| Literature DB >> 35911591 |
Jiang Zhang1,2, Yuyan Liu1, Xiaonan Guo3,4, Jing Guo5, Zhengcong Du6, Muyuan He1, Qihong Liu7, Dundi Xu1, Taiyuan Liu8, Junran Zhang1, Huijuan Yuan9, Meiyun Wang8, Shasha Li10,11.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: According to reports, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a progressive disease. However, no known research has examined the progressive brain structural changes associated with T2D. The purpose of this study was to determine whether T2D patients exhibit progressive brain structural alterations and, if so, how the alterations progress. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: causal structural covariance network analysis; gray matter volume; structural magnetic resonance imaging; type 2 diabetes; voxel-based morphometry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911591 PMCID: PMC9336220 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.936943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.473
Demographics clinical characteristics of the participants.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.15 ± 9.26 | 54.13 ± 7.50 | 0.60a |
| Sex (male/female) | 51/30 | 22/26 | 0.06b |
| Education | |||
| Less than high school graduate | 51 (63%) | 10 (20.8%) | - |
| High school graduate | 12 (14%) | 5 (10.4%) | - |
| Some college or technical school | 17 (21%) | 20 (41.7%) | - |
| College graduate or more | 1 (1%) | 13 (27.1%) | - |
| Handedness (right/left) | 81/0 | 48/0 | - |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 9.24 ± 6.61 | - | - |
| Weight (kg) | 70.5 ± 10.56 | 70.48 ± 10.36 | 0.96a |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.93 ± 3.18 | 25.20 ± 10.92 | 0.62a |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 9.30 ± 2.95) | - | - |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.14 ± 1.71 | - | - |
| MoCA score | 26.96 ± 3.40 | 25.17 ± 2.08 | <0.0001a |
Variables are represented as mean±standard deviation or values (percentage). T2D, Type 2 Diabetes; BMI, Body Mass Index; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; HbA1c, Glycated hemoglobin; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
.
Demographic and clinical variables in subgroups.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main grouping strategy |
| |||
| n | 16 | 39 | - | |
| Age (years) | 50.44 ± 4.82 | 50.46 ± 7.47 | 0.99a | |
| Sex (male/female) | 8/8 | 23/16 | 0.54b | |
|
| ||||
| n | 32 | 42 | - | |
| Age (years) | 55.97 ± 7.97 | 57.57 ± 9.52 | 0.44a | |
| Sex (male/female) | 14/18 | 28/14 | 0.05b | |
| Validation grouping strategy |
| |||
| n | 10 | 28 | - | |
| Age (years) | 48.50 ± 4.81 | 48.39 ± 4.81 | 0.95a | |
| Sex (male/female) | 5/5 | 17/11 | 0.56b | |
|
| ||||
| n | 21 | 27 | - | |
| Age (years) | 53.19 ± 5.91 | 53.63 ± 9.18 | 0.85a | |
| Sex (male/female) | 9/12 | 18/11 | 0.18b | |
|
| ||||
| n | 17 | 26 | - | |
| Age (years) | 58.5 ± 8.14 | 60.88 ± 8.77 | 0.39a | |
| Sex (male/female) | 8/9 | 16/10 | 0.35b |
Age is represented as mean±standard deviation.
.
Figure 1Stage-specific GMV alterations in T2D patients under different grouping strategies. GRF correction (voxel-level p < 0.001, cluster-level p < 0.01) was used in all subgroups. (A) Stages in the main grouping strategy were categorized by illness duration (stage 1, duration <9 years; stage 2, duration ≥9 years). (B) Stages in the validation grouping strategy were also divided by illness duration (stage 1, duration <6 years; stage 2, 6 ≤ duration ≤ 11 years; stage 3, duration >11 years).
Figure 2The right temporal pole-based CaSCN analysis results (GRF correction, voxel-level p < 0.001, cluster-level p < 0.01).
The right temporal pole-based CaSCN analysis results.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occipital lobe extending to temporal lobe and cerebellum | L/R | −43.5, −58.5, −9 | 9.45 | 9,558 |
| Uncus extending to Parahippocampa Gyrus and FuG | L | −28.5, −4.5, −37.5 | 11.39 | 6,005 |
| Uncus extending to parahippocampa Gyrus | R | 30, −3.5, −37.5 | 6.5 | 1,080 |
| Temporal pole | R | 55.5, 6, −18 | 7.05 | 776 |
| MTG extending to MOG and ITG | R | 51, −54, 4.5 | 12.49 | 10,795 |
| MFG extending to SFG and SMA | R | 24, −3, 61.5 | 9.16 | 1,109 |
| MFG extending to SFG and SMA | L | −19.5, −12, 61.5 | 6.34 | 838 |
| FuG extending to cerebellum | R | 37.5, −69, −18 | −8.8 | 1,200 |
| Caudate extending to medial frontal gyrus and ACC | L/R | 0, 12, −6 | −5.84 | 1,354 |
| MFG extending to IFG and insula | L | −42, 21, 25.5 | −7.87 | 2,884 |
| Thalamus | L/R | 0, −9, 6 | −6.88 | 716 |
| Insula extending to STG and IPL | L | −42, −36, 19 | −10.51 | 3,691 |
| Insula extending to PosG and STG | R | 43, −25.5, 19.5 | −7.86 | 1,344 |
| dmPFC | R | 37.5, 18, 28.5 | −7.24 | 703 |
| IPL | R | 36, −54, 43.5 | −9.26 | 1,582 |
| PreG | L | −43.5, −3, 48 | −7.08 | 685 |
| MFG extending to PreG | R | 40.5, −4.5, 58.5 | −7.41 | 1,196 |
| ACC extending to moPFC | L/R | 1.5, 33, −9 | −8.04 | 1,410 |
| MFG extending to IFG and insula | L | −42, 21, 25.5 | −7.87 | 2,884 |
MTG, middle temporal gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; FuG, Fusiform gyrus; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; PosG, Postcentral gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; dmPFC, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex; PreG, Precentral gyrus; moPFC, medial orbital prefrontal cortex.
Figure 3Summary of the right temporal pole-based CaSCN analysis results. The arrow lines represent the positive causal effects or the negative causal effects from the seed region (the right temporal pole). TPO_R, the right temporal pole; LimL, limbic lobe; VisC, visual cortex; SMA, supplementary motor area; LanC, language cortex; Cere_R, right cerebellum; Tha, thalamus; AudC, auditory cortex; dmPFC, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex; SsmC, sensorimotor cortex; moPFC, medial orbital prefrontal cortex; Cau, caudate; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Cere, bilateral cerebellum.