| Literature DB >> 35910275 |
Zdenka Pelaić1, Zrinka Čošić1, Maja Repajić2, Sandra Pedisić1, Zoran Zorić1, Mario Ščetar2, Kata Galić2, Branka Levaj2.
Abstract
Research background: Potato tissue is damaged during fresh-cut production, which makes fresh-cut potato susceptible to the quality loss and microbiological spoilage. At the same time, such products are desirable due to their convenience; however, they are extremely sensitive and have short shelf life. The main challenge of the fresh-cut potato industry is to find possibilities to overcome these drawbacks. UV-C treatment, known for its antibacterial activity, is a promising technique and it shows a potential to improve shelf life of fresh-cut potato products. Experimental approach: The influence of the UV-C treatment on the safety and quality, as well as sensory traits of fresh-cut potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Birgit) during storage was examined. For this purpose, 0-, 3-, 5- and 10-min UV-C irradiation was applied on vacuum-packed potato slices pretreated with sodium ascorbate solution. During 23 days of storage at (6±1) °C, microbiological, physicochemical and sensory properties of raw samples were monitored, along with sensory properties of boiled and fried fresh-cut potatoes. Results and conclusions: The 5- and 10-min UV-C treatments significantly reduced microbial growth, increased total solids and lightness (L*), and positively affected odour and firmness of raw potatoes. Cooked UV-C-treated samples were described with more pronounced characteristic potato odour and taste. Overall, UV-C-treated fresh-cut potato retained its good quality and sensory traits up to 15 days at (6±1) °C. Novelty and scientific contribution: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scientific article dealing with the effect of UV-C light on durability (safety, quality and sensory traits) of fresh-cut potato cv. Birgit and its suitability for boiling and frying. In general, UV-C treatment is a known antimicrobial technique, but its application on fresh-cut potato is poorly explored. Results confirmed that vacuum-packed fresh-cut potato treated only with UV-C and sodium ascorbate as anti-browning agent, without the addition of chemical preservatives, had twofold longer shelf-life at (6±1) °C than the fresh-cut potato not treated with UV-C. Fresh-cut potato treated with UV-C retained good overall quality and sensory properties either raw, boiled or fried. Results of this study could also be useful for producers in terms of potential UV-C application as a strategy for prolonging the shelf-life of fresh-cut potato.Entities:
Keywords: CIELAB colour; firmness; potato cv. Birgit; principal component analysis (PCA); sodium ascorbate treatment; vacuum packaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35910275 PMCID: PMC9295623 DOI: 10.17113/ftb.60.02.22.7182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Technol Biotechnol ISSN: 1330-9862 Impact factor: 2.330
Fig. 1Total aerobic mesophilic bacteria count (TAMBC) of untreated and UV-C-treated raw fresh-cut potatoes during storage, expressed as mean values of log CFU/g (p<0.01, α≤0.05). 3-, 5- and 10-UV-C=samples treated with UV-C for 3, 5 and 10 min respectively
The influence of UV-C treatment and storage time on total soluble (TSS) and total solids, pH, firmness and colour parameters of raw fresh-cut potatoes
| Source of variation | TSS/(g/100 g) | pH | Firmness/N |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | p=0.05* | p=0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.22 | p=0.33 |
| Control | (21.7±0.4)a | (4.59±0.06)b | (5.64±0.01)c | (7.77±0.09)c | (71.8±0.4)ab | (1.6±0.2)a | (40.0±0.9)a |
| 3-UV-C | (21.9±0.4)ab | (4.58±0.06)ab | (5.63±0.01)bc | (7.00±0.09)a | (71.1±0.4)a | (1.4±0.2)a | (38.4±0.9)a |
| 5-UV-C | (22.2±0.4)ab | (4.44±0.06)a | (5.59±0.01)ab | (7.35±0.09)ab | (73.2±0.4)b | 2.0±0.2)a | (40.3±0.9)a |
| 10-UV-C | (23.2±0.4)c | (4.30±0.06)a | (5.57±0.01)a | (7.37±0.09)b | (73.0±0.4)b | (2.0±0.2)a | (40.5±0.9)a |
| p=0.05 | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.14 | p=0.38 | p=0.10 | p=0.25 | |
| 0 | (21.9±0.1)a | (4.80±0.07)b | (5.99±0.01)d | (7.4±0.1)a | (71.6±0.5)a | (1.7±0.3)a | (4077±1.0)a |
| 8 | (21.8±0.4)a | (4.40±0.07)a | (5.62±0.01)c | (7.5±0.1)a | (72.8±0.5)a | (2.2±0.3)a | (39.9±1.00)a |
| 11 | (23.1±0.4)a | (4.26±0.07)a | (5.51±0.01)b | (7.4±0.1)a | (71.9±058)a | (1.3±0.3)a | (39.6±1.0)a |
| 15 | (21.6±0.4)a | (4.18±0.07)a | (5.42±0.01)a | (7.2±0.1)a | (72.6±0.5)a | (219±0.3)a | (41.0±1.0)a |
| 23 | (22.9±0.4)a | (4.75±0.07)b | (5.50±0.01)b | (7.3±0.1)a | (72.4±0.5)a | (1.5±0.3)a | (37.9±1.0)a |
| Grand mean | 22.24 | 4.48 | 5.61 | 7.37 | 72.24 | 1.74 | 39.80 |
*Statistically significant variable at α≤0.05. Results are expressed as mean value±S.E. Different letters in the same column mean statistically different values at α≤0.05. 3-UV-C, 5-UV-C and 10-UV-C=samples treated with UV-C for 3, 5 and 10 min respectively
The influence of UV-C treatment and storage time on sensory properties of raw fresh-cut potatoes
| Source of variation | Browning | Odour | Off-odour | Moistness | Firmness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.09 | p=0.03* |
| Control | (1.98±0.04)b | (3.40±0.03)a | (1.53±0.03)b | (1.55±0.02)a | (4.97±0.05)b |
| 3-UV-C | (1.58±0.04)a | (3.47±0.03)a | (1.53±0.03)b | (1.52±0.02)a | (4.75±0.05)a |
| 5-UV-C | (1.66±0.04)a | (3.48±0.03)a | (1.43±0.03)b | (1.50±0.02)a | (4.82±0.05)ab |
| 10-UV-C | (1.65±0.04)a | (3.67±0.03)b | (1.17±0.03)a | (1.50±0.02)a | (4.85±0.05)ab |
| p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.06 | p=0.01* | |
| 0 | (1.50±0.05)a | (4.00±0.04)b | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.56±0.02)a | (4.65±0.06)a |
| 8 | (1.50±0.05)a | (4.00±0.04)b | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.52±0.02)a | (4.92±0.06)b |
| 11 | (1.73±0.05)b | (3.98±0.04)b | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.50±0.02)a | (4.90±0.06)b |
| 15 | (1.94±0.05)c | (3.98±0.04)b | (1.02±0.03)a | (1.50±0.02)a | (4.88±0.06)b |
| 23 | (1.94±0.05)c | (1.56±0.04)a | (3.06±0.03)b | (1.50±0.02)a | (4.90±0.06)b |
| Grand mean | 1.72 | 3.51 | 1.42 | 1.52 | 4.85 |
*Statistically significant variable at α≤0.05. Results are expressed as mean±S.E. Different letters in the same column mean statistically different values at α≤0. 3-UV-C, 5-UV-C and 10-UV-C=samples treated with UV-C for 3, 5 and 10 min respectively
The influence of UV-C treatment and storage time on sensory properties of boiled fresh-cut potatoes
| Source of variation | Browning | Odour | Off-odour | Moistness | Firmness | Creaminess | Potato | Sweet | Sour | Salty | Bitter | Off-taste |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.17 | p=0.70 | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.39 | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p=0.57 |
| Control | (2.40±0.05)c | (4.70±0.03)a | (1.07±0.03)a | (2.07±0.03)a | (2.30±0.08)c | (3.70±0.07)a | (4.35±0.05)a | (1.05±0.04)a | (1.05±0.03)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.03±0.02)a | (1.00±0.01)a |
| 3-UV-C | (1.95±0.05)a | (4.78±0.03)a | (1.08±0.03)a | (2.08±0.03)a | (1.97±0.08)b | (4.23±0.07)b | (4.93±0.05)b | (1.12±0.04)ab | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.01)a |
| 5-UV-C | (2.13±0.05)b | (4.92±0.03)b | (1.03±0.03)a | (2.12±0.03)a | (1.72±0.08)b | (4.38±0.07)b | (4.92±0.05)b | (1.23±0.04b | (1.03±0.03)a | (1.20±0.04)b | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.02±0.01)a |
| 10-UV-C | (2.03±0.05)ab | (5.00±0.03)b | (1.00±0.03)a | (2.10±0.03)a | (1.12±0.08)a | (4.72±0.07)c | (4.92±0.05)b | (1.45±0.04)c | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.50±0.04)b | (1.02±0.02)a | (1.02±0.01)a |
| p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.03* | p<0.01* | p=0.36 | p<0.01* | p=0.13 | p=0.10 | |
| 0 | (1.50±0.05)a | (5.00±0.04)c | (1.00±0.03)a | (2.00±0.03)a | (1.46±0.09)a | (4.58±0.07)b | (4.69±0.05)a | (1.10±0.05)a | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.08±0.05)ab | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.01)a |
| 8 | (1.92±0.05)b | (4.52±0.04)a | (1.00±0.03)a | (2.17±0.03)b | (2.10±0.09)b | (4.13±0.07)a | (4.83±0.05)a | (1.06±0.05)a | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.48±0.05)c | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.01)a |
| 11 | (1.67±0.05)a | (5.00±0.04)c | (1.00±0.03)a | (2.30±0.03)b | (1.83±0.09)bc | (4.23±0.07)a | (4.88±0.05)a | (1.75±0.05)b | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.27±0.05)b | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.01)a |
| 15 | (2.65±0.05)c | (5.00±0.04)c | (1.00±0.03)a | (2.00±0.03)a | (1.58±0.09)ab | (4.23±0.07)a | (4.85±0.05)a | (1.10±0.05)a | (1.04±0.03)a | (1.04±0.05)a | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.01)a |
| 23 | (2.92±0.05)d | (4.73±0.04)b | (1.23±0.03)b | (2.00±0.03)a | (1.90±0.09)bc | (4.13±0.07)a | (4.65±0.05)a | (1.04±0.05)a | (1.06±0.03)a | (1.00±0.05)a | (1.06±0.02)a | (1.04±0.01)a |
| Grand mean | 2.13 | 4.85 | 1.05 | 2.09 | 1.78 | 4.26 | 4.78 | 1.21 | 1.02 | 1.18 | 1.01 | 1.01 |
*Statistically significant variable at α≤0.05. Results are expressed as mean±S.E. Different letters in the same column mean statistically different values at α≤0.05. 3-UV-C, 5-UV-c and 10-UV-C=samples treated with UV-C for 3, 5 and 10 min respectively
The influence of UV-C treatment and storage days on sensory properties of fried fresh-cut potatoes
| Source of variation | Browning | Odour | Off-odour | Oiliness | Firmness | Crispiness | Potato | Sweet | Sour | Salty | Bitter | Off-taste |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p=0.85 | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p<0.01* | p=0.56 | p=0.53 |
| Control | (2.33±0.03)b | (4.63±0.04)a | (1.03±0.02)a | (1.07±0.03)a | (2.32±0.07)b | (2.00±0.02)a | (3.98±0.05)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.03±0.02)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.05±0.03)a | (1.03±0.02)a |
| 3-UV-C | (2.11±0.03)a | (4.75±0.04)ab | (1.02±0.02)a | (1.03±0.03)a | (2.40±0.07)b | (2.02±0.02)a | (4.32±0.05)b | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.02±0.02)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.03±0.03)a | (1.02±0.02)a |
| 5-UV-C | (2.15±0.03)a | (4.80±0.04)bc | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.05±0.03)a | (2.30±0.07)ab | (2.03±0.02)a | (4.33±0.05)b | (1.15±0.04)b | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.17±0.04)b | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.00±0.02)a |
| 10-UV-C | (2.15±0.03)a | (4.93±0.04)c | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.05±0.03)a | (2.03±0.07)a | (2.00±0.02)a | (4.68±0.05)c | (1.52±0.04)c | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.40±0.04)c | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.00±0.02)a |
| p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p<0.01* | p<0.01* | p=0.53 | p<0.01* | p=0.55 | p=0.53 | |
| 0 | (2.00±0.04)a | (5.00±0.05)c | (1.00±0.01)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (2.27±0.08)ab | (2.00±0.02)a | (4.21±0.05)a | (1.29±0.05)b | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.20±0.04)bc | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.00±0.02)a |
| 8 | (2.00±0.04)a | (4.58±0.05)a | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (2.15±0.08)ab | (2.00±0.02)a | (4.54±0.05)c | (1.29±0.05)b | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.25±0.04)c | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.00±0.02)a |
| 11 | (2.00±0.04)a | (4.63±0.05)a | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (2.46±0.08)b | (2.04±0.02)a | (4.17±0.05)a | (1.13±0.05)ab | (1.00±0.02)a | (1.03±0.04)a | (1.00±0.03)a | (1.00±0.02)a |
| 15 | (2.52±0.04)b | (4.75±0.05)ab | (1.02±0.02)a | (1.13±0.04)b | (2.35±0.08)ab | (2.02±0.02)a | (4.25±0.05)ab | (1.13±0.05)ab | (1.04±0.02)a | (1.08±0.04)ab | (1.04±0.03)a | (1.02±0.02)a |
| 23 | (2.42±0.04)b | (4.94±0.05)bc | (1.04±0.02)a | (1.13±0.04)b | (2.08±0.08)a | (2.00±0.02)a | (4.48±0.05)bc | (1.00±0.05)a | (1.02±0.02)a | (1.00±0.04)a | (1.06±0.03)a | (1.04±0.02)a |
| Grand mean | 2.17 | 4.78 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 2.26 | 2.01 | 4.33 | 1.17 | 1.01 | 1.14 | 1.02 | 1.01 |
*Statistically significant variable at α≤0.05. Results are expressed as mean±S.E. Different letters in the same column mean statistically different values at α≤0.05. 3-UV-C, 5-UV-C and 10-UV-C=samples treated with UV-C for 3, 5 and 10 min respectively
Fig. 2Biplot related to the raw fresh-cut potatoes. The first number in the sample label indicates UV-C treatment (min) and the second number indicates storage day. TAMBC=total aerobic mesophilic bacteria count, TSS=total soluble solids
Fig. 3Biplot related to the boiled fresh-cut potatoes. The first number in the sample label indicates UV-C treatment (min) and the second number indicates storage day
Fig. 4Biplot related to the fried fresh-cut potatoes. The first number in the sample label indicates UV-C treatment (min) and the second number indicates storage day