| Literature DB >> 35919344 |
Raffaele Coppini1, Matteo Beltrami2, Ruben Doste3, Alfonso Bueno-Orovio3, Cecilia Ferrantini4, Giulia Vitale4, Josè Manuel Pioner4, Lorenzo Santini1, Alessia Argirò2, Martina Berteotti2, Fabio Mori5, Niccolò Marchionni4, Pierluigi Stefàno4, Elisabetta Cerbai1, Corrado Poggesi4, Iacopo Olivotto2.
Abstract
Aims: Ventricular cardiomyocytes from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patient hearts show prolonged action potential duration (APD), impaired intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and abnormal electrical response to beta -adrenergic stimulation. We sought to determine whether this behaviour is associated with abnormal changes of repolarization during exercise and worsening of diastolic function, ultimately explaining the intolerance to exercise experienced by some patients without obstruction. Methods and results: Non-obstructive HCM patients (178) and control subjects (81) underwent standard exercise testing, including exercise echocardiography. Ventricular myocytes were isolated from myocardial samples of 23 HCM and eight non-failing non-hypertrophic surgical patients. The APD shortening in response to high frequencies was maintained in HCM myocytes, while β-adrenergic stimulation unexpectedly prolonged APDs, ultimately leading to a lesser shortening of APDs in response to exercise. In HCM vs. control subjects, we observed a lesser shortening of QT interval at peak exercise (QTc: +27 ± 52 ms in HCM, -4 ± 50 ms in controls, P < 0.0001). In patients showing a marked QTc prolongation (>30 ms), the excessive shortening of the electrical diastolic period was linked with a limited increase of heart-rate and deterioration of diastolic function at peak effort. Conclusions: Abnormal balance of Ca2+- and K+-currents in HCM cardiomyocytes determines insufficient APD and Ca2+-transient shortening with exercise. In HCM patients, exercise-induced QTc prolongation was associated with impaired diastolic reserve, contributing to the reduced exercise tolerance. Our results support the idea that severe electrical cardiomyocyte abnormalities underlie exercise intolerance in a subgroup of HCM patients without obstruction.Entities:
Keywords: Action potential; Beta adrenergic receptor; Cardiac relaxation; Cardiomyocytes; Repolarization; Stress echocardiography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35919344 PMCID: PMC9242073 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J Open ISSN: 2752-4191
Clinical study patients’ characteristics
| HCM ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age | 45 ± 15 | 45 ± 7 | >0.05 |
| Females | 62 (35%) | 29 (36%) | >0.05 |
| Family history of HCM | 69 (39%) | 0 (0%) | N/A |
| Family history of sudden death | 34 (19%) | 0 (0%) | N/A |
| NYHA class I | 114 (64%) | 81 (100%) | N/A |
| NYHA class II | 64 (36%) | 0 (0%) | N/A |
| Angina | 57 (32%) | 0 (0%) | N/A |
| Syncope | 30 (17%) | 0% | N/A |
| NSVT | 30 (17%) | 0% | N/A |
| Beta-blockers | 116 (65%) | 0 (0%) | N/A |
|
| |||
| Exercise time, min | 11 ± 4 | 12 ± 5 | >0.05 |
| Peak SBP, mmHg | 165 ± 28 | 160 ± 33 | >0.05 |
| Peak heart rate, beats/min | 126 ± 20 | 137 ± 23 | <0.01 |
| % of maximum predicted heart rate | 77 ± 13 | 89 ± 9 | <0.0001 |
| Peak METs | 6.5 ± 1.6 | 9.8 ± 1.8 | <0.0001 |
HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; METs, metabolic equivalents; NYHA, New York Heart Association; NSVT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; SPB, systolic blood pressure.
Estimated oxygen uptake (VO2) at peak exercise was calculated using the standard ACSM equation for leg cycloergometer exercise, that is: VO2 = [10.8 × work rate (W)]/body mass (kg). METs at peak exercise were calculated by dividing estimated VO2 by 3.5.
P calculated with Student’s t-test (unpaired groups).
Electrocardiogram features and echocardiographic data at rest and during exercise
| ECG data | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCM ( | Control ( | HCM vs. CTR (unpaired | ||||||
| At rest | At peak exercise |
| At rest | At peak exercise |
| At rest | At peak exercise | |
| RR (ms) | 942 ± 169 | 473 ± 96 | <0.0001 | 865 ± 172 | 437 ± 79 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.003 |
| QRS (ms) | 90 ± 14 | 93 ± 14 | >0.05 | 87 ± 10 | 85 ± 10 | >0.05 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| JTp (ms) | 239 ± 39 | 140 ± 35 | <0.0001 | 215 ± 38 | 119 ± 20 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Tp-e (ms) | 92 ± 19 | 84 ± 23 | <0.01 | 77 ± 12 | 65 ± 15 | <0.001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| QTc (ms) | 437 ± 35 | 463 ± 49 | <0.001 | 412 ± 23 | 408 ± 43 | >0.05 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ΔQTc | +27 ± 52 | −4 ± 50 | <0.0001 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| At rest | At peak exercise |
| At rest | At peak exercise |
| At rest | At peak exercise | |
| Maximal LV thickness mm | 18 ± 4 | NA | NA | 8 ± 2 | N/A | N/A | <0.0001 | N/A |
| LA diameter mm | 41 ± 6 | NA | NA | 30 ± 5 | N/A | N/A | <0.0001 | N/A |
| LVEDV index ml/m3 | 49 ± 8 | 40 ± 7 | <0.01 | 52 ± 8 | 45 ± 8 | <0.01 | >0.05 | <0.05 |
| LVEF (%) | 69 ± 6 | 71 ± 7 | >0.05 | 62 ± 7 | 69 ± 7 | <0.05 | <0.001 | >0.05 |
| E wave (cm/s) | 66 ± 11 | 128 ± 15 | <0.0001 | 78 ± 10 | 110 ± 12 | <0.0001 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| A wave (cm/s) | 61 ± 9 | 111 ± 12 | <0.0001 | 62 ± 10 | 79 ± 13 | <0.001 | >0.05 | <0.001 |
| E/A ratio | 1.18 ± 0.8 | 1.21 ± 0.8 | >0.05 | 1.29 ± 0.6 | 1.37 ± 0.6 | >0.05 | <0.01 | <0.001 |
| e′ lateral (cm/s) | 9.4 ± 2.1 | 16.1 ± 3.2 | <0.01 | 13.2 ± 2.8 | 18.8 ± 3.2 | <0.01 | <0.0001 | <0.05 |
| E/e′ lateral | 7.6 ± 2.3 | 9.8 ± 2.4 | <0.05 | 5.7 ± 1.8 | 6.0 ± 1.6 | >0.05 | <0.05 | <0.001 |
| LVOT gradient (mmHg) | 9 ± 6 | 19 ± 6 | <0.05 | 5 ± 3 | 7 ± 4 | >0.05 | >0.05 | <0.01 |
JTp, time from end of QRS to peak T wave; Tp-e, Tpeak-Tend interval; LV, left ventricular; LVOT, LV outflow tract; LA, left atrial; LVEDV, LV end diastolic volume; LVEF, LV ejection fraction.
P calculated with Student’s t-test (paired groups for exercise vs. rest comparisons; unpaired groups for HCM vs. CTR comparisons).