Literature DB >> 35919095

Association between blood pressure classification defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines and coronary artery calcification progression in an asymptomatic adult population.

Ki-Bum Won1,2, Donghee Han2,3, Su-Yeon Choi4, Eun Ju Chun5, Sung Hak Park6, Hae-Won Han7, Jidong Sung8, Hae Ok Jung9, Hyuk-Jae Chang2.   

Abstract

Aims: Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is widely used for cardiovascular risk stratification in asymptomatic population. We assessed the association of new blood pressure (BP) classification using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines with coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression according to age in asymptomatic adults. Methods and results: Overall, 10 839 asymptomatic Korean adults (23.4% aged ≤45 years) who underwent at least two CACS evaluations for health check-up were enrolled. Participants were categorized by age (≤45 and >45 years) and BP [normal (<120/<80 mmHg, untreated), elevated (120-129/<80 mmHg, untreated), Stage 1 hypertension (untreated BP 130-139/80-89 mmHg) or Stage 2 hypertension (BP ≥140/≥90 mmHg or anti-hypertensive use)] groups. CAC progression was defined as a difference of ≥2.5 between the square root (√) of the baseline and follow-up CACS. During a mean 3.3-year follow-up, the incidence of CAC progression was 13.5% and 36.3% in individuals aged ≤45 and >45 years, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, obesity, current smoking, and baseline CACS, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for CAC progression in elevated BP, Stage 1 hypertension, and Stage 2 hypertension compared to normal BP were 1.43 (0.96-2.14) (P = 0.077), 1.64 (1.20-2.23) (P = 0.002), and 2.38 (1.82-3.12) (P < 0.001) in the ≤45 years group and 1.11 (0.95-1.30) (P = 0.179), 1.17 (1.04-1.32) (P = 0.009), and 1.52 (1.39-1.66) (P < 0.001) in the >45 years group, respectively.
Conclusion: Newly defined Stage 1 hypertension is independently associated with CAC progression in asymptomatic adults regardless of age. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure; Coronary artery calcium score; Hypertension

Year:  2021        PMID: 35919095      PMCID: PMC9242050          DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeab009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Open        ISSN: 2752-4191


  37 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium score to guide hypertension therapy!

Authors:  Ahmed Aljizeeri; Ahmed Alsaileek; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.162

2.  Increased burden of coronary artery calcium from elevated blood pressure in low-risk young adults.

Authors:  Jeonggyu Kang; Yoosoo Chang; Seolhye Kim; Ki-Chul Sung; Hocheol Shin; Seungho Ryu
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Do We Need More Prognostic Data Prior to Adoption in Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-10-17

4.  Potential U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; John E Hokanson; Khurram Nasir; Leslee J Shaw; Gregory L Kinney; David Chow; Daniel Demoss; Vivek Nuguri; Vahid Nabavi; Raghu Ratakonda; Daniel S Berman; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-12

Review 6.  Implications of Coronary Artery Calcium Testing for Treatment Decisions Among Statin Candidates According to the ACC/AHA Cholesterol Management Guidelines: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hong; Ron Blankstein; Leslee J Shaw; William V Padula; Alejandro Arrieta; Jonathan A Fialkow; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha; Harlan M Krumholz; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08

7.  Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Leslee J Shaw; Sandy T Liu; Steven R Weinstein; Tristen P Mosler; Philip H Tseng; Ferdinand R Flores; Tracy Q Callister; Paolo Raggi; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Accelerated progression of coronary artery calcification in hypertension but also prehypertension.

Authors:  Nils Lehmann; Raimund Erbel; Amir A Mahabadi; Hagen Kälsch; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Susanne Moebus; Andreas Stang; Ulla Roggenbuck; Karl-Heinz Strucksberg; Dagmar Führer-Sakel; Nico Dragano; Thomas Budde; Rainer Seibel; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Cost-effectiveness of Contemporary Statin Use Guidelines With or Without Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment in African American Individuals.

Authors:  Aferdita Spahillari; Jinyi Zhu; Bart S Ferket; M G Myriam Hunink; J Jeffrey Carr; James G Terry; Cheryl Nelson; Stanford Mwasongwe; Robert J Mentz; Emily C O'Brien; Adolfo Correa; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Ankur Pandya
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.