Yang Peng1, Ruixi Li1, Guanglei Tang1, Ke Wang1, Mengya Sun1, Jian Guan2. 1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshanerlu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshanerlu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. guanj6@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diameter changes of Riolan's arch in patients with isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) and to evaluate the implication for treatment selection. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with CT angiography (CTA) confirmed ISMAD were retrospectively included, and another 95 cases with no positive findings on abdominal CTA were included as controls. According to the treatment methods, the patients were subsequently divided into conservative treatment (n = 68) or invasive treatment (n = 27) subgroups. According to the initial CTA images, the prevalence of Riolan's arch as well as its diameter (DR) were determined in each subject, and compared between ISMAD and control cases, as well as between patients with different treatments. In patients with ISMAD, dissections were classified according to the Li classification. RESULTS: Riolan's arch prevalence and DR were significantly elevated in the ISMAD group compared with the control group (83.16% vs. 35.79%, P < 0.001; 2.63 ± 0.56 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.39 mm, P < 0.001). Patients with invasive treatment had significantly higher baseline DR (2.93 ± 0.57 mm vs. 1.89 ± 1.14 mm, P < 0.001), and higher proportion of high-risk dissection (P < 0.001) than those administered conservative treatment. Binary logistic regression revealed DR (OR = 2.771, 95% CI 1.157-6.638, P = 0.022) and Li classification (OR = 0.107, 95% CI 0.019-0.586, P = 0.010) were independent risk factors for treatment selection. With cutoff of 2.635 mm, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.805, 0.778 and 0.794, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dilation of Riolan's arch is common in patients with ISMAD, and Riolan's arch diameter could be a convenient indicator of disease severity and inform subsequent treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diameter changes of Riolan's arch in patients with isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) and to evaluate the implication for treatment selection. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with CT angiography (CTA) confirmed ISMAD were retrospectively included, and another 95 cases with no positive findings on abdominal CTA were included as controls. According to the treatment methods, the patients were subsequently divided into conservative treatment (n = 68) or invasive treatment (n = 27) subgroups. According to the initial CTA images, the prevalence of Riolan's arch as well as its diameter (DR) were determined in each subject, and compared between ISMAD and control cases, as well as between patients with different treatments. In patients with ISMAD, dissections were classified according to the Li classification. RESULTS: Riolan's arch prevalence and DR were significantly elevated in the ISMAD group compared with the control group (83.16% vs. 35.79%, P < 0.001; 2.63 ± 0.56 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.39 mm, P < 0.001). Patients with invasive treatment had significantly higher baseline DR (2.93 ± 0.57 mm vs. 1.89 ± 1.14 mm, P < 0.001), and higher proportion of high-risk dissection (P < 0.001) than those administered conservative treatment. Binary logistic regression revealed DR (OR = 2.771, 95% CI 1.157-6.638, P = 0.022) and Li classification (OR = 0.107, 95% CI 0.019-0.586, P = 0.010) were independent risk factors for treatment selection. With cutoff of 2.635 mm, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.805, 0.778 and 0.794, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dilation of Riolan's arch is common in patients with ISMAD, and Riolan's arch diameter could be a convenient indicator of disease severity and inform subsequent treatment.