Literature DB >> 35918860

Effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative pain control for major abdominal surgery: a randomized double-blinded study.

Arash Peivandi Yazdi1, Mehrdad Esmaeeli1, Mehryar Taghavi Gilani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effect of magnesium sulfate during abdominal surgery.
METHODS: This randomized double-blinded study involved 84 patients candidates for abdominal surgery into two same groups. In the magnesium group, at first 25 mg/kg/1 h magnesium sulfate; and then, 100 mg/kg/24 h was infused in the intensive care unit. The pain intensity (the primary outcome), was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) every 3 h. If the NRS was > 3, morphine (as a secondary outcome) was used and evaluated. The results were analyzed using SPSS ver. 19 software, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: Demographic parameters were similar between the groups. The pain intensity were similar at first and then at the third hour in both groups (P = 0.393 and P = 0.172, respectively), but thereafter between 6 and 24 h, the pain severity was significantly lower in the magnesium group (4.4 ± 1.3 in the control and 3.34 ± 1 in the magnesium group at 6th hour and P = 0.001). In addition, morphine intake in the first 24 h in the two groups had a significant difference, with 13.2 ± 5.7 mg in control group and 8 ± 3.5 mg in magnesium group (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, intravenous magnesium sulfate after abdominal surgeries for 24 h resolved the pain intensity after six hours and reduced morphine dosage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnesium sulfate; Morphine; Opioid; Postoperative pain

Year:  2022        PMID: 35918860      PMCID: PMC9346203          DOI: 10.17085/apm.22156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)        ISSN: 1975-5171


INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain can cause many complications such as restlessness, increased sympathetic activity, high blood pressure, and tachycardia. Opioids are effective analgesics; however, they produce unwanted side effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. Nonopioid drugs can decrease opioid usage and dependency [1,2]. Postoperative pain management improves the patient’s recovery time and activity, and reduces the risk of thromboembolism. Furthermore, pain control leads to faster discharge in outpatient surgeries and is one of the most critical parameters in the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol [3]. According to numerous reports, magnesium sulfate has analgesic effects and lowers opioid consumption [4-9]. Magnesium inhibits calcium channels and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors for pain relief; however, the mechanism is unknown [10]. Magnesium sulfate is used for local and regional anesthesia, intravenous injections, and oral consumption [11-13]. However, magnesium can prolong muscle relaxation, sedation, slow recovery time, dysrhythmia, and negative inotropic effects [5,14]. In some studies, the side effects of magnesium were higher than the pain-relieving effects; therefore, the analgesic effects require further evaluation [10,13]. In this study, we hypothesized that magnesium sulfate would reduce postsurgical pain and opioid consumption; therefore, we evaluated the effect of magnesium sulfate on pain relief and opioid usage in abdominal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a randomized double-blinded clinical trial conducted in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the university’s educational center. The local ethical committee approved this study (no. IR.MUMS.MEDICAL.REC.980757 on 5/11/2019), and it was registered in the Iranian registration center (no. IRCT20210214050359N1 on 24/8/2021). In this study, 84 patients who were candidates for major cancer abdominal surgery with open laparotomy and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II were evaluated. After acquiring the patients’ consent forms, they were randomly assigned to two groups (magnesium sulfate and control; allocation ratio 1:1) using an online random number table. In this study, 84 patients were recruited, but two patients in the magnesium group refused to follow up (n = 2). The remaining 82 patients fulfilled all the criteria and participated in the study. Each patient was allocated to a group using a sealed envelope. Patients and nurses who assessed the patients were blinded to the study groups. Patients with magnesium sulfate allergy, opioid dependency, addiction, neuromuscular disease, low ejection fraction (< 40%), liver and kidney failure, and dissatisfaction with participating in the study were excluded. All the patients were monitored for blood pressure, electrocardiography, oxygen saturation, and capnography. In both groups, the patients were induced with fentanyl (2 µg/kg), 1 mg of midazolam, propofol (2–2.5 mg/kg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained by propofol infusion (100–150 µg/kg/min) and fentanyl bolus (1 mg/kg) every half hour. After the surgery, neostigmine (0.04 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg) were administered, endotracheal tube was removed, and transfer to the recovery unit was done. Muscle relaxation status was carefully evaluated using a 5-s head lift and grip strength maneuver before injecting magnesium sulfate when they were awake. In the magnesium group, 25 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate was injected for 1 h. After ICU transfer, magnesium sulfate was infused with 100 mg/kg/d saline solution. In the control group, 15 ml/L sterile distilled water was added to isotonic saline as placebo, and infused intravenously. The primary outcome was pain intensity, which was evaluated using the NRS (0–10), and the secondary outcome was opioid consumption, which was observed every 3 h in 24 h period at the ICU. If the NRS was > 3, morphine (0.02 mg/kg) was used to reduce pain. No other analgesics were prescribed during the study period. In addition, all patients were monitored for magnesium side effects, such as deep tendon reflex and respiratory rate, every 3 h. Magnesium injection was stopped if any side effects such as bradypnea and muscle relaxation were observed.

Statistical methods

Using the G*Power V3.1 software and according to Kashefi et al. [15], with an average NRS of 3.3, a reduction of 30%, an alpha error 0.01 and 90% power, a sample size of 34 persons in each group was obtained. Considering a 20% decline, 42 individuals were chosen from each group (a total of 84 participants). SPSS ver. 19 software (IBM Co., USA) was used for data analysis, and a P value < 0.05 was significant. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare non-parametric data, and t-tests, Mann–Whitney tests, and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare parametric data, such as NRS and morphine dosage.

RESULTS

In total, 84 patients (42 in each group) participated in this study from June 2021 to May 2021 in the surgical ICU of the university hospital. Two patients in the magnesium group were excluded from the study due to follow-up refusal (Fig. 1). Demographic data, such as age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, BMI, and duration of surgery, were similar in both groups (Table 1).
Fig. 1.

Consort flow diagram.

Table 1.

Demographic Parameters and Operation Time

ParametersControl group (n = 42)Magnesium group (n = 40)P value
Age (yr)57.2 ± 15.654.8 ± 15.90.861
BMI (kg/m2)27.1 ± 3.226.5 ± 3.20.722
Sex, F/M27/1523/170.648
ASA, I/II35/731/90.584
Operation time (min)215.2 ± 28.1228.3 ± 30.20.427

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number only. BMI: body mass index, ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status.

The pain levels were evaluated using the NRS (0–10) every 3 h. After 6 h, there was a significant difference in pain intensity between the two groups (Table 2). At the beginning of the study, the NRS levels were 4 ± 0.2 in the control group and 3.8 ± 0.2 in the magnesium group (P = 0.393). After 3 h, the NRS levels were 3.98 ± 0.2 in the control group and 3.45 ± 0.2 in the magnesium group (P = 0.172). In subsequent evaluations, the pain intensity in the magnesium group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Fig. 2).
Table 2.

Pain Intensity at 24 h on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

NRS evaluation timeControl group (n = 42)Magnesium group (n = 40)P value
Initial4 ± 0.23.8 ± 0.20.393
3rd hour3.98 ± 0.23.45 ± 0.20.172
6th hour4.4 ± 1.33.34 ± 10.001
9th hour4.21 ± 1,53.2 ± 10.009
12th hour4.28 ± 1.52.98 ± 1.20.012
15th hour3.98 ± 1.32.85 ± 0.90.043
18th hour3.67 ± 1.41.37 ± 10.021
21st hour3.26 ± 1.21.19 ± 10.022
24th hour3.05 ± 1.21.16 ± 10.033

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Fig. 2.

Pain intensity on 24 h with numeric rating scale (NRS).

Additionally, the morphine intake after 1 h and 3 h post-operation did not have a significant difference (P= 0.950, 0.451 respectively). However, morphine intake in the magnesium group was lower than that in the control group after 6 h. Subsequently, morphine dosage was lower in the magnesium group in the first 24 h (13.2 ± 5.7 mg in the control group and 8 ± 3.5 mg in the magnesium group (P = 0.001). No considerable changes were observed in the hemodynamic condition, respiratory rate (P = 0.759), muscle relaxation, and deep tendon reflex (P = 0.322).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that magnesium sulfate reduced pain levels after 3 h in a major abdominal surgery, and there were no unwanted side effects. In the first 3 h, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, which may be due to the persistence of the intraoperative analgesic effect and peak delay effect of magnesium sulfate. In addition, it reduced the need for opioids, 24 h after surgery. In our previous study, hypomagnesemia prevalence was 46.7% in hospitalized patients in the ICU after the initial 24 h of elective surgery [16]. A single dose of magnesium to correct hypomagnesemia may decrease pain intensity. Magnesium is a physiological inhibitor of calcium channels; however, its mechanism of pain relief remains unknown. It may also act as an analgesic by adjusting the flow of calcium into the cell and may also serve as an antagonist to the NMDA receptor. On the other hand, intraoperative magnesium injection can lead to dangerous side effects, such as prolonged muscle relaxant effects, prolonged recovery, and sometimes severe heart disturbances. The effects of magnesium on the bispectral index (BIS) and sedation were also studied, and it was shown that magnesium could significantly reduce BIS [12,14]. Magnesium sulfate has been used for analgesia in various surgeries, such as hysterectomy, abdominal surgery, orthopedics, and the thorax, which reduces pain levels and opioid usage [17-21]. Magnesium is used as a loading dose or infusion for regional anesthesia, intra-articular injection, and oral administration after surgery [11-13]. Intra-articular injection of magnesium after arthroscopy helped patients to move faster and reduce their pain [22]. Oral consumption of magnesium results in reduced pain and trismus of the jaw muscles after tooth removal [11]. In a meta-analysis study, no significant difference was observed in the various methods of prescribing magnesium and its effectiveness in pain relief. In addition, no difference was observed between total magnesium consumption and reduced morphine intake during the initial 24 h [23]. In a study conducted by Mehraeen et al., pre-anesthesia injection of 25 and 50 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate did not reduce pain levels during inguinal hernia surgery [24]. Subsequently, in another study conducted by Wilder-Smith et al. [25], magnesium injection before hysterectomy did not affect postoperative pain levels. In a study on knee arthroscopy, the bolus and infusion of magnesium sulfate were not adequate for pain relief [26]. In a study on children, magnesium injection did not affect pain levels and sedation [27]. The difference between these findings and those of our study may be due to the type of surgery, time, method, and magnesium dosage. In this study, we evaluated the effects of magnesium on hemodynamic and muscle relaxation. No significant side effects, such as muscle relaxation or cardiovascular complications, were observed during the initial 24 h of the surgery. No significant differences were observed between studies on magnesium side effects such as muscle relaxation and hypotension [23]. However, in some studies, bradycardia was more common in the magnesium group but without hemodynamic instability [28,29]. In a research conducted on 10,000 pregnant women with preeclampsia, no side effects from high doses of magnesium (28 g) were observed in the first 24 h [30]. One of the limitations of this study was the small sample size. Also, the pain control methods were applied only in painful and complicated abdominal surgeries. Consequently, the study included ICU patients who required more sedatives. In conclusion, prescribing magnesium in the form of bolus and infusion in the ICU can reduce pain levels and morphine dosage, during the first 24 h after abdominal surgery, which does not result to any significant complications. However, owing to these limitations, further evaluation is necessary to determine the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in pain control.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes research in regional anesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  C L Wu; L A Fleisher
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Magnesium sulfate reduces postoperative morphine requirement after remifentanil-based anesthesia.

Authors:  Sedat Kaya; Alper Kararmaz; Ruken Gedik; Selim Turhanoğlu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2009-02

3.  Effects of magnesium sulphate on intraoperative anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesia in gynaecology patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia.

Authors:  J-H Ryu; M-H Kang; K-S Park; S-H Do
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Douglas Altman; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Barbara Farrell; Jack Moodley; James Neilson; David Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Perioperative systemic magnesium to minimize postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Lucas J Castro-Alves; Jamil H Khan; Robert J McCarthy
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Effect of magnesium sulfate on extubation time and acute pain in coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  R Ferasatkish; A Dabbagh; M Alavi; G Mollasadeghi; E Hydarpur; A A Moghadam; Z S Faritus; M Z Totonchi
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Comparison the effect of bupivacaine plus magnesium sulfate with ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate infiltration on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy with general anesthesia.

Authors:  Shahryar Sane; Ata Mahdkhah; Parang Golabi; Seyyed Adnan Hesami; Behzad Kazemi Haki
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Accidental intrathecal injection of magnesium sulfate for cesarean section.

Authors:  Mehryar Taghavi Gilani; Nahid Zirak; Majid Razavi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10

Review 9.  Magnesium and Pain.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Shin; Hyo-Seok Na; Sang-Hwan Do
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Intra-articular magnesium to alleviate postoperative pain after arthroscopic knee surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lijun Shi; Haiyun Zhu; Jinhui Ma; Li-Li Shi; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.