| Literature DB >> 35912312 |
SoEun Choi1, DeokJu Kim2.
Abstract
CBT has a beneficial effect on depression and anxiety; however, the number of cases where therapy was used in patients with stroke was rare. In addition, there is still a lack of research on the effects of occupation-based training and the effects of bilateral upper limb training that provides an intervention based on patients' state of hemiplegic upper limb function. This study investigated the effects of combining CBT and occupation-based bilateral upper limb training on the depression, anxiety, upper limb function, and occupational performance. The experimental group was given 30-min cognitive behavioral therapy and occupation-based bilateral upper limb training, while the control group was given 30-min conventional occupational therapy and occupation-based bilateral upper limb training. For both groups, the intervention was given as a 30-min session once a day and five times a week for 4 weeks. Following intervention, the experimental group showed significant within-group variance for automatic thoughts, depression, anxiety, upper limb function, and occupational performance only (p < 0.01). For between-group variance, a significant difference was found for automatic thoughts, depression, anxiety, and occupational performance (p < 0.01), however, not for upper limb function (p > 0.05). In this study, it is meaningful that this author provided good guidelines for therapists and caregivers by organizing and providing actual programs in a very rare situation where cognitive behavioral therapy was applied to stroke patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35912312 PMCID: PMC9282985 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4688113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Occup Ther Int ISSN: 0966-7903 Impact factor: 1.565
Figure 1Study process.
Cognitive behavioral therapy.
| Stage | Session | Topic | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation | 1–3 | (i) Introduction to the program and education | (i) Program overview |
| Development | 4–6 | (i) To have a positive mindset and build self-confidence | (i) To read positive phrases regarding acceptance |
| 7 | (i) To learn how to reduce tension by relaxation through breathing | (i) To learn the behavioral techniques of relaxation and breathing | |
| 8 | (i) To energize behavior | (i) To record the activity performed at each hour and to evaluate the sense of joy and accomplishment together | |
| 9–12 | (i) To turn negative thoughts into positive thoughts | (i) To read an autobiography of someone with stroke experience and to make a note of thoughts and resolutions | |
| 13–17 | (i) To improve self-esteem and remember to have a positive mindset | (i) To identify a cognitive distortion and find a solution on one's own | |
| Termination | 18–20 | (i) Completion of the program and making a resolution to have a happy life | (i) To learn how to respond to a negative situation |
Occupation-based bilateral upper limb training.
| Brunnstrom recovery stage (BRS) | Activity | Use of bilateral upper limbs |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Washing dishes | (i) To use the hemiplegic limb to push down the dishes to fix their positions and to use the nonhemiplegic limb to do the scrubbing |
| Dressing | (ii) To use the nonhemiplegic limb to fix the sleeve downwards and to use the hemiplegic limb to stretch into the sleeve | |
| Cleaning the table | (iii) To use the hemiplegic limb to fix the cloth and to use the nonhemiplegic limb to assist the hemiplegic limb in moving forward and backward while wiping the surface of the table | |
| 4 | Making a grain powder drink | (i) To use the hemiplegic limb to pull open the refrigerator and to use the nonhemiplegic limb to take out the grain powder |
| Washing dishes | (ii) To use the nonhemiplegic limb to hold the sponge and to use the palm of the hemiplegic limb to squeeze out the washing up liquid | |
| Doing skincare | (iii) To use the hand of the hemiplegic limb to squeeze out the lotion onto the hand of the nonhemiplegic limb and then to use both hands to apply the lotion onto the face | |
| 5 | Setting the table | (i) To use the nonhemiplegic limb to fix the position of the container and to use the hemiplegic limb to open the cover-style lid of the container |
| Washing dishes | (ii) To use the hemiplegic limb to hold the dish and to use the nonhemiplegic limb to do the scrubbing | |
| Hand washing | (iii) To use both hands to wash a pair of socks by rubbing them together | |
| 6 | Reading a book | (i) To use the nonhemiplegic limb to fix the position of the book and to use the hemiplegic limb to turn the pages |
| Using a computer | (ii) To use both hands to type up a simple document using the keyboard | |
| Cleaning the house | (iii) To use both hands to wring a wet cloth to squeeze out the water |
Figure 2(a) BRS 3 stage, cleaning the table; (b) BRS 4 stage, washing dishes; (c) BRS 5 stage, setting the table; (d) BRS 6 stage, reading a book.
General characteristics of participants.
| Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex ( | M | 7 | 70.0 | 5 | 50.0 | 0.361 |
| F | 3 | 30.0 | 5 | 50.0 | ||
| Case type ( | Infarction | 6 | 60.0 | 6 | 60.0 | 1.000 |
| Hemorrhage | 4 | 40.0 | 4 | 40.0 | ||
| Hemiplegic side ( | Right | 4 | 40.0 | 4 | 40.0 | 1.000 |
| Left | 6 | 60.0 | 6 | 60.0 | ||
| Average age | 61.40 (9.33)† | 66.60 (8.63) | 0.150 | |||
| Case period, months | 4.50 (1.17) | 4.60 (1.17) | 0.845 | |||
| BRS | 4.40 (0.84) | 4.50 (0.85) | 0.745 | |||
†Mean (standard deviation) ∗p < 0.05. BRS: Brunnstrom recovery stage.
Comparison of depression, anxiety, upper limb function, and occupational performance between pretest and posttest and the variance between control and experimental groups.
| Pretest | Posttest |
|
| Between-groups |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ATQ-N | E | 98.60 (9.66)† | 78.20 (9.21) | -2.805 | 0.005∗∗ | -21.50 (2.95) | -3.807 |
|
| C | 97.40 (9.77) | 96.70 (9.93) | -1.933 | 0.053 | -0.70 (0.94) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| KDS | E | 60.50 (8.42) | 45.50 (7.09) | -2.816 | 0.005∗∗ | -15.00 (1.82) | -3.798 |
|
| C | 59.50 (8.29) | 58.30 (8.12) | -1.509 | 0.131 | -1.20 (2.14) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| STAI-KYZ(S) | E | 67.70 (7.22) | 56.50 (6.67) | -2.829 | 0.005∗∗ | -11.20 (2.85) | -3.814 |
|
| C | 68.40 (7.47) | 67.20 (7.11) | -1.852 | 0.064 | -0.70 (1.15) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| STAI-KYZ(T) | E | 61.80 (8.84) | 52.60 (10.28) | -2.692 | 0.007∗∗ | -10.10 (1.85) | -3.845 |
|
| C | 62.10 (8.62) | 61.40 (8.83) | -1.933 | 0.053 | -0.60 (0.84) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| MFT | E | 14.00 (5.61) | 19.70 (4.87) | -2.840 | 0.005∗∗ | 5.70 ± 1.33 | -1.538 | 0.124 |
| C | 14.40 (5.92) | 19.20 (5.80) | -2.831 | 0.005∗∗ | 4.80 ± 1.13 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| MAL-AOU | E | 60.10 (23.06) | 75.00 (23.07) | -2.809 | 0.005∗∗ | 14.90 ± 3.14 | -1.227 | 0.220 |
| C | 61.60 (21.72) | 74.90 (22.92) | -2.814 | 0.005∗∗ | 13.30 ± 2.21 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| MAL-QOM | E | 58.50 (23.61) | 68.50 (24.50) | -2.831 | 0.005∗∗ | 10.00 ± 1.82 | -1.500 | 0.134 |
| C | 59.80 (22.65) | 68.30 (23.59) | -2.814 | 0.005∗∗ | 8.50 ± 2.06 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| COPM-P | E | 3.10 (1.36) | 6.78 (1.40) | -2.814 | 0.003∗∗ | 3.68 ± 0.70 | -3.971 |
|
| C | 3.20 (1.51) | 5.22 (1.50) | -3.051 | 0.005∗∗ | 2.02 ± 0.06 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| COPM-S | E | 1.92 (0.97) | 6.30 (1.65) | -2.818 | 0.003∗∗ | 4.38 ± 0.89 | -3.845 |
|
| C | 2.80 (1.25) | 4.84 (1.22) | -2.972 | 0.005∗∗ | 2.04 ± 0.08 | |||
∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. E: experimental group; C: control group; ATQ-N: Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-Negative; KDS: Korean Depression Scale; STAI-KYZ: State Trait Anxiety Inventory-Korean YZ; MFT: Manual Function Test; MAL: Motor Activity Log; COPM: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.