Von V Phan1,2, Charles Mosier1, Michael C Yoon1,2, Evgenia Glukhov3, Conor R Caffrey1, Anthony J O'Donoghue1, William H Gerwick1,3, Vivian Hook1,4. 1. Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States. 2. Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States. 3. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States. 4. Department of Neurosciences and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States.
Abstract
Dysregulation of cathepsin B, which involves the translocation of the enzyme from acidic pH lysosomes to the neutral pH cytosol, followed by the initiation of cell death and inflammation, occurs in numerous brain disorders. The wide difference in the acidic pH (4.6) of lysosomes compared to the neutral pH (7.2) of the cytosol suggests that screening at different pH conditions may identify pH-selective modulators of cathepsin B. Therefore, a collection of pure marine and plant natural product (NP) compounds, with synthetic compounds, was screened at pH 4.6 and pH 7.2 in cathepsin B assays, which led to the identification of GER-12 (Crossbyanol B) and GER-24 ((7Z,9Z,12Z)-octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic acid) marine NP inhibitors at acidic pH but not at neutral pH. GER-12 was effective for the reversible inhibition of cathepsin B, with an IC50 of 3 μM. GER-24 had an IC50 of 16 μM and was found to be an irreversible inhibitor. These results show that NP screening at distinct biological pH conditions can lead to the identification of pH-selective cathepsin B modulators. These findings suggest that screening efforts for molecular probes and drug discovery may consider the biological pH environment of the target in the disease process.
Dysregulation of cathepsin B, which involves the translocation of the enzyme from acidic pH lysosomes to the neutral pH cytosol, followed by the initiation of cell death and inflammation, occurs in numerous brain disorders. The wide difference in the acidic pH (4.6) of lysosomes compared to the neutral pH (7.2) of the cytosol suggests that screening at different pH conditions may identify pH-selective modulators of cathepsin B. Therefore, a collection of pure marine and plant natural product (NP) compounds, with synthetic compounds, was screened at pH 4.6 and pH 7.2 in cathepsin B assays, which led to the identification of GER-12 (Crossbyanol B) and GER-24 ((7Z,9Z,12Z)-octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic acid) marine NP inhibitors at acidic pH but not at neutral pH. GER-12 was effective for the reversible inhibition of cathepsin B, with an IC50 of 3 μM. GER-24 had an IC50 of 16 μM and was found to be an irreversible inhibitor. These results show that NP screening at distinct biological pH conditions can lead to the identification of pH-selective cathepsin B modulators. These findings suggest that screening efforts for molecular probes and drug discovery may consider the biological pH environment of the target in the disease process.
Cathepsin B is a lysosomal
cysteine protease that is normally involved
in molecular pathways that maintain cellular homeostasis through proteolysis
and protein catabolism.[1,2] Dysregulation of cathepsin B has
been implicated in brain disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease
(AD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and others,[2] as well as cancer[3] and inflammatory
diseases.[4,5] The inhibition of cathepsin B activity has
been an area of interest to assess the mechanistic role of cathepsin
B in disease pathogenicity and drug discovery efforts.Evidence
for the participation of cathepsin B in brain disorder
pathogenicity has spurred much investigation into agents that inhibit
cathepsin B to ameliorate dysfunctions associated with neurodegenerative
diseases. Cathepsin B is involved in the inflammatory pathways and
cell death pathways of AD and TBI, which are hypothesized to involve
the leakage of lysosomal cathepsin B into the cytosol.[2]In vivo inhibition or gene silencing of
cathepsin B in AD mouse models results in improved memory deficits
and alleviates neuropathology.[6−8]In vivo studies
of TBI mouse models show that gene knockout of cathepsin B improves
motor dysfunction and reduces brain tissue loss.[9] Furthermore, clinical patient studies indicate elevated
levels of cathepsin B in AD and TBI.[10,11] Thus, there
is interest in the field to discover new cathepsin B inhibitors.Marine and plant natural products (NP) provide rich sources of
chemically diverse compounds that are biologically active and useful
as active therapeutic agents.[12,13] Studies have shown
that potent and effective protease inhibitors can be identified from
NP sources.[14,15] For example, gallinamide A is
a potent and selective inhibitor of the lysosomal cysteine protease
cathepsin L discovered from marine cyanobacteria,[16] which has the potential to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection.[17] Natural products, both marine and terrestrial,
account for ∼50% of small-molecule drugs approved for the treatment
of cancer and related conditions; this includes their novel structures
as well as their derivatives.[18] Thus, NP
small-molecule libraries provide rich and novel resources to search
for selective inhibitors of cathepsin B activity.Screening
of small molecules in drug discovery efforts has traditionally
utilized optimal enzyme assay conditions for the assessment of effective
modulators. However, drug targets in biological systems may be located
at different pH conditions within subcellular and extracellular locations
in diseases compared to normal healthy conditions. For example, cathepsin
B in numerous brain disorders[2] and cancer[3] mediates disease deficits at abnormal neutral
pH locations, including the cytosol and extracellular locations; however,
cathepsin B is normally located in lysosomes containing an acidic
internal pH.[1,2] The large pH differences between
pathogenic and normal enzyme locations in biological systems suggest
that drug discovery should target the pathogenic pH form of the enzyme
in screening programs.Significantly, our previous studies showed
that cathepsin B is
selectively inhibited by Z-Arg-Lys-AOMK at neutral pH 7.2 with a nanomolar
(nM) potency, with no inhibition at acidic pH 4.6 at nM inhibitor
concentrations.[19] The Z-Arg-Lys-AOMK inhibitor
was designed using the pH 7.2 preferences of residues adjacent to
the cleavage sites of cathepsin B proteolysis. Cleavage profiling
analysis of cathepsin B using a defined library of diverse peptide
substrates led to the design of the neutral-pH-selective substrate
Z-Arg-Lys-AMC and an acid-pH-selective substrate Z-Glu-Lys-AMC. We
propose that the use of these pH-selective substrates in compound
screening efforts may uncover pH-selective modulators of cathepsin
B.For these reasons, the goal of this study was to evaluate
the hypothesis
for differential screening outcomes of natural product (NP) modulators,
from marine and plant organisms, of cathepsin B by comparing screening
assays conducted at the acidic lysosomal pH of 4.6 to those conducted
at the neutral cytosolic pH of pH 7.2. Indeed, results of such a screening
approach identified NP inhibitors effective at acidic pH, but not
at neutral pH, for inhibition of cathepsin B. These findings indicate
that NP compound screening at distinct biological pH conditions can
lead to the differential identification of cathepsin B enzyme modulators.
Furthermore, the finding of pH-dependent NP modulators may reflect
natural pH-dependent activities of NP molecules in their native ecological
environments.
Results and Discussion
Results
Strategy
to Assess Marine and Plant Natural Product (NP) Modulators
of Cathepsin B at Acidic and Neutral pH Conditions Using pH-Selective
Peptidic Substrates
A collection of purified natural product
compounds consisting of 151 chemical molecules from marine organisms
of cyanobacteria, Rhodophyta, sponge, mollusk, and Phaeophyceae combined
with NP molecules from plants were utilized to discover pH-dependent
inhibitory modulators of human cathepsin B proteolytic activity (Figure ). Our unique cathepsin
B screening strategy was conducted at the lysosomal pH of 4.6 and
the cytosolic pH of 7.2. These cathepsin B assays used pH-selective
substrates Z-Glu-Lys-AMC and Z-Arg-Lys-AMC that monitor cathepsin
B activity at acidic pH 4.6 and neutral pH 7.2, respectively.[19] NP molecules displaying at least 50% inhibition
of cathepsin B activity were further assessed for potency by calculating
IC50 values, the reversible or irreversible mechanism of
inhibition, and the specificity of the NP inhibition of cathepsin
B compared to other cysteine cathepsins.
Figure 1
Workflow for screening
marine and plant natural products (NP),
and synthetic compounds, in cathepsin B assays at acidic and neutral
pH conditions. A collection of pure NP compounds was assessed for
modulators of human cathepsin B using acidic pH 4.6 and neutral pH
7.2 screening assay conditions. NP molecules that inhibited cathepsin
B by >50% were characterized for potency, a reversible or irreversible
inhibition mechanism, and specificity for cathepsin B compared to
other cysteine cathepsins.
Workflow for screening
marine and plant natural products (NP),
and synthetic compounds, in cathepsin B assays at acidic and neutral
pH conditions. A collection of pure NP compounds was assessed for
modulators of human cathepsin B using acidic pH 4.6 and neutral pH
7.2 screening assay conditions. NP molecules that inhibited cathepsin
B by >50% were characterized for potency, a reversible or irreversible
inhibition mechanism, and specificity for cathepsin B compared to
other cysteine cathepsins.
Inhibitors of Acidic Cathepsin B Activity Revealed through Screening
a Collection of Pure NP Compounds at Neutral and Acidic pH Assay Conditions
The library of pure NPs from marine and plant organisms was assessed
for the modulation of human cathepsin B activity. Assays were conducted
by preincubating (30 min) each NP with cathepsin B at pH 7.2 and pH
4.6, followed by adding the substrate and monitoring the proteolytic
activity. Screening of the NP compounds utilized pH-selective substrates
Z-Arg-Lys-AMC at pH 7.2 and Z-Glu-Lys-AMC at pH 4.6, which led to
the identification of several active compounds that showed varying
degrees of cathepsin B modulation (Figure ). Seven compounds were observed to significantly
(p < 0.05) inhibit cathepsin B activity at pH
4.6 by at least 50% at NP concentrations of 1–10 μM,
with no inhibition of cathepsin B at neutral pH 7.2 (Table ). Furthermore, at pH 4.6, one
NP molecule activated cathepsin B at least 200% or greater compared
to controls (100%), with no effects at pH 7.2. Additionally, two other
NPs activated cathepsin B at pH 7.2 without effects at pH 4.6 (Table ). These results illustrate
the differential discovery of NP inhibitors or activators of cathepsin
B activity at acidic pH 4.6 compared to neutral pH 7.2. Inhibition
of cathepsin B has been predicted in the field to ameliorate several
conditions of brain disorders, cancer, infectious disease, and others.[2−9] Therefore, we continued with the characterization of NP inhibitors
of cathepsin B.
Figure 2
Heat map of
the screening data illustrates pH-selective modulators
of cathepsin B. NP molecules were preincubated with human cathepsin
B (30 min) and then assessed for the modulation of proteolytic activity
at pH 4.6 with the Z-E-K-AMC substrate and at pH 7.2 with the Z-R-K-AMC
substrate. Modulators resulted from screening marine and plant natural
products and synthetic compounds. Modulators of cathepsin B activity
are illustrated in a heat map, which shows the inhibition (blue) and
activation (red) by NPs (1–10 μM) compared to the controls
(100%, no inhibitor).
Table 1
Identification of pH-Selective Marine
Natural Product Modulators of Cathepsin Ba
A collection of pure marine natural
products (purified) were assessed for the modulation of human cathepsin
B activity (with preincubation) by screening them at pH 4.6 and pH
7.2 using pH-selective substrates of Z-E-K-AMC and Z-R-K-AMC, respectively.
the asterisk indicates compounds that resulted in a significant inhibition
of <50% (blue) or activation of >200% (green) with *p < 0.05.
A collection of pure marine natural
products (purified) were assessed for the modulation of human cathepsin
B activity (with preincubation) by screening them at pH 4.6 and pH
7.2 using pH-selective substrates of Z-E-K-AMC and Z-R-K-AMC, respectively.
the asterisk indicates compounds that resulted in a significant inhibition
of <50% (blue) or activation of >200% (green) with *p < 0.05.Heat map of
the screening data illustrates pH-selective modulators
of cathepsin B. NP molecules were preincubated with human cathepsin
B (30 min) and then assessed for the modulation of proteolytic activity
at pH 4.6 with the Z-E-K-AMC substrate and at pH 7.2 with the Z-R-K-AMC
substrate. Modulators resulted from screening marine and plant natural
products and synthetic compounds. Modulators of cathepsin B activity
are illustrated in a heat map, which shows the inhibition (blue) and
activation (red) by NPs (1–10 μM) compared to the controls
(100%, no inhibitor).
GER-12 (Crossbyanol B)
and GER-24 ((7Z,9Z,12Z)-Octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic Acid)
NP Inhibition of Cathepsin B at Acidic pH
To evaluate the
seven inhibitors at the same concentration, inhibitors were tested
at 5 μM since the initial inhibitor testing was performed in
the micromolar range (shown in Table ). Reassessment of the seven inhibitors (without preincubation)
resulted in two compounds, GER-12 and GER-24, that demonstrated the
inhibition of cathepsin B (Table ). Therefore, continued studies examined GER-12 and
GER-24 in concentration-dependent studies (Figures and 4, respectively).
Table 2
Inhibitors with No Preincubation in
Cathepsin B Assays at pH 4.6 with the Z-EK-AMC Substratea
inhibitor (5 μM)
% control
cathepsin B activity
none
100
GER-12
28
GER-24
80
GER-163
103
GER-165
112
GER-169
99
GER-170
101
ST024730
110
The indicated NP
molecules were
assessed at 5 μM, with no preincubation of inhibitor and cathepsin
B enzyme, in assays using the substrate Z-EK-AMC at pH 4.6.
Figure 3
GER-12 (crossbyanol B) potency and reversible
inhibition of cathepsin
B. (a) The GER-12 NP structure, (b) the potency for inhibition illustrated
by its IC50 value, and (c) the reversible mechanism of
inhibition are illustrated. Potency was assessed at different concentrations
of GER-12 to assess IC50 values for the inhibition of cathepsin
B, and the reversible mechanism of GER-12 inhibition was determined
by dilution experiments, as explained in the section Experimental Procedures.
Figure 4
GER-24
((7Z,9Z,12Z)-octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic
acid) potency and irreversible inhibition
of cathepsin B. (a) The GER-24 NP structure, (b) the potency for inhibition
illustrated by its IC50 value , and (c) the irreversible
mechanism of inhibition are illustrated. Potency was assessed at different
concentrations of GER-12 for the inhibition of cathepsin B, as assessed
by the IC50 value, and the irreversible mechanism of GER-12
inhibition was determined by dilution experiments, as explained in
the section Experimental Procedures.
The indicated NP
molecules were
assessed at 5 μM, with no preincubation of inhibitor and cathepsin
B enzyme, in assays using the substrate Z-EK-AMC at pH 4.6.GER-12 (crossbyanol B) potency and reversible
inhibition of cathepsin
B. (a) The GER-12 NP structure, (b) the potency for inhibition illustrated
by its IC50 value, and (c) the reversible mechanism of
inhibition are illustrated. Potency was assessed at different concentrations
of GER-12 to assess IC50 values for the inhibition of cathepsin
B, and the reversible mechanism of GER-12 inhibition was determined
by dilution experiments, as explained in the section Experimental Procedures.GER-24
((7Z,9Z,12Z)-octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic
acid) potency and irreversible inhibition
of cathepsin B. (a) The GER-24 NP structure, (b) the potency for inhibition
illustrated by its IC50 value , and (c) the irreversible
mechanism of inhibition are illustrated. Potency was assessed at different
concentrations of GER-12 for the inhibition of cathepsin B, as assessed
by the IC50 value, and the irreversible mechanism of GER-12
inhibition was determined by dilution experiments, as explained in
the section Experimental Procedures.The potencies of the NPs were assessed by calculating
the concentration
of each compound that inhibited cathepsin B by 50% (IC50 value). The GER-12 inhibition of cathepsin B at pH 4.6 had an IC50 value of 3 μM (Figure b). The GER-24 inhibition of cathepsin at pH 4.6 had
an IC50 value of 16 μM (Figure b). These results show the effective inhibition
of cathepsin B at acidic pH by GER-12 and GER-24 at micromolar levels
of inhibitors.
GER-12 Reversible Inhibition and GER-24 Irreversible
Inhibition
of Cathepsin B
The mechanism of GER-12 and GER-24 inhibition
was assessed by preincubating cathepsin B (at 100× the enzyme
concentration for the assay) for 30 min with the inhibitor (at 10×
times its IC50). A 100-fold dilution was then performed
on the mixture, and the Z-E-K-AMC substrate was added to the mixture
to the monitor the proteolytic activity over a time-course up to 120
min.After GER-12 preincubation, the progress of cathepsin B
activity in the time course was similar to that for the enzyme incubated
alone (no inhibitor), demonstrating reversible inhibition by GER-12
(Figure c). Further
assessment of the reversible inhibition showed that GER-12 inhibition
of cathepsin B was not observed in the presence of the nonionic detergent
triton X-100 (Supplemental Figure S1).After GER-24 preincubation, cathepsin B inhibition occurred over
the entire time course, which demonstrated the irreversible inhibition
of cathepsin B by GER-24 (Figure c). These data demonstrate the different reversible
and irreversible inhibition mechanisms of GER-12 and GER-24, respectively.
Kinetics of GER-12 and GER-24 Inhibition
Kinetics of
GER-12’s reversible inhibition of cathepsin B was assessed
by Michael–Menten and inverse Lineweaver–Burk plots
(Supplemental Figure S2). A Ki value of 1.4 μM was calculated for the noncompetitive
inhibition of cathepsin B by GER-12. GER-24’s irreversible
inhibition of cathepsin B was observed to possess the kinetic constant kinact/KI of 4.2
× 105 μM–1 s–1 (Supplemental Figure S3).
GER-12 and
GER-24 Inhibition of Cathepsin B Compared to Other
Cysteine Cathepsins
GER-12 was evaluated for the inhibition
of cathepsin B compared to members of the cysteine cathepsin family
consisting of cathepsins C, H, K, L, S, V, and X. At 10 μM (pH
4.6), GER-12 inhibited cathepsin B up to 14% of the control with no
inhibitor (100%) and inhibited cathepsins C, H, K, L, S, V, and X
up to 26%, 8%, 21%, 89%, 13%, 3%, and 54% compared to control (Table ). These data indicate
that GER-12 inhibits several cysteine cathepsins in addition to cathepsin
B.
Table 3
Evaluation of the GER-12 and GER-24
Inhibition of Cathepsin B Compared to Other Cysteine Cathepsin Proteasesa
protease
GER-12 (10 μM)
% control activity (100%,
no inhibitor)
GER-24 (50 μM) %
control activity (100%,
no inhibitor)
cathepsin B
14
0
cathepsin C
26
65
cathepsin H
8
21
cathepsin K
21
7
cathepsin L
89
84
cathepsin S
13
0
cathepsin V
3
17
cathepsin X
53
67
GER-12 and GER-24
inhibition (no
preincubation) of cathepsin B and the cysteine cathepsins C, H, K,
L, S, V, and X were compared. Assay conditions (no preincubation)
for these human cysteine cathepsins are provided in the procedures.
GER-12 and GER-24
inhibition (no
preincubation) of cathepsin B and the cysteine cathepsins C, H, K,
L, S, V, and X were compared. Assay conditions (no preincubation)
for these human cysteine cathepsins are provided in the procedures.At 50 μM (pH 4.6), GER-24
inhibited cathepsin B up to 0%
of control (100%) and inhibited cathepsins C, H, K, L, S, V, and X
up to 65% 21%, 7%, 84%, 0%, 17%, and 67% compared to the no-inhibitor
control (100%) (Table ). Thus, GER-24 at a high concentration of 50 μM inhibits cathepsin
B and several cysteine cathepsin proteases.These data show
that the inhibition of cathepsin B by GER-12 and
GER-24 occurs without selectivity, as shown by inhibition of other
cysteine cathepsin proteases.
Discussion
Results
of this study highlight the incorporation of biological
pH conditions for screening NP modulators of cathepsin B at acidic
pH compared to neutral pH conditions. The use of different pH screening
conditions for cathepsin B resulted in the identification of different
NP compounds that inhibited cathepsin B at lysosomal acidic pH 4.6
compared to cytosolic neutral pH 7.2. These findings indicate the
importance of considering the distinct pH environments of the biological
locations of enzyme targets in the design of screening conditions
to identify NP or other types of chemical modulators. Most chemical
library screens for enzyme modulators utilize the optimum in vitro enzymatic assay conditions, including pH. However,
differential pH properties of enzymes, such as those for cathepsin
B, suggest that the target enzyme may be treated as distinct types
of enzymes at different pH levels. Our previous finding of pH-selective
modulators of cathepsin B may reflect the enzyme’s pH-selective
cleavage properties at acid and neutral pH conditions.[19] The discovery and development of modulators
through chemical screening will benefit from specifying the pH condition
of the enzyme target to address pH-specific cellular or physiological
functions.It is of interest that cathepsin B displays pH-dependent
properties
for inhibitors through compound screening at acidic pH 4.6 and neutral
pH 7.2 conditions. Protease inhibitors often mimic peptide substrate-binding
properties with the protease enzyme. The substrate profiling analysis
of cathepsin B showed its pH-dependent preferences for amino acid
residues adjacent to the P1–P1′ substrate cleavage sites.[19] Notably, glutamate (Glu) is the preferred P2
residue of cathepsin B at acidic pH 4.6, but the Glu residue is not
preferred at pH 7.2. It is of interest that GER-24 possesses a functional
group of −CH2–CH2–COOH
that resembles the Glu side chain of substrates that interact with
the S2 subsite (Glu-245) of the enzyme.[19] Thus, it is possible that the −CH2–CH2–COOH group of GER-24 may interact with cathepsin B
at its S2 subsite. With respect to GER-12, its inhibitory activity
was not observed in the presence of the detergent triton X-100, suggesting
nonionic detergent-dependent interactions; however, a future structural
analysis will be needed. Interactions of inhibitors with target proteases
are best assessed by structural analysis via X-ray crystallography,
which has, for example, been achieved for the selective CA-074 inhibitor
of cathepsin B.[20−22] CA-074 interacts with the enzyme’s active
site region at the S2–S2′ subsites. It will be of interest
to assess pH-selective inhibitor interactions with cathepsin B through
future structural analyses.Proteases such as cathepsin B may
have dual functions within acidic
lysosomes and extra-lysosomal neutral cellular compartments, including
the cytosol, nuclei, and extracellular locations.[1,2,23] Cathepsin B, for example, displays distinct
substrate and inhibitor specificity at acidic pH compared to neutral
pH functions.[19,24] Therefore, it will be valuable
to develop inhibitors of neutral pH cathepsin B to allow the assessment
of its functions in extra-lysosomal locations, including cell death,
inflammation, and cancer. Selective inhibitors of acidic cathepsin
B functions will enhance the understanding the enzyme’s role
in protein health, namely proteostasis, which is important for cellular
functions in health and disease. Furthermore, pH-selective activators
may be utilized to gain an additional understanding of the function
of cathepsin B.Furthermore, the results of our NP screens for
modulators of cathepsin
B indicate that marine natural product molecules such as GER-12 (crossbyanol
B from cyanobacteria) and GER-24 ((7Z,9Z,12Z)-octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic acid from Rhodophyta)
may possess pH-dependent modulating functions for target enzymes.
This study opens avenues to assess natural products for the pH-selective
inhibition or activation of proteases and enzymes. Therefore, natural
product screening under different biological pH conditions, as demonstrated
by this study, can be an important avenue to advance our understanding
of the multiple roles of cathepsin B and enzymes in cellular compartments
of differing pH conditions.In summary, the results of this
study indicate that using different
pH conditions to screen NP chemical libraries can lead to the identification
of pH-selective modulators of targeted protease enzymes in designated
biological pH environments.
Experimental Procedures
Experimental
procedures are summarized here. Detailed descriptions
of protocols are provided in the Supporting Information.
Materials and Reagents
The sources of enzymes, peptide
substrates, and reagents are provided in the Supporting Information.
Collection of Purified Marine and Plant Natural
Products (NP)
Natural products have been collected and purified
from multiple
marine organisms of cyanobacteria, Rhodophyta, sponges, mollusk, Phaeophyceae,
and plant sources. The list of NP molecules investigated is provided
in Supporting Information Table S1. Marine
NP compound stocks were 1 mg/mL and were screened at a final concentration
of 2 μg/mL. The plant NP compounds stocks were at 1 mM and were
screened at a final concentration of 2 μM. The structures of
the NP molecules are provided in Supporting Information Table S2, which indicates diverse NP chemical structures. These
molecules were utilized for screening in the cathepsin B assays.
NP Screening Conducted at pH 4.6 and pH 7.2 to Identify Modulators
of Cathepsin B
Assays of cathepsin B (activated) with 151
pure marine natural products were conducted in triplicate with 5 mM
DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, and 1.5% DMSO using 0.2 ng/μL cathepsin
B at pH 4.6 in 40 mM citrate phosphate buffer with 60 μM Z-Glu-Lys-AMC
substrate and at pH 7.2 in 40 mM citrate phosphate buffer with 60
μM Z-Arg-Lys-AMC substrate. Each pure NP (151 compounds in total)
was preincubated with the enzyme for 30 min at RT. To the mixture
was then added the substrate, and the sample was incubated at RT for
30 min. Fluorescence was measured at 360 nm excitation and 460 nm
emission. Cathepsin B activity in the absence and presence of each
NP was assessed for significance using Student’s t test with p < 0.05. As a positive inhibitor
control, each screening plate included CA-074 (1 μM final concentration),
a known selective inhibitor of cathepsin B;[21,22] CA-074 is a natural product originally isolated from Aspergillus
japonicus.[25]It is noted
that the Z-Glu-Lys-AMC substrate at pH 4.6 and the Z-Arg-Lys-AMC substrate
at pH 7.2 had similar Km values of 460
and 429 μM, respectively. These similar Km values of both substrates at a concentration of 60 μM
in the screening assays represent equivalent substrate conditions.
Potency of NP Inhibition of Cathepsin B as Assessed by IC50 Values
GER-12 (crossbyanol B) and GER-24 ((7Z,9Z,12Z)-octadeca-7,9,12-trien-5-ynoic
acid) at different concentrations were incubated with cathepsin B
(activated) without preincubation in cathepsin B assay conditions
(described above). IC50 values were calculated as the inhibitor
concentration that reduced cathepsin B activity by 50%. Curve-fitting
of the inhibition curves and the calculation of IC50 values
were performed with Prism software (version 8). Confidence intervals
of 95% were obtained for GER-24 and GER-12 at 7.9–36.5 and
2.1–4.4 μM, respectively, using a nonlinear regression
curve fit model.
Assessment of Inhibitors for a Reversible
or Irreversible Mechanism
of Inhibition
Cathepsin B (100×) was preincubated with
GER-12 or GER-24 at 10× the determined IC50 concentration
for 30 min at room temperature (25 °C). Then, a 1:100 dilution
of the mixture was performed. The Z-Glu-Lys-AMC substrate was added
to the diluted mixture, and the fluorescence was monitored for proteolytic
activity every minute for 2 h. The lack of inhibition of cathepsin
B activity following dilution indicates a reversible inhibitory mechanism.
The reduction of cathepsin B activity following dilution indicates
an irreversible inhibitory mechanism.
Kinetics of the Reversible
and Irreversible Inhibition of Cathepsin
B
GER-12 reversible inhibition kinetics was assessed by Michaelis–Menten
and Lineweaver–Burke inverse plots to determine the Ki value for the noncompetitive inhibition of
cathepsin B by GER-12 using the equation appVmax = Vmax(Ki /[I]o + Ki)).[26] The irreversible inhibition
by GER-24 was assessed by determining the KI value as we previously described.[19]
Evaluation of GER-12 and GER-24 for the Inhibition of Cathepsin
B Compared to Other Cysteine Cathepsins
GER-12 at 10 μM
and GER-24 at 50 μM were evaluated for the inhibition of cathepsin
B compared to cathepsins C, H, K, L, S, V, and X. Assay conditions
for these cathepsin proteases are described in the Supporting Information.
Authors: M Murata; S Miyashita; C Yokoo; M Tamai; K Hanada; K Hatayama; T Towatari; T Nikawa; N Katunuma Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 1991-03-25 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Michael C Yoon; Angelo Solania; Zhenze Jiang; Mitchell P Christy; Sonia Podvin; Charles Mosier; Christopher B Lietz; Gen Ito; William H Gerwick; Dennis W Wolan; Gregory Hook; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Vivian Hook Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Kristiina Rajamäki; Jani Lappalainen; Katariina Oörni; Elina Välimäki; Sampsa Matikainen; Petri T Kovanen; Kari K Eklund Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael C Yoon; Mitchell P Christy; Von V Phan; William H Gerwick; Gregory Hook; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Vivian Hook Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.321
Authors: Eduardo P Amaral; Nicolas Riteau; Mahtab Moayeri; Nolan Maier; Katrin D Mayer-Barber; Rosana M Pereira; Silvia L Lage; Andre Kubler; William R Bishai; Maria R D'Império-Lima; Alan Sher; Bruno B Andrade Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 7.561