| Literature DB >> 35916699 |
Kofoworola D A Williams1, Sharyn A Dougherty2, Emily G Lattie3, Jeanine P D Guidry4, Kellie E Carlyle2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social media is widely accessible and increasingly utilized. Social media users develop hashtags and visual, text-based imagery to challenge misrepresentations, garner social support, and discuss a variety of mental health issues. Understanding how Black men are represented on social media and are using social media may be an avenue for promoting their engagement with and uptake of digital mental health interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Black masculinity; Black/African American men; Instagram; content analysis; hashtags; mental health prevention; social media
Year: 2022 PMID: 35916699 PMCID: PMC9379788 DOI: 10.2196/34044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Form Res ISSN: 2561-326X
Characteristics, descriptions, and post content among posts tagged with #theblackmancan and #blackboyjoy (N=500).
| Variable and category/item | Value, n (%) | ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| #blackboyjoy | 248 (49.6) |
|
|
| #theblackmancan | 225 (45.0) |
|
|
| Both | 27 (5.4) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Individual | 272 (54.4) |
|
|
| Commercial | 17 (3.4) |
|
|
| Community Organization | 135 (27.0) |
|
|
| Poster source gender: male | 194 (38.8) |
|
|
| Poster source race: Black | 269 (53.8) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Image | 368 (73.6) |
|
|
| Text | 7 (1.4) |
|
|
| Mix of image/text | 12 (2.4) |
|
|
| Drawing | 4 (0.8) |
|
|
| Video | 106 (21.2) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Only one person present | 179 (35.8) |
|
|
| Individual present is Black | 179 (35.8) |
|
|
| Individual present is male | 177 (35.4) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Only multiple people present | 312 (62.4) |
|
|
| Single race: Black | 272 (54.4) |
|
|
| Single gender: only men | 122 (24.4) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Children | 32 (6.4) |
|
|
| Friends | 18 (3.6) |
|
|
| Colleagues | 15 (3.0) |
|
|
| Love | 48 (9.6) |
|
|
| Family | 55 (11.0) |
|
|
| Brotherhood | 17 (3.4) |
|
|
| Fatherhood | 100 (20.0) |
|
|
| Other | 35 (7.0) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Safe space | 3 (0.6) |
|
|
| Community service | 4 (0.8) |
|
|
| Celebration of boys | 101 (20.2) |
|
|
| Protection | 19 (3.8) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Finding joy | 217 (43.4) |
|
|
| Education | 44 (8.8) |
|
|
| Mentorship | 9 (1.8) |
|
|
| Casual attire wear | 254 (50.8) |
|
|
| Business casual wear | 36 (7.2) |
|
|
| Professional attire wear | 36 (7.2) |
|
|
| Formal attire wear | 50 (10.0) |
|
|
| Stereotypically dressed | 6 (1.2) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Gender behavior | 127 (25.4) |
|
|
| Restricted affection | 29 (5.8) |
|
|
| Restricted emotion | 7 (1.4) |
|
|
| Conflict | 5 (1.0) |
|
|
| Power and competition | 17 (3.4) |
|
|
| Graduation themed | 9 (1.8) |
|
|
| Cool pose | 154 (30.8) |
aThese variables were visually assessed along with the captions associated with posts.
Figure 1Examples of posts portraying aspects related to finding joy, fatherhood, and celebration of Black boys or men.
Median engagement scores for posts containing race and gender variables in this analysis (N=500 unless otherwise noted).
| Variable and engagement variable | Median (present) | Median (absent) | Z score | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 1076.00 | 370.00 | 24,115.500 | 3.058 | .002a | |||||
|
| Comments | 27.00 | 15.00 | 24,494.000 | 3.351 | <.001a | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 23,588.000 | 3.696 | <.001a | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 619.00 | 410.00 | 32,658.500 | 1.220 | .22 | |||||
|
| Comments | 17.00 | 17.00 | 31,666.000 | 0.600 | .55 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 34,830.000 | 3.591 | <.001a | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 1779.00 | 313.00 | 31,077.000 | 5.256 | <.001a | |||||
|
| Comments | 43 | 13 | 28,941.500 | 3.739 | <.001a | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 26,968.000 | 3.254 | .001b | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 231.00 | 491.00 | 6651.000 | –0.236 | .81 | |||||
|
| Comments | 18.00 | 17.00 | 6519.500 | –0.411 | .68 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 8478.500 | 3.045 | .002b | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 3449.00 | 424.00 | 6076.500 | 2.440 | .02a | |||||
|
| Comments | 67.00 | 17.00 | 6055.500 | 2.406 | .02a | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 4826.000 | 0.579 | .56 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 403.00 | 462.00 | 2304.500 | 0.221 | .83 | |||||
|
| Comments | 33.00 | 17.00 | 2519.500 | 0.722 | .47 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 1944.000 | –0.862 | .39 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 279.00 | 475.50 | 972.000 | –0.069 | .95 | |||||
|
| Comments | 14.00 | 17.00 | 1125.500 | 0.464 | .64 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 778.000 | –1.037 | .30 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 102.00 | 489.00 | 364.500 | –1.527 | .13 | |||||
|
| Comments | 7.00 | 17.00 | 394.000 | –1.409 | .16 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 813.000 | 0.377 | .71 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 455.00 | 458.00 | 10,551.000 | 0.567 | .57 | |||||
|
| Comments | 23.00 | 17.00 | 10,688.000 | 0.717 | .47 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 10,333.000 | 0.459 | .65 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 2854.50 | 941.00 | 491.500 | 1.316 | .19 | |||||
|
| Comments | 37.00 | 36.00 | 426.500 | 0.327 | .74 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 448.000 | 1.028 | .30 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 1779.00 | 313.00 | 31,077.000 | 5.256 | <.001a | |||||
|
| Comments | 43.00 | 13.00 | 28,941.500 | 3.739 | <.001a | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 26,968.000 | 3.254 | .001a | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 231.00 | 491.00 | 6651.000 | –0.236 | .81 | |||||
|
| Comments | 18.00 | 17.00 | 6519.500 | –0.411 | .68 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 8478.500 | 3.045 | .002a | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 879.00 | 452.00 | 1721.500 | –0.011 | .99 | |||||
|
| Comments | 15.00 | 17.00 | 1647.000 | –0.207 | .84 | |||||
|
| Views | 5237.00 | 0 | 2817.000 | 4.009 | <.001a | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 373.00 | 489.00 | 1284.000 | 0.145 | .89 | |||||
|
| Comments | 67.00 | 17.00 | 1582.000 | 1.072 | .28 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 1199.000 | –0.167 | .87 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 122.00 | 519.00 | 2968.500 | –1.942 | .05 | |||||
|
| Comments | 6.00 | 18.00 | 3390.500 | –1.222 | .22 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 4629.000 | 1.223 | .22 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 352.50 | 607.50 | 24,622.500 | –1.354 | .18 | |||||
|
| Comments | 18.00 | 17.00 | 26,060.000 | –0.390 | .70 | |||||
|
| Views | 0 | 0 | 23,774.500 | –2.681 | .007b | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Likes | 2332.00 | 426.00 | 4614.000 | 1.772 | .08 | |||||
|
| Comments | 106.00 | 16.00 | 5420.500 | 3.236 | .001a | |||||
|
| Views | 7575.00 | 0 | 5817.000 | 5.514 | <.001a | |||||
aSignificant at P<.05.
bSignificant at P<.05, but not significant in practice as both medians are 0.