Literature DB >> 35910558

Genome-Wide Analysis of Odorant-Binding Proteins and Chemosensory Proteins in the Bean bug Riptortus pedestris.

Jin-Bu Li1,2, Mao-Zhu Yin2, Wei-Chen Yao3, Sai Ma3, Youssef Dewer4, Xing-Zhou Liu2, Yue-Ying Wang2, Chao-Wei Wang2, Bao-Ping Li1, Xiu-Yun Zhu3.   

Abstract

Insects have sensitive olfactory systems to interact with environment and respond to the change in host plant conditions. Key genes in the system can be potential targets for developing new and efficient pest behaviour control methods. Riptortus pedestris is an important soybean pest in East Asia and has caused serious damage to the soybean plants in Huang-Huai-Hai region of China. However, the current treatment of pests is dominated by chemical insecticides and lacks efficient sustainable prevention and control technologies. In this study, we identified 49 putative odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) (43 were new genes) and 25 chemosensory proteins (CSPs) (17 were new genes) in R. pedestris genome. These OBP and CSP genes are clustered in highly conserved groups from other hemipteran species in phylogenetic trees. Most RpedOBPs displayed antennal-biased expression. Among the 49 RpedOBPs, 33 were significantly highly expressed in the antennae, including three male-biased and nine female-biased. While many RpedCSPs were detected both in the antennae and in non-antennal tissues, only 11 RpedCSPs displayed antennal-biased expression, in which four RpedCSPs were male-biased and five RpedCSPs were female-biased. Some OBP and CSP genes showed sex-biased expression profiles. Our results not only provide a foundation for future exploration of the functions of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs but also aid in developing environmentally friendly insecticides in the future.
Copyright © 2022 Li, Yin, Yao, Ma, Dewer, Liu, Wang, Wang, Li and Zhu.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Riptortus pedestris; chemosensory proteins; genome analysis; odorant-binding proteins; olfactory

Year:  2022        PMID: 35910558      PMCID: PMC9329939          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.949607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.755


Introduction

Insects have a sensitive olfactory system, which enhances their ability to adapt to the complex external environment to accurately complete behavioural reactions such as feeding, mating, and avoiding natural enemies (Leal, 2013; Robertson, 2019). A large amount of studies on the molecular mechanisms of insect olfactory systems have found that the accurate operation of the system is inseparable from the participation of olfactory genes such as odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), chemosensory proteins (CSPs), and olfactory receptors (ORs) (Zhang et al., 2013; Glaser et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Elfekih et al., 2016; Larter et al., 2016; Paula et al., 2016; Renou and Anton, 2020; Rihani et al., 2021). OBPs and CSPs are located in the lymph of insect antennal sensilla, and can accurately bind to external odorants and transport them to the corresponding ORs, ionotropic receptors (IRs) or gustatory receptors (GRs) to initiate behavioural responses. Therefore, the action of OBPs and CSPs is the first step in activating insect olfactory perception (Zhou, 2010; Dani et al., 2011; Pelosi et al., 2018; Rihani et al., 2021), which can be used as potential target genes to develop new and efficient pest behaviour control agents. Since the discovery of the first OBP and CSP in Antheraea polyphemus (Vogt and Riddiford, 1981) and Drosophila melanogaster (McKenna et al., 1994), respectively, a large number of OBPs and CSPs have been confirmed and studied in different insects (Latorre-Estivalis et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; He et al., 2022). These two types of genes have been the subject of studies on evolution, molecular structure, tissue distribution, and functional analysis (Spinelli et al., 2012; Pelosi et al., 2018; Li et al., 2021). It is now clear that both OBPs and CSPs are soluble small-molecule proteins. Generally, OBPs use six positionally conserved cysteines to form three interlocking disulfide bridges that stabilise the three-dimensional structure of the proteins. OBPs can be divided into three distinct subfamilies: classic OBPs (six conserved cysteines), minus-C OBPs (four conserved cysteines), and plus-C OBPs (more than six conserved cysteines) (Zhou, 2010; Schultze et al., 2012; Spinelli et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; He and He, 2014; Zhang et al., 2017b). Compared with OBPs, CSPs are smaller, display greater evolutionary conservation, and have only two disulfide bridges with four conserved cysteines (Maleszka and Stange, 1997; Bohbot et al., 1998; Pelosi et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhu J. et al., 2016; Yi et al., 2017; Pelosi et al., 2018). Additionally, OBPs are often specifically or highly expressed in the antennae and are mainly involved in odorant recognition (Krieger et al., 1996; Sengul and Tu, 2010; Missbach et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017a), whereas many CSPs are expressed in the antennal and other non-olfactory organs (Pelosi et al., 2005; Vogt, 2005; Zhang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhang L.-W. et al., 2016; Chen G.-L. et al., 2018). This suggests that CSPs may play both olfactory and non-olfactory roles in insects. The bean bug Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Alydidae) is an important soybean pest in East Asia (Xu et al., 2021) and has a wide range of hosts. In addition to soybean, it can also harm Cruciferae, Gramineae, and other crops (Huang et al., 2021). R. pedestris damages soybeans by sucking, which results in poor growth and development of plants and insufficient pods (Chen J. H. et al., 2018). In recent years, R. pedestris has caused serious damage to the soybean plants in Huang-Huai-Hai region of China and has greatly reduced the yield of soybean, or lost the harvest. It has now become an important pest in China’s summer soybean producing areas (Chen J. H. et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019). However, the current treatment of pests is still dominated by the use of chemical insecticides and lacks efficient green prevention and control technologies. This has become a growing consensus that the development of green and efficient behaviour disruptors is a popular research direction based on the exploration of insect olfactory systems (Sun et al., 2011; Cui and Zhu, 2016; Qin et al., 2020). In this study, we identified 49 OBPs and 25 CSPs in the R. pedestris genome and found that these genes were clustered in highly conserved groups comprising OBP and CSP genes from other hemipteran species, respectively. The gene expression profiles of OBPs and CSPs showed that most RpedOBPs displayed antennal-biased expression, while many RpedCSPs were highly expressed in the antennae and non-antennal tissues, and some genes showed sex-biased expression. These results will help us identify the functions of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs and develop environmentally friendly insecticides against this pest in the future.

Materials and Methods

Insect Rearing and Tissue Extraction

R. pedestris were fed with bean sprouts and maintained at a temperature of 26 ± 1°C under a 14:10 h light:dark photoperiod. Female and male adults, as well as larvae, were placed in insect cages for reproduction. Fifth instar larvae were collected and raised separately to obtain three-day-old virgin adults. The heads, thoraxes, abdomens, legs, wings, and antennae of virgin adults were collected. All collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at ˗80°C for future use.

Sequence Data Collection and Analyses

Genome data, gene, protein, RNA and annotation files of R. pedestris were obtained from the Genome Warehouse (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gwh/Assembly/18849/show). We used the protein data of R. pedestris and blasted with different database of Nr (Non-Redundant Protein Sequence), Nt (nucleotide sequence database), UniProt (The Universal Protein Resource), KOG (Clusters of orthologous groups for eukaryotic complete genomes), eggNOG (evolutionary genealogy of genes: No-supervised Orthologous Groups), Interpro (the integrative protein signature), GO (Gene Ontology), and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) databases (Huang et al., 2021), so R. pedestris proteins were annotated based on homology (These data were derived from a previous genome paper). We acquired the genes and ORF sequences of OBPs and CSPs by corresponding protein ID using R. pedestris genomic database. To ensure the accuracy of gene sequences, we used OBP and CSP genes to blast with Nr (Non-Redundant Protein Sequence) database in NCBI BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). We also selected some genes (RpedOBP8, RpedOBP37, RpedCSP5) to clone and sent to sequencing to verify the correctness of the sequences. A total of 49 OBPs and 25 CSPs were obtained based on the similarity analysis. Putative N-terminal signal peptides of all OBPs and CSPs were predicted using SignalP 4.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/), (Petersen et al., 2011).

RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using a FastPure® Cell/Tissue Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and RNA quality was checked using a spectrophotometre (NanoDropTM 2000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). Single-stranded cDNA templates were synthesised from 1 μg of total RNA from various tissue samples using the MonScript™ RTlll Super Mix with dsDNase (Two-Step) (Monad, Shanghai, China).

Quantitative Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction

The qRT-PCR primers for 49 OBPs and 25 CSPs (Supplementary Table S1) were designed using Beacon Designer 7.9 (PREMIER Biosoft International, CA, United States). Expression profilings of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs were performed using qRT-PCR in a LightCycler® 96 (Roche, Switzerland) with a mixture of 5 μL MonAmp™ ChemoHS qPCR Mix (Monad, Shanghai, China), 0.2 μL of each primer (10 μM), 2.5 ng of sample cDNA, and 3.6 μL of sterilised ultrapure H2O. The reaction program was as follows: 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 30 s. The results were analysed using LightCycler® 96 SW 1.1. Then, fluorescence was measured over a 55–95°C melting curve to detect a single gene-specific peak and to check the absence of primer dimer peaks; a single and discrete peak was detected for all primers tested. Negative controls consisted of non-template reactions in which the cDNA was replaced with H2O. The expression levels of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs were calculated relative to the reference genes RpedGAPDH (R. pedestris glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and RpedEF (R. pedestris elongation factor) using the Q-Gene method in Microsoft Excel-based software Visual Basic (Muller et al., 2002; Simon, 2003). For each sample, three biological replicates were performed with three technical replicates per biological replicate.

Sequence Analyses

Based on sequence alignments, all phylogenetic trees in this study were constructed using the MEGA7 software (Kumar et al., 2016) using the neighbour-joining method, and each tree was tested by bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the alignment results of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) genes from different species (Aphis gossypii: KR017753.1, Nilaparvata lugens: AB325705.1, Sogatella furcifera: LC005703.1, Adelphocoris lineolatus: MZ608737.1, Adelphocoris suturalis: KY367052.1, Nysius ericae: KM022105.1, and R. pedestris: MG838422.1). The amino acid sequences of the RpedOBPs, RpedCSPs, and other hemipteran OBPs and CSPs were listed in Supplementary Table S2. The totals numbers of OBPs and CSPs in other insects have been reported in previous studies (Gu et al., 2011; Gu et al., 2013; Cao et al., 2014; He and He, 2014; Xue et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014; He et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Cui et al., 2017). Gene structure and exon/intron structure maps were generated using TBTools (version 1.098728) (Chen et al., 2020) based on R. pedestris annotated file (Gene Location Visualisation from GTF/GFF and Visualisation of Gene Structure). Pairwise similarity of sequences was also generated by TBTools based protein sequences (Protein Pairwise Similarity Matrix). Expression heat maps and bars were drawn using TBtools and GraphPad Prism 9.0, respectively, based on the qRT-PCR results.

Statistical Analysis

The qRT-PCR data (mean ± SE) of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs from various samples were subjected to one-way nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a least significant difference test (LSD) to compare means using the SPSS Statistics software (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

Results and Discussion

Identification of OBP and CSP Genes in R. pedestris

Recent progress in the whole-genome sequencing provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of olfaction in insects (Cheng et al., 2017; Wan et al., 2019). Second- and third-generation sequencing methods have also been successfully used for R. pedestris genome assembly. Based on BUSCO completeness and contig length, the Wtdbg2 assembly was used for the draft assembly of the R. pedestris genome (Huang et al., 2021). We downloaded the R. pedestris genome, protein, RNA and annotation files using Genome Warehouse and further annotated them using the Nr, Nt, SwissProt, KOG, eggNOG, Interpro, GO, and KEGG databases. A total of 53 OBPs and 25 CSPs of R. pedestris were identified and corrected using the following correction through BLAST. Finally, 49 OBPs and 25 CSPs were identified and named RpedOBP1-49 (43 were new genes), RpedCSP1-25 (17 were new genes) (Table 1). The predicted results of the sequences analysis revealed that all OBPs and CSPs had full-length open reading frames (ORF), and 39 OBPs and 23 CSPs had a signal peptide, respectively. The 49 OBPs without signal peptides share 22.5–99.19% amino acid identities with each other, while the 25 CSPs share 22.5–99.07% amino acid identities with each other (Supplementary Table S3). Full-length sequences of the 49 RpedOBPs and 25 RpedCSPs were presented in the supplementary files.
TABLE 1

The sequences information of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs.

GeneGeneORFSignalCompleteBest blastx match
NameID(aa)PeptideORFNameAcc. numberSubject ORF(aa)SpeciesE valueIdentity (%)
Odorant binding protein (OBP)
RpedOBP1Rp.chr1.1194170NYodorant-binding protein 1AWW17235.1223 Riptortus pedestris 6E-1043
RpedOBP2Rp.chr1.1641331NYodorant-binding protein 5 AOV87022.1 224 Halyomorpha halys 1E-4841
RpedOBP3Rp.chr1.19711731–16Ygeneral odorant-binding protein 70XP_014286615.1225 Halyomorpha halys 2E-8380
RpedOBP4Rp.chr2.03761701–19Yodorant-binding protein 7 AYN07348.1 226 Yemma signatus 1E-7471
RpedOBP5Rp.chr2.03932151–25Yodorant-binding protein 19 AXB87334.1 227 Tropidothorax elegans 5E-2434
RpedOBP6Rp.chr2.03942801–21Yodorant-binding protein 11 AYN07352.1 228 Yemma signatus 2E-2746
RpedOBP7*Rp.chr2.0395215NYodorant-binding protein 2 AWW17236.1 229 Riptortus pedestris 2E-129100
RpedOBP8*Rp.chr2.03962231–22Yodorant-binding protein 1 AWW17235.1 230 Riptortus pedestris 3E-12699
RpedOBP9Rp.chr2.0983248NYodorant binding protein 47 QCZ25104.1 231 Nezara viridula 5E-8658
RpedOBP10Rp.chr2.12341651–24Yodorant binding protein 39 QCZ25096.1 232 Nezara viridula 9E-3944
RpedOBP11Rp.chr2.12391461–18Yodorant-binding protein 15 AXB87330.1 233 Tropidothorax elegans 1E-5353
RpedOBP12*Rp.chr2.13781531–18Yodorant-binding protein 5 AWW17239.1 234 Riptortus pedestris 3E-95100
RpedOBP13Rp.chr2.14852111–20Yodorant-binding protein 1 AXB87316.1 235 Tropidothorax elegans 2E-7273
RpedOBP14Rp.chr2.16351481–20Yodorant-binding protein 10 AYN07351.1 236 Yemma signatus 1E-4056
RpedOBP15Rp.chr2.17041471–21Yodorant binding protein 45 QCZ25102.1 237 Nezara viridula 3E-5667
RpedOBP16Rp.chr2.17061371–18Yodorant binding protein 42QCZ25099.1238 Nezara viridula 6E-734
RpedOBP17Rp.chr2.20241511–20Yodorant-binding protein 14 AXB87329.1 239 Tropidothorax elegans 1E-6774
RpedOBP18*Rp.chr2.21701421–18Yodorant-binding protein 6AWW17240.1240 Riptortus pedestris 3E-100100
RpedOBP19Rp.chr2.31051591–24Yodorant-binding protein 4AWW17238.1241 Riptortus pedestris 8E-8991
RpedOBP20Rp.chr2.32201441–21Yodorant-binding protein 11 AXB87326.1 242 Tropidothorax elegans 1E-2138
RpedOBP21Rp.chr2.32711481–27Yodorant binding protein 14 QCZ25071.1 243 Nezara viridula 3E-5365
RpedOBP22Rp.chr2.32721361–17Yodorant-binding protein 4AYN07346.1244 Yemma signatus 2E-5271
RpedOBP23Rp.chr2.3273109NYodorant binding protein 34 QCZ25091.1 245 Nezara viridula 5E-4261
RpedOBP24Rp.chr2.32741551–19Yodorant-binding protein 3AXB87318.1246 Tropidothorax elegans 1E-3451
RpedOBP25Rp.chr2.32751511–17Yodorant binding protein 41 QCZ25098.1 247 Nezara viridula 3E-5165
RpedOBP26Rp.chr2.3276121NYodorant binding protein 41 QCZ25098.1 248 Nezara viridula 8E-1440
RpedOBP27Rp.chr2.32781491–17Yodorant binding protein 41 QCZ25098.1 249 Nezara viridula 2E-1231
RpedOBP28Rp.chr2.33203091–17Yodorant binding protein 41QCZ25098.1250 Nezara viridula 5E-1236
RpedOBP29Rp.chr2.33211481–22Yodorant-binding protein 11AXB87326.1251 Tropidothorax elegans 1E-1843
RpedOBP30Rp.chr2.33261481–22Yodorant-binding protein 11AXB87326.1252 Tropidothorax elegans 3E-1336
RpedOBP31Rp.chr2.344594NYodorant binding protein 16QCZ25073.1253 Nezara viridula 1E-832
RpedOBP32Rp.chr2.3446184NYodorant binding protein 15 QCZ25072.1 254 Nezara viridula 2E-1033
RpedOBP33Rp.chr2.34471291–16Yodorant binding protein 42QCZ25099.1255 Nezara viridula 3E-1139
RpedOBP34Rp.chr3.2341149NYodorant-binding protein 10 AXB87325.1 256 Tropidothorax elegans 2E-4148
RpedOBP35Rp.chr3.23431461–19Yodorant-binding protein 10 AXB87325.1 257 Tropidothorax elegans 1E-3952
RpedOBP36Rp.chr3.24311461–21Yodorant-binding protein 14AYN07355.1258 Yemma signatus 3E-3144
RpedOBP37Rp.chr3.26441321–18Yodorant-binding protein 1AYN07343.1259 Yemma signatus 1E-6177
RpedOBP38*Rp.chr5.11341531–19Yodorant-binding protein 7 AWW17241.1 260 Riptortus pedestris 2E-108100
RpedOBP39*Rp.chr5.22421471–23Yodorant-binding protein 3 AWW17237.1 261 Riptortus pedestris 5E-49100
RpedOBP40Rp.chr5.22431441–20Yodorant-binding protein 3AWW17237.1262 Riptortus pedestris 1E-4798
RpedOBP41Rp.chr5.22441461–20Yodorant-binding protein 10AXB87325.1263 Tropidothorax elegans 4E-3647
RpedOBP42Rp.chr5.24931961–23Yodorant binding protein 24QCZ25081.1264 Nezara viridula 4E-1028
RpedOBP43Rp.chr5.25331341–19Ygeneral odorant-binding protein 56 hXP_016995790.1265 Drosophila takahashii 3E-627
RpedOBP44Rp.chr5.25361481–21Yodorant binding protein 3KAF2903755.1266 Sirex nitobei 3E-436
RpedOBP45Rp.chr5.25371521–21Yodorant-binding protein 2AIX97125.1267 Rhyzopertha dominica 9E-641
RpedOBP46Rp.chr5.25381521–21Ygeneral odorant-binding protein 19d-like XP_031341271.1 268 Photinus pyralis 3E-735
RpedOBP47Rp.chr5.25391441–19Yodorant binding protein 13 QCZ25070.1 269 Nezara viridula 0.0229
RpedOBP48Rp.chr5.25781411–22Yodorant binding protein 56 QCZ25112.1 270 Nezara viridula 7E-1230
RpedOBP49Rp.scaffold.288125NYodorant binding protein 56QCZ25112.1271 Nezara viridula 8E-1128
Chemosensory Protein (CSP)
RpedCSP1Rp.chr1.28261201–16Ychemosensory proteinAID61322.1121 Calliphora stygia 2E-2643
RpedCSP2Rp.chr3.0416128NYputative chemosensory proteinSAJ59007.1113 Triatoma brasiliensis 3E-5075
RpedCSP3*Rp.chr3.21831261–16Ychemosensory protein 7 AWW17231.1 126 Riptortus pedestris 1E-56100
RpedCSP4*Rp.chr3.26501331–20Ychemosensory protein 5 AWW17229.1 133 Riptortus pedestris 2E-65100
RpedCSP5*Rp.chr3.26511311–19Ychemosensory protein 10AWW17234.1131 Riptortus pedestris 3E-74100
RpedCSP6Rp.chr3.26611271–19Ychemosensory protein 1AWW17225.1127 Riptortus pedestris 7E-7284
RpedCSP7Rp.chr3.26621271–19Ychemosensory protein 1AWW17225.1127 Riptortus pedestris 7E-7284
RpedCSP8Rp.chr3.26821341–15Ychemosensory proteinAVM86426.1131 Corythucha ciliata 3E-3345
RpedCSP9Rp.chr3.26831261–16Ychemosensory protein 7AWW17231.1126 Riptortus pedestris 4E-4568
RpedCSP10Rp.chr3.26841271–16Ychemosensory protein 5QCZ25119.1126 Nezara viridula 3E-5170
RpedCSP11Rp.chr3.26871391–16Ychemosensory protein CSP3 ABM67690.1 126 Spodoptera exigua 2E-2239
RpedCSP12*Rp.chr3.26881331–18Ychemosensory protein 3 AWW17227.1 133 Riptortus pedestris 5E-76100
RpedCSP13Rp.chr3.26891871–16Ychemosensory protein 7 AWW17231.1 126 Riptortus pedestris 4E-2963
RpedCSP14Rp.chr3.26901271–16Ychemosensory protein 1AWW17225.1127 Riptortus pedestris 3E-6483
RpedCSP15Rp.chr3.26921271–16Ychemosensory protein 1 AWW17225.1 127 Riptortus pedestris 1E-6382
RpedCSP16*Rp.chr3.26931271–19Ychemosensory protein 1 AWW17225.1 127 Riptortus pedestris 6E-75100
RpedCSP17Rp.chr3.26941271–19Ychemosensory protein 1 AWW17225.1 127 Riptortus pedestris 5E-6891
RpedCSP18Rp.chr3.26951271–19Ychemosensory protein 1 AWW17225.1 127 Riptortus pedestris 2E-6791
RpedCSP19Rp.chr3.26961271–19Ychemosensory protein 1 AWW17225.1 127 Riptortus pedestris 2E-6892
RpedCSP20Rp.chr3.26971291–16Ychemosensory protein 4AWW17228.1121 Riptortus pedestris 1E-6391
RpedCSP21Rp.chr3.26981301–16Ychemosensory protein 4AWW17228.1121 Riptortus pedestris 6E-6898
RpedCSP22*Rp.chr3.26991321–16Ychemosensory protein 9 AWW17233.1 132 Riptortus pedestris 7E-79100
RpedCSP23*Rp.chr5.25031251–17Ychemosensory protein 2 AWW17226.1 125 Riptortus pedestris 5E-87100
RpedCSP24*Rp.chrX.0381155NYchemosensory protein 6AWW17230.1130 Riptortus pedestris 3E-5499
RpedCSP25Rp.chrX.09791211–16Ychemosensory protein 7 QCZ25121.1 124 Nezara viridula 3E-5070

*indicates that this gene has been saved in GenBank by other researchers.

The sequences information of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs. *indicates that this gene has been saved in GenBank by other researchers. The number of RpedOBP and RpedCSP genes identified for R. pedestris is larger than those in other hemipterans (Figure 1). For example, 11 OBPs and 17 CSPs were identified in N. lugens (Xue et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2014; Zhang Y.-N. et al., 2016), 14 OBPs and 8 CSPs in A. lineolatus (Gu et al., 2011; Zhang Y.-N. et al., 2016), 16 OBPs and eight CSPs in A. suturalis (Cui et al., 2017), 28 OBPs and 16 CSPs in N. ericae (Zhang Y.-N. et al., 2016), nine OBPs and nine CSPs in A. gossypii (Gu et al., 2013; Zhang Y.-N. et al., 2016), and 12 OBPs and nine CSPs were identified in S. furcifera (He and He, 2014; Zhou et al., 2015). The differences in gene numbers may be explained by: 1) the different behaviours of different insects requiring distinct molecular mechanisms that have been developed over evolutionary time, and 2) the genomic data of R. pedestris that is more conducive to the comprehensive mining of OBP and CSP genes than other hemipteran species.
FIGURE 1

The number of OBP and CSP genes in different insect species, obtained from genome (*) or antennal transcriptome (#). The digits by the histogram bars represent number of OBP and CSP genes in different hemipteran species (Aphis gossypii, Nilaparvata lugens, Sogatella furcifera, Adelphocoris lineolatus, Adelphocoris suturalis, Nysius ericae, R. pedestris) and phylogenetic tree was built by these hemipteran species COI genes.

The number of OBP and CSP genes in different insect species, obtained from genome (*) or antennal transcriptome (#). The digits by the histogram bars represent number of OBP and CSP genes in different hemipteran species (Aphis gossypii, Nilaparvata lugens, Sogatella furcifera, Adelphocoris lineolatus, Adelphocoris suturalis, Nysius ericae, R. pedestris) and phylogenetic tree was built by these hemipteran species COI genes.

Localization of OBPs and CSPs in the R. pedestris Genome

To clarify the position of OBPs and CSPs in chromosomes, we carried out chromosome location analysis of all genes, and the results showed that 48 OBP genes were distributed across four chromosomes (Figure 2A); only RpedOBP49 was located on scaffold056, which could not be mapped to a chromosome based on the current genome assembly. Thirty OBPs clustered together on chromosome 2, followed by chromosome 5 (11 OBPs), 3 (four OBPs), and 1 (three OBPs). Twenty-five CSP genes were distributed across four chromosomes, with 21 CSPs clustered together on chromosome 3 and the others on chromosome X (two CSPs), 1 (one CSP), and 5 (one CSP) (Figure 2B). More than 60% OBP and 80% CSP genes are located within clusters, as seen in other insects (Gong et al., 2009; Gu et al., 2013), indicating a relatively recent expansion of the OBP and CSP families of R. pedestris and the diverse functions of genes have evolved in response to different odorants in the environment.
FIGURE 2

Localization of OBPs and CSPs in the R. pedestris genome. Based on the annotation file of R. pedestris, we acquired the localization of OBP and CSP genes in genome. (A) The RpedOBPs in the R. pedestris genome, they clustered together in 4 chromosomes and one scaffold. (B) The RpedCSPs in the R. pedestris genome, they clustered together in 4 chromosomes.

Localization of OBPs and CSPs in the R. pedestris genome. Based on the annotation file of R. pedestris, we acquired the localization of OBP and CSP genes in genome. (A) The RpedOBPs in the R. pedestris genome, they clustered together in 4 chromosomes and one scaffold. (B) The RpedCSPs in the R. pedestris genome, they clustered together in 4 chromosomes.

Genomic Structure of R. pedestris OBPs and CSPs

To further clarify the genomic structural characteristics of OBPs and CSPs, we obtained the gene lengths and intron numbers of OBPs and CSPs based on the genome annotation file of R. pedestris (Figure 3). The lengths of the OBP genes ranged from 3.065 to 46.888 kb, with 33 OBPs having six introns and the other 16 OBPs having four, five, seven, eight, nine, and 12 introns, respectively (Figure 3A). The CSP genes were much shorter, ranging from 2.114 to 34.628 kb, with one, two, or three introns (Figure 3B). The phylogenetic trees of OBPs and CSPs in R. pedestris showed that the genes clustered together tended to have similar genomic structures, which also implies that they may have similar functions. The sequences of RpedOBPs were longer and had more introns than those of RpedCSPs, indicating that they may have complex features of functional differentiation.
FIGURE 3

Genomic structure of R. pedestris OBPs and CSPs. Based on the annotation file of R. pedestris, we acquired genomic structures of OBP and CSP genes. (A) Numbers of exon/intron and exon/intron structures of RpedOBPs. (B) Numbers of exon/intron and exon/intron structures of RpedCSPs.

Genomic structure of R. pedestris OBPs and CSPs. Based on the annotation file of R. pedestris, we acquired genomic structures of OBP and CSP genes. (A) Numbers of exon/intron and exon/intron structures of RpedOBPs. (B) Numbers of exon/intron and exon/intron structures of RpedCSPs.

Phylogenetic Analyses of Hemipteran OBPs and CSPs

Two phylogenetic trees were constructed for the OBPs and CSPs using protein sequences from R. pedestris, A. lineolatus, Apolygus lucorum, Aphis gossypii, and other hemipteran species (Gu et al., 2011; Gu et al., 2013; Cao et al., 2014; He and He, 2014; Xue et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014; He et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Cui et al., 2017). Similar to that in other studies (Gu et al., 2011; Zhang Y.-N. et al., 2016; Cui et al., 2017), the OBP tree in this study showed that eight RpedOBPs (OBP1, 5–9, 13, and 42) could be divided into the Plus-C OBP subfamily, and the other 41 RpedOBPs clustered into the classic OBP subfamily (Figure 4). In the constructed CSP tree, our results indicated that all 25 RpedCSPs were distributed along various branches, and each clustered with at least one other moth orthologue (Figure 5). The diversity of the RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs families suggests a role for positive selection in the rapid evolution and functional diversification of these genes. We speculate that both RpedOBP and RpedCSP genes had some gene expansions, such as OBP1/5/6/7/8/13, OBP23/10/48/16/33/32/31/49/46/45/44/47/43, OBP25/26/27/28, OBP40/39/41/34/15/36/35/11, CSP13/8/19/22, and CSP12/15/14/16/17/19/18/6/7, indicating that these genes may be involved in the recognition of important odorants related to R. pedestris behaviour (Pelosi et al., 2005; Matsuo et al., 2007; Gu et al., 2012; Poivet et al., 2013; Martin-Blazquez et al., 2017; He et al., 2019).
FIGURE 4

Phylogenetic tree of OBPs. Phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA7 based on alignment results of MEGA7. A phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using the OBPs protein that removed signal peptide. Bootstrap values higher than 70 were displayed.

FIGURE 5

Phylogenetic tree of CSPs. Phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA7 based on alignment results of MEGA7. A phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using the CSPs protein that removed signal peptide. Bootstrap values higher than 50 were displayed.

Phylogenetic tree of OBPs. Phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA7 based on alignment results of MEGA7. A phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using the OBPs protein that removed signal peptide. Bootstrap values higher than 70 were displayed. Phylogenetic tree of CSPs. Phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA7 based on alignment results of MEGA7. A phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree was constructed using the CSPs protein that removed signal peptide. Bootstrap values higher than 50 were displayed.

Expression Profiles of R. pedestris OBP and CSP Genes

We used qRT-PCR to assess expression profiles of all R. pedestris OBPs and CSPs in the heads, thoraxes, abdomens, legs, wings, and antennae of the adults. The results showed that all OBPs and CSPs were expressed in the adult antennae of R. pedestris. Among the 49 RpedOBPs, 33 (approximately 67%) were significantly highly expressed in the antennae, including three male-biased (RpedOBP19, RpedOBP21, and RpedOBP32) and nine female-biased (RpedOBP2, RpedOBP6, RpedOBP9, RpedOBP17, RpedOBP24, RpedOBP34, RpedOBP36, RpedOBP48, and RpedOBP49). Among the 49 RpedOBPs, RpedOBP37 exhibited the highest expression level in male and female antennae (Figure 6). Compared to RpedOBPs, RpedCSPs were highly expressed in adult antennae as well as in non-antennal tissues. Of the 25 identified RpedCSP genes, only 11 RpedCSPs (approximately 44%) displayed antennal-biased expression; four RpedCSPs (RpedCSP3, RpedCSP12, RpedCSP20, and RpedCSP21) were male-biased and five RpedCSPs (RpedCSP4, RpedCSP9, RpedCSP11, RpedCSP13, and RpedCSP24) were female-biased in their expression (Figure 7). Several studies have shown that OBPs and CSPs are required for the correct recognition of some odorants from the external environment (Zhang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015; Chen G.-L. et al., 2018; Pelosi et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020a; Zhang et al., 2020b), therefore, we infer that the 33 RpedOBPs and 11 RpedCSPs highly expressed in adult antennae are likely to be involved in the crucial odorant reorganisation of R. pedestris (Krieger et al., 1996; Bohbot and Vogt, 2005; Zhang et al., 2014; Missbach et al., 2015; Chen G.-L. et al., 2018). The sex-biased RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs may be involved in the reorganisation of plant volatiles from oviposition sites or other sex-related odorants (He et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2019). Further analysis is needed to explore their exact roles, such as through fluorescence competitive binding assays (Liu et al., 2015; Ingham et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022), CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing (Zhu G.-H. et al., 2016; Han et al., 2022), and gene mutations (Stowers and Logan, 2008; Zhang et al., 2020b).
FIGURE 6

Tissue expression profiles of R. pedestris OBPs by qRT-PCR. The relative expression level is presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). The heatmap use Log2 and row scale based the relative expression level data. Different capital letters mean a significant difference between tissues (p < 0.05, ANOVA, LSD). He, heads; Th, thoraxes; Ab, abdomens; Le, legs; Wi, wings; FA, female antennae; MA, male antennae.

FIGURE 7

Tissue expression profiles of R. pedestris CSPs by qRT-PCR. The relative expression level is presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). The heatmap use Log2 and row scale based the relative expression level data. Different capital letters mean a significant difference between tissues (p < 0.05, ANOVA, LSD). He, heads; Th, thoraxes; Ab, abdomens; Le, legs; Wi, wings; FA, female antennae; MA, male antennae.

Tissue expression profiles of R. pedestris OBPs by qRT-PCR. The relative expression level is presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). The heatmap use Log2 and row scale based the relative expression level data. Different capital letters mean a significant difference between tissues (p < 0.05, ANOVA, LSD). He, heads; Th, thoraxes; Ab, abdomens; Le, legs; Wi, wings; FA, female antennae; MA, male antennae. Tissue expression profiles of R. pedestris CSPs by qRT-PCR. The relative expression level is presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). The heatmap use Log2 and row scale based the relative expression level data. Different capital letters mean a significant difference between tissues (p < 0.05, ANOVA, LSD). He, heads; Th, thoraxes; Ab, abdomens; Le, legs; Wi, wings; FA, female antennae; MA, male antennae. Similar to the findings of previous studies (Zhang et al., 2013; McKenzie et al., 2014; Gu et al., 2015; Zhang L.-W. et al., 2016), we also found that there were 12 RpedOBP and six RpedCSP genes highly expressed in non-antennal tissues, including four leg-biased genes (RpedOBP14, RpedOBP35, RpedOBP44, and RpedCSP6), six head-biased genes (RpedOBP16, RpedOBP29, RpedOBP30, RpedOBP31, RpedOBP45, and RpedOBP46), one thorax-biased gene (RpedOBP39), two abdomen-biased genes (RpedOBP26 and RpedOBP28), and five wing-biased genes (RpedCSP1, RpedCSP2, RpedCSP8, RpedCSP10, and RpedCSP25), indicating that these genes may have other non-olfactory functions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we identified 49 OBPs and 25 CSPs in the R. pedestris genome and found that these genes were clustered in highly conserved groups comprising OBP and CSP genes from other hemipteran species. To further understand the functions of these genes, we conducted comprehensive and comparative phylogenetic analyses and studied the gene expression profiles of OBPs and CSPs. We found that most RpedOBPs displayed antennal-biased expression, but many RpedCSPs were detected in the antennae and were highly expressed in non-antennal tissues, and some genes showed characteristics of sex-biased expression. Tissue- and sex-biased expression patterns will help us identify the functions of RpedOBPs and RpedCSPs, which will also aid in understanding the olfactory mechanism of R. pedestris and the development of environmentally friendly insecticides against this pest in the future.
  73 in total

1.  Crystal structure of Apis mellifera OBP14, a C-minus odorant-binding protein, and its complexes with odorant molecules.

Authors:  Silvia Spinelli; Amandine Lagarde; Immacolata Iovinella; Pierre Legrand; Mariella Tegoni; Paolo Pelosi; Christian Cambillau
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.714

2.  Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data.

Authors:  Perikles Simon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Odorant-binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in pheromone detection and release in the silkmoth Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Francesca R Dani; Elena Michelucci; Simona Francese; Guido Mastrobuoni; Silvia Cappellozza; Giancarlo La Marca; Alberto Niccolini; Antonio Felicioli; Gloriano Moneti; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Two subclasses of odorant-binding proteins in Spodoptera exigua display structural conservation and functional divergence.

Authors:  N-Y Liu; F Yang; K Yang; P He; X-H Niu; W Xu; A Anderson; S-L Dong
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.585

5.  Molecular characterization, expression profiling, and binding properties of odorant binding protein genes in the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera.

Authors:  Ming He; Peng He
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  De novo analysis of the Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) antenna transcriptome and expression patterns of olfactory genes.

Authors:  Shuang-Shuang Zhou; Ze Sun; Weihua Ma; Wei Chen; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae.

Authors:  R G Vogt; L M Riddiford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981 Sep 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Identification and preliminary characterization of chemosensory perception-associated proteins in the melon fly Bactrocera cucurbitae using RNA-seq.

Authors:  Samia Elfekih; Chien-Yu Chen; Ju-Chun Hsu; Mahdi Belcaid; David Haymer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A comparison of the olfactory gene repertoires of adults and larvae in the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Erwan Poivet; Aurore Gallot; Nicolas Montagné; Nicolas Glaser; Fabrice Legeai; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identification and comparative expression analysis of odorant binding protein genes in the tobacco cutworm Spodoptera litura.

Authors:  Shao-Hua Gu; Jing-Jiang Zhou; Shang Gao; Da-Hai Wang; Xian-Chun Li; Yu-Yuan Guo; Yong-Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.