| Literature DB >> 35919400 |
Sara Al Mahrouqi1, Amal Gadalla2, Saleh Al Azri3, Salama Al-Hamidhi1, Amina Al-Jardani3, Abdullah Balkhair4, Amira Al-Fahdi1, Laila Al Balushi5, Samiya Al Zadjali5, Asmahan Mohammed Nasser Al Marhoubi1, Hamza A Babiker1,6.
Abstract
Background: The Sultanate of Oman is country a low TB-incidence, with less than seven cases per 105 population detected in 2020. Recent years have witnessed a persistence in TB cases, with sustained incidence rate among expatriates and limited reduction among Omanis. This pattern suggests transmission from the migrant population. The present study examined the genetic profile and drug resistance-conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis collected from Omanis and expatriates to recognise possible causes of disease transmission.Entities:
Keywords: Drug resistance genes; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Oman; Spoligotypes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35919400 PMCID: PMC9339217 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Drug response profile of M.tuberculosis isolates obtained from Omanis and expatriates, between 2009 and 2018.
| Expatriates 1,198 (47.2%) | Omanis 1,341 (52.8%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitive | 1022 (85.3%) | 1176 (87.6%) | 0.637 |
| Any drug resistance | 176 (14.7%) | 165 (12.3% ) | |
| SMR | 35 (53.8%) | 30 (46.2%) | 0.689 |
| INHR | 60 (65.2%) | 32 (34.8%) | 0.002 |
| RIFR | 4 (44.4%) | 5 (55.6%) | 0.663 |
| PZAR | 31 (40.8%) | 45 (59.2%) | 0.032 |
| PolyR | 25 (62.5%) | 15 (37.5%) | 0.143 |
| MDR | 21 (35.6%) | 38 (64.4%) | 0.007 |
Notes.
χ2.
logistic regression.
Streptomycin mono-resistant
Isoniazid mono-resistant
Rifampicin mono-resistant
Pyrazinamide mono-resistant
Poly-resistant
Multi-drug-resistant
Drug resistance response profiles among different M.tuberculosis obtained from Omanis and expatriates.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Non-Omani ( | Referent | ||
| Omani ( | 0.46 | 0.28 | 0.75 |
|
| |||
| Non-Omani ( | Referent | ||
| Omani ( | 1.90 | 1.03 | 3.56 |
|
| |||
| Non-Omani ( | Referent | ||
| Omani ( | 1.79 | 1.07 | 3.02 |
Notes.
Logit regression.
Isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis.
Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.
Pyrazinamide mono-resistant tuberculosis.
Figure 1Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of PZAR-TB and MDR-TB to evaluate the strength of association between DST profiles and provinces with > 10 reported TB cases.
Figure 2Drug susceptibility test (DST) profiles of M. tuberculosis isolates collected between 2009 and 2018.
MDR pattern (A), mono-resistance (B), poly-resistance (C) and pattern of INHR (D), PZAR (E), RIFR (F) SMR (G). Black dots are the observed data with 0 being negative and 1 being positive for drug resistance response. Lines represent estimated prevalence overtime based on logistic regression models, gray shade around the line is the 95% confidence intervals. P and logistic regression model and odd ratio (OR) correspond to time of significant change in prevalence compared to the reference year (2009).
Distribution of clustered drug resistant M tuberculosis lineages among Omanis and expatriates.
| Clade | SIT | Expatriate | Omani | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 1 | 17 (36.2) | 11 (22.0) | 28 (28.9) | 0.124 |
| CAS1-Delhi | 25 | 2 (4.2) | 6 (12.0) | 8 (8.2) | 0.526 |
| 26 | 12 (25.5) | 12 (24.0) | 24 (24.7) | ||
| 309 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (4.0) | 3 (3.1) | ||
| EAI1-SOM | 48 | 2 (4.2) | 1 (2.0) | 3 (3.1) | 0.758 |
| 72 | 1 (2.1) | 3 (6.0) | 4 (4.1) | ||
| EAI3-IND | 11 | 3 (6.4) | 1 (2.0) | 4 (4.1) | 0.918 |
| 298 | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.0) | 2 (2.1) | ||
| 3803 | 1 (2.1) | 3 (6.0) | 4 (4.1) | ||
| EAI5 | 126 | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.0) | 2 (2.1) | ND |
| 2921 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (4.0) | 3 (3.1) | ||
| LAM11-ZWE | 59 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (4.0) | 3 (3.1) | ND |
| T1 | 393 | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.0) | 2 (2.1) | ND |
| T2 | 52 | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.0) | 2 (2.1) | ND |
| T3-ETH | 149 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (4.0) | 3 (3.1) | ND |
| X3 | 92 | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.0) | 2 (2.1) | ND |
| Total | 47 | 50 | 97 | ||
Notes.
not done.
Distribution of drug resistance profiles among M.tuberculosis sub-lineages in Oman, 2014–2018.
| Clade | Total | Any drug resistance | Total | Resistance to one drug | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| EAI | 100 | 90(37.2%) | 8(3.3%) | 2(0.8%) | 90 | 13(7.2%) | 23(12.7%) | 1(0.6%) | 53(29.3%) |
| BEIJING | 28 | 12(5.0%) | 4(1.7%) | 12(5.0%) | 12 | 8(4.4%) | 3(1.7%) | – | 1(0.6%) |
| CAS | 60 | 41(16.9%) | 9(3.7%) | 10(4.1%) | 41 | 15(8.3%) | 19(10.5% | 4(2.2%) | 3(1.7%) |
| T | 25 | 13(5.4%) | 2(0.8%) | 10(4.1%) | 13 | 2(1.1%) | 7(3.9%) | 2(1.1%) | 2(1.1%) |
| LAM | 11 | 8(3.3%) | 3(1.2%) | – | 1(0.6%) | 6(3.3%) | – | 1(0.6%) | |
| H | 10 | 10(4.1) | – | – | 10 | 3(1.7%) | 6(3.3%) | – | 1(0.6%) |
| Others | 8 | 25(10.3%) | 3(1.2%) | 1(0.4%) | 25 | 6(3.3%) | 12(6.6%) | 1(0.6%) | 6(3.3%) |
| 0.000 | 0.154 | 0.000 | 0.028 | 0.632 | 0.329 | 0.000 | |||
Notes.
Cameroon (n = 2), Manu (n = 2), X(n = 3), Zero (n = 1).
Mono-drug resistant.
Poly-drug resistant.
Multi-drug resistant.
Streptomycin mono-resistant.
Isoniazid mono-resistant.
Rifampicin mono-resistant.
Pyrazinamide mono-resistant.
Drug resistance conferring mutations among M.tuberculosis in Oman, 2009 to 2018.
| Drug | Gene | Allele | Overall mutation prevalence | Sensitive | Resistant isolates mutation (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streptomycin |
| K43R | 20/282(7.1%) | 1/240 (0.4%) | 19/42 (45.2%) | 0.000 |
| R86W | 1/282(0.4%) | 0.00 (0.00%) | 1/42 (2.4%) | ND | ||
| V19F | 1/282(0.4%) | 1/240 (0.4%) | 0(0%) | ND | ||
|
| Q302E | 2/190(1.1%) | 1/168 (0.6%) | 1/22 (4.5%) | ND | |
| L341F | 3/190(1.6%) | 3/168 (1.8%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| A409G | 1/190(0.5%) | 1/168 (0.6%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| Isoniazid | C-15T | 14/299(4.7%) | 1/233 (0.4%) | 13/66 (19.7%) | 0.000 | |
| G-17T | 7/299(2.3%) | (0%) | 7/66 (10.6%) | 0.000 | ||
| G-47A | 1/299(0.3%) | 1/233 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
|
| I95L | 1/313(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/71 (1.4%) | ND | |
| I194T | 1/313(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/71 (1.4%) | ND | ||
|
| S315T | 34/309(11%) | 1/239 (0.4%) | 33/70 (47.1%) | 0.000 | |
| P364S | 2/298(0.7%) | 1/239 (0.4%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | ND | ||
| A379D | 1/298(0.3%) | (0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0.228 | ||
| S383A | 1/298(0.3%) | 1/239 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| R463L | 166/298(55.7%) | 129/239 (54.0%) | 37/70 (52.9%) | 0.457 | ||
| L472I | 1/298(0.3%) | 1/239 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| T475I | 1/298(0.3%) | 1/239 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| V503A | 2/298(0.7%) | 2/239 (0.8%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| L526H | 1/298(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | ND | ||
| D735A | 1/298(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | ND | ||
|
| F77V | 1/250(0.4%) | 1/194 (0.5%) | (0%) | ND | |
| Rifampicin |
| H343Q | 1/306(0.3%) | 1/276 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND |
| V359A | 1/306(0.3%) | 1/276 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| M390T | 1/306(0.3%) | 1/276 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| S441L | 1/306(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/30 (3.3%) | ND | ||
| H445L | 1/306(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/30 (3.3%) | ND | ||
| H445D | 1/306(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/30 (3.3%) | ND | ||
| S450L | 16/306(9.8%) | (0%) | 16/30 (53.3%) | 0.000 | ||
| K512R | 8/306(2.6%) | 7/276 (2.5%) | 1/30 (3.3%) | ND | ||
| P541L | 1/306(0.3%) | 1/276 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| V575I | 2/306(0.7%) | 2/276 (0.8%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| Ethambutol |
| M306V | 4/287(1.4%) | 3/281 (1.1%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | ND |
| M306I | 2/287(0.7%) | 2/281 (0.7%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| A313V | 1/287(0.3%) | 1/281 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| S347R | 1/287(0.3%) | 1/281 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| E378A | 111/287(38.7%) | 111/287 | (0%) | ND | ||
| G406D | 2/287(0.7%) | 2/281 (0.7%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| embC | T270I | 41/101(40.6%) | 41/98 (41.8%) | (0%) | ND | |
| N394D | 40/101(39.6%) | 40/98 (40.8%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| Pyrazinamide |
| I6L | 1/287(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/54 (1.9%) | ND |
| Q10 | 1/287(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/54 (1.9%) | ND | ||
| D12A | 2/287(0.7%) | (0%) | 2/54 (3.7%) | ND | ||
| D12E | 1/287(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/54 (1.9%) | ND | ||
| P54Q | 2/287(0.7%) | 1/233 (0.4%) | 1/54 (1.9%) | ND | ||
| H71R | 1/287(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/54 (1.9%) | ND | ||
| F106L | 1/287(0.3%) | 1/233 (0.4%) | (0%) | ND | ||
| G132D | 1/287(0.3%) | (0%) | 1/54 (1.9%) | ND |
Notes.
not done.
Figure 3Distribution of drug resistance-conferring mutations among M. tuberculosis obtained from Omanis and expatriates.
Distribution of drug resistance conferring mutations among different M. tuberculosis lineages.
| Mutation | Clades | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| – | 10(55.6%) | 1(5.6%) | 2(11.1%) | – | 1(5.6%) | 1(5.6%) | 3(16.7%) | 0.000 |
| 4(12.5%) | 9(28.1%) | 9(28.1%) | 8(25.0%) | 1(3.1%) | – | 1(3.1%) | – | 0.001 | |
| 4(57.1%) | – | 1(14.3%) | – | – | – | – | 2(28.6%) | 0.846 | |
| – | – | 3(100.0%) | – | – | – | – | – | 0.000 | |
| – | 6(40.0%) | 2(13.3%) | 6(40.0%) | – | – | 1(6.7%) | – | 0.000 | |
| 49(31.6%) | 20(12.9%) | 35(22.6%) | 2(1.3%) | – | – | 3(1.9%) | 48(29.7%) | 0.000 | |
| 36(63.2%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21(36.8%) | 0.000 | |
| 15(68.2%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7(31.8%) | 0.000 | |
| 15(68.2%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7(31.8%) | 0.000 | |
Notes.
Logit regression.
Cameroon, Manu, Turkey, S and X clades.