Literature DB >> 35916971

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of cystic ovarian tumors: major differential diagnoses in five types frequently encountered in daily clinical practice.

Ayumi Ohya1, Yasunari Fujinaga2.   

Abstract

There are many types of ovarian tumors, and these different types often form cystic masses with a similar appearance, which can make their differentiation difficult. However, with the exclusion of rare ovarian tumors, the number of ovarian tumors encountered in daily practice is somewhat fixed. It goes without saying that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for differentiating ovarian tumors. In this review, we summarize the differential diagnoses for each of the five types of MRI findings commonly encountered in daily practice. First, unilocular cystic masses without mural nodules/solid components include benign lesions such as serous cystadenoma, functional cysts, surface epithelial inclusion cysts, paratubal cysts, and endometriosis. Second, multilocular cystic ovarian lesions include mucinous tumors and ovarian metastases. It should be noted that mucinous tumors may be diagnosed as borderline or carcinoma, even if no solid component is observed. Third, cystic lesions with mural nodules that are unrelated to endometriosis include serous borderline tumor and serous carcinoma. Cystic lesions with solid components are more likely to be malignant, but some may be diagnosed as benign. Fourth, ovarian tumors deriving from endometriosis include seromucinous borderline tumors, endometrioid carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma. These tumors sometimes need to be differentiated from serous tumors. Finally, cystic lesions with lipid contents include teratoma-related tumors. In mature cystic teratoma, mural nodules (called "Rokitansky protuberance" or "dermoid nipple") are sometimes seen, but they do not suggest malignancy. Some of these lesions can be diagnosed accurately by considering their characteristic imaging findings, their changes over time, MRI findings other than those of the primary lesion, and information from other modalities such as tumor markers. To ensure the optimal treatment for ovarian tumors, it is important to estimate the histological type as well as to diagnose whether a lesion is benign or malignant.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystic ovarian tumor; Differential diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2022        PMID: 35916971     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01321-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.701


  50 in total

Review 1.  Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses.

Authors:  Izumi Imaoka; Akihiko Wada; Yasushi Kaji; Takafumi Hayashi; Michiharu Hayashi; Michimasa Matsuo; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states.

Authors:  Mayumi Takeuchi; Kenji Matsuzaki; Hiromu Nishitani
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging.

Authors:  K Togashi; K Nishimura; I Kimura; Y Tsuda; K Yamashita; T Shibata; Y Nakano; J Konishi; I Konishi; T Mori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Seung Eun Jung; Jae Mun Lee; Sung Eun Rha; Jae Young Byun; Jung Im Jung; Seong Tai Hahn
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Multimodality Imaging Approach to Ovarian Neoplasms with Pathologic Correlation.

Authors:  Erin C Taylor; Lina Irshaid; Mahan Mathur
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Ovarian carcinoma in patients with endometriosis: MR imaging findings.

Authors:  Y O Tanaka; T Yoshizako; M Nishida; M Yamaguchi; K Sugimura; Y Itai
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mi Young Kim; Sung Eun Rha; Soon Nam Oh; Seung Eun Jung; Young Joon Lee; You Sung Kim; Jae Young Byun; Ahwon Lee; Mee-Ran Kim
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sadowski; Katherine E Maturen; Andrea Rockall; Caroline Reinhold; Helen Addley; Priyanka Jha; Nishat Bharwani; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Tubo-Ovarian Abscess (with/without Pseudotumor Area) Mimicking Ovarian Malignancy: Role of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Wenhua Li; Xiangru Wu; Bing Yin; Caiting Chu; Ming Ding; Yanfen Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Edouard Poncelet; Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray; Adalgisa Guerra; Laure S Fournier; Sanja Stojanovic; Ingrid Millet; Nishat Bharwani; Valerie Juhan; Teresa M Cunha; Gabriele Masselli; Corinne Balleyguier; Caroline Malhaire; Nicolas F Perrot; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Marc Bazot; Patrice Taourel; Raphaël Porcher; Emile Darai; Caroline Reinhold; Andrea G Rockall
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.