Lisa B Mirel1, Dean M Resnick2, Jonathan Aram1, Christine S Cox3. 1. Data Linkage Methodology and Analysis Branch, Division of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD, USA. 2. Statistics and Methodology Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Health Care Programs Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) links data from surveys to administrative data sources, but privacy concerns make accessing new data sources difficult. Privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) is an alternative to traditional linkage approaches that may overcome this barrier. However, prior to implementing PPRL techniques it is important to understand their effect on data quality. METHODS: Results from PPRL were compared to results from an established linkage method, which uses unencrypted (plain text) identifiers and both deterministic and probabilistic techniques. The established method was used as the gold standard. Links performed with PPRL were evaluated for precision and recall. An initial assessment and a refined approach were implemented. The impact of PPRL on secondary data analysis, including match and mortality rates, was assessed. RESULTS: The match rates for all approaches were similar, 5.1% for the gold standard, 5.4% for the initial PPRL and 5.0% for the refined PPRL approach. Precision ranged from 93.8% to 98.9% and recall ranged from 98.7% to 97.8%, depending on the selection of tokens from PPRL. The impact of PPRL on secondary data analysis was minimal. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest PPRL works well to link patient records to the National Death Index (NDI) since both sources have a high level of non-missing personally identifiable information, especially among adults 65 and older who may also have a higher likelihood of linking to the NDI. CONCLUSION: The results from this study are encouraging for first steps for a statistical agency in the implementation of PPRL approaches, however, future research is still needed.
BACKGROUND: The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) links data from surveys to administrative data sources, but privacy concerns make accessing new data sources difficult. Privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) is an alternative to traditional linkage approaches that may overcome this barrier. However, prior to implementing PPRL techniques it is important to understand their effect on data quality. METHODS: Results from PPRL were compared to results from an established linkage method, which uses unencrypted (plain text) identifiers and both deterministic and probabilistic techniques. The established method was used as the gold standard. Links performed with PPRL were evaluated for precision and recall. An initial assessment and a refined approach were implemented. The impact of PPRL on secondary data analysis, including match and mortality rates, was assessed. RESULTS: The match rates for all approaches were similar, 5.1% for the gold standard, 5.4% for the initial PPRL and 5.0% for the refined PPRL approach. Precision ranged from 93.8% to 98.9% and recall ranged from 98.7% to 97.8%, depending on the selection of tokens from PPRL. The impact of PPRL on secondary data analysis was minimal. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest PPRL works well to link patient records to the National Death Index (NDI) since both sources have a high level of non-missing personally identifiable information, especially among adults 65 and older who may also have a higher likelihood of linking to the NDI. CONCLUSION: The results from this study are encouraging for first steps for a statistical agency in the implementation of PPRL approaches, however, future research is still needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
National Center for Health Statistics; National Death Index; National Hospital Care Survey
Authors: Sean M Randall; Anna M Ferrante; James H Boyd; Jacqueline K Bauer; James B Semmens Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Patricia C Lloyd; Veronica E Helms; Alan E Simon; Cordell Golden; James Brittain; Eileen Call; Lisa B Mirel; Barry L Steffen; Jon Sperling; Elizabeth C Rudd; Jennifer D Parker; Carol S Star Journal: Vital Health Stat 1 Date: 2017-10
Authors: Long Nguyen; Mark Stoové; Douglas Boyle; Denton Callander; Hamish McManus; Jason Asselin; Rebecca Guy; Basil Donovan; Margaret Hellard; Carol El-Hayek Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 5.428