Adolfo M García1, Ariane E Welch1, Maria Luisa Mandelli1, Maya L Henry1, Sladjana Lukic1, María José Torres Prioris1, Jessica Deleon1, Buddhika M Ratnasiri1, Diego L Lorca-Puls1, Bruce L Miller1, William Seeley1, Adam P Vogel1, Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini2. 1. From the Global Brain Health Institute (A.M.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Cognitive Neuroscience Center (A.M.G.), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) (A.M.G.), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Lingüística y Literatura, Facultad de Humanidades (A.M.G.), Universidad de Santiago de Chile; Memory and Aging Center (A.E.W., M.L.M., S.L., J.D., B.M.R., D.L.L.P., B.L.M., W.S., M.L.G.-T.), Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (M.L.H.), University of Texas at Austin; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (S.L.), Adelphi University, Garden City, NY; Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit (M.J.T.P.), Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias (M.J.T.P.), University of Malaga; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga - IBIMA (M.J.T.P.), Malaga; Area of Psychobiology (M.J.T.P.), Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain; Sección Neurología (D.L.L.P.), Departamento de Especialidades, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Chile; Centre for Neuroscience of Speech (A.P.V.), Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne; and Redenlab (A.P.V.), Melbourne, Australia. 2. From the Global Brain Health Institute (A.M.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Cognitive Neuroscience Center (A.M.G.), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) (A.M.G.), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Lingüística y Literatura, Facultad de Humanidades (A.M.G.), Universidad de Santiago de Chile; Memory and Aging Center (A.E.W., M.L.M., S.L., J.D., B.M.R., D.L.L.P., B.L.M., W.S., M.L.G.-T.), Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (M.L.H.), University of Texas at Austin; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (S.L.), Adelphi University, Garden City, NY; Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit (M.J.T.P.), Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias (M.J.T.P.), University of Malaga; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga - IBIMA (M.J.T.P.), Malaga; Area of Psychobiology (M.J.T.P.), Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain; Sección Neurología (D.L.L.P.), Departamento de Especialidades, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Chile; Centre for Neuroscience of Speech (A.P.V.), Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne; and Redenlab (A.P.V.), Melbourne, Australia. marialuisa.gornotempini@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Motor speech function, including speech timing, is a key domain for diagnosing nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). Yet, standard assessments use subjective, specialist-dependent evaluations, undermining reliability and scalability. Moreover, few studies have examined relevant anatomo-clinical alterations in patients with pathologically confirmed diagnoses. This study overcomes such caveats using automated speech timing analyses in a unique cohort of autopsy-proven cases. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we administered an overt reading task and quantified articulation rate, mean syllable and pause duration, and syllable and pause duration variability. Neuroanatomical disruptions were assessed using cortical thickness and white matter (WM) atrophy analysis. RESULTS: We evaluated 22 persons with nfvPPA (mean age: 67.3 years; 13 female patients) and confirmed underlying 4-repeat tauopathy, 15 persons with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA; mean age: 66.5 years; 8 female patients), and 10 healthy controls (HCs; 70 years; 5 female patients). All 5 speech timing measures revealed alterations in persons with nfvPPA relative to both the HC and svPPA groups, controlling for dementia severity. The articulation rate robustly discriminated individuals with nfvPPA from HCs (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.95), outperforming specialist-dependent perceptual measures of dysarthria and apraxia of speech severity. Patients with nfvPPA exhibited structural abnormalities in left precentral and middle frontal as well as bilateral superior frontal regions, including their underlying WM. The articulation rate correlated with atrophy of the left pars opercularis and supplementary/presupplementary motor areas. Secondary analyses showed that, controlling for dementia severity, all measures yielded greater deficits in patients with nfvPPA and corticobasal degeneration (nfvPPA-CBD, n = 12) than in those with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology (nfvPPA-PSP, n = 10). The articulation rate robustly discriminated between individuals in each subgroup (AUC = 0.82). More widespread cortical thinning was observed for the nfvPPA-CBD than the nfvPPA-PSP group across frontal regions. DISCUSSION: Automated speech timing analyses can capture specific markers of nfvPPA while potentially discriminating between patients with different tauopathies. Thanks to its objectivity and scalability; this approach could support standard speech assessments. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that automated speech analysis can accurately differentiate patients with nonfluent PPA from normal controls and patients with semantic variant PPA.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Motor speech function, including speech timing, is a key domain for diagnosing nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). Yet, standard assessments use subjective, specialist-dependent evaluations, undermining reliability and scalability. Moreover, few studies have examined relevant anatomo-clinical alterations in patients with pathologically confirmed diagnoses. This study overcomes such caveats using automated speech timing analyses in a unique cohort of autopsy-proven cases. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we administered an overt reading task and quantified articulation rate, mean syllable and pause duration, and syllable and pause duration variability. Neuroanatomical disruptions were assessed using cortical thickness and white matter (WM) atrophy analysis. RESULTS: We evaluated 22 persons with nfvPPA (mean age: 67.3 years; 13 female patients) and confirmed underlying 4-repeat tauopathy, 15 persons with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA; mean age: 66.5 years; 8 female patients), and 10 healthy controls (HCs; 70 years; 5 female patients). All 5 speech timing measures revealed alterations in persons with nfvPPA relative to both the HC and svPPA groups, controlling for dementia severity. The articulation rate robustly discriminated individuals with nfvPPA from HCs (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.95), outperforming specialist-dependent perceptual measures of dysarthria and apraxia of speech severity. Patients with nfvPPA exhibited structural abnormalities in left precentral and middle frontal as well as bilateral superior frontal regions, including their underlying WM. The articulation rate correlated with atrophy of the left pars opercularis and supplementary/presupplementary motor areas. Secondary analyses showed that, controlling for dementia severity, all measures yielded greater deficits in patients with nfvPPA and corticobasal degeneration (nfvPPA-CBD, n = 12) than in those with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology (nfvPPA-PSP, n = 10). The articulation rate robustly discriminated between individuals in each subgroup (AUC = 0.82). More widespread cortical thinning was observed for the nfvPPA-CBD than the nfvPPA-PSP group across frontal regions. DISCUSSION: Automated speech timing analyses can capture specific markers of nfvPPA while potentially discriminating between patients with different tauopathies. Thanks to its objectivity and scalability; this approach could support standard speech assessments. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that automated speech analysis can accurately differentiate patients with nonfluent PPA from normal controls and patients with semantic variant PPA.
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: José V Manjón; Pierrick Coupé; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; D Louis Collins; Montserrat Robles Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Stephen M Wilson; Nina F Dronkers; Jennifer M Ogar; Jung Jang; Matthew E Growdon; Federica Agosta; Maya L Henry; Bruce L Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Maria Luisa Mandelli; Eduardo Caverzasi; Richard J Binney; Maya L Henry; Iryna Lobach; Nikolas Block; Bagrat Amirbekian; Nina Dronkers; Bruce L Miller; Roland G Henry; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Günter U Höglinger; Gesine Respondek; Maria Stamelou; Carolin Kurz; Keith A Josephs; Anthony E Lang; Brit Mollenhauer; Ulrich Müller; Christer Nilsson; Jennifer L Whitwell; Thomas Arzberger; Elisabet Englund; Ellen Gelpi; Armin Giese; David J Irwin; Wassilios G Meissner; Alexander Pantelyat; Alex Rajput; John C van Swieten; Claire Troakes; Angelo Antonini; Kailash P Bhatia; Yvette Bordelon; Yaroslau Compta; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Carlo Colosimo; Dennis W Dickson; Richard Dodel; Leslie Ferguson; Murray Grossman; Jan Kassubek; Florian Krismer; Johannes Levin; Stefan Lorenzl; Huw R Morris; Peter Nestor; Wolfgang H Oertel; Werner Poewe; Gil Rabinovici; James B Rowe; Gerard D Schellenberg; Klaus Seppi; Thilo van Eimeren; Gregor K Wenning; Adam L Boxer; Lawrence I Golbe; Irene Litvan Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks; Jordan Jarrett; Taylor Ray; Kevin T Cunningham; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Maya L Henry Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: David W Sanders; Sarah K Kaufman; Sarah L DeVos; Apurwa M Sharma; Hilda Mirbaha; Aimin Li; Scarlett J Barker; Alex C Foley; Julian R Thorpe; Louise C Serpell; Timothy M Miller; Lea T Grinberg; William W Seeley; Marc I Diamond Journal: Neuron Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Claire Cordella; Megan Quimby; Alexandra Touroutoglou; Michael Brickhouse; Bradford C Dickerson; Jordan R Green Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 9.910