handling was fuelled by children’s’ academic underachievement, disruptive conduct, and having poor peer relationship. This finding is consistent with that reported by Mohr-Jensen and colleagues whereby parents expressed their concerns about their children’s poor peer relationship [24]. Moreover, participants faced these difficulties because they were not cognizant of the clinical symptoms of ADHD. Similar experiences of handling children with abnormal behaviours have been reported in France [11], although parents were more informed and aware of ADHD than those in our study. The difficulties in handling abnormal behaviour reported in our study prevented parents from planning for children’s basic needs. This important area needs further investigation. The emotional and physical exhaustion experienced by the parents was driven by children’s abnormal and disruptive behaviour. This situation has adverse consequences on the affairs of the family to fulfil parental roles. This finding is consistent with the previous study [9] which revealed the emotional and physical effects when caring for children with mental illness, including ADHD. Participants experienced a lack of sleep due to monitoring their children night long. A prolonged lack of sleep affects physical and mental well-being [25]. Additionally, parental stress might have been exacerbated by the co-occurrence of conduct disorders in children with ADHD [26, 27], especially when the child is not using medications regularly. The shortage of medications caused stress to the parents and children. Lack of medication may be due to problems with availability in the government stores as found in the previous study [14]. In the context of emotional and physical exhaustion experienced by parents, continued psychological support from health professionals is necessary. Research shows that when participants are well supported and collaborate with health professionals their care burden may be lessened [28]. The disruption of family process and social stability experienced by the parents created substantial impairments in social and peer functioning in the families. Parents experienced disturbances in their normal routines as a result of having an ADHD child at home. In such a situation, normal family functioning is affected by the child’s daily behaviour [29]. This finding is similar to the experiences of parents reported by the study conducted in Norway whereby caregiving conflicts between the spouses occurred frequently [30]. This argument is supported by a systematic review, which showed that female caregivers experience more caregiving burden than males [31]. This discrepancy in caregiving burdens causes family conflicts and misunderstandings among the spouses as reported in our findings. The finding is also consistent with the study conducted in Nairobi, Kenya [32], where mothers were mostly blamed due to the bad conduct of their children. Such similarity may be explained by the fact that Kenya and Tanzania have similar social-cultural practices. The fact that parents were more likely to divorce due to the caregiving burden needs further investigation as marital conflict and divorce may be contributed by other factors [33]. Family disruption was also revealed in the previous study [10] whereby social disintegration was reported by many families. More research is needed to reveal how better professional support can be provided to promote family functioning for parents caring for children with DHD in similar settings. The disruption of economic activities occurred due to the parents experiencing inadequate support from the government and community. Caregiving remained as their role while having other responsibilities in the family. This is consistent with the previous study in the United Kingdom [34]. The financial constraints experienced by the participants in this study may be contributed by participants staying at home most of the time to look for sick children. Also, the tendency of many house girls (housemaids) leaving their job as reported in this study may be attributed to the intolerable behaviours of children with ADHD. This is because, caregiving for children with ADHD is considered a "24 hours, 7 days a week task" which involves constant monitoring of the children to prevent injurious behaviours towards self or others. This experience is also reported elsewhere [9]. There is no specific policy to deal with children with ADHD, which makes parents lack support from the community and government. As reported in our study, traveling long distances to attend multiple clinic appointments contributes to disrupted economic activities among participants. Sometimes, they need to sacrifice the needs of other children in the family to meet the needs of one child as reported also by Oruche et al. who highlighted that family resources are used to care mostly for the sick child [35]. This is also corroborated by a previous study [36] where parents cried for financial constraints with no or minimal community support. This was due to the amount of money earned from the limited working time that was all used to care for the ADHD child such as purchasing medications. The strength of this study is that we used the purposive sampling technique to recruit participants which enabled us to get in-depth and detailed information about the experiences and challenges parents of children with ADHD go through. The limitation is that we did not explore variations of experiences and challenges among parents which could be influenced by sociocultural factors, including the sex of children which in our study was predominantly males. The scope of this study precluded a detailed consideration of cultural aspects of caring and we suggest further research to explore the needs of diverse cultures, social classes, and communities.

Conclusion

Parents living with a child with ADHD experience various challenges as they struggle to cope with the burden of care. Caring for children with ADHD is different when compared to other chronic illnesses due to the nature of ADHD symptoms. Parents experience multiple social, economic, and psychological challenges due to care demands. Support from the government and other stakeholders is important for the well-being of both parents and their sick children. Addressing these problem requires use of a collaborative approach among the government, health care providers, and other stakeholders. Further studies including quantitative research to investigate issues such as parents’ stress levels and depressive symptoms are needed. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. 16 Jun 2022
PONE-D-22-11196
Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder:  A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Ambikile, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 31 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, M Atiqul Haque, MBBS, MPH, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Partly ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/A Reviewer #2: N/A ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Minor Revision; The Manuscript “Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania” explore how parents struggle to meet and cope with care demands posed by children with ADHD. It has got significance for the public health practices. Please mention the study approach i.e., Phenomenology. Provide the Interview guide in Tabular form. How many participants were initially contacted and how many did not show their willingness to participate? Where the interviews were carried out? Instead of Study Limitations, write about methodological consideration with both strength and limitations. Reduce quotation in the Results Section and describe it in the content of the results. Reviewer #2: In title- the type of study (qualitative study) and place of study (Tanzania) need to be added. Sample size is low (only 16 IDI), FGD can be incorporated. Description of content analysis need to be added with reference Gender based findings of the parents and their children with ADHD can be compared Gender of the children with ADHD and gender based segregation of parental support can be added Analytical findings can be expressed in percentages also (eg- how many/% of them faced challenges) ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Abu Sayeed Md. Abdullah ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
24 Jun 2022 ACDEMIC EDITOR'S COMMENTS: Comment: 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf Authors' response: We have ensured that our manuscript follow PLOS ONE's style requirements by reading and adhering to the templates found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf. For this reason, we have also deleted the section named ‘Implication for practice’ as it is not supported by the sections required. Comment: 2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Authors' response: We appreciate the comment. We have made excerpts of the transcripts relevant to the study available by uploading them as Supporting Information files. Comment: Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. Authors' response: We appreciate the comment. We have uploaded our study’s minimal underlying data set as Supporting Information files. Comment: 3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. Authors' response: We appreciate the comment. We have reviewed our reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. We have also referred to the PLOSONE guidelines for preparing references to ensure that we meet the requirement. We have also added references number 20, 21, 22, and 23 due to information added in the process of addressing the reviewers’ comments REVIEWERS' COMMENTS REVIEWER # 1: Comment: The Manuscript “Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania” explore how parents struggle to meet and cope with care demands posed by children with ADHD. It has got significance for the public health practices. Authors' response: We appreciate the comments Comment: Please mention the study approach i.e., Phenomenology. Authors' response: We accept the comment. The study approach has been mentioned as phenomenology. Comment: Provide the Interview guide in Tabular form. Authors' response: We accept the comment. The interview guide has been modified into a tabular form. Comment: How many participants were initially contacted and how many did not show their willingness to participate? Authors' response: Thank you for the comment. We accept it and have added a summary of this information in the methods section under subsection ‘Selection of participants’ Comment: Where the interviews were carried out? Authors' response: The interviews were carried in a room that was available at Child and Adolescent Psychiatric clinic which was temporarily prepared to be used for conducting interviews. This information was provided in the Materials and methods section under sub-section ‘Data collection methods and tools’. However, information about this venue for interviews has been further revised for more clarity. Comment: Instead of Study Limitations, write about methodological consideration with both strength and limitations. Authors' response: We appreciate this good comment and accept it. We have removed Study Limitations section and included methodological consideration (with both strength and limitations) at the end of the discussion section. Comment: Reduce quotation in the Results Section and describe it in the content of the results. Authors' response: We appreciate the comment provided. Quotations in the Results section have been reduced by deleting those which were not necessary to reduce bulkiness and the summary of information carried by deleted quotes have been included in the content of the results. REVIWER # 2: Comment: In title- the type of study (qualitative study) and place of study (Tanzania) need to be added. Authors' response: We appreciate the comment. However, our titles reads “Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania” which already contains the type and place of the study. Comment: Sample size is low (only 16 IDI), FGD can be incorporated. Authors' response: We appreciate this comment. However, we understand that in qualitative studies sample size is not the main issue. What is more important in qualitative studies is reaching ‘saturation’ with the information gathered i.e. when no new information is coming up as you continue to gather data. For this reason, we reached saturation at the 16th in-depth interview. Moreover, we did not use FGDs because we wanted to get more deeper and varying personal experiences of parents as they cared for children with ADHD which we thought could better be achieved through in-depth interviews. Comment: Description of content analysis need to be added with reference Authors' response: Description of content analysis has been added including steps involved in the process. We have also added references to support the description. Comment: Gender based findings of the parents and their children with ADHD can be compared Authors' response: We appreciate the comment. However, qualitatively, we were much more interested in describing experiences and challenges of parents. We think that gender based findings of the parents and their children with ADHD could be better compared in a quantitative study. Comment: Gender of the children with ADHD and gender based segregation of parental support can be added Authors' response: We accept the comment. We have added age and gender of the children in table 3 (sociodemographic characteristics of participants). Gender based segregation of parental support is reflected in the sociodemographic data. However, since we did not explore this we have included it in the discussion section as a limitation to our study. Comment: Analytical findings can be expressed in percentages also (eg- how many/% of them faced challenges) Authors' response: We appreciated this comment. All interviewed participants faced challenges one way or the other. In qualitative studies emphasis or interest is more placed on the quality (insight and understanding of phenomena through intensive collection of narrative data rather than quantity such as percentages or frequencies). We are of the opinion that this comment could be better addressed if this was a quantitative study. Submitted filename: Response to Reviwers.docx Click here for additional data file. 20 Jul 2022 Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder:  A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania PONE-D-22-11196R1 Dear Dr. Ambikile, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, M Atiqul Haque, MBBS, MPH, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): We appreciate your responses to the reviewers. Now the manuscript is in a good shape to publish. Congratulations. Reviewers' comments: 25 Jul 2022 PONE-D-22-11196R1 Experiences and challenges of parents caring for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder:  A qualitative study in Dar es salaam, Tanzania Dear Dr. Ambikile: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Mr. M Atiqul Haque Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  26 in total

1.  Unmet needs associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in eight European countries as reported by caregivers and adolescents: results from qualitative research.

Authors:  Vanja Sikirica; Emuella Flood; C Noelle Dietrich; Javier Quintero; Val Harpin; Paul Hodgkins; Klaus Skrodzki; Kathleen Beusterien; M Haim Erder
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Sources of marital conflict in five cultures.

Authors:  Lisa M Dillon; Nicole Nowak; Glenn E Weisfeld; Carol C Weisfeld; Kraig S Shattuck; Olcay E Imamoğlu; Marina Butovskaya; Jiliang Shen
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2015-01-05

3.  The described experience of primary caregivers of children with mental health needs.

Authors:  Ukamaka Marian Oruche; Janis Gerkensmeyer; Linda Stephan; Corrine A Wheeler; Kathleen M Hanna
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.218

4.  Parenting and the behavior problems of young children with an intellectual disability: concurrent and longitudinal relationships in a population-based study.

Authors:  Vasiliki Totsika; Richard Patrick Hastings; Dimitrios Vagenas; Eric Emerson
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-09

5.  Gender differences in caregiving among family - caregivers of people with mental illnesses.

Authors:  Nidhi Sharma; Subho Chakrabarti; Sandeep Grover
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-22

Review 6.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and adverse health outcomes.

Authors:  Joel T Nigg
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12-07

7.  Challenges experienced by parents living with a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Meisie Mofokeng; Anna E van der Wath
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2017-09

8.  Challenges of caring for children with mental disorders: Experiences and views of caregivers attending the outpatient clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam - Tanzania.

Authors:  Joel Semel Ambikile; Anne Outwater
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Children With Conduct Problems and Co-occurring ADHD: Behavioral Improvements Following Parent Management Training.

Authors:  Gunnar Bjørnebekk; John Kjøbli; Terje Ogden
Journal:  Child Fam Behav Ther       Date:  2015-03-09

10.  Do parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) receive adequate information about the disorder and its treatments? A qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Rana Ahmed; Jacqueline M Borst; Cheng Wei Yong; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.