| Literature DB >> 35912072 |
Zhenjie Teng1,2, Jing Feng3, Ronghui Liu4, Yifan Ji2, Jing Xu2, Xin Jiang2, Huifang Chen2, Yanhong Dong2, Nan Meng2, Yining Xiao1,2, Xiaohua Xie2, Peiyuan Lv1,2.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relations of serum total homocysteine (tHcy) with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and cognitive function and evaluate whether CSVD mediates the effect of serum tHcy on cognitive function.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral microbleed; cerebral small vessel disease; cognitive impairment; homocysteine; lacune; perivascular space; white matter hyperintensity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35912072 PMCID: PMC9335204 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.868777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.702
Characteristics of the study participants between cognitive impairment and no-cognitive-impairment groups.
| Variable | Cognitive impairment group ( | No cognitive impairment group ( | |
| Age, mean (SD), year | 68.8 ± 8.9 | 65.1 ± 8.7 | <0.001 |
| Sex (male), n (%) | 205 (55.7) | 322 (48.4) | 0.025 |
| Education, median (IQR), year | 9 (6–12) | 11 (6–12) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 24.7 ± 3.2 | 24.9 ± 3.0 | 0.177 |
| Current smoking, n (%) | 77 (20.6) | 109 (16.4) | 0.069 |
| Alcohol use, n (%) | 53 (14.4) | 78 (11.7) | 0.216 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 262 (71.2) | 376 (56.5) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 100 (27.2) | 264 (24.7) | 0.375 |
| Coronary heart disease, n (%) | 71 (19.3) | 121 (18.2) | 0.664 |
| History of stroke | 136 (37.0) | 177 (26.6) | 0.001 |
| TC, median (IQR), mmol/L | 4.52 (3.82–5.34) | 4.62 (3.90–5.40) | 0.118 |
| TG, median (IQR), mmol/L | 1.21 (0.87–1.70) | 1.27 (0.90–1.80) | 0.373 |
| HDL-C, median (IQR), mmol/L | 1.12 (0.95–1.30) | 1.16 (0.99–1.35) | 0.050 |
| LDL-C, median (IQR), mmol/L | 2.92 (2.37–3.56) | 3.00 (2.43–3.60) | 0.209 |
| VLDL-C, median (IQR), mmol/L | 0.43 (0.28–0.60) | 0.44 (0.30–0.61) | 0.652 |
| Uric acid, median (IQR), μmol/L | 295 (239–359) | 290 (244–354) | 0.751 |
| Serum tHcy | 1.24 (1.13–1.36) | 1.14 (1.05–1.23) | <0.001 |
| Total CSVD burden score | <0.001 | ||
| pWMH (score = 3), n (%) | 169 (45.9) | 123 (18.5) | <0.001 |
| Presence of lacune, n (%) | 281 (76.4) | 301 (45.3) | <0.001 |
| Presence of deep CMB, n (%) | 166 (45.1) | 152 (22.9) | <0.001 |
| BG-EPVS (score ≥ 2), n (%) | 279 (75.8) | 314 (47.2) | <0.001 |
*p < 0.05. SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; tHcy, total homocysteine; CSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; pWMH, periventricular white matter hyperintensity; dWMH, deep white matter hyperintensity; CMB, cerebral microbleed; BG, basal ganglia; CSO, centrum semiovale; EPVS, enlarged perivascular spaces.
FIGURE 1Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis for the associated factors with cognitive impairment. aThe variable was transformed to log scale.
ORs (and 95% CIs) of cognitive impairment by quartiles of serum tHcy levels.
| Serum tHcy levels | |||||
|
| |||||
| Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | ||
| Model 1 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.538 (1.005–2.354) | 2.335 (1.542–3.534) | 5.004 (3.267–7.665) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.539 (1.002–2.363) | 2.174 (1.430–3.305) | 4.851 (3.152–7.466) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.490 (0.953–2.329) | 1.715 (1.105–2.662) | 3.562 (2.260–5.616) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.486 (0.961–2.297) | 1.962 (1.280–3.006) | 4.254 (2.740–6.603) | <0.001 |
| Model 5 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.554 (1.003–2.408) | 2.019 (1.319–3.089) | 4.533 (2.925–7.024) | <0.001 |
| Model 6 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.438 (0.928–2.229) | 1.893 (1.234–2.904) | 4.140 (2.666–6.430) | <0.001 |
| Model 7 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.532 (0.997–2.356) | 1.941 (1.268–2.971) | 4.056 (2.604–6.319) | <0.001 |
| Model 8 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.539 (1.002–2.363) | 2.175 (1.427–3.315) | 4.855 (3.141–7.504) | <0.001 |
| Model 9 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.494 (0.967–2.310) | 1.957 (1.279–2.994) | 4.398 (2.837–6.817) | <0.001 |
FIGURE 2Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis for the associated factors with total CSVD burden score. aThe variable was transformed to log scale.
ORs (and 95% CIs) of different markers of CSVD according to quartiles of serum tHcy levels.
| Serum tHcy levels | |||||
|
| |||||
| Markers of CSVD | Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | |
| Total CSVD burden (score > 2) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.115 (0.713–1.745) | 2.337 (1.520–3.593) | 3.862 (2.467–6.047) | <0.001 |
| pWMH (score = 3) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.505 (0.915–2.477) | 2.600 (1.619–4.176) | 3.501 (2.146–5.712) | <0.001 |
| dWMH (score ≥ 2) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.978 (0.657–1.455) | 1.795 (1.203–2.680) | 1.914 (1.256–2.918) | <0.001 |
| Presence of lacune | 1.00 (reference) | 1.316 (0.881–1.966) | 2.182 (1.446–3.294) | 2.925 (1.883–4.545) | <0.001 |
| Presence of deep CMBs | 1.00 (reference) | 1.106 (0.677–1.807) | 3.357 (2.146–5.253) | 6.272 (3.949–9.963) | <0.001 |
| Presence of lobar CMBs | 1.00 (reference) | 1.223 (0.727–2.056) | 2.564 (1.587–4.145) | 3.241 (1.985–5.294) | <0.001 |
| BG-EPVS (score ≥ 2) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.243 (0.850–1.817) | 2.079 (1.403–3.080) | 2.234 (1.475–3.384) | <0.001 |
| CSO-EPVS (score ≥ 2) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.988 (0.663–1.474) | 0.973 (0.648–1.463) | 0.759 (0.496–1.161) | 0.183 |
FIGURE 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of serum tHcy levels for cognitive impairment. The optimal cut-off point of serum tHcy levels of patients with cognitive impairment was 15.95 μmol/L. The specificity was 0.698 (1–0.302) and sensitivity was 0.590. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.68.
FIGURE 4Mediation by different markers of CSVD in the relation between higher serum tHcy levels and cognitive impairment. Mediation analyses are shown for different markers of CSVD as mediators in the relation between higher serum tHcy levels and cognitive impairment. (A) The mediator is a severe CSVD burden score. (B) The mediator is severe pWMH. (C) The mediator is moderate to severe dWMH. (D) The mediator is presence of lacune. (E) The mediator is presence of deep CMB. (F) The mediator is presence of lobar CMB. (G) The mediator is moderate to severe BG-EPVS. (H) The mediator is moderate to severe CSO-EPVS. The mediation effect is the indirect effect expressed as a percentage of the total effect, that is, the proportion of the relation between the independent and dependent variables attributable to mediation.