Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a high-cost disease that affects approximately one in ten people globally, progresses rapidly, results in kidney failure or dialysis, and triggers other diseases. Although clinically used serum creatinine tests are used to evaluate kidney functions, these tests are not suitable for frequent and regular control at-home settings that obstruct the regular monitoring of kidney functions, improving CKD management with early intervention. This study introduced a new electromechanical lab-on-a-chip platform for point-of-care detection of serum creatinine levels using colorimetric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The platform was composed of a chip containing microreservoirs, a stirring bar coated with creatinine-specific antibodies, and a phone to detect color generated via ELISA protocols to evaluate creatinine levels. An electromechanical system was used to move the stirring bar to different microreservoirs and stir it inside them to capture and detect serum creatinine in the sample. The presented platform allowed automated analysis of creatinine in ∼50 min down to ∼1 and ∼2 mg/dL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fetal bovine serum (FBS), respectively. Phone camera measurements in hue, saturation, value (HSV) space showed sensitive analysis compared to a benchtop spectrophotometer that could allow low-cost analysis at point-of-care.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a high-cost disease that affects approximately one in ten people globally, progresses rapidly, results in kidney failure or dialysis, and triggers other diseases. Although clinically used serum creatinine tests are used to evaluate kidney functions, these tests are not suitable for frequent and regular control at-home settings that obstruct the regular monitoring of kidney functions, improving CKD management with early intervention. This study introduced a new electromechanical lab-on-a-chip platform for point-of-care detection of serum creatinine levels using colorimetric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The platform was composed of a chip containing microreservoirs, a stirring bar coated with creatinine-specific antibodies, and a phone to detect color generated via ELISA protocols to evaluate creatinine levels. An electromechanical system was used to move the stirring bar to different microreservoirs and stir it inside them to capture and detect serum creatinine in the sample. The presented platform allowed automated analysis of creatinine in ∼50 min down to ∼1 and ∼2 mg/dL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fetal bovine serum (FBS), respectively. Phone camera measurements in hue, saturation, value (HSV) space showed sensitive analysis compared to a benchtop spectrophotometer that could allow low-cost analysis at point-of-care.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a disease
that progresses rapidly,
is irreversible, and brings many complications.[1,2] If
the disease progression is not monitored regularly, it can rapidly
worsen and result in end-stage renal disease with kidney failure,
which needs dialysis or renal replacement therapy.[3] Because of this, CKD needs quick screening and regular
monitoring.[4]Glomerular filtration
rate (GFR) is used to evaluate CKD stages
by measuring renal clearance with endogenous or exogenous substances.[5] Instead of using this complex method, estimated
GFR can be calculated from the serum creatinine level using different
formulas with age, race, and gender information.[6,7] For
this purpose, the serum creatinine level can be determined using the
Jaffe method, enzymatic methods, isotope dilute gas chromatography–mass
spectrometry (IDGC-MS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC),
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thin-layer chromatography
(TLC).[8−13] However, these methods’ cost and lengthy analysis time limit
their usage at point-of-care.Serum creatinine levels ranging
0–11.3 mg/dL (0–1000
μM), where 0.6–1.2 mg/dL for men and 0.5–1.1 mg/dL
for women are normal results in healthy patients,[14] can also be detected using different biosensors. For instance,
creatinine can be detected in a concentration range of 0–11.33
mg/dL using a conductive polymer-based biosensor.[15] Electrochemical measurements were used to detect the binding
of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated creatinine antibody with
creatinine in the presence of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB). Furthermore,
a creatinine biosensor based on the capacitive detection of creatinine
antibodies bound to the immobilized creatinine layer in the presence
of serum creatinine allowed the detection of serum creatinine in the
range of 0–10 mg/dL.[16] Creatinine
measurement was also conducted on the modified carbon paste electrode
down to 0.008 μM levels.[17] Enzymatic
hydrolysis created a redox signal in a developed electrochemical biosensor.[18] In this biosensor, the measurement was conducted
in the 0.24–4 mg/dL creatinine concentration range with 300
μL sample. A dual electrochemical sensor on a test strip was
also utilized for creatinine measurement in the presence of hydrogen
peroxide.[19] When the sample flows through
the device, hydrogen peroxide is produced with the reaction of three
enzymes in the immobilization area. Moreover, creatinine can be detected
using a molecularly imprinted polymer.[20] However, these methods require many production steps, increasing
the cost and device complexity of biosensors that limit their usage.
On the other hand, lab-on-a-chip (LOC) systems are good candidates
to perform creatinine detection at point-of-care by automating complex
assay protocols, including preparation, processing, and analyzing
samples.[21−23] For example, creatinine detection from whole blood
was achieved on a three-dimensional (3D) paper-based microfluidic
device.[24] Separated serum in this device
was analyzed using the Jaffe method. The obtained color through the
Jaffe reaction was evaluated with a CMOS camera using intensity values
of green and blue channels that allowed detection of serum creatinine
in the range of 0.19–7.64 mg/dL. Furthermore, creatinine can
be measured using surface plasmon resonance on a polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS) microfluidic device.[25] Au film on
this device was coated with HRP-linked osmium-poly (vinyl pyridine)
and creatinine-specific enzyme. Creasensor including the SIMPLE-based
biosensor and the microfluidic cartridge was used for colorimetric
creatinine measurement with a range of 0.76–20 mg/dL.[26] However, these devices required manual pumps,
integrated heated modules, and contained expensive device components
for complete creatinine analysis.LOC devices can combine fluidics,
electronics, and optics on a
single device for standalone operation.[27,28] Automated
fluidic operations on these devices require valves, mixers, and pumps
that can create difficulties in integrating and controlling all these
elements realized with a complex fabrication process.[29,30] Electromechanical LOC devices can provide self-driving operations
with electronic and mechanical components for fully automated assay
protocols.[31] For instance, automatic water
analysis was achieved with a 3D-printed robotic system coupled with
a syringe pump to transfer samples and reagents, temperature and conductivity
sensors to provide accurate measurement, and a webcam for colorimetric
pH analysis on a 96-well plate.[32] Moreover,
a robotic system was used to perform automated ELISA protocols for
chloramphenicol detection using colorimetric measurements.[33] Protocols were conducted on a microfluidic chip,
where pneumatically driven loading, mixing, and washing steps were
achieved with a robotic arm. A fully automated microfluidic platform
was also developed for CD4 cell counting with colorimetric ELISA protocols.[34] In this platform, magnetic beads used as assay
surfaces were transferred between different chambers separated by
mineral oils using a motorized magnet stage. Different assay protocols
from purification to detection of CD4 cells were conducted in each
chamber. These electromechanical LOC systems can be very convenient
in routine clinical and point-of-care testing. With 3D printing, these
systems can be fabricated rapidly in a cost-effective way. They can
also enable plug-and-play and standalone operations with no or minimal
preparation, which can significantly benefit LOC systems’ usability.This study presents a new electromechanical LOC system that enables
the automated detection of creatinine. The electromechanical system
allows the movement and stirring of a creatinine-specific antibody-coated
bar on a chip containing microreservoirs. These microreservoirs are
filled with necessary ELISA solutions to detect creatinine in a drop
of sample, and the analysis is conducted in a plug-and-play format.
After the automated assay protocols, the creatinine is detected using
colorimetric analysis with a simple smartphone camera placed on the
platform. The captured images are analyzed in HSV space to evaluate
creatinine levels. By doing so, the electromechanical LOC system allows
for the detection of creatinine down to 1 mg/dL in 180 μL of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 2 mg/dL in 18 μL of fetal
bovine serum (FBS). The low-cost and portable platform offers automated
creatinine detection in ∼50 min. This practical measurement
method shows similar performance compared to the benchtop spectrophotometer.
Experimental Section
Electromechanical LOC Platform
Our platform contained
an electromechanical system that automatically conducted the creatinine
detection protocol in a microreservoir chip (Supporting Information)
by transferring and mixing the stirring bar (Supporting Information)
in consecutive microreservoirs. For this purpose, 2 DC stepper motors
with linear guide rails (D8-MOTOR80, Tools Shopping Center Store,
Shenzhen, China) to transfer the stirring bar to different microreservoirs
and one DC motor (Micro Metal Gearmotor HPCB 3061, Pololu Robotics
and Electronics, Las Vegas, USA) to conduct mixing inside microreservoirs
were used. The frame of the platform was fabricated using the polylactic
acid (PLA) filament (Ultimaker, Utrecht, Netherlands) in a 3D printer
(Ultimaker 2+, Ultimaker, Utrecht, Netherlands), and the motors were
arranged on it (Figure a). The platform has a size of 10 cm × 10 cm × 20 cm and
a weight of 390 g. The motors were controlled with a microcontroller
(Arduino Mega 2560 R3, Arduino LLC, Boston, USA) equipped with a motor-driver
board (CNC Expansion Board V3.0, Shenzhen HiLetgo Technology Co. Ltd.,
Shenzhen, China), two motor drivers (A4988, Pololu Robotics, and Electronics,
Las Vegas, USA), DC motor driver circuit, which have Darlington transistor
(BDX53C, STMicroelectronics, Switzerland), 100 ohms ±5% resistance,
and diode (1 N4007, MIC Electronic Co., Shanghai), and a Bluetooth
module (HC-06 Bluetooth Module, Shenzhen HiLetgo Technology Co. Ltd.,
Shenzhen, China) (Figure S2). Stepper motors
were driven with 7 V to reach ∼9 mm/s speed on their carriages
to move the stirring bar. The voltage induced on the DC motor could
be adjusted between 0 and 15 V to change the rotation speed (Figure S3). The platform can be remotely controlled
with an in-house-developed Android application (Figure S4 and Movie 1) through
Bluetooth connection to conduct creatinine detection protocols.
Figure 1
An electromechanical
lab-on-a-chip platform for automated creatinine
analysis. (a) Photograph of the platform. Scale bar is 2 cm. (b) Creatinine
detection protocol. (i) An antibody-coated stirring bar enters the
sample in the first microreservoir, and the mixing process is started
by rotating the stirring bar. At this stage, the creatinine in the
sample is captured by the antibodies on the stirring bar. (ii) Stirring
bar then enters the second microreservoir containing the HRP-creatinine
and is mixed there. The antibodies capture HRP-creatinine. (iii) Stirring
bar is then washed in the washing solution in the third and fourth
microreservoirs. (iv) Then, the stirring bar is passed into the last
microreservoir containing the TMB and mixed. TMB reacts enzymatically
with HRP, and (v) a blue color appears, which is inversely proportional
to the creatinine concentration in the sample.
An electromechanical
lab-on-a-chip platform for automated creatinine
analysis. (a) Photograph of the platform. Scale bar is 2 cm. (b) Creatinine
detection protocol. (i) An antibody-coated stirring bar enters the
sample in the first microreservoir, and the mixing process is started
by rotating the stirring bar. At this stage, the creatinine in the
sample is captured by the antibodies on the stirring bar. (ii) Stirring
bar then enters the second microreservoir containing the HRP-creatinine
and is mixed there. The antibodies capture HRP-creatinine. (iii) Stirring
bar is then washed in the washing solution in the third and fourth
microreservoirs. (iv) Then, the stirring bar is passed into the last
microreservoir containing the TMB and mixed. TMB reacts enzymatically
with HRP, and (v) a blue color appears, which is inversely proportional
to the creatinine concentration in the sample.
Creatinine Detection Protocol Conducted on the Electromechanical
LOC Platform
The microreservoir chip was filled with the
creatinine sample on its first microreservoir, 1:400 HRP-creatinine
solution on its second microreservoir, 0.05% pluronic solution on
its third and fourth microreservoirs, and TMB solution on its last
microreservoir. Each microreservoir contained 180 μL of the
corresponding solution. A stirring bar with creatinine-specific antibodies
on its tip was also mounted on the electromechanical system. To conduct
the creatinine detection, the stirring bar was automatically dipped
into different microreservoirs (Figure S5 and Movie 1), and the following protocol
was followed: (i) stirring 10 min at 1000 rpm in the first and the
second microreservoirs, respectively, (ii) stirring 1 min at 1000
rpm in the third and the fourth microreservoirs, respectively, and
(iv) stirring 30 min at 3000 rpm in the fifth microreservoir. By doing
so, creatinine in the sample was captured on the stirring bar, and
then, HRP-creatinine was caught on the remaining antibodies on the
stirring bar. After the stirring bar was cleaned twice in the pluronic
solution to eliminate unspecific binding, HRP-creatinine captured
on the stirring bar was reacted with TMB on the last microreservoir,
and blue color appeared. The intensity of the blue color was inversely
proportional to the captured creatinine from the sample solution (Figure b). The appeared
color was analyzed with a benchtop spectrophotometer using absorbance
measurements at 650 nm (Multiscan Go, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts,
USA) and a smartphone camera (OPPO RX17 Neo, OPPO Electronics Corp.,
Dongguan, China). Images were taken at 10 cm from the top of the platform
in an unlit environment with a flash of a smartphone. A closed box,
which eliminates the effect of ambient light changes on analysis,
is used to cover the electromechanical LOC system during imaging.
The images taken by focusing with the fixed focus feature of the mobile
phone were saved for analysis in RGB and HSV color spaces. The mean
intensity values of red, green, and blue channels were used for the
detection. For the detection with HSV color space, hue (0.194<
and 0.612>), saturation (0.013< and 1.0>), and brightness
(0.0<
and 0.933>) parameters were fixed for each image. Thanks to the
HSV
color space features, the camera, ambient light, and photograph resolution
affect the analysis at a minimum level.[35] The recorded images were analyzed using the MATLAB program to find
the color intensities in RGB and HSV color spaces.For the optimization
of protocol parameters, antibody, and protein-G concentration, mixing
time for HRP and TMB microreservoirs, mixing speed, and the ratio
of HRP-creatinine were analyzed. The creatinine sample was prepared
in 180 μL of PBS or 18 μL of FBS. FBS samples were further
diluted with 162 μL of PBS in the first microreservoir.
Statistical Analysis
Data were shown as the mean ±
standard deviation (SD) of at least 3 replicates of experiments. For
statistical analysis, an unpaired Student’s t-test was conducted
on the data. The statistical significance threshold was set to 0.05
(p < 0.05). The coefficient of determination (R2) values of linear regression models were presented
in the figures. These analyses were performed using GraphPad software
(Prism 8 version, GraphPad, USA).
Results and Discussion
In the developed electromechanical
LOC platform (Figure ), an automated creatinine
detection protocol was conducted in the microreservoir chip. The protocol
contained transferring the stirring bar consequently between different
microreservoirs filled with different assay solutions and mixing inside
these microreservoirs by rotating the stirring bar to enhance and
fasten the analysis.
Surface Functionalization of the Glass Substrate
The
success of the surface functionalization protocols was evaluated with
FTIR analysis (Figure S6, Supporting Information).
As a result, it was concluded that the glass surface was successfully
functionalized with anti-creatinine antibodies.The concentration
of protein-G and anti-creatinine antibodies used for surface functionalization
protocols was also studied to determine the concentration to saturate
the glass surface. As the surface becomes saturated with anti-creatinine
antibodies, it is expected that less-fluorescent IgG will be captured
on the surface, and the fluorescent signal on the surface will decrease
(Figures S7 and S8). Moreover, the effect
of antibody concentration on creatinine detection was examined. Equal
absorbance signals were observed for 10 and 100 μg/mL antibodies
while detecting 0 μg/mL of creatinine (Figure S9). Because of that, 10 μg/mL creatinine antibody and
100 μg/mL Protein-G were used in the platform.
Mixing Performance of the Electromechanical LOC Platform
On the platform, the stirring bar was rotated with a DC motor to
enhance mixing within the microreservoirs. The effect of rotation
speeds was evaluated on the mixing performance (Figure ). The mixing index value (eq 1 in Supporting
Information)[36] was decreased below 0.1,
which indicates an adequate mixing profile,[37] in <7 s for different rotation speeds (1000–3000 rpm).
On the other hand, adequate mixing was achieved only in ∼110
s with pure diffusion-based mixing, which was at least 16-fold slower
than active mixing with rotation. As rotation speed was increased,
a very rapid mixing profile was observed. However, a high rotation
speed (>3000 rpm) could splash the solutions from microreservoirs
that could create unwanted contamination.[38] Furthermore, a high rotation speed (>3000 rpm) could also detach
the glass substrate from the stirring bar, which can interrupt assay
protocols. Because of these reasons, the stirring bar was rotated
at ≤3000 rpm in the assay protocol.
Figure 2
Effect of the stirring
bar’s rotation speeds on mixing inside
the microreservoir. (a) Micrographs of microreservoirs were taken
with mixing at 1000 rpm and pure diffusion-based mixing. The scale
bar is 4 mm. (b) Mixing index values for mixing at different speeds
(1000–3000 rpm) and pure diffusion-based mixing.
Effect of the stirring
bar’s rotation speeds on mixing inside
the microreservoir. (a) Micrographs of microreservoirs were taken
with mixing at 1000 rpm and pure diffusion-based mixing. The scale
bar is 4 mm. (b) Mixing index values for mixing at different speeds
(1000–3000 rpm) and pure diffusion-based mixing.
Optimization of Electromechanical Protocol Parameters for Creatinine
Detection
A high-speed mixing by rotating stirring bar at
3000 rpm in microreservoirs was utilized for fast analysis, and the
creatinine detection protocol was conducted. Because the most critical
step for creatinine detection was the enzymatic reaction of HRP and
TMB, different mixing times at the TMB microreservoir were evaluated.
While mixing time was increased from 10 to 30 min, statistical differences
between the 0 and 10 μg/mL creatinine were observed (Figure a). Hence, TMB mixing
time was set to 30 min in the protocol.
Figure 3
Effect of electromechanical
protocol parameters on creatinine detection.
(a) Absorbance measurements conducted using a detection protocol with
0 or 10 μg/mL creatinine samples for different mixing times
at TMB microreservoirs. 3000 rpm mixing was used in all protocol steps.
(b) Absorbance graph obtained for the creatinine detection protocol
conducted with 1000 rpm mixing at first four microreservoirs and 30
min mixing at 3000 rpm at TMB microreservoir. (*) and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Effect of electromechanical
protocol parameters on creatinine detection.
(a) Absorbance measurements conducted using a detection protocol with
0 or 10 μg/mL creatinine samples for different mixing times
at TMB microreservoirs. 3000 rpm mixing was used in all protocol steps.
(b) Absorbance graph obtained for the creatinine detection protocol
conducted with 1000 rpm mixing at first four microreservoirs and 30
min mixing at 3000 rpm at TMB microreservoir. (*) and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.However, a high-speed mixing profile can induce
shear stress that
can detach absorbed molecules from the stirring bar in the first four
microreservoirs and can alter the detection signal. For this purpose,
the mixing speed was reduced to 1000 rpm on the first four microreservoirs.
We observed that error bars on the measurement signals were reduced,
and the statistical difference between 0 and 10 μg/mL creatinine
was increased (Figure b). For this reason, 1000 rpm mixing was chosen to be utilized in
the first four microreservoirs, while 3000 rpm mixing was set for
the TMB microreservoir.
Creatinine Detection
Creatinine in the concentration
range of 0–15 μg/mL prepared in PBS was analyzed on the
electromechanical LOC platform. As shown in Figure a, absorbance levels measured at the TMB
microreservoir decreased as the amount of creatinine increased, and
a statistical difference was observed for ≥10 μg/mL (i.e.,
≥1 mg/dL) concentration levels compared to the control group
without creatinine (0 μg/mL). The obtained color in the TMB
microreservoir was also analyzed using a smartphone camera. Low correlation
and statistical difference with creatinine concentration were obtained
using the mean intensity of captured image’s red/blue/green
channels (Figure S10). On the other hand,
similar correlation values and statistical differences were achieved
using the mean intensity values at the HSV space (Figures b and S11). The primary color range can be determined sharper than
RGB channels with the hue feature in HSV color space.[39] Besides, analysis closer to absorbance values can be obtained
by focusing on the saturation of the primary color. These features
provide better measurements than RGB channels.[40] Creatinine detection was also conducted in FBS with the
creatinine concentration range of 0–50 μg/mL to simulate
patient sample conditions on the platform. Absorbance levels were
measured in the last microreservoir. As the amount of creatinine in
the serum increased, the signal level decreased as expected, and a
statistical difference was observed in FBS solution for concentration
levels ≥20 μg/mL (i.e., ≥2 mg/dL) compared to
the control group (0 μg/mL), as shown in Figure c. Creatinine was also measured using the
Jaffe method as the gold standard method (Figure S12). It was observed the detection signal of the Jaffe method
was also correlated with the creatinine concentration. Moreover, the
HSV value was measured with a creatinine concentration range of 0–50
μg/mL, and there is a statistical difference ≥20 μg/mL
compared to the control group likewise absorbance measurements in
FBS (Figures d and S11). The creatinine measurements in FBS showed
lower signal levels than the measurements in PBS signal levels because
the presence of different molecules and proteins in FBS may have affected
the capture of creatinine on the electromechanical platform. Signal
levels were saturated for ≥30 μg/mL creatinine in FBS
(Figure S13). The platform allowed automated
analysis of creatinine using 180 μL in PBS or 18 μL FBS
in ∼50 min down to ∼1 and ∼2 mg/dL in PBS and
FBS, respectively. The plug-and-play feature of the electromechanical
LOC platform allows the creatinine to be detected without the need
for technical personnel and bulky instruments. Color measurement,
which determines the amount of creatinine, is made from a phone camera
reducing the platform cost. With the use of the platform, critical
changes in creatinine levels could be detected, and the necessary
intervention could be made rapidly for the patient.
Figure 4
Absorbance values and
mean intensity values in HSV spaces for creatinine
detection in (a, b) PBS and (c, d) FBS, respectively. Statistical
differences according to 0 μg/mL creatinine measurements were
indicated on the graphs. Images of the last microreservoirs in creatinine
experiments were also given in the figures. (*) and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
The scale bars are 2 mm.
Absorbance values and
mean intensity values in HSV spaces for creatinine
detection in (a, b) PBS and (c, d) FBS, respectively. Statistical
differences according to 0 μg/mL creatinine measurements were
indicated on the graphs. Images of the last microreservoirs in creatinine
experiments were also given in the figures. (*) and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
The scale bars are 2 mm.
Storage Conditions
We investigated the long-term stability
of the stirring bar and microreservoir chip filled with assay solutions
to assess the usability of the detection method in clinical or home
settings. For this purpose, stirring bars were stored at −20
and + 4 °C for 6 months. We observed that the cover glasses were
detached from the stirring bars stored at −20 °C. On the
other hand, the stirring bar stored at +4 °C showed a similar
performance compared to the freshly prepared bars (Figure ). The microreservoir chip
was maintained at −20 and + 4 °C for 2 months. The solutions
were evaporated, and color change was observed in microreservoirs
stored at +4 °C. However, these problems were not seen for the
chip stored at −20 °C. Although the detection signal was
slightly decreased for stored chips, no statistical signal difference
was observed considering freshly prepared chips (Figure ). These examinations show
the potential of the developed system to be used in point-of-care
settings when the required storage conditions are provided.
Figure 5
Comparison
of the detection signal obtained from the freshly prepared
chip and stirring bar, stirring bar stored at +4 °C for 6 months,
and microreservoir chip stored at −20 °C for 2 months.
For the experiments, 5 μg/mL creatinine prepared in PBS was
used. ns indicates a nonsignificant p-value (p > 0.05).
Comparison
of the detection signal obtained from the freshly prepared
chip and stirring bar, stirring bar stored at +4 °C for 6 months,
and microreservoir chip stored at −20 °C for 2 months.
For the experiments, 5 μg/mL creatinine prepared in PBS was
used. ns indicates a nonsignificant p-value (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
We showed a new electromechanical LOC platform
to detect creatinine
automatically. The electromechanical system on the platform provided
the movement and mixing of the stirring bars on different microreservoirs
filled with assay solutions. Colorimetric detection of creatinine
was conducted on the platform using a smartphone camera. The obtained
detection signal, the mean intensity values of HSV spaces, showed
a similar signal profile obtained with a benchtop spectrophotometer.
The cost of the portable electromechanical LOC platform is ∼$90,
and the cost for creatinine testing is ∼$2.7 per analysis (Table S1). These costs could be further reduced
with mass production. The platform allows the detection of creatinine
down to 1 and 2 mg/dL in PBS and FBS, respectively, which can be used
to monitor CKD patients. Automated detection is offered with this
platform in ∼50 min using only a minute amount of the serum
sample (18 μL). Consumables of the platform (i.e., stirring
bar and microreservoir chip filled with assay solutions) can be stored
for long-term usage. Hence, the end-user could use this platform with
a plug-and-play approach without the need for an expert in point-of-care
settings with its portable and inexpensive design. The electromechanical
LOC platform eliminates the need for pumps or valves or spectrometers
that can increase the cost of detection systems. Therefore, compared
to previously reported LOC/biosensor-based creatinine detection systems,
the proposed electromechanical LOC platform allows more cost-effective
and automated analysis (Table S2). Although
the device could sense elevated creatinine levels in serum, the signal
level and linear operation range can be improved further. For this
purpose, the surface area of the stirring bar could be enlarged with
nanomaterials to capture more analyte efficiently.[41−43] The platform
could be modified with different antibodies and assay solutions further
to detect different biomarkers for different disease monitoring. In
this way, the platform could become a generic detection platform that
could democratize and disseminate disease-screening tests.