Literature DB >> 35913668

Disparities in Time to Treatment for Breast Cancer: Shifting Focus to the Root Cause.

Solange Bayard1, Vivian J Bea2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35913668      PMCID: PMC9341160          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11948-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


× No keyword cloud information.
Breast cancer mortality for African American (AA) women remains 40 % higher than for white women.[1] In addition to earlier onset of disease, later stage at diagnosis, and genetic predisposition to aggressive breast cancer phenotypes, AA women face inequities in access to quality breast cancer treatment.[1] Disparities in time to treatment are well documented, with AA women facing a longer time to treatment than white women for surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and endocrine therapy.[2-5] Because delays in treatment correlate with worse outcomes and reduced overall survival, it is imperative to address this inequity.[5] Song et al.[6] conducted a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB), identifying 557,816 women older than 65 years with non-metastatic breast cancer (2010–2017). Time from diagnosis to initial treatment was evaluated by race/ethnicity and hospital type in both Commission on Cancer-accredited minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) and non-minority serving hospitals (non-MSHs). Minority patients were found to have higher odds of treatment delays than non-Hispanic white patients for all types of initial treatment. These disparities persisted after multivariate regression adjusted for MSH status as well as patient, tumor, and hospital-level characteristics. Overall, those treated at MSHs had higher odds of treatment delays than those treated at non-MSHs regardless of race/ethnicity. In concordance with previous studies, these results demonstrate a longer time to treatment for minorities and worse outcomes at MSHs. The treatment of minorities is concentrated in hospitals that care for higher proportions of underinsured and low-income populations secondary to residential segregation by race and income.[7] Lack of financial reserve contributes to fewer resources and decreased quality of care at MSHs. In addition, MSHs have been disproportionately influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, further contributing to the financial burden. To address inequities in resources, policy, and reform, allocation of financial support to improve the infrastructure of MSHs is imperative. Because most minorities seek care at a small number of facilities, the authors suggest targeting improved quality of care at MSHs to mitigate racial disparities in time to treatment. However, although achieving equitable care at MSHs is necessary, the persistence of treatment delays for minorities at non-MSHs suggests that systemic barriers are pervasive. It is imperative that the root cause of these systemic factors be addressed in parallel with any targeted initiatives. As described by Dimick et al.[8] racial disparities can be described by two main emerging theories: lower quality of care at MSHs and lack of provider cultural competence. Few studies evaluating MSHs account for the racial/ethnic makeup of their hospital, yet racial concordance between patients and providers improves communication and mitigates disparities, including treatment delays.[9-13] Cultural competence is central to understanding treatment delays because a willingness to adhere to treatment is influenced by trust, communication, and bias. Therefore, mitigation of disparities requires increased representation of minorities among the physician workforce and integration of diversity, equity, and inclusion training for all levels of providers. Social determinants of health (SDH) are non-medical factors that account for 30–55% of health outcomes. These are conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. According to the World Health Organization, these factors can have a more significant influence on health than health care, underscoring the importance of comprehensive approaches to addressing health inequities.[14] Therefore, we must be aware that improving outcomes for minorities encompasses a much broader scope than MSHs and includes policy, employment, education, safety, and economic stability. Focus on these structural and systemic barriers will arguably have a more considerable impact on minorities by tending to the root of health care disparities, not just the branches. Future studies should account for the contributing role of social determinants in time to treatment for breast cancer patients. Additionally, focus should be placed on identifying characteristics of hospitals and providers as an approach to assessing the role of trust, bias, and systemic racism while addressing health care disparities in their entirety.
  12 in total

1.  Emergency department visits after surgery are common for Medicare patients, suggesting opportunities to improve care.

Authors:  Keith E Kocher; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Breast cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Jiemin Ma; Mia M Gaudet; Lisa A Newman; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  ASO Visual Abstract: Prognosis of Patients with 1-4-cm Papillary Thyroid Cancer Who Underwent Lobectomy-Focus on Gross Extrathyroidal Extension Invading Only Strap Muscles.

Authors:  Ahreum Jang; Meihua Jin; Won Woong Kim; Min Ji Jeon; Tae-Yon Sung; Dong Eun Song; Tae Yong Kim; Ki-Wook Chung; Won Bae Kim; Young Kee Shong; Yu-Mi Lee; Won Gu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-11       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Racial disparities in low-value surgical care and time to surgery in high-volume hospitals.

Authors:  Destiny K Jackson; Yaming Li; Mariam F Eskander; Allan Tsung; Bridget A Oppong; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; Electra D Paskett; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Adherence to cardiovascular disease medications: does patient-provider race/ethnicity and language concordance matter?

Authors:  Ana H Traylor; Julie A Schmittdiel; Connie S Uratsu; Carol M Mangione; Usha Subramanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Time to Treatment: Measuring Quality Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Amy C Polverini; Rebecca A Nelson; Emily Marcinkowski; Veronica C Jones; Lily Lai; Joanne E Mortimer; Lesley Taylor; Courtney Vito; John Yim; Laura Kruper
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Understanding concordance in patient-physician relationships: personal and ethnic dimensions of shared identity.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Kimberly J O'Malley; Lisa A Cooper; Paul Haidet
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Physician peer group characteristics and timeliness of breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jacqueline Bachand; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Craig E Pollack; Xiao Xu; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; Debra L Roter; Rachel L Johnson; Daniel E Ford; Donald M Steinwachs; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Time to initial cancer treatment in the United States and association with survival over time: An observational study.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Katherine Tullio; Paul Elson; Nathan A Pennell; Stephen R Grobmyer; Matthew F Kalady; Daniel Raymond; Jame Abraham; Eric A Klein; R Matthew Walsh; Emily E Monteleone; Wei Wei; Brian Hobbs; Brian J Bolwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.