| Literature DB >> 35909735 |
Lovepreet Singh Chahal1, Joann A Conner1,2, Peggy Ozias-Akins1,2.
Abstract
The combination of apomixis and hybrid production is hailed as the holy grail of agriculture for the ability of apomixis to fix heterosis of F1 hybrids in succeeding generations, thereby eliminating the need for repeated crosses to produce F1 hybrids. Apomixis, asexual reproduction through seed, achieves this feat by circumventing two processes that are fundamental to sexual reproduction (meiosis and fertilization) and replacing them with apomeiosis and parthenogenesis, resulting in seeds that are clonal to the maternal parent. Parthenogenesis, embryo development without fertilization, has been genetically engineered in rice, maize, and pearl millet using PsASGR-BABY BOOM-like (PsASGR-BBML) transgenes and in rice using the OsBABY BOOM1 (OsBBM1) cDNA sequence when expressed under the control of egg cell-specific promoters. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that BABY BOOM (BBM)/BBML genes from monocots cluster within three different clades. The BBM/BBML genes shown to induce parthenogenesis cluster within clade 1 (the ASGR-BBML clade) along with orthologs from other monocot species, such as Setaria italica. For this study, we tested the parthenogenetic potential of three BBM transgenes from S. italica, each a member of a different phylogenetic BBM clade. All transgenes were genomic constructs under the control of the AtDD45 egg cell-specific promoter. All SiBBM transgenes induced various levels of parthenogenetic embryo development, resulting in viable haploid T1 seedlings. Poor seed set and lower haploid seed production were characteristics of multiple transgenic lines. The results presented in this study illustrate that further functional characterization of BBMs in zygote/embryo development is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: AP2 transcription factor; BABY BOOM (BBM); Setaria italica; apomixis; parthenogenesis; rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909735 PMCID: PMC9329937 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.863908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Phylogenetic analysis of 42 BABY BOOM (BBM)/BABY BOOM-like (BBML) proteins. The phylogenetic tree displays four distinct clades, including a eudicot clade and three monocot clades. The encircled and colored proteins are the Setaria italica BBM used in this study. The encircled proteins in clade 1 denotes BBM/BBML proteins which already had been shown to induce parthenogenesis.
FIGURE 2gSiBBM constructs. A diagrammatic figure of the three genomic SiBBM constructs used in this study. Transgenic plantlets were selected with hygromycin driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. SiBBM1 contains 8 exons, while SiBBM2 and SiBBM3 have 9 exons. The constructs are not drawn to scale.
FIGURE 3Overview of transgenic T0 line evaluation. Analysis of gSiBBM2 lines (A–D). (A) PCR products from transgenic lines, most showing the expected size of the full length gSiBBM2 transgene. gSiBBM2_9, while positive for the hygromycin plant selectable marker, did not contain a full-length gSiBBM2 transgene. The PCR- lane is a negative control with no DNA added to the PCR reaction tube while the gWT lane is DNA isolated from an untransformed wild-type Oryza sativa Nipponbare plant. (B) Non-quantitative RT-PCR expression of the gSiBBM2 transgene in ovary tissue collected prior to fertilization. (C) Bulk seed flow cytometry results as an overlay from two samples of gSiBBM2 lines, one with (black) and without (red) the gSiBBM2 transgene. The H peak corresponds to rice embryo haploid (N) signal, the D peak corresponds to the rice embryo diploid (2C) signal, and the P peak corresponds to the genome standard P. notum diploid (2C) signal. (D) Confocal image of a parthenogenic embryo in rice induced by the gSiBBM2 transgene. The parthenogenetic embryo is shown in the bracket, while the presence of unfused polar nuclei (starred) denotes that fertilization has not occurred. The scale bar equals 25 μm.
Summary of T1 seed/seedling evaluation of gSiBBM1, gSiBBM2, and gSiBBM3 lines.
| Construct | Line | Seed germinated | Number of viable seedlings | Germination rate (%) | Diploid seedlings | Haploid seedlings | Number of ungerminated seed | Haploid signal in ungerminated seed | Transgene inheritance in diploid offspring |
|
| −6C | 50 | 47 | 94 | 37 | 10 | 3 | Yes | Yes |
| −7B | 50 | 42 | 84 | 41 | 1 | 8 | Yes | Yes | |
| −8B | 50 | 18 | 36 | 18 | 0 | 32 | Yes | Yes | |
| −4B | 50 | 31 | 62 | 28 | 3 | 19 | Yes | Yes | |
| −5C | 50 | 38 | 76 | 35 | 3 | 12 | Yes | Yes | |
|
| −1 | 50 | 31 | 62 | 23 | 8 | 19 | Yes | Yes |
| −7 | 50 | 19 | 38 | 16 | 3 | 31 | Yes | Yes | |
| −43 | 50 | 36 | 72 | 35 | 2 | 14 | Yes | Yes | |
| −50 | 50 | 31 | 62 | 27 | 4 | 19 | Yes | Yes | |
| −44 | 50 | 35 | 70 | 31 | 4 | 15 | Yes | Yes | |
| −8 | 50 | 32 | 64 | 28 | 4 | 18 | Yes | Yes | |
|
| −8 | 50 | 45 | 90 | 39 | 6 | 5 | Yes | Yes |
| −5 | 38 | 34 | 89 | 26 | 8 | 4 | Yes | Yes | |
| −27 | 50 | 48 | 96 | 33 | 15 | 2 | n/a | Yes | |
| −9 | 50 | 34 | 68 | 31 | 3 | 16 | Yes | Yes |