Literature DB >> 35920926

Nutritive value of Urochloa decumbens Stapf R. D. Webster and Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. and performance of cattle in monoculture and silvopastoral systems, in the Agreste region of Pernambuco.

Chrislanne Barreira de Macêdo Carvalho1, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello2, Márcio Vieira da Cunha2, Valéria Xavier de Oliveira Apolinário3, José Carlos Batista Dubeux Júnior4, Diana Valadares Pessoa2, Pedro Mouzinho de Oliveira Neto2, Vanilson Pedro da Silva5.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the nutritive value of signalgrass (Urochloa decumbens Stapf R. D. Webster) and sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.), and animal performance in grass monoculture pastures and in silvopastoral system (SPS) in the early development stage, in the Agreste of Pernambuco. Four treatments were evaluated in a randomized block design with three replications: signalgrass + Eucalyptus spp.; signalgrass + sabiá; signalgrass monoculture and sabiá monoculture. Holstein × Zebu crossbred calves (170 ± 15 kg BW) were managed under continuous stocking with variable stocking rate (SR). The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of signalgrass and sabiá were assessed, as well as forage allowance (FA), stocking rate (SR), average daily weight gain (ADG) and weight gain per area (WGA) over eleven evaluation cycles (March 2019 to January 2020). Signalgrass had the highest DM contents in March 2019 and January 2020 (456 and 507 g kg-1, respectively), while for IVDMD the highest values ranged from 436 to 547 g kg-1 (April to August 2019). Sabiá presented the highest's IVDMD (311 and 381 g kg-1 DM) and DM content (385 and 416 g kg-1) and lowest CP (110 and 82 g kg-1 DM) and NDF (568 and 500 g kg-1 DM) in November 2019 and January 2020, respectively. FA and SR decreased throughout the evaluation cycles. ADG (0.38 kg animal-1 day-1) and WGA (17.89 kg ha-1 28 days-1) did not differ among treatments, with weight loss in the period of low water availability. In the early development stage of the trees, SPS does not affect the nutritive value of signalgrass, nor the animal performance.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arboreal legumes; Grazing; Integrated systems; Ruminants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35920926     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03246-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.893


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds.

Authors:  L A Holden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 2.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Effects of grazing management in brachiaria grass-forage peanut pastures on canopy structure and forage intake1.

Authors:  Fernanda K Gomes; Michael D B L Oliveira; Bruno G C Homem; Robert M Boddey; Thiago F Bernardes; Mateus P Gionbelli; Marcio A S Lara; Daniel R Casagrande
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Sward characteristics and performance of dairy cows in organic grass-legume pastures shaded by tropical trees.

Authors:  D S C Paciullo; M F A Pires; L J M Aroeira; M J F Morenz; R M Maurício; C A M Gomide; S R Silveira
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.