| Literature DB >> 35909845 |
Zijiang Zhu1,2, Hang Chen3, Song Xie1, Yi Hu1,2, Jing Chang1,2.
Abstract
The efficient biological signal processing method can effectively improve the efficiency of researchers to explore the work of life mechanism, so as to better reveal the relationship between physiological structure and function, thus promoting the generation of major biological discoveries; high-precision medical signal analysis strategy can, to a certain extent, share the pressure of doctors' clinical diagnosis and assist them to formulate more favorable plans for disease prevention and treatment, so as to alleviate patients' physical and mental pain and improve the overall health level of the society. This article in biomedical signal is very representative of the two types of signals: mammary gland molybdenum target X-ray image (mammography) and the EEG signal as the research object, combined with the deep learning field of CNN; the most representative model is two kinds of biomedical signal classification, and reconstruction methods conducted a series of research: (1) a new classification method of breast masses based on multi-layer CNN is proposed. The method includes a CNN feature representation network for breast masses and a feature decision mechanism that simulates the physician's diagnosis process. By comparing with the objective classification accuracy of other methods for the identification of benign and malignant breast masses, the method achieved the highest classification accuracy of 97.0% under different values of c and gamma, which further verified the effectiveness of the proposed method in the identification of breast masses based on molybdenum target X-ray images. (2) An EEG signal classification method based on spatiotemporal fusion CNN is proposed. This method includes a multi-channel input classification network focusing on spatial information of EEG signals, a single-channel input classification network focusing on temporal information of EEG signals, and a spatial-temporal fusion strategy. Through comparative experiments on EEG signal classification tasks, the effectiveness of the proposed method was verified from the aspects of objective classification accuracy, number of model parameters, and subjective evaluation of CNN feature representation validity. It can be seen that the method proposed in this paper not only has high accuracy, but also can be well applied to the classification and reconstruction of biomedical signals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909845 PMCID: PMC9334110 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6548811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Relationships between biomedical informatics and other disciplines.
The statistics of common working.
| Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate | 180890 | 21% | Breast | 246660 | 29% |
| Lung and bronchus | 117920 | 14% | Lung and bronchus | 106470 | 13% |
| Colon and rectum | 70820 | 8% | Colon and rectum | 63670 | 8% |
| Urinary bladder | 58950 | 7% | Uterine corpus | 60050 | 7% |
| Melanoma of the skin | 46870 | 6% | Thyroid | 49350 | 6% |
| Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | 40170 | 5% | Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | 32410 | 4% |
| Kidney and renal pelvis | 39650 | 5% | Melanoma of the skin | 29510 | 3% |
| Oral cavity and pharynx | 34780 | 4% | Leukemia | 26050 | 3% |
| Leukemia | 34090 | 4% | Pancreas | 25400 | 3% |
| Liver and intrahepatic bile duct | 28410 | 3% | Kidney and renal pelvis | 23050 | 3% |
| All sites | 841390 | 100% | All sites | 843820 | 100% |
Figure 2Directed acyclic graph representation of CNN.
D main parameters of each layer of network.
| The name | Filter size | Filter dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Conv1 | 4 | 64 |
| BN | — | — |
| ReLU1 | 1 | — |
| Conv2 | 4 | 128 |
| BN | — | — |
| ReLU2 | 1 | — |
| Conv3 | 4 | 256 |
| BN | — | — |
| ReLU3 | 1 | — |
| Conv4 | 4 | 512 |
| BN | — | — |
| ReLU4 | 1 | — |
| Fc5 | 1 | 1024 |
| BN | — | — |
| Fc6 | 1 | 40 |
Figure 3Classification accuracy of breast masses by different methods.
Comparison with other convolutional neural network models.
| Tumor classification method | The storage space (MB) | The number of arguments | Classification accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlexNet | 233 | 6.1 | 92 |
| VGGNet | 528 | 1.4 | 97 |
| Ours | 204 | 5.8 | 96.7 |
Figure 4CNN feature distribution visualization of tumor. (a) The underlying characteristics. (b) Conv5. (c) Fc7.
Figure 5Classification accuracy of EEG signals.
Figure 6Visualized distribution of EEG features in visual guidance. (a) EEG. (b) EEG-Alex. (c) EEG-Res50. (d) EEG-Res101.