| Literature DB >> 35919503 |
Amal H Alharbi1, C V Aravinda2, Meng Lin3, P S Venugopala2, Phalgunendra Reddicherla4, Mohd Asif Shah5.
Abstract
In the bone marrow, plasma cells are made up of B lymphocytes and are a type of WBC. These plasma cells produce antibodies that help to keep bacteria and viruses at bay, thus preventing inflammation. This presents a major challenge for segmenting blood cells, since numerous image processing methods are used before segmentation to enhance image quality. White blood cells can be analyzed by a pathologist with the aid of computer software to identify blood diseases accurately and early. This study proposes a novel model that uses the ResNet and UNet networks to extract features and then segments leukocytes from blood samples. Based on the experimental results, this model appears to perform well, which suggests it is an appropriate tool for the analysis of hematology data. By evaluating the model using three datasets consisting of three different types of WBC, a cross-validation technique was applied to assess it based on the publicly available dataset. The overall segmentation accuracy of the proposed model was around 96%, which proved that the model was better than previous approaches, such as DeepLabV3+ and ResNet-50.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35919503 PMCID: PMC9293541 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5913905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Sample WBC image [6].
Figure 2Various types of WBCs [6]. (a) Cropped image WBC. (b) Blood smear image. (c) Ground truth image.
Figure 3Classification of white blood cells.
Figure 4Process of segmentation.
Figure 5UNet architecture for WBC.
Layers of the proposed model used.
| Layer type | Output | Parameter |
|---|---|---|
| I2 | (N, 300, 300, 3) | 0 |
| EF | (N, 10, 10, 1636) | 11783535 |
| Fl | (N, 163500) | 0 |
| DP | (N, 163500) | 0 |
| DN | (N, 4) | 714404 |
| Total params: 12, 497, 939 | ||
| Trainable params: 12, 410, 936 | ||
| Nontrainable params: 97, 606 |
I2, input layer; EF, efficient netblock; Fl, flatten layer; DP, dropout layer; DN, dense layer; N, none.
Figure 6The ResNet architecture model [20].
Figure 7RGB WBC under different illuminations. (a) Image-shade 1. (b) Image-shade 2. (c) Illumination 1st image. (d) Illumination 2nd image.
Comparison of results sets of existing supervised methods.
| Methods of architecture | Mean accuracy | IoU | B.F score | Precision | Recall | Specificity | F1 score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNet | 93.4 | 90.2 | 0.65 | 92.55 | 97.12 | 92.74 | 94.50 |
| SegNet | 92.14 | 85.6 | 0.52 | 98.77 | 97.66 | 99.89 | 99.10 |
| FCN | 91.34 | 92.6 | 0.72 | 95.65 | 96.77 | 97.45 | 98.67 |
| Proposed method | 94.14 | 95.6 | 0.92 | 98.45 | 97.56 | 93.23 | 98.67 |
Loss functions of the proposed method.
| Dataset | Method | Precision | IoU | FOR | FOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set 1, Jiangxi Tekang Technology |
| 95.50 | 96.2 | 0.45 | 1.55 |
| Set 2, Jiangxi Tekang Technology |
| 96.52 | 97.52 | 0.35 | 2.15 |
| Set 3, Jiangxi Tekang Technology |
| 97.52 | 98.25 | 0.06 | 6.05 |
Figure 8Dataset's samples predicted. (a) Input image. (b) Ground truth image. (c) UNet image. (d) Our model image.