Literature DB >> 35913653

Studies in the Mentality of Literates: 3. Conceptual Structure and Nonsense of Personality Testing.

Aaro Toomela1, Delma Barros Filho2, Ana Cecília S Bastos3, Antonio Marcos Chaves3, Marilena Ristum3, Sara Santos Chaves4, Soraya Jesus Salomão5, Aleksander Pulver5.   

Abstract

In this study, third in a series of studies of the relationships between the dominant type of the Word Meaning Structure (WMS) and various psychic processes, response patterns on personality questionnaires with Likert-type response format of individuals with different levels of education (including adult illiterates) in Brazil (N = 102) and in Estonia (N = 520) were assessed with person oriented methods of data analysis. We found that responses to two personality questionnaires (International Personality Item Pool Questionnaire, IPIP-Q60 and Estonian Collectivism Scale, ESTCOL) are inconsistent and do not correspond to theories that underlie construction and interpretation of such assessment tools. Two novel ways to assess inconsistent response patterns were developed. The Consistency Index (CI) characterizes between-item inconsistency and the Determinacy Index (DI) characterizes within-item inconsistency. The dominant type of the WMS and the level of education were related to both CI and DI. Higher level of between-item inconsistency characterizes everyday conceptual thinkers with lower levels of education and higher level of within-item inconsistency was observed among logical conceptual thinkers with higher levels of education. Systematic relationships between WMS and inconsistent patterns of responses indicate that responses on personality questionnaires cannot be interpreted in terms of personality characteristics. The results of our study also provide further support to the idea that dominant type of the WMS is a pervasive characteristic of the psyche and determines qualitatively possibilities and limits of the psychic processes. The results of this study are in agreement with the idea that WMS defines the "Great Divide."
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Great Divide; Illiteracy; Level of education; Personality structure; Personality testing; Unilineal evolution; Word meaning structure

Year:  2022        PMID: 35913653     DOI: 10.1007/s12124-022-09706-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci        ISSN: 1932-4502            Impact factor:   1.156


  15 in total

1.  Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Daphna Oyserman; Heather M Coon; Markus Kemmelmeier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

3.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.

Authors:  L R Goldberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-12

4.  Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data.

Authors:  Jason L Huang; Mengqiao Liu; Nathan A Bowling
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2014-12-15

5.  Comparability of self- and other-rated personality structure.

Authors:  Hallie Nuzum; Rebecca E Ready; Lee Anna Clark
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-02-07

6.  Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances.

Authors:  René Mõttus; Christian Kandler; Wiebke Bleidorn; Rainer Riemann; Robert R McCrae
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-04-28

7.  A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data.

Authors:  Víctor B Arias; L E Garrido; C Jenaro; A Martínez-Molina; B Arias
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12

8.  A Five-Factor Theory Perspective on Causal Analysis.

Authors:  Robert R McCrae; Angelina R Sutin
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2018-01-15

9.  Explanatory, Multilevel Person-Fit Analysis of Response Consistency on the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Wilco H M Emons; Marcel A L M van Assen; Susanne S Pedersen; Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Peeking into personality test answers: inter- and intraindividual variety in item interpretations.

Authors:  Grete Arro
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.