Literature DB >> 3591384

Effects of chronic stimulation on the size and speed of long-term denervated and innervated rat fast and slow skeletal muscles.

R Hennig, T Lømo.   

Abstract

This study seeks to identify the mechanisms which motoneurones use to control the contractile force and speed of skeletal muscles. We have stimulated directly slow soleus (SOL) and fast extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of adult rats intermittently at 100 Hz for 1-9 months. The muscles were either chronically denervated, denervated and reinnervated, or normally innervated. The stimulation started either immediately, or more commonly, after 1-9 months of denervation. Stimulation starting several months after denervation increased the mean maximum tetanic tension 37 times in SOL and eight times in EDL. These values represented 40 and 12% of the increases obtained by reinnervation after comparable periods of time. In denervated SOL and EDL muscles stimulated directly for more than 2 months, the mean isometric twitch contraction times were 13 and 12.7 ms, as in normal EDL muscles (13 ms). In innervated SOL muscles stimulated directly for 1-4 months, the mean twitch contraction times were 23.6 ms (normally innervated) and 19.2 ms (reinnervated), which were considerably shorter than in normal control SOL muscles (39.2 ms). Single motor unit recordings revealed that the natural (background) nerve impulse activity was essentially unaffected by the stimulation. Twitch contraction time and percentage of type II fibres in SOL muscles were related. The fastest muscles (denervated and stimulated) consisted of 100% type II fibres (with one exception), the second fastest (reinnervated and stimulated) of 70-50%, the third fastest (normally innervated and stimulated) of 45-0%, the second slowest (reinnervated) of 15-0%, and the slowest muscles (innervated controls) of 5-0% type II fibres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3591384     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1987.tb08118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6772


  18 in total

1.  Human skeletal muscle: phasic type of electrical stimulation increases its contractile speed.

Authors:  R Karba; A Stefanovska; S Dordević
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Functional and histological effects of intravaginal electrical stimulation on the pelvic muscles: a study in the rat.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques J Wyndaele; Arianne Poortmans
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-09-28

3.  In vivo time-lapse microscopy reveals no loss of murine myonuclei during weeks of muscle atrophy.

Authors:  Jo C Bruusgaard; Kristian Gundersen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Differences in H-reflex between athletes trained for explosive contractions and non-trained subjects.

Authors:  A Casabona; M C Polizzi; V Perciavalle
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

Review 5.  Excitation-transcription coupling in skeletal muscle: the molecular pathways of exercise.

Authors:  Kristian Gundersen
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-10-06

6.  Acute molecular response of mouse hindlimb muscles to chronic stimulation.

Authors:  W A LaFramboise; R C Jayaraman; K L Bombach; D P Ankrapp; J M Krill-Burger; C M Sciulli; P Petrosko; R W Wiseman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 7.  Electrical stimulation for stress incontinence.

Authors:  T Yamanishi; K Yasuda
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

8.  Electrical stimulation of transplanted motoneurons improves motor unit formation.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Robert M Grumbles; Christine K Thomas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Electrical stimulation resembling normal motor-unit activity: effects on denervated fast and slow rat muscles.

Authors:  T Eken; K Gundersen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Id-1 as a possible transcriptional mediator of muscle disuse atrophy.

Authors:  K Gundersen; J P Merlie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.