| Literature DB >> 35911932 |
Romeo Popa1, Magdalena Diaconu1, Valentin Cirlig1, Ciprian Marius Văruţ2, Daniel Cosmin Caragea3, Răzvan Andrei Codea4, Flaviu Alexandru Tabaran5, Mara Aurori6, Mihai Gafencu7, Cristian Corneliu Georgescu1.
Abstract
Antioxidants have been commonly used in medicine for thousands of years. Clinically, pentoxifylline and Ginkgo biloba have beneficial renal effects. Our study evaluated the nephroprotective effect of Gingko biloba in combination with Pentoxifiln in an experimental model of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. Male Winstar rats were used in 3 groups: CONTROL, VANCO and VANCO+GBI+PTX and each group included 6 rats. Insufficient studies in the literature on the prevention of acute kidney injury by the combination of Ginkgo biloba and pentoxifylline led to the necessity to perform the study. Acute kidney injury was demonstrated by measuring serum values of classical markers such as urea and creatinine but also by measuring the urinary N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase index, a topical marker in modern medicine. The significant decrease of the biochemical parameters in group III (VANCO+GBI+PTX) compared to group II (VANCO) and values similar to group I (CONTROL), demonstrates, the nephroprotective effect of the use in combination of the two substances.Entities:
Keywords: Acute kidney injure; Ginko Biloba; Pentoxifylline; Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911932 PMCID: PMC9289589 DOI: 10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Health Sci J
Figure 1The medications used in our study
Biochemical, blood and urinary parameters, from the 11th day of the study, from lots I CONTROL and II VANCO-values obtained, mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and t test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,3 |
0,32 |
5,9 |
|
31,5 |
0,44 |
6,5 | |
|
32 |
0,50 |
6,1 | |
|
31,2 |
0,49 |
5,5 | |
|
27,8 |
0,37 |
6,13 | |
|
29,1 |
0,43 |
5,57 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,5 |
0,75 |
235,16 |
|
48,3 |
0,83 |
212,90 | |
|
48,2 |
0,90 |
218,10 | |
|
50,1 |
0,88 |
379,18 | |
|
49,9 |
0,78 |
342,37 | |
|
52,15 |
0,85 |
311,10 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,1 |
0,46 |
66,7 |
|
35,9 |
0,32 |
62,5 | |
|
38,1 |
0,37 |
68,1 | |
|
37,12 |
0,29 |
74,9 | |
|
39,02 |
0,41 |
84,8 | |
|
40,9 |
0,39 |
54,5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2Blood and urinary biochemical parameters from the 11th day of the study (lot average values), from the CONTROL, VANCO and VANCO+PTX+GBI lots
Figure 7Histopathological sections through the kidney from an individual in the VANCO+PTX+GBI. Proximal twisted tubes with ischemia ×20H&E
Figure 3Serum urea values from the 11th study day (batch average values), within the CONTROL, VANCO, VANCO+PTX+GBI batches
Figure 6Histopathological sections through the kidney from an individual in the VANCO group. Urinary tract with cell necrosis and cytoplasmic vacuolations and occupation of the tubular lumen with necrotic detritus ×20H&E
Figure 5Histopathological sections through the kidney from an individual in the CONTROL group. Normal urinary tubules. Control group, x20ColH&E
Figure 4Urinary iNAG values on the 11th study day in the CONTROL, VANCO, VANCO+PTX+GBI lots