| Literature DB >> 35910995 |
Hu Chen1, Yingchao Wang2, Na Li3.
Abstract
Experience marketing plays an important role in improving the quality and upgrading tourism services in cultural tourism cities and helps guide the planning and development, commodity design, and business management of cultural tourism products. However, the urgent problems that need to be solved are as follows: How does experiential marketing in cultural tourism cities affect tourists' consumption behavior? How to adjust consumption emotion in tourist experience and revisit intention? Starting from the experience needs of tourists, this study selected Jinan city, represented by "Qilu culture," as the research object; discussed the relationship between experiential marketing, consumption emotion, and revisit intention; and used a structural equation model to verify the relationship between the three. This study divided the perception of experiential marketing into four dimensions-sensory experience, action experience, emotional experience, and thinking experience, and divided tourists' revisit intention into two dimensions- "revisit" and "recommendation". Totally, 305 tourists were randomly selected to participate in the questionnaire survey, and they came from 34 provinces in China. The results showed that cultural tourism cities can enhance tourists' positive consumption emotion through experiential marketing over time, and high-quality tourist consumption experience directly motivates tourists to revisit intention and then promotes tourists to go to cultural tourism cities for secondary consumption. These results suggest that cultural tourism cities should start from Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, pay attention to the needs of tourists at different levels, and adopt effective experiential marketing strategies from tourism experience to improve the quality of tourists' travel experience and promote tourists' revisit intention.Entities:
Keywords: consumption emotion; cultural tourism cities; experiential marketing; revisit intention; structural equation model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35910995 PMCID: PMC9326360 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical model chart.
Tourist experience measurement questions.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Sensory experience | 1. | |
| 2. | Schmitt, | |
| 3. | Shen, | |
| 4. | ||
| Action experience | 5. Traveling in | Schmitt, |
| 6. The service staff recommends me to try new things in | Shen, | |
| 7. | ||
| 8. Interact with folk craftsmen in | Brakus et al., | |
| Emotional experience | 9. | Schmitt, |
| 10. | Shen, | |
| 11. The atmosphere of | ||
| Thinking experience | 12. | Schmitt, |
| 13. | Shen, | |
| 14. Traveling in | ||
| 15. Traveling in |
Consumption emotion measurement questions.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Positive consumption emotion | 16. I was surprised to play in | Bosque and Martín, |
| 17. I was delighted to play in | ||
| 18. | ||
| 19. |
Revisit invention measurement questions.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Revisit invention | 20. I will come back to | Akgün et al., |
| 21. | ||
| Recommendation invention | 22. I would recommend | |
| 23. I will encourage family and friends to visit |
Statistics of demographic characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 99 | 32.5 |
| Female | 206 | 67.5 | |
| Age | <20 | 20 | 6.6 |
| 21–30 | 76 | 24.9 | |
| 31–40 | 103 | 33.8 | |
| 41–50 | 94 | 30.8 | |
| 51–60 | 10 | 3.3 | |
| >60 | 2 | 0.7 | |
| Education | High school and below | 13 | 4.3 |
| College | 58 | 19.0 | |
| Undergraduate | 154 | 50.5 | |
| Postgraduate | 80 | 26.2 | |
| Work | Civil servants | 162 | 53.1 |
| Enterprise employees | 46 | 15.1 | |
| Students | 34 | 11.1 | |
| Free-lancers | 24 | 7.9 | |
| Others | 39 | 12.8 | |
| Average annual tourism consumption of tourists | <500 | 9 | 3.0 |
| 501–1,000 | 21 | 6.9 | |
| 1,001–2,000 | 48 | 15.7 | |
| 2,001–3,000 | 73 | 23.9 | |
| >3,000 | 154 | 50.5 |
Descriptive statistical analysis of each item.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 5.15 | 1.451 | −0.623 | 0.103 | 0.844 |
| 2. | 5.1 | 1.47 | −0.596 | −0.043 | |
| 3. | 5.23 | 1.46 | −0.832 | 0.365 | |
| 4. | 5.04 | 1.546 | −0.544 | −0.398 | |
| 5. Traveling in | 5.05 | 1.536 | −0.51 | −0.408 | 0.87 |
| 6. The service staff recommends me to try new things in | 5.67 | 1.402 | −1.154 | 1.071 | |
| 7. | 5.43 | 1.408 | −0.851 | 0.485 | |
| 8. Interact with folk craftsmen in | 5.49 | 1.379 | −1.056 | 1.222 | |
| 9. | 5.21 | 1.396 | −0.613 | 0.304 | 0.858 |
| 10. | 5.06 | 1.51 | −0.603 | 0.038 | |
| 11. The atmosphere of | 5.53 | 1.398 | −1.072 | 1.13 | |
| 12. | 5.33 | 1.387 | −0.819 | 0.5 | 0.822 |
| 13. | 5.65 | 1.361 | −1.061 | 0.89 | |
| 14. Traveling in | 5.4 | 1.38 | −0.898 | 0.803 | 0.869 |
| 15. Traveling in | 5.47 | 1.449 | −0.895 | 0.378 | |
| 16. I was surprised to play in | 5.01 | 1.414 | −0.496 | −0.246 | 0.93 |
| 17. I was delighted to play in | 5.42 | 1.291 | −0.838 | 0.619 | |
| 18. | 5.45 | 1.282 | −0.896 | 0.753 | |
| 19. | 5.34 | 1.41 | −0.863 | 0.502 | |
| 20. I will come back to | 4.11 | 1.911 | −0.135 | −1.069 | 0.876 |
| 21. | 3.93 | 1.79 | 0.097 | −0.899 | |
| 22. I would recommend | 4.68 | 1.785 | −0.422 | −0.849 | |
| 23. I will encourage family and friends to visit | 5.11 | 1.725 | −0.72 | −0.406 |
Correlation coefficients of dimensions in each group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE | Correlation coefficient | 1 | |||||
| Sig. (Bilateral) | |||||||
| AE | Correlation coefficient | 0.807 | 1 | ||||
| Sig. (Bilateral) | 0.000 | ||||||
| EE | Correlation coefficient | 0.716 | 0.780 | 1 | |||
| Sig. (Bilateral) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||
| TE | Correlation coefficient | 0.657 | 0.696 | 0.766 | 1 | ||
| Sig. (Bilateral) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
| CE | Correlation coefficient | 0.711 | 0.748 | 0.789 | 0.820 | 1 | |
| Sig. (Bilateral) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| RI | Correlation coefficient | 0.477 | 0.517 | 0.580 | 0.607 | 0.621 | 1 |
| Sig. (Bilateral) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Summary table of original model fits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index value | 4.449 | 0.077 | 0.107 | 0.875 | 0.932 | 0.946 |
| Fit criteria | <3 | <0.1 | <0.080 | >0.900 | >0.900 | >0.900 |
| Fit evaluation | Non-compliant | Compliant | Non-compliant | Non-compliant | Compliant | Compliant |
Figure 2Initial model path diagram (normalized coefficients).
Comprehensive evaluation indicators of the revised model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index value | 2.503 | 0.064 | 0.070 | 0.935 | 0.965 | 0.978 |
| Fit criteria | <3 | <0.1 | <0.080 | >0.900 | >0.900 | >0.900 |
| Fit evaluation | Compliant | Compliant | Compliant | Compliant | Compliant | Compliant |
Figure 3Modified model path diagram (normalization coefficient).
Decomposition description of various effects of modified model path analysis.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Derived variable | Experiential marketing | Direct effect | 0.919 | 19.812 | 0.578 | 3.914 |
| Indirect effect | 0.142 | 0.995 | ||||
| Overall effect | 0.919 | 19.812 | 0.720 | 4.909 | ||
| Endogenous variable | Consumption emotion | Direct effect | 0.142 | 0.995 | ||
| Indirect effect | ||||||
| Overall effect | 0.142 | 0.995 | ||||
p < 0.001.
Summary table of empirical results of research hypotheses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Experiential Marketing → Revisit Invention | 0.578 | 3.914 | Established |
|
| Experiential Marketing → Consumption Emotion | 0.919 | 19.812 | Established |
|
| Consumption Emotion → Revisit Invention | 0.142 | 0.995 | Non-established |
|
| Experiential Marketing → Consumption Emotion → Revisit Invention | 0.142 | 0.995 | Non-established |
Indicates that the larger the Std. Coefficient, the stronger the persuasiveness, that is, the hypothesis is established.