| Literature DB >> 35919251 |
Élisabeth Ravaoarisoa1,2, Voahangy Hanitriniaina Isabelle Andrianaranjaka1,2, Aina David Ramanantsahala1, Tovonahary Angelo Rakotomanga1,2, Fanomezantsoa Ralinoro1,2, Rianasoambolanoro Rakotosaona3, Ranjàna Hanitra Randrianarivo1, Danielle Aurore Doll Rakoto1, Victor Jeannoda1, Arsène Ratsimbasoa1,4.
Abstract
Background: Malaria is a parasitic disease caused by a hematozoan of the genus Plasmodium. Early diagnosis followed by effective treatment is one of the keys to control this disease. In Madagascar, after more than 60 years of use for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, chloroquine (CQ) was abandoned in favor of artesunate + amodiaquine (ASAQ) combination because of high prevalence of CQ treatment failure. Surveillance based on the assessment of therapeutic efficacy and genetic markers of resistance to antimalarials is therefore essential in order to detect the emergence of potentially resistant parasites as early as possible. In this context, our study aimed to genotype the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene or Pfcrt and Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 or Pfmdr1 in isolates collected from children in the district of Vatomandry.Entities:
Keywords: Antimalarial; Children; Indian Ocean; Madagascar; Pfcrt; Pfmdr1; Plasmodium falciparum; Resistance; Vatomandry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35919251 PMCID: PMC9326783 DOI: 10.48327/mtsi.v2i2.2022.198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Trop Sante Int ISSN: 2778-2034
Figure 1Site d’étude (Programme national de lutte contre le paludisme, Madagascar)
Study site (National Malaria Control Program, Madagascar)
Caractéristiques de la population étudiée
Characteristics of study population
| Variables | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| (n = 59) | (n = 83) | |
|
| ||
| < 5 | 17(29%) | 14(17%) |
| 5 - 9 | 25 (42%) | 33 (40%) |
| 10 - 15 | 17(29%) | 36 (43%) |
|
| 6,9 ± 3,7 | 8,6 ± 3,5 |
|
| 36,8 ± 0,6 | 37,1 ± 0,8 |
|
| ||
| féminin | 33 (56%) | 46 (55%) |
| masculin | 26 (44%) | 37(45%) |
|
| 35 (59%) | 37(45%) |
Figure 2Electrophorèse des produits de digestion de Pfcrt avec l'enzyme ApoI
Electrophoresis of restriction fragments of Pfcrt after digestion with ApoI
Fréquence des génotypes pour le codon 76 du gène Pfcrt
Genotype frequency for the codon 76 of Pfcrt gene
|
| Mutant 76T n (% [IC95%]) | Sauvage K76 n (% [IC95%]) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 1 (4,8 % [IC95% : 0,2 - 25,9]) | 20(95,2 % [IC95% : 74,1 - 99,7]) |
|
| 0 (0 % [IC95% : 0,0 - 21,9]) | 18(100 % [IC95% : 78,1 - 100]) |
|
| 1 (2,6 % [IC95% : 0,1 - 15,1]) | 38(97,4 % [IC95% : 84,9 - 99,9]) |
IC95% : Intervalle de confiance à 95 %
Figure 3Electrophorèse des produits de digestion de Pfmdr1 avec l'enzyme AflIII
Electrophoresis of restriction fragments of Pfmdr1 after digestion with AfIII
Fréquence des génotypes pour le codon 86 du gène Pfmdr1
Genotype frequency for the codon 86 of Pfmdr1 gene
|
| Mutant 86Y n (% [IC95%]) | Sauvage N86 n (% [IC95%]) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 10 (36 % [IC95% : 19,3 - 55,9]) | 18 (64 % [IC95% : 44,1 - 80,7]) |
|
| 10 (36 % [IC95% : 19,3 - 55,9]) | 18 (64 % [IC95% : 44,1 - 80,7]) |
|
| 20 (36 % [IC95% : 23,7 - 49,7]) | 36 (64 % [IC95% : 50,3 - 76,3]) |
IC95% : Intervalle de confiance à 95 %