Literature DB >> 35920843

Picking apart p values: common problems and points of confusion.

Sophia J Madjarova1, Riley J Williams1, Benedict U Nwachukwu1, R Kyle Martin2, Jón Karlsson3, Mattheu Ollivier4, Ayoosh Pareek5.   

Abstract

Due to its frequent misuse, the p value has become a point of contention in the research community. In this editorial, we seek to clarify some of the common misconceptions about p values and the hazardous implications associated with misunderstanding this commonly used statistical concept. This article will discuss issues related to p value interpretation in addition to problems such as p-hacking and statistical fragility; we will also offer some thoughts on addressing these issues. The aim of this editorial is to provide clarity around the concept of statistical significance for those attempting to increase their statistical literacy in Orthopedic research.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35920843     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07083-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  2 in total

1.  In Defense of P Values.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2016-10

2.  This month in JAAD: April 2022.

Authors:  Dirk M Elston
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 11.527

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Fragility Part I: a guide to understanding statistical power.

Authors:  Sophia J Madjarova; Ayoosh Pareek; Christina M Eckhardt; Arjun Khorana; Kyle N Kunze; Mattheu Ollivier; Jón Karlsson; Riley J Williams; Benedict U Nwachukwu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.114

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.