| Literature DB >> 35920913 |
Hongming Zhang1, Lifu Zhang2, Sa Wang2, LinShan Zhang2.
Abstract
Water quality monitoring is very important in agricultural catchments. UV-Vis spectrometry is widely used in place of traditional analytical methods because it is cost effective and fast and there is no chemical waste. In recent years, artificial neural networks have been extensively studied and used in various areas. In this study, we plan to simplify water quality monitoring with UV-Vis spectrometry and artificial neural networks. Samples were collected and immediately taken back to a laboratory for analysis. The absorption spectra of the water sample were acquired within a wavelength range from 200 to 800 nm. Convolutional neural network (CNN) and partial least squares (PLS) methods are used to calculate water parameters and obtain accurate results. The experimental results of this study show that both PLS and CNN methods may obtain an accurate result: linear correlation coefficient (R2) between predicted value and true values of TOC concentrations is 0.927 with PLS model and 0.953 with CNN model, R2 between predicted value and true values of TSS concentrations is 0.827 with PLS model and 0.915 with CNN model. CNN method may obtain a better linear correlation coefficient (R2) even with small number of samples and can be used for online water quality monitoring combined with UV-Vis spectrometry in agricultural catchment.Entities:
Keywords: Convolutional neural networks; Total organic carbon; Total suspended solids; Turbidity compensation; UV–Vis spectrophotometry
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35920913 PMCID: PMC9349112 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10118-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 3.307
Fig. 1Study area
Fig. 2UV–Visible absorption spectra of the first 20 training samples
Fig. 3Schematic of the CNN network
Fig. 4Turbidity compensation with MSC method
Fig. 5Comparison between predicted TOC concentrations and the true TOC concentrations constructed with the PLS and CNN models
Fig. 6Comparison between predicted TSS concentrations and the true TSS concentrations constructed with the PLS and CNN models