| Literature DB >> 35911278 |
Garima Garima1, Sharad Thanvi2, Anurag Singh3, Vijay Verma4.
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma is the most frequent and the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Standard treatment includes surgical removal of the tumor followed by concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Temozolomide, an oral alkylating agent, is currently the most commonly used chemotherapy. However, the median survival of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients remains very low. Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is a novel marker for GBM patients of Indian origin as very few studies have been done on this molecular marker in our country. This is the first study utilizing this molecular marker among GBM patients in Rajasthan, India. This was a single institutional study that aimed to estimate the proportion of EGFRvIII mutation in GBM patients of Indian origin. Methodology This was a non-randomized, ambispective, single institutional observational study done on 35 brain tissue biopsies of histopathologically diagnosed and confirmed cases of GBM based on the World Health Organization 2007 Classification received in the pathology department of Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur from 2015 to 2020 after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Molecular study of the EGFRvIII marker was conducted in all cases of GBM in the same institution on the RNA extracted from selected biopsy samples. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 22.0 software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY USA). The correlation between age and gender with EGFR-positive cases was analyzed, and EGFR positivity compared with previous studies. Results The occurrence of the EGFRvIII mutation was found to be 17.4% (6/35 cases). The mean age of presentation of a tumor with this mutation was estimated to be 54.3 years. Males were more commonly found to be affected (66.6%, 4/6 cases). Conclusions Thus, the identification of this mutation would segregate patients who may benefit from newer therapeutic approaches. In the future, personalized treatment may be advised for GBM patients depending on the presence of the EGFRvIII mutation.Entities:
Keywords: egfr mutation variant iii; genetic pathways; molecular markers; rt-pcr; targeted therapy; world health organization classification 2007
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911278 PMCID: PMC9335135 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
| All brain biopsies with histopathological diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme from 2015 to 2020 | Extremely small biopsies (<5 mm) |
| Glioblastoma multiforme cases with single tissue block | |
| Biopsies of the brain with histopathological diagnoses other than glioblastoma multiforme |
Figure 1RT-PCR graph of tissue samples showing the delta run versus cycle number.
RT-PCR: reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Age distribution.
P-value was 1.0000 for the association between age and EGFRvIII positivity.
EGFRvIII: epidermal growth factor receptor variant III
| Age (years) | EGFRvIII | Total | ||||
| Positive | Negative | |||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| 17–30 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 100.00 | 4 | 11.43 |
| 31–40 | 1 | 25.00 | 3 | 75.00 | 4 | 11.43 |
| 41–50 | 1 | 8.33 | 11 | 91.67 | 12 | 34.29 |
| 51–60 | 2 | 40.00 | 3 | 60.00 | 5 | 14.29 |
| 61–70 | 2 | 20.00 | 8 | 80.00 | 10 | 28.57 |
| Total | 6 | 17.14 | 29 | 82.86 | 35 | 100.00 |
Gender distribution.
EGFRvIII: epidermal growth factor receptor variant III
| Gender | EGFRvIII | Total | ||||
| Positive | Negative | |||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Male | 4 | 19.05 | 17 | 80.95 | 21 | 60.00 |
| Female | 2 | 14.29 | 12 | 85.71 | 14 | 40.00 |
| Total | 6 | 17.14 | 29 | 82.86 | 35 | 100.00 |
Previous studies on epidermal growth factor receptor in glioblastoma multiforme patients.
| Year | Authors | Study region | Technique used | Positivity |
| 2020 |
Jose et al. [ | India | Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification | 57.5% |
| 2017 |
Felsberg et al. [ | Germany | Immunohistohemistry | 50.5% |
| Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction | 56.8% | |||
| 2017 |
O’Rourke et al. [ | Philadelphia, United States | Next-generation sequencing | 21% |
| 2011 |
Jha et al. [ | India | Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction | 10.7% |
| 2011 |
Montano et al. [ | Italy | Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction | 43.8% |
| 2008 |
Yashimoto et al. [ | California, United States | Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) | 27% |
| 2008 |
Stutz et al. [ | United States | Southern blot | 17% |
| 2007 |
Saikali et al. [ | France | Immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) | 64% |
| 2004 |
Aldape et al. [ | Immunohistochemistry) | 43.2% | |
| Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction | 40.9% | |||
| 2003 |
Shinojima et al. [ | Japan | Immunohistochemistry) | 25.3% |
| 2000 |
Frederick et al. [ | Minnesota | Sequence analysis | 67% |
| 1999 |
Feldkamp et al. [ | United States | Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot | 25% |
| 1995 |
Moscatello et al. [ | Philadelphia | Western blot | 56% |
| 1990 |
Sugawa et al. [ | Sweden | Southern blot | 17% |