| Literature DB >> 35911437 |
Mitushi Raj1, Samridhi Singh1, Kanishka Solanki1, Ramani Selvanambi1.
Abstract
Nowadays, a lot of people indulge themselves in the world of social media. With the current pandemic scenario, this engagement has only increased as people often rely on social media platforms to express their emotions, find comfort, find like-minded individuals, and form communities. With this extensive use of social media comes many downsides and one of the downsides is cyberbully. Cyberbullying is a form of online harassment that is both unsettling and troubling. It can take many forms, but the most common is a textual format. Cyberbullying is common on social media, and people often end up in a mental breakdown state instead of taking action against the bully. On the majority of social networks, automated detection of these situations necessitates the use of intelligent systems. We have proposed a cyberbullying detection system to address this issue. In this work, we proposed a deep learning framework that will evaluate real-time twitter tweets or social media posts as well as correctly identify any cyberbullying content in them. Recent studies has shown that deep neural network-based approaches are more effective than conventional techniques at detecting cyberbullying texts. Additionally, our application can recognise cyberbullying posts which were written in English, Hindi, and Hinglish (Multilingual data).Entities:
Keywords: Cyberbullying; Deep learning model; Multilingual; Real-time tweets; Stack word embeddings
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911437 PMCID: PMC9321314 DOI: 10.1007/s42979-022-01308-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SN Comput Sci ISSN: 2661-8907
Fig. 1Proposed model
Fig. 2CNN-BiLSTM architecture
Fig. 3WebAPP architecture
Fig. 4Activation and optimizer Comparison on baseline models
Fig. 5Hybrid models before hyper-parameter tuning
Comparison of activations and optimizer on baseline models
| Sl. no | Model Name | Hyperparameter | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LSTM | Activation-sigmoid; Optimizer-Adam | 0.87 |
| 2 | LSTM | Activation-relu; Optimizer-Adam | 0.85 |
| 3 | LSTM | Activation-sigmoid; Optimizer-RMSProp | 0.86 |
| 4 | LSTM | Activation-relu; Optimizer-RMSProp | 0.85 |
Comparison of activations and optimizer on baseline models
| Sl. no | Model Name | Accuracy Before Hypertuning | Accuracy After Hypertuning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CNN+BIGRU | 0.8905 | 0.9369 |
| 2 | CNN+BILSTM | 0.9135 | 0.9512 |
| 3 | BILSTM+BIGRU | 0.85330 | 0.8853 |
Fig. 6Hybrid models after hyper-parameter tuning
Fig. 7Posting tweets
Fig. 8Updated feed
Fig. 9Tweet status
Fig. 10Admin feature to block users