| Literature DB >> 35909829 |
Zeyu Wang1, Jia Lu2, Mingyu Li3, Siting Yang4, Yutong Wang5, Xin Cheng6.
Abstract
Aiming at improving the enterprise performance and venture capital management, the edge computing is combined with blockchain technology in the construction of the supply chains so as to improve the stability and security of raw material supply chains of venture capital enterprises. Firstly, the relationships among venture capital, enterprise performance, and supply chain integration are analyzed, and the positive impacts of optimization and innovation of supply chain technology and venture capital on enterprise performance improvement are discussed. Secondly, the edge computing and blockchain technology are adopted to optimize the supply chain, and a protocol model is established to improve the security of supply chain information transmission. In addition, the supply chain Internet of Things (IoT) system is designed in layers based on blockchain and edge computing technology. Finally, the designed protocol model is applied to the supply chain and the supplier performance is evaluated by using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). The results show that the gas value of the designed protocol model is stable at 104,000∼116,000 in blockchain transactions, and the execution time of a single blockchain transaction fluctuates between 4,300 and 6,100 ms. Therefore, the designed protocol model can effectively ensure the security of supply chain data during the transmission. The evaluation results of supplier performance suggest that the cooperative relationship between venture capital enterprises and suppliers is affected by many factors. Optimizing the supply chain structure and production activities can improve the performance of suppliers and venture capital enterprises. This work provides a reference for analyzing the performance of blockchain technology on venture capital enterprises and suppliers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909829 PMCID: PMC9329009 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2914936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1The protocol model based on blockchain technology and edge computing.
Comprehensive evaluation system for performance of supplier.
| Target layer | Criterion layer | Program layer |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation on performance of supplier (A) | Cooperative performance (A1) | Product qualification rate (B1) |
| Control of purchase cost (B2) | ||
| On-time delivery rate (B3) | ||
| Innovation ability (B4) | ||
| Credibility (A2) | Willingness to cooperate (B5) | |
| Contract fulfillment rate (B6) | ||
| Compliance (B7) | ||
| Closeness (A3) | Proportion of purchase amount (B8) | |
| Contract period (B9) | ||
| Risk and benefit sharing (B10) | ||
| Harmony (A4) | Proportion of conflict events (B11) | |
| Communication efficiency of management (B12) | ||
| Communication efficiency of staff (B13) | ||
| Harmony of corporate culture (B14) | ||
| Communication skills (A5) | Information sharing level (B15) | |
| Information response capability (B16) | ||
| Status of production equipment (B17) | ||
| Collaboration ability (A6) | Human resources investment level (B18) | |
| Capability of work flow reorganization (B19) | ||
| Learning ability (A7) | Staff knowledge level (B20) | |
| Management level (B21) | ||
| Professional knowledge transference (B22) |
Figure 2The gas value for transaction based on edge computing combined with blockchain technology.
Figure 3Execution time of the protocol model based on edge computing combined with blockchain technology.
Weights for evaluation on performance of supplier.
| Target layer | Criterion layer | Weight layer | Program layer | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation on performance of supplier (A) | Cooperative performance (A1) | 0.41 | Product qualification rate (B1) | 0.34 |
| Control of purchase cost (B2) | 0.25 | |||
| On-time delivery rate (B3) | 0.16 | |||
| Innovation ability (B4) | 0.09 | |||
| Credibility (A2) | 0.21 | Willingness to cooperate (B5) | 0.53 | |
| Contract fulfillment rate (B6) | 0.29 | |||
| Compliance (B7) | 0.45 | |||
| Closeness (A3) | 0.14 | Proportion of purchase amount (B8) | 0.28 | |
| Contract period (B9) | 0.14 | |||
| Risk and benefit sharing (B10) | 0.13 | |||
| Harmony (A4) | 0.18 | Proportion of conflict events (B11) | 0.27 | |
| Communication efficiency of management (B12) | 0.09 | |||
| Communication efficiency of staff (B13) | 0.67 | |||
| Harmony of corporate culture (B14) | 0.33 | |||
| Communication skills (A5) | 0.15 | Information sharing level (B15) | 0.41 | |
| Information response capability (B16) | 0.24 | |||
| Status of production equipment (B17) | 0.14 | |||
| Collaboration ability (A6) | 0.13 | Human resources investment level (B18) | 0.14 | |
| Capability of work flow reorganization (B19) | 0.08 | |||
| Learning ability (A7) | 0.09 | Staff knowledge level (B20) | 0.16 | |
| Management level (B21) | 0.35 | |||
| Professional knowledge transference (B22) | 0.13 |
The judgment matrix for supplier evaluation.
| Target layer | Criterion layer | Program layer | Excellent | Good | Medium | Poor | Extreme poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation on performance of supplier (A) | Cooperative performance (A1) | B1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| B2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||
| B3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| B4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Credibility (A2) | B5 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | |
| B6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3 | ||
| B7 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Closeness (A3) | B8 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| B9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| B10 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 0 | ||
| Harmony (A4) | B11 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | |
| B12 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||
| B13 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | ||
| B14 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Communication skills (A5) | B15 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| B16 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | ||
| B17 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Collaboration ability (A6) | B18 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | |
| B19 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Learning ability (A7) | B20 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| B21 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | ||
| B22 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 |